Search:  

 
 
   News
newer
story category Users Increasingly Going Cell Only
New data explores trend state by state...
(old news - 08:49AM Friday Mar 20 2009)
tags: business · wireless · stats
Tipped by GOLFnSUN See Profile
The National Center for Health Statistics offers some interesting data by state on users who are ditching landlines and going cell only. According to the data, which is collected to ensure accuracy in health-related polling via landline, Oklahoma tops the country -- with 26.2 percent of households only having a cell phone. The least cell-only friendly state is Vermont, where only 5.1% of users have ditched their landlines for a mobile phone. Larger and more urban states, like New York (11.4%) and California (9%) interestingly aren't leading the pack. Of course this data is from 2007 -- so these numbers may have increased significantly since then.

Related:
  1. Report: Mobile WiMax An Also-Ran
  2. iPhone 3G Most Popular Phone
  3. 17.5% of Households Wireless Only
  4. We Don't Need No Stinkin' DTV Delay
  5. Android Climbs, But iPhone Remains King
  6. Sprint Still Bleeding Customers
  7. Recession Accelerates Death Of Landlines
  8. LTE To See Explosive Growth
Forums » Users Increasingly Going Cell Only
view: topics flat text 
Post a:
page: 1 · 2

screavic
Premium
join:2006-08-11
Paron, AR

Well...

Either ways it goes if landline service companies were not 20 years in the past I think people would have more landlines. Considering they offer absolutely nothing but overpriced telephone service here.
No DSL no U Verse nothing...

Chuckles
Premium
join:2006-03-04
Saint Paul, MN

Re: Well...

said by screavic See Profile :

Either ways it goes if landline service companies were not 20 years in the past I think people would have more landlines. Considering they offer absolutely nothing but overpriced telephone service here.
No DSL no U Verse nothing...
Overpriced? You can get a landline for around $20/month. What's your cellphone bill?

screavic
Premium
join:2006-08-11
Paron, AR

Re: Well...

$80 / month for my landline with long distance or $50 without long distance.

Our cell phone bill with text messaging and internet (cause no DSL) is about $80-100

Chuckles
Premium
join:2006-03-04
Saint Paul, MN

Re: Well...

So your cell is more.

Either way you need to shop around. You're paying way too much!

screavic
Premium
join:2006-08-11
Paron, AR
·Verizon Wireless B..
·Alltel Axess

Re: Well...

Our cell phone bill is for 2 cell phones and internet

I can't shop around on landline service cause AT&T is the only provider out here. Either way it goes we are just shutting down our landline service soon cause it's just not worth it.

I don't know if it's just Arkansas in general but all our cell phone and landline services seem high on all carriers.

Chuckles
Premium
join:2006-03-04
Saint Paul, MN

Re: Well...

Yeah ditch that landline. Why have both? You could put the money towards better things.

en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
Time to get a cell phone, and possibly Skype or another VoIP for outgoing house calls.

I pay $3/month for unlimited outbound calls on Skype... and I can put it on my cellphone and use it with WiFi when I'm out of the county in Canada.

C0deZer0
Oc'D To Rhythm And Police
Premium
join:2001-10-03
Davenport, FL
·Verizon FIOS

said by Chuckles See Profile :

So your cell is more.

Either way you need to shop around. You're paying way too much!
There is no such thing as "shopping around" for a landline though. You either get whoever is contracted to service your location, or you get nothing.

And up until Verizon started doing "bundle" specials here, just having the landline was another $40/month (with all the un-fees and BS) just to have a functional landline (which wasn't entirely, due to the fact that everything we'd want to call within a mile is a separate area code, and thus long distance ). It was only as their trucks began laying down the infrastructure that allowed us to finally upgrade to FiOS that we started seeing more "common sense" options for a landline, such as being able to have unlimited calls to anywhere in the US and Puerto Rico off of it. VoIP was an option considered as well, but Bright House at least in this local bit of land is notorious for lousy service, and about the only part of the company that will work regardless of everything else getting SNAFU or FUBAR... is (you guessed it) billing.

