 |
 |   INT0CABLE BANNED Premium join:2007-10-22 Bronx, NY | Re: Dem contributing trial lawyers & election politics holdup get outta here with your republican crap. that bill should be buried | |
|
 |  |   ropeguru Premium join:2001-01-25 Hollywood, FL clubs: | Re: Dem contributing trial lawyers & election politics holdup Agreed... I typically follow the republican ideas but this one is pure BS. They should be held accountable and fined for each item that was given illegally to the govt. | |
|
 |  |  |
 |  |  |  nasadude
join:2001-10-05 Rockville, MD
·Comcast
| Re: Dem contributing trial lawyers & election politics holdup said by wierdo :[ It's not Republican crap, it's fascist (and corporatist) crap. second that. real republicans actually believe in the rule of law. Bruce Fein, a very conservative republican (but also constitutional scholar) is appalled at the Bush administration contempt for the law and the constitution | |
|
 |  |  amigo_boy
join:2005-07-22 Tempe, AZ
·magicjack.com
·EarthLink
| said by INT0CABLE :get outta here with your republican crap. that bill should be buried I'm not a Republican. I agree with TK.
Mark | |
|
 |  |  |   INT0CABLE BANNED Premium join:2007-10-22 Bronx, NY | Re: Dem contributing trial lawyers & election politics holdup then weirdo its right this is not republican and i should have known better because ron paul doesnt approve of this blown in your face violation of civil liberties.
it's fascist (and corporatist) crap. | |
|
 |  |  |  |   S_engineer
join:2007-05-16 Chicago, IL
| Re: Dem contributing trial lawyers & election politics holdup said by INT0CABLE :then weirdo its right this is not republican and i should have known better because ron paul doesnt approve of this blown in your face violation of civil liberties. it's fascist (and corporatist) crap. Funny how when you download music via bit torrent, it's seems to be ok. But when our gov't sifts through the network...it's facism. What a load of crap! Any person thats ever downloaded a song illegally is just as guilty as the gov't for "obtaining binary" that they're not entitled to!
Thank You Verizon...Thank You AT&T and all others that helped when we needed you.
And by the way...why the hell hasn't Mark Klien been indicted? | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  ackman
join:2000-10-04 Acworth, GA
·AT&T Southeast
| Re: Dem contributing trial lawyers & election politics holdup said by S_engineer :said by INT0CABLE :then weirdo its right this is not republican and i should have known better because ron paul doesnt approve of this blown in your face violation of civil liberties. it's fascist (and corporatist) crap. Funny how when you download music via bit torrent, it's seems to be ok. But when our gov't sifts through the network...it's facism. What a load of crap! Any person thats ever downloaded a song illegally is just as guilty as the gov't for "obtaining binary" that they're not entitled to! Thank You Verizon...Thank You AT&T and all others that helped when we needed you. And by the way...why the hell hasn't Mark Klien been indicted? That was a pretty dimwitted and uninformed comment you made. It is documented that Bush and fascist cronies started illegally wiretapping long before 9/11/01. Since they couldn't prevent the largest attack on the mainland US in history, how do you feel that AT&T helped when we needed them? And if they were so patriotic, why is it that wiretapping stopped when the FBI was delinquent on paying the bill to AT&T? I don't think people really buy all the lies and propaganda from the reich wing anymore. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |   TK Junk Mail Golf season has returned - hurrah Premium join:2002-03-03 Margate City, NJ clubs:
·Comcast
| Re: Dem contributing trial lawyers & election politics holdup said by ackman : It is documented that Bush and fascist cronies started illegally wiretapping long before 9/11/01. The US has been tapping the phone systems since the 50's, including Clinton, Carter, Johnson, Kennedy and all the other liberal Dems. And this won't change if Obama or Hillary gets elected president. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  brandpc
join:2003-08-25 Canton, CT
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
| Re: Dem contributing trial lawyers & election politics holdup COINTELPRO was no were near the size of the current program which the administration has developed:
»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cointelpro
And in regards to your comment in general, I love how you attempt to make it seem as if only liberals are being wiretapped --- despite how you have no real backing on that.
