republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   News
newer
story category When FiOS And U-Verse Compete
Verizon shows interest in crossing established territory lines...
12:18PM Thursday Jun 26 2008 by Karl Bode
tags: competition · business · telco · Verizon FIOS · AT&T U-Verse
A few weeks ago a report surfaced that suggested that Verizon would be overbuilding in AT&T territory, in essence bringing FiOS in to compete with U-Verse in some select Texas territories. Light Reading notes that Verizon isn't overbuilding, they're actively laying new plant. Verizon is showing interest in taking FiOS outside of where they've traditionally offered copper-based services. Seeing Verizon and AT&T (or Qwest) do battle would certainly be appealing to consumers, given it would add a competitive dimension to an otherwise fairly stale duopoly system.

The rationale for Verizon's fiber extension is pretty obvious. In North Texas, according to Verizon, the percentage of consumers who have ordered FiOS services more than doubles the national average. "It's a very mature FiOS market," a spokesman says. Verizon's also leaving the door wide open because it won't discuss any future plans beyond its fiber network extensions.
There's a lot of interesting "what ifs" here. AT&T and Verizon have traditionally been bosom buddies on the regulatory front, so will they ensure that neither really impacts the others' territory? Should Qwest be worried? Does AT&T's distance-limited VDSL technology put them at a disadvantage should they want to return fire and deploy into Verizon territory? Would aggression by Verizon force AT&T to finally embrace FTTH?

I'd guess that this kind of baby bell cross-competition will be rare, as Verizon's first priority will be deploying FiOS to its most profitable existing markets. Though the the slower AT&T U-Verse and Qwest ADSL2+ products could prove a tasty target should Verizon want to play FiOS hardball.

Related:
  1. FiOSTV Tops Cable
  2. When U-Verse and FiOS Compete
  3. NYC FiOS Deal Completed
  4. FiOSTV Hits NYC
  5. U-Verse Launched in Jacksonville
  6. Who Knew FiOS Installers Used Amazon Kindles?
  7. U-Verse, Whole Home DVR Expand
  8. JD Power: TelcoTV Beating Cable In Satisfaction
Forums » When FiOS And U-Verse Compete
view: topics flat text 
Post a:
smokarz

join:2006-07-24
West Hartford, CT

come to my town

FioS, please come to my town. I'll give you a cold one to chill with.

ptrowski
Got Helix?
Premium
join:2005-03-14
Putnam, CT
clubs:

Re: come to my town

Hell I am right on the RI border...Just a few more miles....

burgerwars

join:2004-09-11
Northridge, CA
·RoadRunner Cable

Re: come to my town

said by ptrowski See Profile :

Hell I am right on the RI border...Just a few more miles....
I'm less than a mile from Verizon's area (I'm in AT&T Uverse Land). Come on contractors, just keep digging a little bit further south.

Camelot One
Premium,MVM
join:2001-11-21
Austin, TX
clubs:
·VoicePulse

Re: come to my town

I moved 2 months before Fios went live at my old place. And now I'm in a UVerse hole, they've stopped 1/2 mile north of me, and started another segment about a mile south of me, working South from there naturally. At the moment, they have no plans to fill the hole.
--
Intel Q6600 @3400Mhz/GA-EP35-DS3P/2x 2048Mb G.Skill/Seagate 750.10/EVGA 8800GT's SLI/Silverstone 850W/Custom water cooler
Madtown

join:2008-04-26
Madera, CA
I sure wish Verizon would come to this town or even Uverse would come to this town.

wifi4milez
In Need Of Garbage Pail Kids 1st Series

join:2004-08-07
New York, NY
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

It all comes down to price....

While the majority of the people on this website would chose Verizon for the higher speeds, that is simply not the priority for the rest of the country. 9+ out of 10 people would chose a cheaper option (for instance a 768k connection) versus a 100Mbps connection. There is a reason the fastest growing tier for both cable operators and (DSL) telcos is the "light" tier (generally 768k). I would suspect that unless Verizon wanted to lose money on a rollout, ATT would likely win more customers in a greenfield area simply because they can offer cheaper service without losing (as much, if any) money. Uverse is far cheaper to deploy than FIOS, and that means cheaper prices for customers (unless VZ takes a loss per sub).
--
If history teaches us anything, it teaches that simple-minded appeasement or wishful thinking about our adversaries is folly.
-Ronald Reagan-
EngineerDave

join:2001-08-27
Hattiesburg, MS

Re: It all comes down to price....