As it is now, I'm currently paying about $67 after all told for a family share plan with two lines. I was looking into getting an iPhone when the contract ends (because then I could pay for AppleCare ONCE and be covered, instead of paying some BS insurance fee every month on contract); problem is, to even have one adds another $30 a month to get the iPhone-specific data plan. Granted, I would be whoring the hell out of the data plan for sure, but that's certainly not an expense I can justify in the foreseeable moment. Maybe if things go well and I can get employed in my field of study, things will look more favorably to that...

yock
TFTC
Premium
join:2000-11-21
Fairfield, OH

said by screavic See Profile :

$80 / month for my landline with long distance or $50 without long distance.

Our cell phone bill with text messaging and internet (cause no DSL) is about $80-100
Have you tried dropping called ID, voice mail, call waiting, callback, etc? My fiancee and I pay something like $20/mo for our landline.

screavic
Premium
join:2006-08-11
Paron, AR

Re: Well...

To get that really good price your talking about here is to drop it to "limited minutes" package.

I wish it was $20 for basic phone unlimited usage cause we would probably keep it for emergencies.

yock
TFTC
Premium
join:2000-11-21
Fairfield, OH

Re: Well...

said by screavic See Profile :

To get that really good price your talking about here is to drop it to "limited minutes" package.

I wish it was $20 for basic phone unlimited usage cause we would probably keep it for emergencies.
We don't have any long distance plan, it's free on our wireless phones. The landline is a communication line when wireless service is unavailable or when the power goes out and the cell phones are dead. I don't need long distance in that case, and if I did then the $0.50 a minute is just fine for a 2 minute call to let whomever I must call to let them know I'm okay.

Really, this isn't a big deal.

screavic
Premium
join:2006-08-11
Paron, AR
·Verizon Wireless B..
·Alltel Axess

Re: Well...

It wasn't a big deal when I spoke about it.

I'm dropping the landline because I believe it's overpriced for the services provided. By the way everyone else speaks it just makes me not want it more if they can get basic landline service for $20 a month for unlimited local calling.

yock
TFTC
Premium
join:2000-11-21
Fairfield, OH

Re: Well...

said by screavic See Profile :

It wasn't a big deal when I spoke about it.

I'm dropping the landline because I believe it's overpriced for the services provided. By the way everyone else speaks it just makes me not want it more if they can get basic landline service for $20 a month for unlimited local calling.
You can get it too, you just haven't asked. You probably have a landline with all of the absurd features and haven't bothered to try and drop them.

I have AT&T too, so don't tell me they don't offer basic POTS.

screavic
Premium
join:2006-08-11
Paron, AR
·Verizon Wireless B..
·Alltel Axess

Re: Well...

I have talked to AT&T about it and everytime I have tried they always tell me $30. I'm talking after taxes and everything too, I don't know if you all are talking about before taxes. My uncle had POTS Limited before he passed away and his bill was $20 after taxes but he could only use the phone so much per month and had unlimited 911 calling.
elray

join:2000-12-16
Santa Monica, CA
·SONIC.NET
·RoadRunner Cable
·Verizon Online DSL

Re: Well...

said by screavic See Profile :

I have talked to AT&T about it and everytime I have tried they always tell me $30. My uncle had POTS Limited before he passed away and his bill was $20 after taxes but he could only use the phone so much per month and had unlimited 911 calling.
AT&T Measured Service is, at most, $11.85/month+tax in your zip code. Even with Al Gore tax, it won't break $20/month total. But you have to be diligent and pursue it - they aren't going to offer it up to you - after all, someone has to pay for Ed Whitacre's pension.

»https://swot.sbc.com/swot/telcoProductDe···d=155496

I'm not sure why anyone would want or need "unlimited 911 calling". If you really need to call 911 more than a couple times in a given month, you probably should move to safer neighborhood, or to a nursing home.

NY Tel
Premium
join:2004-04-09
Smithtown, NY
·VOIPo

said by yock See Profile :

said by screavic See Profile :

$80 / month for my landline with long distance or $50 without long distance.