MLK was being wiretapped too by COINTELPRO. It really doesn't matter who it was. It was illegal, is illegal, and still should be illegal. And someone needs to stop it (clearly not you). | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  ackman
join:2000-10-04 Acworth, GA
·AT&T Southeast
| said by TK Junk Mail :said by ackman : It is documented that Bush and fascist cronies started illegally wiretapping long before 9/11/01. The US has been tapping the phone systems since the 50's, including Clinton, Carter, Johnson, Kennedy and all the other liberal Dems. And this won't change if Obama or Hillary gets elected president. Actually, it will be quite entertaining to hear all the dim-witted narrow minded conservatives squeal like stuck pigs about wiretapping if a democrat wins the White House. Funny how little punk conservatives love to throw around "liberal" as a derogatory label, as if it's a bad thing to be a free thinker and differ from a narrow convention held by people so frightened of change. Hey, conservatives, look behind you, it's Bin Laden! BOO! Ha ha... | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |   insomniac84
join:2002-01-03 Schererville, IN | Amigo, you are not a republican then. Republicans are for less government. | |
|
 |  |  |  |   KrK Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy Premium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southwest
| Re: Dem contributing trial lawyers & election politics holdup said by insomniac84 :Republicans are for less government. No.... not really. Maybe once. These days, the Republican party merely gives lip service to this, while actually increasing Government size and expanding Government Scope and Power at previously unheard of speed... (Well, since WWII. anyway.)
Republicans these days all seem to be about "Keep your hands off our money" and "No business regulation for OUR businesses" but want strict control over everything else.... -- "Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!) | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |   JakCrow
join:2001-12-06 Palo Alto, CA
·DSL EXTREME
·Comcast
| Re: Dem contributing trial lawyers & election politics holdup said by KrK :said by insomniac84 :Republicans are for less government. No.... not really. Maybe once. These days, the Republican party merely gives lip service to this, while actually increasing Government size and expanding Government Scope and Power at previously unheard of speed... (Well, since WWII. anyway.) Republicans these days all seem to be about "Keep your hands off our money" and "No business regulation for OUR businesses" but want strict control over everything else.... People would be hard pressed to find a moment in time when republicans really practiced what they preach. | |
|
 |   boognish Premium join:2001-09-26 Baton Rouge, LA clubs:
| If they didn't do anything wrong then they shouldn't have anything to worry about. They should not be offered immunity and rewarded if what they did was wrong and they knew what they were doing was wrong. They have enough lawyers and are under enough regulations to know if what they did was kosher or not. It should not be about what party you are in or how you feel about spying and the war. We are a country governed by laws. There should not be a set of laws for one class or for one type of organization. It should be an even playing field and the same rules should be applied to everyone regardless of class, size, political leaning, or anything else. If they chose to ignore or bend the rules for someone then screw them now they can suffer the consonances. -- don't get 2 close 2 my fantasy | |
|
 |  |   TK Junk Mail Golf season has returned - hurrah Premium join:2002-03-03 Margate City, NJ clubs:
·Comcast
| Re: Dem contributing trial lawyers & election politics holdup said by boognish :If they didn't do anything wrong then they shouldn't have anything to worry about. They should not be offered immunity and rewarded if what they did was wrong and they knew what they were doing was wrong. They have enough lawyers and are under enough regulations to know if what they did was kosher or not. It should not be about what party you are in or how you feel about spying and the war. We are a country governed by laws. There should not be a set of laws for one class or for one type of organization. It should be an even playing field and the same rules should be applied to everyone regardless of class, size, political leaning, or anything else. If they chose to ignore or bend the rules for someone then screw them now they can suffer the consonances. Well, I live in the real world and not in the fantasy land you apparently think we should live in. You are ignoring the "Golden Rule" - those who have the gold rule. That rule has controlled the world for thousands of years and nothing I have ever seen in governance around the world is going to change it. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page | |
|
 |  |  |   dsldude08