I agree. The typical DSLR reader represents a very small portion of the market. I would think if Verizon crossed the line that AT&T would do the same in those markets. Since U-Verse is IP based it doesn't have to be constrained to copper plant.

en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME
·DSL EXTREME

Re: It all comes down to price....

I'm all with the 'bottom line' approach, however, I've always seen 2 distinct arguments.

1. Bottom line pricing: I'll take a 3Mbps/512kbps for $25/month and be happy (for now). I'll save $25x12) = $300/year
2. Cheaper in bulk pricing: Some will say that 12-15Mbps for $50 is a better deal. Well, it is on a per Mbps rate. If you can justify the price, then maybe its worth it - I.e. online gamers, BT, etc.

I'm typically more of the option #1 approach, while I know most companies attempt to sell item #2 with packages.
--
Canada = Hollywood North

MattE
Obama '08
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..
·Corporate Colocation

One problem with your line of thinking is that AT&T is running fiber to almost all new greenfield deployments, just limiting it to U-Verse speeds.

So their cost to greenfield deployments may actually be HIGHER per sub than Verizon since Verizon has likely negotiated better contracts with their suppliers and contractors.

XBL2007

join:2001-01-03
Chicago, IL
Currently paying $14.99 for 3 megabits which is ok for the price but it's still to slow to upload at 512kbps.

Hell we all should be seeing 25mbps for $25 by now or better.

CUBS_FAN
Wait 'til next year. Again

join:2005-04-28
Chicago, IL
·Comcast
·Vonage

Re: It all comes down to price....

said by XBL2007 See Profile :

Currently paying $14.99 for 3 megabits which is ok for the price but it's still to slow to upload at 512kbps.

Hell we all should be seeing 25mbps for $25 by now or better.
Where in Chicago can you get 3mb's for $14.99? Im paying like 5 times that right now for 6mb's with Comcast. I don't care about uploads, in the past year or so I was just upgraded to 1mb but for the longest I had 384k.

OSUGoose

join:2007-12-27
Columbus, OH
clubs:
You've seen uptake on the Basic DSL packages for one main reason. Thats the level of service AT&T pushes when they talk about bundling for 75 or 99.

wifi4milez
In Need Of Garbage Pail Kids 1st Series

join:2004-08-07
New York, NY
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

Re: It all comes down to price....

said by OSUGoose See Profile :

You've seen uptake on the Basic DSL packages for one main reason. Thats the level of service AT&T pushes when they talk about bundling for 75 or 99.
No, the "light" tiers are offered as stand alone product by most providers. The only requirement most providers have with the light tiers is that you sign a 12 month (or greater) term to get them.
--
If history teaches us anything, it teaches that simple-minded appeasement or wishful thinking about our adversaries is folly.
-Ronald Reagan-

OSUGoose

join:2007-12-27
Columbus, OH
clubs:
·AT&T Midwest
·Cingular Wireless
·Verizon BroadbandA..
·RoadRunner Cable

Re: It all comes down to price....

No, i was refering to their popularity, not offering. Every at&t ad you see Talks about bundling home phone, internet and tv or wireless for 75 or 99/mo. Jo Consumer calls in to switch from cable, and says i want that 75 or 99 bundle deal, and i bet most reps dont say but thats for our cheepest dsl speed, for 5 or 10 bucks more a month you can double or tripple ur speed.

MattE
Obama '08
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..
·Corporate Colocation

Re: It all comes down to price....

said by OSUGoose See Profile :

No, i was refering to their popularity, not offering. Every at&t ad you see Talks about bundling home phone, internet and tv or wireless for 75 or 99/mo. Jo Consumer calls in to switch from cable, and says i want that 75 or 99 bundle deal, and i bet most reps dont say but thats for our cheepest dsl speed, for 5 or 10 bucks more a month you can double or tripple ur speed.
Same with Time Warner's $99 triple play or the 3 for $29 each promos they have going.
Warez_Zealot
Mr. Misanthrope

join:2006-04-19
St Catharines, ON

said by wifi4milez See Profile :