Our cell phone bill with text messaging and internet (cause no DSL) is about $80-100
Have you tried dropping called ID, voice mail, call waiting, callback, etc? My fiancee and I pay something like $20/mo for our landline.
In NY, after dropping everything, a POTS line still costs between 25 and 30 dollars a month.

screavic
Premium
join:2006-08-11
Paron, AR
·Verizon Wireless B..
·Alltel Axess

Re: Well...

Thank you someone else who understands that it might not be $20 everywhere .

About the Skype comment above, I wish I could and believe me I would have if we had reliable internet out here. I have cell phone internet and have to reconnect and reset many times a day. DSL & Cable are not here

yock
TFTC
Premium
join:2000-11-21
Fairfield, OH

said by NY Tel See Profile :

said by yock See Profile :

said by screavic See Profile :

$80 / month for my landline with long distance or $50 without long distance.

Our cell phone bill with text messaging and internet (cause no DSL) is about $80-100
Have you tried dropping called ID, voice mail, call waiting, callback, etc? My fiancee and I pay something like $20/mo for our landline.
In NY, after dropping everything, a POTS line still costs between 25 and 30 dollars a month.
That's New York, not Arkansas, and that's still much better than the $50 the OP cited.

NY Tel
Premium
join:2004-04-09
Smithtown, NY
·VOIPo

Re: Well...

said by yock See Profile :

That's New York, not Arkansas, and that's still much better than the $50 the OP cited.
Yes I agree, my point is that there is a BIG price difference in POTS charges from State to State which is why some people are doing the voip thing or cell only.

I have a POTS line but can't remember the last time I made or received a call on it.

Monthly total for me is:

Voice Services $28.20

Matt
Gone playing Dragon Age Origins
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC

Cell Only for Years

I've been cell only for years. I only know one person who still has a POTS line actually ... and they are in their 60's and 70's.

Cjaiceman
Premium,MVM
join:2004-10-12
Parker, CO

Re: Cell Only for Years

Same, been cellphone only since late 2004. I just haven't seen the need for a land-line any more.

nipseyrussel
Nipsey Russell, yo

join:2002-02-22
Philadelphia, PA

said by Matt See Profile :

I only know one person who still has a POTS line actually ... and they are in their 60's and 70's.
split personalities are a b;tch

Matt
Gone playing Dragon Age Origins
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..

Re: Cell Only for Years

said by nipseyrussel See Profile :

said by Matt See Profile :

I only know one person who still has a POTS line actually ... and they are in their 60's and 70's.
split personalities are a b;tch
LOL. I meant one household. Not sure why I typed one "person." Nice catch.

Piggie
I Actually use Windstream
Premium
join:2005-11-23
Orange Springs, FL
·HughesNet Satellit..
·Windstream

said by Matt See Profile :

I've been cell only for years. I only know one person who still has a POTS line actually ... and they are in their 60's and 70's.
What does age have to do with signal level?
--
| Speedstream 4200 Modem - 3m/384 plan | W98-W2KSP4-XPSP2 - All AMD | Buffalo WHR G54S with Tomato 1.18 | 3 downstream switches feeding 6 total clients (no wireless) | Including the Data port on the side of my neck |
The Way Out

join:2003-01-20

California...

...is a big state and is by and large rural. There are a few large urban centers vastly swamped by rural areas.

djrobx

join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
·PHONE POWER
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T CallVantage
·Time Warner VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable

Re: California...

The terrain in the greater Los Angeles area is not always friendly to wireless services. In many areas around here, if you want to hold a reliable, clear conversation you need a landline of some sort.

There's a cell tower less than 5,000 feet from me, but the service is still unreliable here. In fact, out of four households in my immediate family (located in Valencia, Tujunga, Rolling Hills Estates and Palos Verdes), not even one of us has good cellular service at hour home from any provider.

We're definitely looking forward to femtocells.
--
AT&T U-Hearse
Your funeral. Delivered.

en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA

Re: California...

Yeah - some areas are poor.
I have an AT&T cell site 1/2 mile from me (fairly flat) and I've done 2 hour conf calls.
Lately, I've been having issues with Sprint 'Network signal faded' messages, and its site is ~ 1 block from me.
Gilitar

join:2000-11-20
Mobile, AL

The map tells the story

Look at the map... It's obvious Verizon is doing much better at keeping landline business versus AT&T.