join:2008-01-03 La Crosse, WI | Re: Dem contributing trial lawyers & election politics holdup You are part of the cause of all of this if that is your attitude. The reason for that is because you sit back and let them get away with these things and refuse to try to change the ways when you actually have the power to do so. | |
|
 |  |  |  |   TK Junk Mail Golf season has returned - hurrah Premium join:2002-03-03 Margate City, NJ clubs:
·Comcast
edit: April 24th, @05:35PM
| Re: Dem contributing trial lawyers & election politics holdup said by dsldude08 :You are part of the cause of all of this if that is your attitude. The reason for that is because you sit back and let them get away with these things and refuse to try to change the ways when you actually have the power to do so. I think you miss the point. I am on the side of those who rule - not on the side of the "great unwashed" masses. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |   rit56
join:2000-12-01 New York, NY
| Re: Dem contributing trial lawyers & election politics holdup everyone should note that you Mr. America are in favor of corporations violating the Constitution, breaking the law. they broke the law and should be punished, period. what don't you understand about this? they broke the law and it is a known fact... the telecoms were handing this information over before 9 11 and it did nothing to stop 9 11. they were spying on ordinary citizens who differed in their politics. they broke the law. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  amigo_boy
join:2005-07-22 Tempe, AZ
·magicjack.com
·EarthLink
| Re: Dem contributing trial lawyers & election politics holdup said by rit56 : they broke the law and should be punished, If they broke the law, charge them criminally. Civil court isn't where criminal prosecutions occur. Most people opposed to wiretapping usually admit that they don't want to do the work involved with prosecuting law breakers (impeachment of the President, congressional hearings, criminal prosecutions, etc.). What they're really saying is that they're ok with taking the same shortcuts they accuse the government of taking.
And, for what it's worth, the laws cover the telcos' actions. 18 U.S.C. 2511(2)(a)(ii)(B) grants immunity merely if the AG certifies that a warrant isn't necessary.
U.S.C. 2702(a)(3) & (c) does the same thing if a telco has reasonable belief of imminent danger. This was amended in 2006 to reduce "reasonable belief" of "imminent danger" to merely "good faith belief" of "danger" (not imminent). This tends to show the legislative branch felt the laws should be relaxed -- not strengthened.
Mark | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  rahvin112
join:2002-05-24 Sandy, UT
| Re: Dem contributing trial lawyers & election politics holdup The current administration is unwilling to pursue criminal charges, beyond the obvious reasons such prosecution would likely implicate many of the politicians currently in charge.
Given the discord and contempt with which most Americans hold the president and this administration lets allows the guard to change then discuss the bill rationally. Once the deck isn't stacked with the same criminals that asked the companies to violate the law we'll have a much fairer verdict on whether the telecom companies should be charged for violations of the privacy policies they themselves prepared and agreed to abide by.
But those criminal charges alone don't negate the civil penalties for the actions. No civil immunity should be granted to any company, especially one that willingly broke the law and their own policies.
Hopefully in 8 short months real criminal charges will be filed against everyone that was involved including those in the administration who were involved, hopefully right to the top of the current administration. Willful disregard of the law should be punished severely. I'd personally like to see the soon to be former president charged, convicted and jailed for his egregious breaking of laws, authorization of subordinates (who don't deserve protection because they were ordered to do it) to break the law and his other illegal behavior while president. Just because current politics protect him, shouldn't give him immunity for his actions. We apparently need a precedent that sitting presidents are accountable for their actions after leaving office as the founders intended. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  amigo_boy
join:2005-07-22 Tempe, AZ
·magicjack.com
·EarthLink
edit: April 24th, @09:13PM
| Re: Dem contributing trial lawyers & election politics holdup said by rahvin112 :Hopefully in 8 short months real criminal charges will be filed against everyone that was involved including those in the administration who were involved, hopefully right to the top of the current administration. I'm ok with that. I just haven't liked the idea of using civil suits as a proxy for criminal prosecution (which is what many opponents of wiretapping have openly admitted it to be). Eight months isn't long.
