 |
 KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK | Time for Google and Bing to be taken down.... ... for "substantial infringement activity" or "enabling copyright infringement."
Unless we're saying laws should be selectively enforced....
--
In Reality: It's these laws themselves that should be taken down. -- "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini
| |
|
 |  KearnstdElf WizardPremium join:2002-01-22 Mullica Hill, NJ | Re: Time for Google and Bing to be taken down.... and to take them down the Googles of the world need to buy more congress critters.
Sadly our government is not about what we the voting public want but about who has the most dollars.
Bing naturally sits in an interesting area in that MS itself has to be against piracy yet they cant sue their own search engine. -- [65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports | |
|
 KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK | AT&T Blames FCC Quoting a user response to the article by fgoldstein:
"Let me get th is stragiht. On the one hand, ATT is whining that they are desperate for more spectrum, which is why they wanted T-Mobile. On the ohter hand, ATT is whining that so much customer traffic has been offloaded onto WiFi that they are not making enough money to cover their investment, so they have to raise prices.
The contradiction is breathtaking. If it were not ATT, one would begin to wonder, but ATT routinely does things like this to test the fealty of their puppet analysts, regulators and legislators." -- "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini
| |
|
 |  reub2000Premium join:2001-12-28 Evanston, IL | Re: AT&T Blames FCC First off, if AT&T didn't charge ridiculous prices for HSPDA bandwidth, then nobody would be using WiFi. Second off, they're probably well aware that the higher caps will have little influence on actual usage. If network congestion was really the issue, then they could allow users to have unlimited data usage in off-peak times to discourage big downloads during times of high load. -- My pbase gallery | |
|
 |  |
 | | cheap internet for poor I agree the internet should be cheaper than it is now. | |
|
 |  FBGuyPremium join:2005-03-19 Evanston, IL | Re: cheap internet for poor I think it should be priced fairly, not necessarily cheaper. | |
|
 |  |  KearnstdElf WizardPremium join:2002-01-22 Mullica Hill, NJ | Re: cheap internet for poor said by FBGuy:I think it should be priced fairly, not necessarily cheaper. Or more importantly it should cost exactly what it says on the advertisement. if they say $45/mo for 12mbit then the bill at the end of the month should be for $45 not $60 after all the fee rape. -- [65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports | |
|
 |
 |  CXM_SplicerLooking at the bigger picturePremium join:2011-08-11 NYC kudos:1 Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
| Re: Hawaii make keep track of all websites visited said by Mr Matt: Here is the problem: individuals--users' origin IP address. With NAT how are the privacy invaders going to identify who was using the broadband connection. In the case of a shared connection more incorrect identification and malicious prosecutions. That hasn't stopped the music or movie industries from suing the person who pays for the Internet connection. Never mind the fact that they have NO WAY of knowing who used the connection. | |
|
 |
 |
|