republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   News
newer
story category USDA Funds $267 Million Rural WiMax
6 million rural residents to get broadband out of the deal
10:10AM Saturday Mar 29 2008 by KathrynV
tags: coverage · business · wireless · alternatives
Tipped by TK Junk Mail See Profile
About a year ago Congress reprimanded the USDA for funding more urban broadband development than rural broadband when the purpose of its programs is specifically to bring broadband to rural areas that lack it. The USDA has been working on improvements since that time. The latest of those improvements is that they have issued a loan designed to bring wireless portable broadband connectivity to over 50 rural areas across seventeen different states. The loan, which exceeds a quarter billion dollars, was given to a company called Open Range Communications which is going to use the funding, along with private investments, to bring WiMax and satellite Internet to areas currently not served by broadband. Their goal is to bring broadband to six million people in the next five years.

Related:
  1. Product Spotlight: EV-DO Showdown - Verizon vs. Sprint
  2. Base Station Solutions for Indoor 3G
  3. First Android Phone Gets FCC Approval
  4. Clearwire Expects Finished Sprint Deal By Year's End
  5. Houston Downtown Wi-Fi Goes Live
  6. Cell Phones VoIP Crashes Wireless Industry Party
  7. Xohm Deployment Ahead of Schedule
  8. Friday Evening Links
Forums » USDA Funds $267 Million Rural WiMax
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

jhawk44

join:2006-10-19
USA
·PeoplePC
·1and1
·EarthLink


edit:
March 29th, @10:54AM

Yay they be bringing the satellite internets!

I'm so excited!!!!1

WHY?! If said people in rural area (like me) wanted satellite, we would get it. If we wanted to stick with our lousy dialup because it performs better than satellite for 99% of stuff except like download speed (like me) that's why we are using dialup and not satellite. It's not like there's a shortage of satellite service...

More Wimax, less satellite.

Satellite isn't even high-speed internet, IMO. It should be called "Desperation Internet".

Also: 6 million people? That's like only 2% of the population of the US. If 80% are living in urban areas (and thus probably have some form of faster than dialup connection), that still leaves the 18% in the rest of the rural areas unserved.

gaforces
United We Stand, Divided We Fall

join:2002-04-07
Santa Cruz, CA
·Cruzio Internet


edit:
March 29th, @11:05AM

Re: Yay they be bringing the satellite internets!

From what I've heard, there are still people on the waiting list for Wild Blue and Hughes? satellite for years. The people that do have it complain about slow speeds and congestion during peak hours.

The article states that they will also deploy in areas that have access to broadband ... Cue the corporate shills loudly proclaiming it's a waste of money. WiMax ate my baybeee!
--
There is no greater sign of a general decay of virtue in a nation, than a want of zeal in its inhabitants for the good of their country. ~ Joseph Addison

RealoRc
Premium
join:2003-01-25
Brooklyn, NY
and $267 million loan to give WiMax and satellite broadband to only 6 million people would equate to $44.5 million per person. For $44 million I'll drag an ethernet from my house to anywhere in the US.

DoctorDoom
Troll hunter
Premium
join:2006-09-19
Becket, MA


edit:
March 29th, @06:34PM

Re: Yay they be bringing the satellite internets!

quote:
and $267 million loan to give WiMax and satellite broadband to only 6 million people would equate to $44.5 million per person. For $44 million I'll drag an ethernet from my house to anywhere in the US.
Er ... ahh ... that would be $44.50 per person, n'est-ce pas?

shoe1

join:2007-09-28
Colfax, CA

Re: Yay they be bringing the satellite internets!

yeah....even then his comment makes no sense.

AMD Phreak
Please do the needfull
Premium
join:2003-12-14

I hope they brought lots of pens and paper.....

Kudos to the company taking this project on. I hope they are well prepared for lots of writing and auditing.

TK Junk Mail
Go ahead, make my day
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Margate City, NJ
clubs:
·Comcast

Why these 17 states ??? And not others?

The loan to Open Range is expected to foster business development and create new jobs in Alabama, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina and Wisconsin.
I'll bet powerful House & Senate politicians had a hand in who gets the money.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page

supergirl

join:2007-03-20
Pensacola, FL
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southeast
·magicjack.com
·Skype

Re: Why these 17 states ??? And not others?

said by TK Junk Mail See Profile :

The loan to Open Range is expected to foster business development and create new jobs in Alabama, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina and Wisconsin.
I'll bet powerful House & Senate politicians had a hand in who gets the money.
Lobbyists. I don't get Alabama or Arkansas or S.Carolina but the others make sense--they have money. Of course, Georgia has more hills than Jenna Jameson.

You know it is kinda funny the Amish have no modern conveniences and manage quite well.
--
Saving the world keeps me busy. However, I find Earth very primitive from my home planet of Krypton.
-Supergirl
lvlorpheus

join:2008-02-17
Eureka Springs, AR

Re: Why these 17 states ??? And not others?

Arkansas has a budget surplus and has for years. Maybe they are making these loans to states that can pay them back.
EPS

join:2008-02-13
Hingham, MA

Re: Why these 17 states ??? And not others?

But New York is on the list-I thought they had the highest debt in the nation (or maybe we here in MA passed them with our "Big Dig" and debt-ridden transit agencies)
Nuts

join:2006-04-27
Forest, OH
You may want to visit an Amish community. You would be surprised how many have solar panels. The furniture makers have electricity and phones in their shops.

ureihcim
Freshly made

join:2007-12-16
Miami, FL

...

I already have a bad taste on my mouth about this and the company they chose to deploy such a service.
Edward1978

join:2007-07-23
De Soto, IL

About time it is 2008!!!

Ok what do they call rural, a town of 45,000+ or a town of 200+? That is what makes me mad, all these companies doing wireless in cities that already has DSL & Cable!!! Wow thanks guys they allready have broadband!!!
neufuse

join:2006-12-06
Indiana, PA

Re: About time it is 2008!!!

Apparently a town of 50,000 is rural *LOL* because our town would be covered under this according to the plan... and we already have 4 broadband providers in the populated areas... but a ton of farm land around it
papawjim

join:2007-01-05
West Terre Haute, IN

Re: About time it is 2008!!!

Where is the listing of the areas they plan to serve, out in the sticks here I onny have dial up or satellite. Be interested in seeing what kind of areas they are going to serve, ones with duplication already in broadband service or truly ones without current service.

Mr Anonymous

@comcast.net

Satellite is NOT broadband.

It is a contradiction in terms....like "military intelligance", or "politicians with integrity".

Forums » USDA Funds $267 Million Rural WiMax


Sunday, 07-Sep 23:51:17 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.