republican-creole
site Search:


 
   
story category
Wireless Industry Cancels San Fran Trade Show Over Radiation Law
CTIA Enterprise and Applications show to be held elsewhere
by Karl Bode Thursday 24-Jun-2010 tags: business · wireless
We recently noted how despite any solid science leaning one way or the other, San Francisco was the first government to the nation to require that wireless retailers clearly display the amount of radiation each cell phone puts out. Retailers now have to display this information -- specifically the phone's specific absorption rate (SAR) -- in 11 point type right next to the price. Obviously the wireless industry isn't happy about the extra work and possible bad PR caused by cancer fears, so they're apparently responding by canceling a major trade show in the city after this year:

"(The) Board of Supervisors' action has led us to decide to relocate our show," said CTIA Vice President of Public Affairs John Walls in a statement. "We are disappointed to announce that the 2010 CTIA Enterprise and Applications show in October will be the last one we have in San Francisco for the foreseeable future." ... In a statement, the association said the ordinance will potentially mislead consumers with point of sale requirements suggesting some phones are "safer" than others based on RF emissions. All phones sold legally in the United States must comply with the FCC's safety standards for RF emissions.

"The scientific evidence does not support point of sale requirements that would suggest some compliant phones are 'safer' than other compliant phones based on RF emissions," CTIA said.

According to the FCC, phones can't have a SAR higher than 1.6 watts per kilogram. Scientific studies so far have not been able to conclude that cell phones cause cancer, though some data seems to indicate that the potential exists for higher cancer rates with extremely heavy use. However, solid data on this front doesn't exist yet -- though several long-term studies (as in thirty years long) are ongoing.

view: topics flat text 
Post a:

Metatron2008
Premium
join:2008-09-02
Stockbridge, GA

1 edit

I would too.

Crazy hippies that don't want wireless shouldn't have it.

Hell, not only would I cancel wireless, I'd mock them by saying that we're dropping out to save your life. I mean think of the children!
boc_reaver

join:2004-01-29
Plattsmouth, NE

San Fran, triple-distilled ignorance

Clearly San Francisco's govt is run by complete morons. 100W lightbulb? NO problem! 1W cell phone? OH NOEZ!

fAcEtIOUs
Premium
join:2002-03-03
kudos:4

Re: San Fran, triple-distilled ignorance

said by boc_reaver:

Clearly San Francisco's govt is run by complete morons.
The people running that city are mentally challenged. But the voters who put them in office are just as bad. They deserve whatever happens to their economy.
--
Are you happy with your rep in Washington, DC?
fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3

Re: San Fran, triple-distilled ignorance

I have to agree 100% ... I lived in that city for a year back in the 90's and couldn't stand it.

I just have one question though.. with all these things that SF tries to push down the throats of people, when they did one day wake up and decide that they're a state or country of their own?

Some of the laws and things they want to change and establish just seem to be a bit out of their reach.

There isn't much data behind the cellular version of "global warming" claims to establish any hard core evidence other than "becuase some study or group of people said so"..

If San Francisco wants to do something like this, quite honestly, this is where I'd LOVE to see the carriers ban together and stop selling phones INSIDE the city limits of San Francisco - offer service only. I don't think they'd have anything to worry about as they'd simply get their sales on-line, via the phone, or people would simply go to South San Fran, Oakland, Sausalito or other close-by area.

I'm sure the cellular providers are just itchin' to pull out all this data and change everything up for a very small portion of the overall population of the country.

And, in the end.. what does it matter? We went through all this crap for menu's at restaurants and all because "everyone wanted it" and as many people I know in the service industry, very few people ever ask for that data.

I think SF (like many others) have some nerve pulling these crazy stunts, like they do all the time, and should be boycotted.. the city officials need to learn a lesson - pretty much the same one they're trying to teach the state of AZ over quite honestly enforcing the EXACT SAME immigration laws that the federal government forgot they have. Since the laws read the same, I wonder why SF hasn't boycotted the federal government yet.. oh yea, that's right.. Queen Pelosi.
chgo_man99

join:2010-01-01
Iowa
"100W lightbulb? NO problem! 1W cell phone?"

Its not even 1W, it's less than 0.6W

swhx7
Premium
join:2006-07-23
Elbonia

1 edit
said by boc_reaver:

Clearly San Francisco's govt is run by complete morons. 100W lightbulb? NO problem! 1W cell phone? OH NOEZ!