But, I doubt there will be criminal prosecutions because the law permits the wiretapping. See my previous posts in this topic. There may be a reason to charge the President or Attorney General for abusing these laws. But, it appears the telcos were within the law.
BTW: The immunity deal only protects against civil suits for activities between 9/11/2001 to early 1/17/2007. It won't interfere with your hoped-for criminal prosecutions. And, it could be repealed.
Mark | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  amigo_boy
join:2005-07-22 Tempe, AZ
·magicjack.com
·EarthLink
| Re: Dem contributing trial lawyers & election politics holdup said by wierdo :Or did you conveniently forget about that? You have congressional hearings available to you. And elections to replace those you believe are preventing justice. Just 8 months.
Mark | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  wierdo
join:2001-02-16 Tulsa, OK
·Future Nine Corpor..
·Teliax VOIP
·Cox HSI
| Re: Dem contributing trial lawyers & election politics holdup said by amigo_boy :said by wierdo :Or did you conveniently forget about that? You have congressional hearings available to you. And elections to replace those you believe are preventing justice. Just 8 months. What a nice tactic. Change the subject when you don't like someone's point. Today, and since 2004, it has not been possible to federally prosecute a crime that the political machine does not want to see prosecuted.
Besides, the ECPA and other wiretap laws specifically create a civil cause of action, so I don't know where you get off saying that these companies should only find themselves in criminal court. Are you just carrying water for the administration?
I hope you're getting paid well for your obfuscatory services. -- It's wierdo, not weirdo. Yes, I know that's not the 'proper' spelling of the similar english language word.  | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  amigo_boy
join:2005-07-22 Tempe, AZ
·magicjack.com
·EarthLink
edit: April 24th, @10:47PM
| Re: Dem contributing trial lawyers & election politics holdup said by wierdo :What a nice tactic. Change the subject when you don't like someone's point. Today, and since 2004, it has not been possible to federally prosecute a crime that the political machine does not want to see prosecuted. Sorry. I didn't realize I changed the topic. You complained that it's impossible for criminal charges to be brought due to the current administration. I responded that you have political options such as 1) pressure Congress to hold hearings (and call for prosecutions depending on the results). And, 2) use the election process to replace those who you believe aren't pursuing justice.
said by wierdo :Besides, the ECPA and other wiretap laws specifically create a civil cause of action, so I don't know where you get off saying that these companies should only find themselves in criminal court. I was just replying to the incessant statements that "a crime was committed" or "they broke the law." If those statements are true, the place to prove it is in a criminal court, not civil. Many proponents of these civil suits have openly stated that it's being done because it's easier than seeking criminal charges. (Which sounds a lot like what the corner-cutting which the Administration is accused of.).
Mark | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   KrK Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy Premium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southwest
edit: April 25th, @12:30AM
| Re: Dem contributing trial lawyers & election politics holdup said by amigo_boy :I was just replying to the incessant statements that "a crime was committed" or "they broke the law." If those statements are true, the place to prove it is in a criminal court, not civil. Many proponents of these civil suits have openly stated that it's being done because it's easier than seeking criminal charges. (Which sounds a lot like what the corner-cutting which the Administration is accused of.). You have repeated this theme several times. This type of logic goes like this "Because no criminal prosecution is occurring, no criminal activity must of occurred."
That's bassackwards. As I have stated before, a citizen cannot bring criminal charges against someone or some organization... all they can do is allege or accuse! It's up to the GOVERNMENT to FILE criminal charges. In this case, the Administration is complicit and equally guilty, and so THEY AREN'T filing charges against themselves, are they?
