  Surfinusa Premium join:2001-02-08 | Ham's arent complaining ?
If this works maybe finally BPL will get off the ground. And Ham radio operators can live with BPL ( if it really works ). Sure hope so. Time will tell if Ham radio's have interference in all states if it really does get implemented. | |
|
 |  |
 |  AnOldGuy Premium join:2008-02-29 Kewanee, IL | Re: Ham's arent complaining ? well - I live about 30 miles from Princeton and the hams that I know there are complaining. Seems that they have experienced interference and as with most of the other BPL trials it has been swept under the table by the FCC. | |
|
 |  |  BF69
join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN
| Re: Ham's arent complaining ? said by AnOldGuy :well - I live about 30 miles from Princeton and the hams that I know there are complaining. Seems that they have experienced interference and as with most of the other BPL trials it has been swept under the table by the FCC. BS and who cares. God why are we catering to a very very very small less than 1% group of people? that's why t takes forever for technology to advance becaus every single group that might complain has to be sattisfied which is IMPOSSIBLE. The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. Ham operators can find a new hobby. | |
|
 |  |  |  jc100
join:2002-04-10
·RoadRunner Cable
| Re: Ham's arent complaining ? Umm... Because if this were done on a large scale, it'd effect a lot more than 1 percent. Still, ham operators are probably the minority but this technology just sucks. Find better ways to give internet if you ask me. Wimax for one or satellite via the balloons sounds more feasible. | |
|
 |  |  |  wvcaver
join:2005-04-17 Millersburg, OH | BPL SUCKS !!!!! | |
|
 |  |  |  jjeffeory
join:2002-12-04 USA
edit: March 16th, @01:38PM
| HAM radio is too important to just make the "little HAM radio geeks" go away. It's very useful in the event of a major catastrophic emergency... You know, like hurricanes, large fires, earthquakes, major brown outs, terrorist attacks, etc... 10 years ago I would have laughed at the odds of having 3 of the events happening near the same time, but living through many of them, has changed that thought. You can speak to people very far away with very little power. I think it's stupid to just tell them to go away. I don't use HAM radio, but for me it is like having a backup plan to communicate across distances in case some other major infrastructure is "fubared". BPL, sounds like crap... If it works and doesn't mess with HAM radio, give it a try, oterhwise it shouldn't be used. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  amigo_boy
join:2005-07-22 Tempe, AZ
·magicjack.com
·EarthLink
| Re: Ham's arent complaining ? said by jjeffeory :HAM radio is ... very useful in the event of a major catastrophic emergency... It's all relative. Hobbyists sacrifice the quality of their frequencies in the name of personal enjoyment and expanding their participants. A good example is eliminating morse code. 10 years ago the argument for retaining it is exactly the same argument used today against BPL. It was the only thing that could reliably communicate in an emergency (when your microphone is damaged, etc.). It communicates in a smaller band with less power. Etc., etc. And, without it, the riff-raff would get licenses and the hobby hands would sound like CB.
But, it went by the wayside. Now you have people using more power than is required to communicate. Just talking over others. Etc.
Which bands does BPL affect? HF only? It sounds like it because people say the problem with BPL is propagation. But, I'm not sure.
Mark | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  moonpuppy
join:2000-08-21 Glen Burnie, MD | Re: Ham's arent complaining ? BPL affect more than just HAM radio. It affects frequencies up to 80Mhz.
Please do some more research before you spout off what you clearly know nothing about. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  amigo_boy
join:2005-07-22 Tempe, AZ
·magicjack.com
·EarthLink
| Re: Ham's arent complaining ? said by moonpuppy :BPL affect more than just HAM radio. It affects frequencies up to 80Mhz. Ok, but what I was getting at is: why can't higher frequencies be used for the stated "emergency services" which hobby frequencies are supposed to be protected for?
Mark | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  moonpuppy
join:2000-08-21 Glen Burnie, MD
·Verizon Online DSL
| Re: Ham's arent complaining ? said by amigo_boy :said by moonpuppy :BPL affect more than just HAM radio. It affects frequencies up to 80Mhz. Ok, but what I was getting at is: why can't higher frequencies be used for the stated "emergency services" which hobby frequencies are supposed to be protected for? Mark Do you even know what occupies the HF spectrum? It runs the gamut from commercial operators all the way to the military. Try telling the military they have to move. Add to that, we as taxpayers have to pay higher taxes for all government and military users to swap out all their radios with new ones. That won't be cheap.