While the majority of the people on this website would chose Verizon for the higher speeds, that is simply not the priority for the rest of the country. 9+ out of 10 people would chose a cheaper option (for instance a 768k connection) versus a 100Mbps connection. There is a reason the fastest growing tier for both cable operators and (DSL) telcos is the "light" tier (generally 768k). I would suspect that unless Verizon wanted to lose money on a rollout, ATT would likely win more customers in a greenfield area simply because they can offer cheaper service without losing (as much, if any) money. Uverse is far cheaper to deploy than FIOS, and that means cheaper prices for customers (unless VZ takes a loss per sub).
How do you know that? Why do ISP's always advertise speeds then? Me thinks you are trying to pass off your opinions as facts.

wifi4milez
In Need Of Garbage Pail Kids 1st Series

join:2004-08-07
New York, NY
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

Re: It all comes down to price....

said by Warez_Zealot See Profile :

said by wifi4milez See Profile :

While the majority of the people on this website would chose Verizon for the higher speeds, that is simply not the priority for the rest of the country. 9+ out of 10 people would chose a cheaper option (for instance a 768k connection) versus a 100Mbps connection. There is a reason the fastest growing tier for both cable operators and (DSL) telcos is the "light" tier (generally 768k). I would suspect that unless Verizon wanted to lose money on a rollout, ATT would likely win more customers in a greenfield area simply because they can offer cheaper service without losing (as much, if any) money. Uverse is far cheaper to deploy than FIOS, and that means cheaper prices for customers (unless VZ takes a loss per sub).
How do you know that? Why do ISP's always advertise speeds then? Me thinks you are trying to pass off your opinions as facts.
If you are asking me how I know what the fastest growing tier is, I suggest you do your own research if you dont believe me (its been mentioned/discussed multiple times). You can start right here on this very website in fact. If you are asking me how I know people prefer cheaper tiers, I suspect once you research what I just mentioned your answer will be fairly clear as well.
--
If history teaches us anything, it teaches that simple-minded appeasement or wishful thinking about our adversaries is folly.
-Ronald Reagan-

MattE
Obama '08
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC

May be required to grow

Verizon, AT&T and even the MSO's will soon realize they can't squeeze their current customer base any longer to increase revenues, so they may expand into areas where they feel they can compete and gain ground against U-Verse or Qwest.

en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA

Re: May be required to grow

Kudos to Verizon for attempting to expand the Fiber footprint.
--
Canada = Hollywood North
attsbcisgay

join:2003-03-18
Beverly Hills, CA

Re: May be required to grow

35 for 5/2
45 for 15/2
and 55 for 30/5
or 65 for 15/15 is a pretty sweet deal imho.

en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA

Re: May be required to grow

I'd probably use 5/2, possibly 15/2.
I don't even need faster than the 3008/512kbps I have now.. no reason for me to pay extra.
--
Canada = Hollywood North
patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY

I bet the only reason why Verizon built into ATT's POTS territory was to met the requirements of the Video Franchise agreement that states Verizon must provide TV to the entire town (just like the incumbant cable co does). From the TV aspect, the law does not see Verizon's telephone plant/assets/business.
ILpt4U

join:2006-11-12
Crystal Lake, IL
·AT&T Yahoo

I know where I am at in Northern IL/Metro Chicago, I see the white poles with orange caps (the buried fiber markers) all over. Most of them are noted Ameritech/SBC/AT&T (depends on how old they are), but I have definitely noted at least a couple of fiber routes where the orange caps are noted with MCI, which I believe Verizon owns now? I could be mistaken about Verizon having bought MCI, but not about the buried fiber markers noted MCI around my area.

So I guess my point here is, if a Verizon company's fiber is already around, would Verizon consider those areas for deployment as well?

At the same time, though, doesn't Verizon still have a decently sized current customer base that FiOS is yet to reach? Why not concentrate on finishing the current job before starting to branch out onto new turf?

MattE
Obama '08
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC

Re: May be required to grow

MCI is now Verizon Business, so you're probably out of luck. It's not like they can just tap into the fiber run on your road unfortunately. There is a lot of back-end infrastructure required to support B/GPON.

