Phone Service Coalition Seeks Intercarrier Compensation DecisionFCC asked to set a uniform rate for fees before year's end ( old news - 12:05PM Friday Aug 08 2008) tags: prices · fcc · business · wireless · telco · VoIPA coalition of spectrum providers has written a letter to the FCC urging that changes be made to Intercarrier Compensation rules and also requesting that the FCC issue a statement that VoIP services are to be governed only by federal rules and not state rules. Intercarrier compensation refers to the charges that one carrier pays to another when a call starts with the first carrier and ends with the other. The rates for these charges vary widely. The coalition (comprised of mobile, telco, and VoIP advocacy groups as well as incumbents) is asking that the FCC set one uniform rate for these charges, an issue which has been debated by the FCC since 2001. The coalition says that this will allow for reasonable rates but others warn that it has the potential to raise charges on your cell phone bill. There are also concerns about how changes might affect VoIP service; some groups have suggested that special access charges be applied to situations in which a call originates from a VoIP service (including one that is free to the customer) but ends with a non-VoIP carrier. As the FCC is addressing these issues, the VoIP industry hopes it will also make a statement clarifying that only federal rules govern VoIP so that states cant apply their own rules in situations like this one. The coalition is asking for a decision on this issue by November. Related:- Thursday Morning Links
- Friday Evening Links
- Monday Evening Links
- Wednesday Evening Links
- Friday Evening Links
- FCC To Shorten Landline Port Window
- Verizon's New Wireless Pricing Is An Insult
- What Network Neutrality Is REALLY About
|
  en102 Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26 Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME
| Sounds like the business model that's in use in other countries.
Caller pays, and its a different rate, depending on what service the end user is on. Eg. Calls to a mobile phone in Europe cost a lot more than more than calls to a land line in Europe. In North America (Canada/US anyways), its the same rate whether you call a landline, mobile or VoIP. -- Canada = Hollywood North | |
|  |   S_engineer
join:2007-05-16 Chicago, IL
·Comcast
| Re: Sounds like the business model Its sad that technologies can't get fully implemented before someones carving it up for their cut of money. This breeds stagnation and indecision about which systems to implement residentially or commercially. Whens the next Boston Tea party? -- The "Lifetime" channel is responsible for 83% of all divorces...Robert Ginty | |
|  |  |   en102 Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26 Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME
| Re: Sounds like the business model Yup... all businesses want some slice of the action. If they can't compete directly, they'll use their lobbying power to sway government to 'help' them. America is the land of opportunity (or just opportunists).
The Internet in general is going this way (esp email w/spam). It started off as a nice way to communicate and link networks. Spam email, phishing, viruses, distribution of pirated content, etc. have turned many people off. -- Canada = Hollywood North | |
|  |  |  |   S_engineer
join:2007-05-16 Chicago, IL
·Comcast
| Re: Sounds like the business model Agreed. It was nice before everyone decided to use it as a revenue stream. Unfortunatly, since businesses as well as gov't have put all there eggs in this basket we'd be paying the revenues even if we as individuals unplugged!
Sigh* -- The "Lifetime" channel is responsible for 83% of all divorces...Robert Ginty | |
|  |  |  |   TKJunkMail Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ | A plan is needed that treats all types of calls equally
The current rules aren't consistent across the different platforms. What is needed are a set of consistent regulations that treats VOIP, Cell, & landline the same. Maybe something where the caller & called carriers split the costs equally. | |
|  | |  |
|
|