This means the *only* recourse a citizen has to bring out the truth IS a civil case. Any citizen can file a civil lawsuit. A citizen *CANNOT* file a criminal prosecution!
Sheesh! Round and round, and still you keep saying the same thing. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  wierdo
join:2001-02-16 Tulsa, OK
·Future Nine Corpor..
·Teliax VOIP
·Cox HSI
| said by amigo_boy :Sorry. I didn't realize I changed the topic. You complained that it's impossible for criminal charges to be brought due to the current administration. I responded that you have political options such as 1) pressure Congress to hold hearings (and call for prosecutions depending on the results). And, 2) use the election process to replace those who you believe aren't pursuing justice. Congressional hearings do not equal criminal prosecutions.
Somehow, I expect that the folks who are obstructing the workings of the criminal justice system will not be returning. Well, unless they decide to truly wipe their ass with the Constitution. I'm so very glad that Roosevelt had that third term. Were it not for him, we wouldn't have term limits any longer. Of course, I doubt that Bush could be elected again anyway, but it's nice to have certainty that he will be departing.
said by amigo_boy :I was just replying to the incessant statements that "a crime was committed" or "they broke the law." If those statements are true, the place to prove it is in a criminal court, not civil. Many proponents of these civil suits have openly stated that it's being done because it's easier than seeking criminal charges. (Which sounds a lot like what the corner-cutting which the Administration is accused of.). No one needs to prove it to you, and regardless of your opinion on the civil suit, there are statutory damages specified in law. Why? Because the people who wrote the law were well aware that many instances of this malfeasance would not be prosecuted. Interestingly, it's the same reason why many environmental laws and quite a few trade regulations have a private cause of action specifically written into them.
Obviously, civil court is one of the places for this, given that it's written into the law. -- It's wierdo, not weirdo. Yes, I know that's not the 'proper' spelling of the similar english language word.  | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |   lg75
join:2003-01-31 Bronx, NY moderated: April 25th, @09:00AM
| No we didn't miss the point. We get it. You think it is perfectly legal for someone to go into someone else's house, steal their wallet and get away with it... Good point you make there. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  See 20 replies to this post |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  james1
join:2001-02-26 antarctica | Not to invoke Godwin's Law, but... | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  nasadude
join:2001-10-05 Rockville, MD
·Comcast
| said by TK Junk Mail :I think you miss the point. I am on the side of those who rule - not on the side of the "great unwashed" masses. don't tell me you're .. gasp.. elitist! | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |   KrK Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy Premium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK | If you can't beat Facism, become a Facist then, eh?
No thanks. The People always win in the end, even if they have to tear down the castles and drag the facists from their beds and hang them... eventually.... the Empire falls. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |   TK Junk Mail Golf season has returned - hurrah Premium join:2002-03-03 Margate City, NJ clubs:
·Comcast
| Re: Dem contributing trial lawyers & election politics holdup said by KrK : The People always win in the end LOL. Sure they do. How naive of you. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |   KrK Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy Premium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southwest
| Re: Dem contributing trial lawyers & election politics holdup said by TK Junk Mail :LOL. Sure they do. How naive of you. Oh I'm not saying it's quick. It takes a long time, but eventually the revolution happens, the the Empires fall. | |
|
 |  |  |   boognish Premium join:2001-09-26 Baton Rouge, LA clubs: | If history has shown anything in the real world those that have the gold have to watch how they rule or the peasants revolt at some point. -- don't get 2 close 2 my fantasy | |
|
 |  |  |  |  See 6 replies to this post |
|
 |  |  |  |
 |  |   dsldude08
join:2008-01-03 La Crosse, WI | Couldn't have said it better myself. | |
|
 |  |   PhoenixDown -- Ron Paul 2008 -- Premium join:2003-06-08 Fresh Meadows, NY clubs:   |
|