Worrying about the < 1W radiation of a cellphone may be misplaced, but your own comparison shows scientific ignorance.

100 watts is the power consumption of the bulb, and a convenient proxy measure of its light output, but is *not* a measure of its microwave radiation, which is negligible.

The cellphone puts out somewhat less than a watt of EMF radiation, in the microwave band. This is very different from the light and heat that the bulb emits. Probably not a health concern, but not comparable to a lightbulb. Apples and oranges.
fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3

Re: San Fran, triple-distilled ignorance

Cool your jets there buddy... The way I read his message is pretty obvious. SF peoples are all about conservation and mother earth as well, and that Global Warmingz stuff.. a 100W lightbulb, to SF, is just as bad as that 1W radiation that no one would even know what to do with that information in the first place.

He's not trying to compare wattage to EMF rather the impact in general it has on "society" - which SF is trying to protect in their own, really really messed up ways, as usual.

thomas

@pacbell.net
Your comment does not make any sense. A simple example is light is the visible range is not dangerous, but UV light can cause cancer. An extreme example would be X-Rays which are nothing but EM waves at very high frequency (10^20 Hz). An absorbed dose of 3 Joule per kg is lethal for 50% of people within 30 days. So a person with a mass of 100 kg would only have to absorb 300 J or 5 watt minutes of energy to die within 30 days. This is 1 watt for only 5 minutes. So 1 watt can be very dangerous.
Reference:
»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sievert
fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3

1 edit

Re: San Fran, triple-distilled ignorance

Got news for ya buddy... EVERYTHING can cause cancer. ..simply existing and being alive causes cancer. Having fought cancer now myself, twice, and many family members and friends as well, you tend to learn a few lessons about cancer.

Until people realize what cancer IS, they will not understand that it's not always something that "causes"... there are forms of cancer that are caused by certain injuries even.

There are people that smoke all their life, heavily, and never get cancer, and then other who do. The fact that gets me is that we need to tighten everything down to "prevent cancer" which is 100% never going to happen or even remotely be achievable in any life time.. that's like saying "we can replace the ozone layer in the sky".. any human being that thinks that we have that kind of ability is misguided.

Cancer starts, basically, with a cell division gone bad.
dfxmatt

join:2007-08-21
Evanston, IL

Re: San Fran, triple-distilled ignorance

is this comment intentional? this is this most ignorant comment I have ever seen.

there are issues with potential radiation coming out of wireless phones, and whether it can do something or not they're trying to create conclusive studies. in the meantime, cali is being careful about it - is this a surprise?

What you're saying is like going oh, why should we wear lead jackets during xrays? cancer is just going to happen!

/facepalm
fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3

Re: San Fran, triple-distilled ignorance

heh..

not even going to argue and debate with you on this one. I know the type.

As I said in a previous post, there are two schools of thought.. those that are proven and those that are nut jobs that think everything is bad. In another thought, you know those environmentalists that burn down hummer dealerships? .. I wonder if they realize that the crap they cause to release into the air from the building fire/smoke collectively is FAR more damaging than every hummer that very dealership will ever produce combined. Proven Fact.

Global Warming is supposed to kill us too. It's about the same argument as cell phones causing brain damage and cancer. California isn't overly cautious.. but many of the politicians there are flat out kooks. And it's not even CA, its San Francisco.

And no.. lead jackets are a must as we HAVE proven that xrays are damaging. Nice try, but there is a BIG difference.

There are MANY things that supposedly are going to kill us.. but, have you ever paid attention to the news? every week there is a study saying its going to kill us only for the next week to tell us it's good for us.

To this date, I don't believe a cell phone has been directly linked to killing anyone with more than any trivial evidence that never amounts to anything.

Sorry.. you can pull your face out of your palm.. I don't agree with you and you don't agree with me... Guess what.. people historically haven't agreed with a lot of what people in Berkley say either. I'm not offended.

I drive a truck and offend those that drive the Prius. I don't care.
sonicmerlin

join:2009-05-24
Cleveland, OH
kudos:1

Re: San Fran, triple-distilled ignorance

I had a feeling you were a truck driver.
fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3

Re: San Fran, triple-distilled ignorance

said by sonicmerlin:

I had a feeling you were a truck driver.
Nice implied dig there.

I make no excuses.. and like everyone in America, I live my life as I see fit, not as someone or another group tells me I should.. you know what I'm talking about.. those people that have blatant disregard for the constitution and the freedoms that we're all afforded.