Eat Me

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ
·PenTeleData
·Future Nine Corpor..
·VOIPo
·Vonage

I hate cell phones

Yet I have two of them - one personal, one for work.

I mostly use them for data. The work phone is a blackberry. The personal phone is a Palm Centro.

But I hate talking on digital cellphones because the audio quality isn't very good, plus all that RF right next to my brain doesn't leave me with a comfortable feeling.

So my solution for keeping a home phone is PAYG VoIP.

SHARPSHARK

join:2002-05-10

Re: I hate cell phones

... and it might not be good for the bees too. :

Voyager2K2

join:2001-10-04
Wayne, PA

1 edit
No duplex audio.
I hate cell phones as well.
I have a crackberry from Sprint. TV's kinda cool. One way at a time phone audio sucks.
POT (VIA FIOS ) still rules for me.

gigahurtz
Premium
join:2001-10-20
Palm Coast, FL
clubs:

I would but...

I would love to go cell only but the problem is my alarm monitoring. If there was a way around this I would do it in a heartbeat.

herdfan
Premium
join:2003-01-25
Hurricane, WV

Re: I would but...

There ARE solutions for both cell and IP, but I personally don't think they are ready for prime time. As a back up, maybe, but for primary notification, no way.

Tziz

@dsli.com
My house has a wireless transponder to notify the alarm company. when we cut the cord in ~2000, there was no interruption.

Chuckles
Premium
join:2006-03-04
Saint Paul, MN

Speaking of cellphones.

A law should be past where businesses can tell customers they will not help them while they're driving while speaking on their cellphones.

I talked to a customer the other day who mentioned they were driving while we spoke. She took down her account number from me which meant she was driving, on the phone and using pen and paper. She then wanted to be transfered to an automated menu system to make a payment which requires her to key in her account number, amount to pay and credit card number. Imagine if she had kids in the car and was smoking!

MrMaster
What If
Premium
join:2000-12-16
Austin, TX
clubs:
·RoadRunner Cable

Re: Speaking of cellphones.

said by Chuckles See Profile :

A law should be past where businesses can tell customers they will not help them while they're driving while speaking on their cellphones.

I talked to a customer the other day who mentioned they were driving while we spoke. She took down her account number from me which meant she was driving, on the phone and using pen and paper. She then wanted to be transfered to an automated menu system to make a payment which requires her to key in her account number, amount to pay and credit card number. Imagine if she had kids in the car and was smoking!
Or she was sitting in gridlock traffic.

aaronwt
Premium
join:2004-11-07
Woodbridge, VA
·Verizon FIOS
·Comcast

said by Chuckles See Profile :

A law should be past where businesses can tell customers they will not help them while they're driving while speaking on their cellphones.

I talked to a customer the other day who mentioned they were driving while we spoke. She took down her account number from me which meant she was driving, on the phone and using pen and paper. She then wanted to be transfered to an automated menu system to make a payment which requires her to key in her account number, amount to pay and credit card number. Imagine if she had kids in the car and was smoking!
You can use your cellphone to save phone numbers, account numbers etc while talking on the phone. This is nothing new. You don't have to use a pen and paper. This is the 21st century.

netwire
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Mooresboro, NC
·RoadRunner Cable
·Millenicom
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Vonage

And this is a big suprise?

It's to be expected, and we should see this trend contiue. Honestly, cell phones are more convvienant than landlines. I myself have not had a land line for over three years now. I do however think that companies over charge for cell services but that's just my $0.02.

KSUJace
Golden Flash

join:2001-12-01
Chicago, IL

what's a landline?

I've never had one
brianstretch

join:2001-12-31
Ann Arbor, MI

Me too, and my parents as well

I went cell phone only a few years ago. I added a second phone to my plan to give to Mom just before my parents made a cross-country trip. Shortly after that my Dad, the classic "what do I need a cell phone for?", decided that he wanted one too and there wasn't much point in paying AT&T for a landline after that. Family plans are very efficient if you can use them for parts of your extended family too.

