  rawwhide Zer0 Premium join:2000-09-03 Zero clubs: | Greedy Greedy Greedy!!! Can we say greed. The music industry will never learn. -- HUH!!! | |
|
 |
 |   spanglo Premium join:2004-05-17 San Diego, CA | Re: Greed. Ask for the moon and settle for a "lower" offer. Nice tactic. | |
|
  LordMalak
join:2003-07-02 Brazil
| They'll never see a penny IMO, the RIAA/Sound Exchange will never see a penny from these royalties. It's just their way of getting Internet radios to depend on the RIAA and play whatever artist they're trying to sell at the moment.
RIAA: "Oh, so you want to play Malevolent Creation and not the latest Hillary Duff teeny bopper tune? Fine, just pay us $5,000,000 and you're off the hook."
Internet Radio: "Well, on second thought..." | |
|
  mrchris We don't miss you Bush Premium join:2002-10-01 North Babylon, NY | Rates are not reasonable Can't they just give them an offer like $150-200? More than reasonable for any small radio station a year. | |
|
 |
 |  |
 |  |  russotto
join:2000-10-05 Collegeville, PA | Re: No. This is not the case. The radio station is free to negotiate royalties with individual rightsholders. | |
|
 |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  russotto
join:2000-10-05 Collegeville, PA | Re: Wrong.... They are the only organization which can collect the _statutory_ royalties, but the radio stations are still free to license the music directly from the rightsholders and bypass the statutory royalty system. | |
|
 |  |
 |  |  |
 |  Kearnstd Elf Wizard Premium join:2002-01-22 Mullica Hill, NJ
| if all the netcasters banded togather and staged a Mutany against soundexchange when the rates go up im sure some shit would be stirred. they all leave SXC, play indy music and pay the artist direct with side deals between them and the artist. therefore no laws are broken as the artist is getting paid. -- [65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports | |
|
 |
  pokesph It Is Almost Fast Premium join:2001-06-25 Sacramento, CA clubs:
·Comcast
| SE greed.. I still want to know how this will affect the small, non-profit / hobby webcaster.. since we don't have an 'income' stream or paid listeners, what do we use to (how do we) pay?
this monster greed we've been seeing lately web-wide is total BS and needs to go. NOW! | |
|
 |   wdoa
join:2001-10-16 Spencer, MA
·Verizon Online DSL
| Re: SE greed.. Basically if you are a "hobby" webcaster you are treated the same as a small commercial webcaster. In essence you are dead meat unless you have thousands of dollars to put into your "hobby". I just shut down my station that focused on independent music. I had about a half dozen volunteers who recorded show. We had no advertising, and did pay BMI & ASCAP royalties, but at the end of the day the RIAA game would bankrupt us. If I could have paid a flat fee of a few hundred dollars a year (as was the case with BMI & ASCAP) I would, however there are no provisions for this. | |
|
  Ari Shohat
@voxel.net
| Ensures the small never get big
This will not work for us at DI.fm, hopefully there can be something else worked out better. This ensures the small always stay small, heaven forbid they actually are free to grow their business. I can understand very small outfits taking this, it's better than nothing, however this sets the bar in a bad place and legitimizes the absolutely ridiculous arguements for such fees. | |
|
 robertfl Premium join:2005-10-10 Mary Esther, FL | Boycott CD's You should boycott CDs except for small artists.
-Rob | |
|
  tileguy Premium join:2007-08-09 Derry, NH
| RIAA???? I don't know.... Is it me? Does the RIAA just exist to make money off of the artists? The bands would make more just selling their music on their own website than spreading the money to the RIAA and other various organizations. WTF!!!! Get it together guys! Make you own money!! There's no need to split it with anyone else now! The Fatcats at the RIAA are not needed anymore. | |
|
  SRFireside
join:2001-01-19 Houston, TX
| Not sure what everybody is crowing about A 10%-12% royalty rate is at least a reasonable charge. That means a percentage of the webcaster's revenue or profits (10%-12% to be exact) pays for the use of the music. Right now royalty rates hover at about 6%-8% for using someone else's music (you record a cover song and sell it, etc). If you ask me this is definitely a step in the right direction.
Percentages are much better than a flat fee no matter how you slice it. | |
|
 |
|
 |