But, as usual, this forum isn't about the user, rather, the topic, so lets stick to that. So please, help me avoid the "hey mods" link.

Back to the topic at hand.
phuntism

join:2003-08-01
Manhattan Beach, CA
said by boc_reaver:

100W lightbulb? NO problem! 1W cell phone? OH NOEZ!
Hey!
microwave
radio wave
visible light
x-ray

tomayto / tomahto, right?!

thender
Screen tycoon
Premium
join:2009-01-01
Brooklyn, NY
kudos:1
A punch in the face is not as bad as a scalpel to your penishead. It takes a lot less force(wattage) to use the scalpel on your penishead, while causing many times more pain.
--
If you're going to repair your own Macbook, benefit from my experiences.

old_dawg
"I Know Noting..."

join:2001-09-22
Westminster, MD
said by boc_reaver:

Clearly San Francisco's govt is run by complete morons. 100W lightbulb? NO problem! 1W cell phone? OH NOEZ!
What do you expect from a city that makes their homeless into deities and allows same to defecate in the streets?
--
"Our network engineers are aware of the problem..."

goalieskates
Premium
join:2004-09-12
Knoxville, TN

wasn't SF one of the cities screaming to boycott AZ?

Wasn't SF one of the cities screaming to boycott AZ?

Wonder how they feel now that the shoe's on the other foot?

Gbcue
Almost P.E.
Premium
join:2001-09-30
Santa Rosa, CA
kudos:8
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse

Re: wasn't SF one of the cities screaming to boycott AZ?

said by goalieskates:

Wasn't SF one of the cities screaming to boycott AZ?

Wonder how they feel now that the shoe's on the other foot?
No, that's LA.
--
My Blog 2.0

en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA

Re: wasn't SF one of the cities screaming to boycott AZ?

Meg Whitman was the one that wanted to go after San Francisco and its sanctuaries.

»www.nytimes.com/2010/06/19/us/po···man.html
elray

join:2000-12-16
Santa Monica, CA
Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·RoadRunner Cable

Re: wasn't SF one of the cities screaming to boycott AZ?

said by en102:

Meg Whitman was the one that wanted to go after San Francisco and its sanctuaries.
Until she won the primary, now she has amnesia.

»blogs.laweekly.com/informer/lati···ampaign/

Governor Moonbeam actually has a fighting chance for a 3rd term, though he can no longer portray himself as taking a vow of poverty - he now lives in a $2M home in Oakland Hills.

Gbcue
Almost P.E.
Premium
join:2001-09-30
Santa Rosa, CA
kudos:8
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse

Re: wasn't SF one of the cities screaming to boycott AZ?

said by elray:

said by en102:

Meg Whitman was the one that wanted to go after San Francisco and its sanctuaries.
Until she won the primary, now she has amnesia.

»blogs.laweekly.com/informer/lati···ampaign/

Governor Moonbeam actually has a fighting chance for a 3rd term, though he can no longer portray himself as taking a vow of poverty - he now lives in a $2M home in Oakland Hills.
How much will $2M buy in Santa Monica?
--
My Blog 2.0

C0deZer0
Oc'D To Rhythm And Police
Premium
join:2001-10-03
Davenport, FL

Re: wasn't SF one of the cities screaming to boycott AZ?

said by Gbcue:

How much will $2M buy in Santa Monica?
A Gucci brand cardboard box.

Gbcue
Almost P.E.
Premium
join:2001-09-30
Santa Rosa, CA
kudos:8
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse

Re: wasn't SF one of the cities screaming to boycott AZ?

said by C0deZer0:

said by Gbcue:

How much will $2M buy in Santa Monica?
A Gucci brand cardboard box.
I rest my case, lol.
--
My Blog 2.0
elray

join:2000-12-16
Santa Monica, CA
Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·RoadRunner Cable
said by Gbcue:

said by elray:

said by en102:

Meg Whitman was the one that wanted to go after San Francisco and its sanctuaries.
Until she won the primary, now she has amnesia.

»blogs.laweekly.com/informer/lati···ampaign/

Governor Moonbeam actually has a fighting chance for a 3rd term, though he can no longer portray himself as taking a vow of poverty - he now lives in a $2M home in Oakland Hills.
How much will $2M buy in Santa Monica?
The point is that Brown can't easily play the Millionaire Card, even if it applies - because he used all that political currency when he ran for governor before. He was famous for sleeping on the floor of a rented bachelor apartment, and personally driving heads of state in his Plymouth Belvedere.