Nsane_iceman
Workaholic
Premium
join:2001-02-26
Bedford, TX
clubs:

Re: May be required to grow

said by MattE See Profile :

MCI is now Verizon Business, so you're probably out of luck. It's not like they can just tap into the fiber run on your road unfortunately. There is a lot of back-end infrastructure required to support B/GPON.
Yup, our old Frame sites that used to be on MCI are now on Verizon Business MPLS or Sprint.
JackBauer

join:2006-08-24
Schenectady, NY

When AT&T and Verizon Compete...

Cable loses.

Rob
In Deo speramus
Premium
join:2001-08-25
Kendall, FL
·Comcast
·AT&T Southeast


edit:
June 26th, @12:59PM

Cherry Picking..

It would be nice if Verizon brought FiOS to all of their markets first before venturing into an AT&T market.

And before anyone says anything, I'm in an AT&T area - so it's not like I'm attacking because FiOS isn't available to me.
--
www.rr.cx | YourIP.US

Skeedatl
Ah, push it - push it real good
Premium
join:2007-12-26
The Cloud

Re: Cherry Picking..

Verizon can walk and chew gum. They don't work one 'hood at a time.

Rob
In Deo speramus
Premium
join:2001-08-25
Kendall, FL
·Comcast
·AT&T Southeast


edit:
June 26th, @02:03PM

Re: Cherry Picking..

said by Skeedatl See Profile :

Verizon can walk and chew gum. They don't work one 'hood at a time.
I doubt they work any 'hoods.

Skeedatl
Ah, push it - push it real good
Premium
join:2007-12-26
The Cloud
·Cox HSI
·Verizon FIOS
·MegaPath
·Cox VOIP
·Verizon west (ex G..
·ViaTalk
·Time Warner VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable

Re: Cherry Picking..

said by Rob See Profile :

said by Skeedatl See Profile :

Verizon can walk and chew gum. They don't work one 'hood at a time.
I doubt they work any 'hoods.
You haven't been through Beaumont or Lake Elsinore, CA then.
cornelius785

join:2006-10-26
Worcester, MA

this cherry picking whining needs to stop. if companies weren't worried about their bottom line and weren't worried if they'd ever see their really expensive investment turn a profit, then they would methodically start deployin in every town. since many companies are generally run by people that understand business and money, they pick towns that MAKE SENSE, like towns that tend to be/have: few MDUs, little underground service, fairly dense population, and others.

i'd love to have fios, but i'm keeping my expectation realistic and don't whine like baby or complain like a little brat.

Rob
In Deo speramus
Premium
join:2001-08-25
Kendall, FL
·Comcast
·AT&T Southeast

Re: Cherry Picking..

said by cornelius785 See Profile :

this cherry picking whining needs to stop. if companies weren't worried about their bottom line and weren't worried if they'd ever see their really expensive investment turn a profit, then they would methodically start deployin in every town. since many companies are generally run by people that understand business and money, they pick towns that MAKE SENSE, like towns that tend to be/have: few MDUs, little underground service, fairly dense population, and others.

i'd love to have fios, but i'm keeping my expectation realistic and don't whine like baby or complain like a little brat.
We'll stop whining about cherry picking, when Corporate America stops whining.
patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY

said by cornelius785 See Profile :

this cherry picking whining needs to stop. if companies weren't worried about their bottom line and weren't worried if they'd ever see their really expensive investment turn a profit, then they would methodically start deployin in every town. since many companies are generally run by people that understand business and money, they pick towns that MAKE SENSE, like towns that tend to be/have: few MDUs, little underground service, fairly dense population, and others.

i'd love to have fios, but i'm keeping my expectation realistic and don't whine like baby or complain like a little brat.
I bet this was a case of where the franchise agreement requires Verizon to provide TV to the entire municipality, same territory and converage requirements as the incumbant cable co. The only way for Verizon to meet this legal requirement is to wire the entire municipality. The law sees and treats Verizon FIOS TV just like any other cable company, not as POTS provider.

mikeindc



Re: Cherry Picking..

Even within areas where FIOS is offered, Verizon selects areas where is it "cheaper" to deploy and where they can expect to make more money. I live in Washington DC and FIOS is not offered where I live now nor where I use to live. Less than 10 blocks away, its offered. I've checked and both locations are still several years away from getting FIOS while they deploy to areas with less cost and better expected returns.
patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY

edit:
June 27th, @02:43PM

Re: Cherry Picking..