And don't think you can confine BPL just to the HAM radio sections because it is not enough space.
Try again. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  amigo_boy
join:2005-07-22 Tempe, AZ
·magicjack.com
·EarthLink
| Re: Ham's arent complaining ? said by moonpuppy :Do you even know what occupies the HF spectrum? One question at a time please. That's not what I asked. Why can't higher frequencies be used for the emergency services which we're told is the benefit of hobby radio?
Mark | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  moonpuppy
join:2000-08-21 Glen Burnie, MD
·Verizon Online DSL
| Re: Ham's arent complaining ? said by amigo_boy :said by moonpuppy :Do you even know what occupies the HF spectrum? One question at a time please. That's not what I asked. Why can't higher frequencies be used for the emergency services which we're told is the benefit of hobby radio? Mark That question directly relates to your question. Moving everyone up will cost billions. It is not just amateur radio that would need to move.
As the frequency goes up, the distance goes down. Long range communications are possible in HF and not so much in VHF or higher. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  amigo_boy
join:2005-07-22 Tempe, AZ
·magicjack.com
·EarthLink
| Re: Ham's arent complaining ? said by moonpuppy : As the frequency goes up, the distance goes down. Long range communications are possible in HF and not so much in VHF or higher. Relays and nets? It's all relative, right?
Mark | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  moonpuppy
join:2000-08-21 Glen Burnie, MD
·Verizon Online DSL
| Re: Ham's arent complaining ? said by amigo_boy :said by moonpuppy : As the frequency goes up, the distance goes down. Long range communications are possible in HF and not so much in VHF or higher. Relays and nets? It's all relative, right? Mark Nope, it is not. Again, you know nothing of what you are talking about. A relay is only as good as the furthest distance it can reach. As it stands now, HF is the ONLY set of frequencies that can cover this country. Not 50Mhz nor anything higher in the amateur spectrum. VHF is line of sight which becomes extremely difficult in mountainous regions. You do realize we have mountains in this country right? | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  amigo_boy
join:2005-07-22 Tempe, AZ
·magicjack.com
·EarthLink
| Re: Ham's arent complaining ? said by moonpuppy :VHF is line of sight which becomes extremely difficult in mountainous regions. That's why there could be a mixture of VHF hobbyists and satellite services.
Mark | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  moonpuppy
join:2000-08-21 Glen Burnie, MD
·Verizon Online DSL
| Re: Ham's arent complaining ? said by amigo_boy :said by moonpuppy :VHF is line of sight which becomes extremely difficult in mountainous regions. That's why there could be a mixture of VHF hobbyists and satellite services. Mark A mobile unit cannot communicate with a satellite easily. HF can be made mobile very easily.
Plus, anytime you start mixing frequencies and modes, you lose reliability of communication and it becomes a bad game of "telephone."
Until you do a bit more research, you won't understand how radio communications work. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  amigo_boy
join:2005-07-22 Tempe, AZ
·magicjack.com
·EarthLink
| Re: Ham's arent complaining ? said by moonpuppy :A mobile unit cannot communicate with a satellite easily. As I said, I never had a problem with my Iridium phone.
Mark | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  moonpuppy
join:2000-08-21 Glen Burnie, MD
·Verizon Online DSL
| Re: Ham's arent complaining ? said by amigo_boy :said by moonpuppy :A mobile unit cannot communicate with a satellite easily. As I said, I never had a problem with my Iridium phone. Mark But you fail to realize the extended costs. The service costs monthly even if it is not used. Currently, the military does not pay for spectrum and neither does public service. Again, how much more in taxes are you willing to spend for this conversion?
Now, you also forget the millions needed to put up even more satellites for all these new phones that have to go out to everyone. Who is going to maintain them? NASA? Even more millions in repairs if they need to fix them. XM Radio paid $15 million for their sats and 2 have failed. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  amigo_boy
join:2005-07-22 Tempe, AZ
·magicjack.com
·EarthLink
| Re: Ham's arent complaining ? said by moonpuppy :Again, how much more in taxes are you willing to spend for this conversion? Again, not more than the price of an M16.