When he was Mayor of Oakland (AFTER being governor and running for President three times), he moved in an industrial loft, trying to convince the middle class that Oakland was a safe place to move to. Unfortunately, you can't reform a place like that with one celebrity, no law enforcement, army or bulldozers, and a public school system.

He'll also have a hard time playing the Goldman-Sachs card, since sister Kathy works there.

Whichever of these clowns prevails, doesn't make much difference to me. Until we have a legislature that represents the citizens and taxpayers of the state, we're hosed. I think we'll have more fun with Jerry, but see better results with the Meginator.

In Santa Monica, $2M will get you a 4500' house north of Montana, on an 8K lot, with lots of snooty Hollywood limousine liberal neighbors to fight with over whose Prius is more plugged-in.

Gbcue
Almost P.E.
Premium
join:2001-09-30
Santa Rosa, CA
kudos:8
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse

Re: wasn't SF one of the cities screaming to boycott AZ?

What does his sister do with him? People are guilty by relation now?

If your dad was a serial killer, because he wanted (not genetic), does that mean you are just as bad as him?

I'm surprised $2M will buy so much in Santa Monica.
--
My Blog 2.0
elray

join:2000-12-16
Santa Monica, CA
Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·RoadRunner Cable

Re: wasn't SF one of the cities screaming to boycott AZ?

said by Gbcue:

What does his sister do with him? People are guilty by relation now?

If your dad was a serial killer, because he wanted (not genetic), does that mean you are just as bad as him?

I'm surprised $2M will buy so much in Santa Monica.
Kathy and Jerry both benefit from the family name/legacy and espouse much of the same philosophy. She only lost her bid for governor because insisted on talking too much. Like most of their clan, they speak of the John Edwards' "two Americas", but never acknowledge that they are both part of the Elites that create the divide. Yes, they are guilty by association.

Whitman is no better, and her "business acumen" doesn't impress me, except that understanding a balance sheet and intending to right it are notions foreign to the majority party in California.

The reason you can buy "so much" in SM right now is that the banks are still making money investing bailout funds in treasuries, not writing new mortgages or extending business credit lines.

pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD

Give Them What They Want

Perhaps all cell towers in San Francisco should also be turned off, because as the local government believes, they could be dangerous.

Think of the children.
--
"Net Neutrality" zealots - the people you can thank for your capped Internet service.

Z80A
Premium
join:2009-11-23
Reviews:
·Cox HSI

1 edit

Re: Give Them What They Want

It's all bullshit!

said by George Carlin :
Something else I'm getting tired of in this country is all this stupid talk
I have to listen to about children. That's all you hear about anymore,
children: "Help the children, save the children, protect the children." You
know what I say? Fuck the children!
fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3

Re: Give Them What They Want

said by Z80A:

It's all bullshit!

said by George Carlin :
Something else I'm getting tired of in this country is all this stupid talk
I have to listen to about children. That's all you hear about anymore,
children: "Help the children, save the children, protect the children." You
know what I say? Fuck the children!
"Our government wants to do everything it can "for the children," except sparing them crushing tax burdens."

Z80A
Premium
join:2009-11-23

Re: Give Them What They Want

It loves borrowing from them too.
unoriginal

join:2000-07-12
San Diego, CA
It would certainly solve a lot of AT&T's problems. Whenever I read an news piece about their network the two cities that are always mentioned are NYC and SF.
k1ll3rdr4g0n

join:2005-03-19
Homer Glen, IL
said by pnh102:

Perhaps all cell towers in San Francisco should also be turned off, because as the local government believes, they could be dangerous.

Think of the children.
Actually, they should ban the use of anything electronic such as TVs, radios. Hell, they should even go back to horse and buggy because cars can be dangerous to one's health also!

Why won't someone think of the children!?
patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1

Re: Give Them What They Want

said by k1ll3rdr4g0n:

Actually, they should ban the use of anything electronic such as TVs, radios. Hell, they should even go back to horse and buggy because cars can be dangerous to one's health also!

Why won't someone think of the children!?
Horses use ONLY renewable fuels.
thedragonmas

join:2007-12-28
Albany, GA

Re: Give Them What They Want

said by patcat88:

said by k1ll3rdr4g0n:

Actually, they should ban the use of anything electronic such as TVs, radios. Hell, they should even go back to horse and buggy because cars can be dangerous to one's health also!