But DC and Montgomery County are 2 different municipalities.

sivran
God Save The Suite
Premium
join:2003-09-15
Arlington, TX
clubs:
Cherry picking?
HA! They brought FiOS to the po' folks of Wylie, TX.

dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ

Re: Cherry Picking..

said by sivran See Profile :

Cherry picking?
HA! They brought FiOS to the po' folks of Wylie, TX.
because sometimes you gotta go thru poor areas to get to the rich ones.
--
When I gez aju zavateh na nalechoo more new yonooz tonigh molinigh - Ken Lee
patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY

said by Rob See Profile :

It would be nice if Verizon brought FiOS to all of their markets first before venturing into an AT&T market.

And before anyone says anything, I'm in an AT&T area - so it's not like I'm attacking because FiOS isn't available to me.
I bet the only reason why Verizon built FIOS lines in ATT territory was to met the requirements of the Video Franchise Agreement that states Verizon must provide TV to the entire town (just like the incumbant cable co does). From the TV aspect, the law does not see Verizon's telephone plant/assets/business.
karpodiem

join:2008-05-20
·WOW Internet and C..

ROI

I can't really blame Verizon if they want to deploy Fios in areas in which they have forecasted they will receive the quickest return on their infrastructure investment. So yeah, please come to Troy, MI.

rcdailey
Dragoonfly
Premium
join:2005-03-29
Rialto, CA

edit:
June 26th, @02:22PM

Re: ROI

Hey, forget Troy, MI. Come to Rialto, CA. Now!
tmc8080

join:2004-04-24
Floral Park, NY

this is good news

perhaps this will convince the remaining big(X-BOC's) that investment in upgrading the last mile is worthwhile. how else will the price of the equipment come down if others don't jump onto last mile fiber infrastructure?

it's been 4 years and there have been some cost reductions but other carriers have not jumped on-board to any significant degree..

now there is an extra incentive to get others to build fttp/fttc networks that are REALLY robust 50mbit+ networks. build into others' backyards and you'll see some fireworks!

NOCMan
Verizon Fios User
Premium
join:2004-09-30
Flower Mound, TX

It's a start

Ever since AT&T was broken up, this was supposed to happen. However every carrier probably colluded to stick with what was given them and continue the game until the regulatory environments allowed the T1000 to reassemble itself.

However, what is now different is that Verizon and AT&T will most likely never be allowed to merge into the Omnipotent AT&T so knowing that, they will probably no longer be friends and begin to chip away where it makes sense.

In the case of FIOS I would expect towns divided by AT&T/Verizon to see deployments across the lines one way or the other at the requests of the cities.
--
Mac Chatter
»www.macchatter.net
soothsayer15

join:2002-03-01
Irving, TX
·Verizon FIOS
·Verizon Online DSL

Re: It's a start

said by NOCMan See Profile :

Ever since AT&T was broken up, this was supposed to happen. However every carrier probably colluded to stick with what was given them and continue the game until the regulatory environments allowed the T1000 to reassemble itself.

However, what is now different is that Verizon and AT&T will most likely never be allowed to merge into the Omnipotent AT&T so knowing that, they will probably no longer be friends and begin to chip away where it makes sense.

In the case of FIOS I would expect towns divided by AT&T/Verizon to see deployments across the lines one way or the other at the requests of the cities.
I think Verizon is trying to put pressure on AT&T to improve their service in AT&T's footprint. AT&T's weak offerings have done poorly against cable compared to Verizon's results. AT&T upgrading their service would force cable to upgrade nationwide, but I guess AT&T doesn't see it that way.

rcdailey
Dragoonfly
Premium
join:2005-03-29
Rialto, CA

Re: It's a start

Why would Verizon care about what AT&T does in areas where they don't share territory or at least closely border each other? Why would Verizon care about AT&T competing with cable? Vierizon can compete with cable by itself. Verizon surely would be happy to let cable providers limp along at 10 Mbps or lower as long as possible.
patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY

Re: It's a start

said by rcdailey See Profile :