Mark | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  moonpuppy
join:2000-08-21 Glen Burnie, MD
·Verizon Online DSL
| Re: Ham's arent complaining ? said by amigo_boy :said by moonpuppy :Again, how much more in taxes are you willing to spend for this conversion? Again, not more than the price of an M16. Mark And again, it costs much more than that.
Until you are willing to open up that pocketbook of yours, this change will not happen and it won't be cheap. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  amigo_boy
join:2005-07-22 Tempe, AZ
·magicjack.com
·EarthLink
| Re: Ham's arent complaining ? said by moonpuppy :And again, it costs much more than that. And again, you have no idea of the comparative costs. I think what's being established is that you're so biased by your hobby that you're unable to see the validity of *any* reasonable compromise.
Remember, the number of purchased Iridium phones would be much less than the number of M16s. It's not like they'd be issued to every soldier. And, they wouldn't require the special security oversight inherent with weapons (and the public safety issues which arise due to their theft).
I could insult you by saying "try again" or "you need to study more before...". But, I feel no need to since I'm mot a partisan.
Mark | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  moonpuppy
join:2000-08-21 Glen Burnie, MD
·Verizon Online DSL
| Re: Ham's arent complaining ? said by amigo_boy :said by moonpuppy :And again, it costs much more than that. And again, you have no idea of the comparative costs. I think what's being established is that you're so biased by your hobby that you're unable to see the validity of *any* reasonable compromise. Remember, the number of purchased Iridium phones would be much less than the number of M16s. It's not like they'd be issued to every soldier. And, they wouldn't require the special security oversight inherent with weapons (and the public safety issues which arise due to their theft). I could insult you by saying "try again" or "you need to study more before...". But, I feel no need to since I'm mot a partisan. Mark You are partisan. You can't see past your point of view.
And again, you still have no clue how communications work.
Here is a simple thing for you to consider. Why do public service people use radios instead of cell phones? When you can answer that question, you will understand why sat phones are a very bad idea.
As for security issues with dolling out weapons, you would know that all communication equipment goes through similar security measures especially since most have cryptographic additions that are more HIGHLY controlled than any personal weapons.
Keep trying. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  amigo_boy
join:2005-07-22 Tempe, AZ
·magicjack.com
·EarthLink
| Re: Ham's arent complaining ? said by moonpuppy :As for security issues with dolling out weapons, you would know that all communication equipment goes through similar security measures especially since most have cryptographic additions that are more HIGHLY controlled than any personal weapons. Aren't you comparing apples to oranges? Why would satellite phones for use during rare emergencies require encrypted communications? They would only be used to augment hobbiests' VHF nets (which aren't encrypted).
Mark | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  moonpuppy
join:2000-08-21 Glen Burnie, MD
·Verizon Online DSL
| Re: Ham's arent complaining ? said by amigo_boy :said by moonpuppy :As for security issues with dolling out weapons, you would know that all communication equipment goes through similar security measures especially since most have cryptographic additions that are more HIGHLY controlled than any personal weapons. Aren't you comparing apples to oranges? Why would satellite phones for use during rare emergencies require encrypted communications? They would only be used to augment hobbiests' VHF nets (which aren't encrypted). Mark Military communications are 90% encrypted. They even use a separate frequency for their air traffic control and use the civilian frequencies only when they are in civil airspace. Almost every single radio they have in their inventory has to have encryption capabilities. That's how they work.
Now answer the question I posted earlier.
"Why do public service people use radios instead of cell phones?" | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  amigo_boy
join:2005-07-22 Tempe, AZ
·magicjack.com
·EarthLink
| Re: Ham's arent complaining ? said by moonpuppy :Military communications are 90% encrypted. Non sequitur. We're talking about augmenting the 30 hobbyists who participated after the Washington floods if they are unable to form nets with 2 meter and 70 cm. Remember? It's not for any other use.
Mark | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  moonpuppy
join:2000-08-21 Glen Burnie, MD
·Verizon Online DSL
| Re: Ham's arent complaining ? said by amigo_boy :said by moonpuppy :Military communications are 90% encrypted. Non sequitur. We're talking about augmenting the 30 hobbyists who participated after the Washington floods if they are unable to form nets with 2 meter and 70 cm. Remember? It's not for any other use. Mark Wrong, the military has specs that need to be met for equipment to be considered. Encryption is one of them. You brought up why not let the military take charge. Well, they need communications that can be encrypted.