Why won't someone think of the children!?
Horses use ONLY renewable fuels.
sure, but they cause air pollution in the form of methane..

and it would really be something if every single cell phone company just up and cancelled every ones contract with no strings attatched, closed down all the stores, shut down all their towers, and hauld butt out of san fran untill such time as that law is repealed.

id laugh so dang hard... but ofcourse it would never happen.
caco
Premium
join:2005-03-10
Whittier, AK

The should move it to Arizona.

That should really go over well with the enlightened folks of San Francisco.

See 12 replies to this post

Z80A
Premium
join:2009-11-23

LOL

They should have it in Arizona...that would really get the smelly hippies riled up.

Steve B
Premium
join:2004-08-02
Seattle, WA

Misleading Headline

The headline is misleading. Reading that I would assume they canceled the one that is already booked. That would be the big thing. Since they are still holding the 2010 show in SF, the headline should reflect that in some way.
moonpuppy

join:2000-08-21
Glen Burnie, MD

Like a warning label is going to help.

Seriously, you could have 100 phones below the acceptable levels of radiation all lined up but an iPhone could have double and the hippies would still buy them.

Stupidity on the part of the idiots in San Francisco? Apparently, you don't need an app for that.

roc5955
Premium
join:2005-11-26
Rosendale, NY

Wait 10 years...

...and cell phone use will be the cigarettes of the 21st century!
--
"Understanding is a three-edged sword."

Thaler
Premium
join:2004-02-02
Los Angeles, CA
kudos:3

Re: Wait 10 years...

Well the long term studies already go back 30 years and have been inconclusive. Maybe if we wait long enough, scientists can prove that cell phones kill through via old age.
Bubba Rock

join:2010-04-21

Re: Wait 10 years...

said by Thaler:

Well the long term studies already go back 30 years and have been inconclusive. Maybe if we wait long enough, scientists can prove that cell phones kill through via old age.
Cell phones have only really been widespread popular for about 10-12 years now. That's not a long time at all. The man has a point.

Studies going back 30 years doesn't really mean much when there hasn't been that many years of actual widespread use.

Alakar
Facts do not cease to exist when ignored

join:2001-03-23
Milwaukee, WI
said by Thaler:

Well the long term studies already go back 30 years and have been inconclusive. Maybe if we wait long enough, scientists can prove that cell phones kill through via old age.
There are no long term studies going back 30 years. The first mobile phone network was established in Japan in 1979; the first in the US was in 1983.

The 30 year study referred to in the article is a ONGOING 30 year study. It hasn't been completed yet.
--
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom; it is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves." William Pitt the Younger

pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
said by roc5955:

...and cell phone use will be the cigarettes of the 21st century!
Yea... they will be taxed out the rear end.
--
"Net Neutrality" zealots - the people you can thank for your capped Internet service.
Kearnstd
Elf Wizard
Premium
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ

Re: Wait 10 years...

said by pnh102:

said by roc5955:

...and cell phone use will be the cigarettes of the 21st century!
Yea... they will be taxed out the rear end.
arent they already with the below the line fees? =)

see now why cant SF lawmakers do something sensible with the phone companies like require them to show the true cost on the ads vs the price before the fees and taxes? that is law i could back.
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports

Robotics
See You On The Dark Side
Premium
join:2003-10-23
Louisa, VA

At Least They Weren't Stupid When It Came To Marijuana

At Least They Weren't Stupid When It Came To Marijuana Laws, like the rest of this nation.

Metatron2008
Premium
join:2008-09-02
Stockbridge, GA

Re: At Least They Weren't Stupid When It Came To Marijuana

Maybe if they were they would actually have intelligence in San Fran...

DaveDude
No Fear

join:1999-09-01
New Jersey
kudos:1

Move it to vegas

They should move it vegas, and set all the AC thermostats at 72F.

Murdoc
Premium
join:2009-02-08
Manitowoc, WI

LOL

Will the state of california ever stop this nonsense? Also keep your governor away from my retarded corrupt governor here in wisconsin, I don't want my state to catch that nonsense thinking they do down in california.
fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3

Re: LOL

Coming from the area you do, and having family there as well in Man, I really doubt WI will ever be as dumb. Still no helmet laws, they resisted drinking laws for a long time (until the feds forced that on them by revocation of federal funding - usual ploy) etc..