Why would Verizon care about what AT&T does in areas where they don't share territory or at least closely border each other? Why would Verizon care about AT&T competing with cable? Vierizon can compete with cable by itself. Verizon surely would be happy to let cable providers limp along at 10 Mbps or lower as long as possible.
Exactly. AT&T and Verizon don't compete. I think this Texas competing thing is just an accident that was created by 2 different telcos serving one half of the same town (north side is ATT, south side is Verizon for example), so when Verizon goes to the municipality and asks for a franchise agreement and asks to have to only provide TV to its own Central Office, the town says "No can do, we can't give you different terms than the incumbent cable company or they will sue."

danza_
Premium
join:2002-08-23
San Jose, CA


edit:
June 26th, @09:01PM

I hope that

they can blanket Silicon Valley with their fiber and go head to head against comcast and uverse. That will make the valley truly 'high tech', and I am pretty sure just about everyone here will jump on FiOS the first chance they get.

It's a shame that the so called 'silicon valley' only have crap'ol 6mb adsl (not even adsl2), uverse and the crappy comcast cable.
patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY

Re: I hope that

said by danza_ See Profile :

It's a shame that the so called 'silicon valley' only have crap'ol 6mb adsl (not even adsl2), uverse and the crappy comcast cable.
Then start a dotcom and get an OC-3 payed by your dotcom/employer/"company your the CEO of" to your house for "telecommuting"
kylemorris

join:2007-12-14
Richardson, TX
·RoadRunner Cable


edit:
June 26th, @09:41PM

go Time Warner

I'll still just stay with my Time Warner. Don't have to worry about contracts unlike ATT and Verizon you have to. I just don't trust verizon becuase of what they have done in the past to there customer base by signing them into contracts and just screwing people over, not to mention the fact that there going into more areas when they still havn't finished deploying fios in there current areas.GO TIME WARNER!

lead cable man

@swbell.net

Re: go Time Warner

Uhmmm... AT&T has not had contracts for a while, especially their video offering, which have never had a contract.

ig0r

@sbcglobal.net

basic tier dsl

I have basic tier dsl through AT&T and I am an avid gamer, I've been playing COD4 online without any slowdown or glitches. Most people just assume they "need" so much more bandwidth to do the "bandwidth intensive" things that they do. And I admit that before trying the basic tier I thought I needed a lot more bandwidth than I actually do.

tb_anon

@nationwide.com

Re: basic tier dsl

Perhaps you should get the opinions of those you play with/against. What if you are not seeing the slowdown but they are? I see it all the time online. One person is lagging like crazy and it throws the whole game off... You would be surprised at how bandwidth intensive your activities really are at times. Spend some time capturing packets from your game console and see how much data you are transferring.

oldfart

@swbell.net

Yes, do it Verizon

As an early adopter of broadband (anyone remember ISDN?) I tried it all. I work at home and do fairly large email attachment up and down loads. Nobody beats the phone companies as far as reliability is concerned. I’m in ATT territory but would love the competition and option of Verizon fiber(cable is not a viable alternative for me because I can’t tolerate “we will come fix your problem in two days” attitude).

dslwanter
Broadband blackhole no more
Premium
join:2002-12-16
Lowellville, OH
·Armstrong Zoom In..
·AT&T Midwest
·AT&T Yahoo

Sounds good to me

Hopefully if they do this part of Western PA soon they'll cross over and realize the money to be made on this side of the border as well. AT&T could care less about giving this area DSL let alone U-Verse. That would be a nice f**k you to AT&T. Then when all the hotels, restaurants, gas stations, etc are finished going up because of the racetrack going in just over the PA border, AT&T will be like, oooooooh....maybe we could have made a few dollars there.
--
Need a DJ within 60 miles of Youngstown, OH? Check out my service: »www.thebomb102djservice.com
patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY

Re: Sounds good to me

This isn't about Verizon randomly somewhere putting FIOS. In the Texas examples its always in a town where Verizon owns 1 or more exchanges in town, but another telco such as ATT owns other exchanges in town. I bet the reason why Verizon wired out the entire town was because the franchise agreement requires them to wire the whole town exactly like the incumbent cable co had to do.

veloct
Tarnation
Premium
join:2003-01-21
Moosup, CT

Either of them

It would be great to have either option in our area.
--
There's no place like ~
Forums » When FiOS And U-Verse Compete


Tuesday, 07-Oct 09:29:32 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.republican-creole