And keep ducking the question I asked. Here it is again.
"Why do public service people use radios instead of cell phones?" Here is a clue: cell phones are cheaper per unit but they still use radio...why? | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   CoxCable4 banned from most servers for cheating
join:2002-10-02 PwnZone | Re: Ham's arent complaining ? who cares about ham radio, emergency services and military- they can be moved to a different spectrum. BPL and the internet is way more important then that crap, out with the old in with the new. we'll put you ham radio guys in a museum | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  moonpuppy
join:2000-08-21 Glen Burnie, MD
·Verizon Online DSL
| Re: Ham's arent complaining ? said by CoxCable4 :who cares about ham radio, emergency services and military- they can be moved to a different spectrum. BPL and the internet is way more important then that crap, out with the old in with the new. we'll put you ham radio guys in a museum More rantings from a little child who knows not what he is talking about.  | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  Austinloop
join:2001-08-19 Austin, TX | Over a period of time and numerous threads concerning BPL, amigo child has proved that he knows nothing. He has an irrational dislike for amateur radio, for what reason, who knows. It is pointless to discuss anything with him. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  moonpuppy
join:2000-08-21 Glen Burnie, MD
·Verizon Online DSL
| Re: Ham's arent complaining ? said by Austinloop :Over a period of time and numerous threads concerning BPL, amigo child has proved that he knows nothing. He has an irrational dislike for amateur radio, for what reason, who knows. It is pointless to discuss anything with him. Yep, he is just trolling. He has no clue on how radio communications work. Furthermore, he has no idea how the military procures equipment and how some specs are non-negotiable. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  W1RFI
join:2003-05-12 Burlington, CT | He has done the research, or at least read all of the responses to the same old argument he keeps posting. No matter what is said in response, he keeps repeating that mantra ad nauseum.
Ed, W1RFI | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |   alphapointe Premium,MVM join:2002-02-10 Columbia, MO clubs: | Re: Ham's arent complaining ? Nice callsign. I like it! | |
|
 |  |  |  |  gefflong
join:2003-02-18 Aledo, IL
| said by jjeffeory :HAM radio is too important to just make the "little HAM radio geeks" go away. It's very useful in the event of a major catastrophic emergency... You know, like hurricanes, large fires, earthquakes, major brown outs, terrorist attacks, etc... 10 years ago I would have laughed at the odds of having 3 of the events happening near the same time, but living through many of them, has changed that thought. You can speak to people very far away with very little power. I think it's stupid to just tell them to go away. I don't use HAM radio, but for me it is like having a backup plan to communicate across distances in case some other major infrastructure is "fubared". BPL, sounds like crap... If it works and doesn't mess with HAM radio, give it a try, oterhwise it shouldn't be used. Well, if such a thing DOES happen, then there won't be any "interference" because the BPL service will be down. I'm tired of hearing the same old argument "HAM is too important in a catastrophe". Bottom line... if everything is down and won't work and we have to rely on HAM radio to communicate, then there's not going to be anything interfering now is there?! | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |   RadioDoc Sortofadog Premium,ExMod 2000-03 join:2000-05-11 Chicago, IL
·AT&T Midwest
| Re: Ham's arent complaining ? You've got it exactly backward. In an area without normal utilities outbound communications is by low powered battery equipment. The receivers are outside the 'disaster' area where the electricity--and BPL system--would be operational. The interference is not to the transmitters, it is to the receivers, and the BPL interference will drown out those low power radios being depended on by on-site responders in the disaster zone. Get it? -- Toolmaster of La Grange. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  gefflong
join:2003-02-18 Aledo, IL | Re: Ham's arent complaining ? still not worried about it. Bring on the BPL, baby. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |   RadioDoc Sortofadog Premium,ExMod 2000-03 join:2000-05-11 Chicago, IL | Re: Ham's arent complaining ? Enjoy the overpriced, underpowered, erratic service, baby. -- Toolmaster of La Grange. | |
|
 |  |  |  |
 |  |  |   RadioDoc Sortofadog Premium,ExMod 2000-03 join:2000-05-11 Chicago, IL
·AT&T Midwest
| I'll put money on there being more hams now than there would ever be rural broadband customers served by BPL even without the technical restrictions. So I agree, why are we catering to a very very very small less than 1% group of people? A group even smaller than the three quarters of a million amateur radio operators in the US alone. Considering that there are multiple, better ways to get relatively slow broadband access to people BPL is at best a bad technology. -- Toolmaster of La Grange. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  See 9 replies to this post |
|
 |  |  W1RFI
join:2003-05-12 Burlington, CT
| Have these hams contact me, as I would like more firsthand reports. For the most part, the 2nd generation BPL equipment has been shown to be better than the first generation, but ARRL has little experience with Main.net G2 equipment. I sent an email today to the BPL operator, and got back an immediate response and an indication that he will work with me or local hams as needed. If there is interference from the present implementation of the system, we all need to have it on the table.
