said by DarkLogix :

um, 0.0.0.0 /0 would be the wild card for (ie everything)

said by Jason Levine :

Some here might remember Taylor Troll.

said by Desdinova :

Yeah, I knda miss o'l Taylor; he/she/it so eloquently represented the lockjaw diehard Zero Tolerance clenched sphincter shoot first crowd...

said by CyrusTheVirus81 :

hmmmm so if I dont like me neighber I jus need to crack his wep password download some free movies and muisic to my computer and he gets disconnected lol

said by CyrusTheVirus81 :

hmmmm so if I dont like me neighber I jus need to crack his wep password download some free movies and muisic to my computer and he gets disconnected lol

said by KrK :

Oh and hit politicans too.

That will get the law removed quickly....

“A deeply flawed law that undermines fundamental rights and simply will not work.”

That is what the telecommunications industry, internet service providers, user groups, internet advocates and IT professionals think of parts of the recently passed Copyright (New Technologies) Amendment Act.

“The Act gives no guidance on what ‘reasonably implement’ or ‘in appropriate circumstances’ mean,” Mr Chivers said. “This leaves the door wide open to those who seek disconnection of an alleged repeat infringer based on flimsy evidence, or worse, allegations alone.”

“Identifying repeat offenders will not be easy. A complex data matching exercise will be required, and even then it will not always be clear who the real offender is, particularly when an internet account is used by a family, a business or a school. The potential for an alleged offender to be denied natural justice is significant. For these reasons, a court order backed up by solid evidence would normally be required before taking such invasive action.”