WI seems to do pretty darn well. Long live Two Rivers.

Gbcue
Almost P.E.
Premium
join:2001-09-30
Santa Rosa, CA
kudos:8
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
said by Murdoc:

Will the state of california ever stop this nonsense? Also keep your governor away from my retarded corrupt governor here in wisconsin, I don't want my state to catch that nonsense thinking they do down in california.
San Francisco != The State of California
--
My Blog 2.0

Murdoc
Premium
join:2009-02-08
Manitowoc, WI

Re: LOL

Indeed it does. But not all the stupidness is coming out of just only one city over there

Metatron2008
Premium
join:2008-09-02
Stockbridge, GA

Hug a tree, remove technology from hippies

They can save the world and plant trees! Think about it! Demolish San Fran and replace it with trees! Then the hippies will be happy!
patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1

Re: Hug a tree, remove technology from hippies

Half the "hippies" are really property investors who want to see 10% year over year appreciation of their un-environmentally friendly single family house in SF.
bgraham

join:2001-03-15
Smithtown, NY
Reviews:
·Verizon VoiceWing
·Verizon FiOS
·VOIPo

Ban radio Stations as Well

They might as well ban radio stations pushing out 40,000 watts.

They might also put a note on phones just for kids saying that "Never put the phone on your lap while texting because a few years from now you will be sorry"
patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1

Re: Ban radio Stations as Well

said by bgraham:

They might as well ban radio stations pushing out 40,000 watts.

They might also put a note on phones just for kids saying that "Never put the phone on your lap while texting because a few years from now you will be sorry"
They would get a better response making a public service ad saying you'll loose the family jewels if you keep a cellphone near them.

TamaraB
Question The Current Paradigm
Premium
join:2000-11-08
Da Bronx
Reviews:
·Optimum Online
·Clearwire Wireless

What's wrong with LABELING?

Nobody is BANNING anything. The sky is not falling down! What is the problem with disclosure? Not just with cell phone radiation, but with ALL consumer goods.

Labeling is the way we build a database, so in the future we can correlate a problem with a cause. Genetically modified foods, chemical preservatives, cleaning fluids, and anything we use daily needs to be clearly LABELED.

The riot over the suggestion that full disclosure be made here, leads me to wonder what the industry is hiding, and what future liability they may be shielding themselves from.

If there is no problem, then what's the big fuss all about? Or do you all believe that ignorance is bliss, and knowledge is elitist? Have we devolved that far as a society?

Bob
--
Would you ever go over to Czechoslovakia, and marry me daughter for me?"

See 6 replies to this post

joebarnhart
Paxio evangelist

join:2005-12-15
Santa Clara, CA

The silent killer(s)

Actually, if they really want to ban devices which expose users to the most electromagnetic radiation they need to ban the use of electric blankets.

These silent killers expose the human body to incredible amounts of EM radiation -- they are especially dangerous because they are so close to the body and the radiation exposure is inversely proportional to the distance squared!

And what about those Bluetooth thingies that are REQUIRED now by state law? They are SO CLOSE to your friggin' brain and they EMIT RF ENERGY!!! OH NO!!!

And while I'm on a roll, why haven't they done anything about those new FULL BODY SCANNERS at SFO airport?!?!? Those things blast you with MILLIMETER-WAVE RADIATION!!!

OH THE HUMANITY!!!!
patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1

Re: The silent killer(s)

They better ban MRI machines if EM induction is so dangerous.

Radio Active
My pappy's a pistol
Premium
join:2003-01-31
Fullerton, CA

This is Just One of the Many Reasons...

...why the rest of the country thinks California is filled with nuts and flakes.
--
Melius est habitare in terra deserta quam cum muliere rixosa et iracunda.
patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1

Re: This is Just One of the Many Reasons...

Wheres the milk?
luckylar

join:2002-01-29
Hixson, TN

Think Again...

If you think this is all a bunch of BS... take a look...

»www.youtube.com/watch?v=V94shlqPlSI

See 6 replies to this post

Ioweyou

@comcast.net

Relocating the show?

No they're not. They say they're going to relocate the show but wait... after this last one in October? That's just stupid to say that. Say it after the October show. Saying it now thinking it will sway the city into conceding is just... dumb.

Thursday, 24-May 05:51:12 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.