The article was inaccurate in that there were interference reports from the earlier implementation, but unless we do get reports from hams in the area, or reports of widespread mobile interference, the conclusion will be that the system is operating without major interference problems.
Ed Hare ARRL 225 Main St Newington, CT 06111 Tel: 860-594-0318 Email: W1RFI@arrl.org | |
|
 |   PthirusPubis
@comcast.net
from: amigo_boy 
| F* the hams! The more I read about the FCC and the ARRL, the more I think that they are both wholly-owned subsidiaries of T and VZ.
I suspect that BPL technology works well enough and that the telecorps obviously don't want more competition. | |
|
 |  |   alphapointe Premium,MVM join:2002-02-10 Columbia, MO clubs:
·Mediacom
| Re: Ham's arent complaining ? If I hear one more ham bashing moron I think I'm going to scream. Most, if not all, wireless technology got its' start in ham radio. Your cell phone? Hams came up with the technology, WLANs stem from packet radio data networks created by hams, and don't even get me started about the emergency communications.
BPL is marketing-induced shit that the FCC needs to get rid of, and if the engineers were still running things like they did 20 years ago, it wouldn't be allowed to cause all this interference. But the politicos are in charge, and only care about lining their pockets.
Sigh
I think I'll go talk to someone 5000 miles away running 1 watt. Sounds like more fun than listening to JAWS spew this crap.
KC0--Z (Callsign obscured for privacy) - Ham operator for 13 years. -- Ham radio for the disabled: »www.handiham.org --- View my gallery: »/pics/dimaging/582493 --- Read about my photos here: »Blind Photography
| |
|
 |  |  |  AnOldGuy Premium join:2008-02-29 Kewanee, IL
·Comcast
| Re: Ham's arent complaining ? Well - it's Sunday and the "Mental Midgets" have nothing better to do with their time so what do you expect?
One other thing - there is a relatively new technology out that does seem to very peacefully coexist with the other services - not just hams but most importantly public service (that's Fire/Police/Rescue) for our mentally challenged friends. Now - if the folks who have BPL deployed would just use this technology then everyone would benefit. | |
|
 |  contsole Premium join:2003-12-30 Bloomfield, CT | Boeing has expressed concern to the FCC about BPL interference to long distance airline communication. That's an unlicensed service interfering with a critical licensed service. That's enough for me. | |
|
 |
 |  See 6 replies to this post |
|
 PDXPLT
join:2003-12-04 Banks, OR
| This is hardly surprising .... The fact of the matter is the vast majority of BPL devices installed do not cause harmful interference to the ham bands. Current Communications has the largest number of commercial deployments; they use HomePlug-based technology which even the ARRL says does not cause them interference:
»www.arrl.org/tis/info/pdf/0707088.pdf
quote: Although the Broadband over Power Lines (BPL) controversy wasnt addressed in the FCC discussions, I did note the presence of the HomePlug Powerline Alliance at the show. This is a group of nearly 80 international market leaders involved in the use of ac power lines for delivering not only power, but also Internet access and networking, which includes BPL..."Over the past 7 years, even though there are over 6 million HomePlug devices deployed, ARRL does not have a single report of harmful interference to Amateur Radio involving HomePlug products. If the entire BPL industry could follow their lead and formally do what HomePlug has determined needs to be done, interference from BPL could become a manageable problem.
Of course the problem is not every equipment provider has followed that "lead"; a small number of highly publicized trials have used "rogue" equipment that interferes, and instead of working with groups like ARRL to solve the problem, they hire lawyers and lobbyists. | |
|
 |  |