I would like to get a femtocell like Sprint's Airave, just because, but I'm still using Nextel phones that aren't supported and Sprint is taking their sweet time coming out with an Android phone I want.

I have been meaning to set up an Asterisk VoIP server, mostly for a new toy to play with, got to get to that some day.
corinthos

join:2007-10-09

extra fees

Mine was low like 12 a month but after added tons of random fees and charges it was like 26. Not worth keeping for that.

Ibexx

join:2008-12-12
Severn, MD

Re: extra fees

I love the freedom my cell phone gives me. I don't have to worry about missing an important call when I'm out at the store, I can check my voicemail remotely and I don't have to worry about a long distance bill when I am calling my boyfriend when he is away at college.

I haven't had a landline phone since I moved out of my parents' house in 2003.I currently live in a rental house with three other people. We do not have landline service to our house, and all of us use our cell phones exclusively.

Madness
A flea circus at a dog show.

join:2000-01-05
Quincy, MA
·Verizon Online DSL

Re: extra fees

I'm no big fan of cellphones. Listening to people blabbing on them in public -- like there's no tomorrow -- is enough of a turnoff for me. Yet, I have a cheap PAYG.

When I thought of killing a landline, Verizon convinced me to stay on by giving me the $19.99/$29.99 (6/6 months) plan for both the line & DSL. Yet, my bill has been like 10 & some change for the past seven months -- they keep giving me a big discount -- including DSL.

My line has flat-rate local, no-monthly-fee long-distance & no custom calling features.
--
No keyboard present or keyboard error. Press <F1> to continue....

IowaStudent
Premium
join:2008-08-21
Grinnell, IA

Re: extra fees

Went cell only at the end of last year, My parents got sick of paying Iowatelecrap $70 a month for Internet(384k DSL) and basic telephone service
Yes, 384 kb per second in 2009!

benc
Premium
join:2007-06-17
Glen Carbon, IL
·Charter Pipeline
·Future Nine Corpor..
·Callcentric
·AT&T Midwest

Interesting

Maybe I'm different, but I'm in my 20s and a landline is all I have. When I'm not home I just look for a payphone.

With the house phone I get unlimited talking to any number in the US. No overages, long distance charges, or anything. Also I have nearly every feature the phone company offers. Only time I pay a per minute charge is if I call another country. Using the house phone is a lot cheaper for that purpose.

I did have a mobile once, but not anymore. My mother is pressuring me into getting one, but so far I have resisted.

Dial-up and faxing are two things that I don't do very often, but the ability to do so is very helpful. If the cable goes out, dial-up really is better than nothing at all. Faxing has also gotten me out of jams before.

Line power is a feature that can't be beat. Plus it's the most reliable utility that I have ever had.

See 7 replies to this post

KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
·AT&T Yahoo
·AT&T DSL Service
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southwest

I still think the Telco's could reverse this if they wanted

... by simply offering low cost POTS. Thing is, many Telcos also own/operate Cell providers, and really don't care that POTS is dying. Everyone but Qwest, that is....
--
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini
ebubman

join:2002-01-17
Enola, PA
·Comcast
·Vonage

landlines have no value

we terminated our vzon landline 7 years ago in favor of gsm cell only since then. sole reason for having a landline @ that point was simply that we had always had a landline. sole regret was that we had not done it sooner. vzon & other telcos act as if landlines are an absolute necessity; in reality, the traditional telcos are running around rearranging chairs on the deck of the titanic. there's really not a tremendous future in it.

fatmanskinny
Premium
join:2004-01-04
Wandering
·Comcast Digital Vo..
·Comcast


1 edit

Re: landlines have no value

said by ebubman See Profile :

in reality, the traditional telcos are running around rearranging chairs on the deck of the titanic. there's really not a tremendous future in it.
Man, I could not have said it better myself! When you see reports that Comcast is the THIRD biggest phone provider and growing, you know that the telcos are shaking in their boots while burying their heads in the sand.

Instead of the telcos rolling out serious cable competition (like Verizon's FIOS service), they do stupid sh*t like Re-Verse from AT&T.

Oh well, Comcast is going to be in the phone business for a long time. I see them evolving way beyond the current offerings and stepping into wireless phone service.
--
Satan is always busy. He makes bad things look good and good things look bad! Watch that Devil.

fiber_man
Things Happen For A Reason
Premium
join:2001-01-27
Port Saint Lucie, FL
·AT&T U-Verse

Hurricanes

Down here most cell towers were useless during the storms. My landline never failed during all of the storms of the past 6 years. Once they got the generators running at the towers to power them up the cell started to work again but was iffy as to where you were. If you were driving and switched towers you easily dropped calls. The wireless carriers are trying to improve on this problem every year as is has gotten better. FYI all cell towers are connected to the landline network via fiber or copper.
--
GO NOLES!!

Voyager2K2

join:2001-10-04
Wayne, PA
·Verizon FIOS

Re: Hurricanes

I was at my parent's house cleaning up after Frances in 2004 then Jeannne hit dead center @ Vero Beach. Cell service never went down both times, every singe wire on the poles were destroyed. It looked like a bomb hit the area.
YMMV but just reporting what happened. Jeanne was no joke BTW.

fiber_man
Things Happen For A Reason
Premium
join:2001-01-27
Port Saint Lucie, FL
·AT&T U-Verse

Re: Hurricanes

No kidding three weeks after Frances we were still working on that mess and to have Jeanne hit just made it worst. Tons of OT for over a year. Jensen Beach was without lineline service for about five weeks. Boat anchor went through the duct run at the Jensen Beach causeway. I could tell you all kinds of stories about those two storms. What people could see on the ground is only part of it.
--
GO NOLES!!

datguy7

@verizon.net

tax them equally

Wait until they tax comcast the way they tax the telco's... then you will be screaming its not really a phone service

John Keels

@bellsouth.net

Wireless

I have been a wireless only phone user for a long time. I even had a landline again for a while a year or so ago but no one ever called me on it anyway. LOL SO, I killed it and went back to wireless. Actually, I do have dry line DSL from AT&T at 3mpbs. The two services provide what I need at a reasonable cost. Cable is faster but less reliable and I rarely watch TV anyway.
TheMG

join:2007-09-04
Edmonton, AB

No landline but no cell.

We ditched our landline for phone service from our cable provider (Shaw).

I still do not own a cell phone though, and as of today still have no intention of getting one.
bgraham

join:2001-03-15
Smithtown, NY
·Verizon FIOS


2 edits

Not switching to wireless yet.

Cell phone around here is "not ready for prime time" Far too many gaps including parts of our town. I have only tried TMobile and Verizon, but my neighbor has ATT and that's not much better. Conversations on cell phones are often full of missed words and disconects. I get 1 or 2 bars with TMobile and Virgin upstairs in my house and no bars in my basement office.

Went VOIP 3 years ago and use pay as you go for cell. Total cost $45 for FIOS, $18 x 2 for VOIP and $10 X 2 for PAYG cell phones, total cost $101. My 2 old pots lines used to cost $120 without any internet.
richlil

join:2002-01-10
Seattle, WA
·Qwest.net

Seattle Earthquake - 2001

I don't have a POTS line anymore... only a cell phone and VOIP with T-Mobile. After the Nisqually earthquake here in Seattle in 2001, cell service with AT&T didn't work for several days afterward. POTS worked - at least for local service, although long distance was knocked out for several hours afterward with jammed circuits. I wonder if the same strain were to happen today on the cell phone system if service would stay on or come back any sooner than a few days?
Ulmo

join:2005-09-22
San Jose, CA
·Comcast
·SONIC.NET

Re: Seattle Earthquake - 2001

In 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, the cell phones didn't work for California's OES (Office of Emergency Services, which I think recently got merged with some Office of Homeland Security or something like that).

I don't think there's been a viable test of cell phones in emergencies since, so we can assume they won't work, unless competent design and testing to the contrary has been performed.
Forums » Users Increasingly Going Cell Onlypage: 1 · 2


Sunday, 08-Nov 09:55:25 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.