Search:  

 
 
   News
newer
story category NYC FiOS Deal Should See Final Approval Today
State PSC meeting to give deal final ok...
(old news - 03:09PM Wednesday Jul 16 2008)
tags: Fiber · business · Verizon FIOS
Judging by the meeting agenda for the New York State Public Service Commission, they should be approving Verizon's application for citywide New York City video franchise today. The agreement, hashed out between Verizon and the mayor largely in secret, is 59 pages long with 74 appendices and multiple additional borough agreements. Verizon promises the agreement has them wiring the entire city with FiOS by 2014, but those who've actually read the monster say that by and large it's a gift to Verizon, allowing them to wiggle out of those promises down the road. Still, if you're in a NYC neighborhood Verizon number crunchers deem profitable, this is very good news.

Related:
  1. Verizon Continues Proud History Of Denial
  2. Verizon Cooking Up Slightly Faster FiOS Speeds?
  3. Verizon Announces New FiOS Tiers, Promotions
  4. Verizon: LTE iPhone 'Apple's Decision'
  5. Pittsburgh Close To Citywide FiOS Agreement
  6. Verizon Continues NYC FiOS Deployment
  7. Verizon Begins FiOS Upgrades In DC
  8. Verizon's FioS Deployment Enters A New Chapter
Forums » NYC FiOS Deal Should See Final Approval Today
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

SuperJoker

join:2005-11-21
Yermo, CA

I'm not in NYC, But...

I'll say It for those Who can't, Yea!!!

Now If Verizon can come out to Yermo CA with FiOS or at least deliver Naked DSL to Yermo CA(Near Barstow CA).

NY BOB

@verizon.net

YIPEEE

Its about time...

Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA

Why bother

BA lied to Pennsylvania while getting billions in goodies and they'll do the same to NYC.
EPS

join:2008-02-13
Hingham, MA

Re: Why bother

Most of the "goodies" in this case are related to running a cable TV system... Why would Verizon go through a long approval process, get approved for cable TV, and then not deploy it? Out of sheer hatred for the City of New York?

Lika

@verizon.net

Re: Why bother

I don't see how they lied, they just finished laying underground cable all around my area in PA and are still laying down around the area and stringing on the poles.

Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA

Re: Why bother

They were supposed to have had it done years ago, more than 1/2 of PA was to have had fiber by 2004.

Lika

@psu.edu

Re: Why bother

The problem was that that Ed Rendell decided that verizon has to go to every single township and sign the deals with them instead of just signing with PA and having that work state wide. There are a lot of different municipalities in PA as there are in many state. I can imagine that taking a lot of time.

Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA

Re: Why bother

That has nothing to do with the original BA Chap 30 requirements.

Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
·Cox HSI
·Verizon FIOS
·Cox VOIP
·ViaTalk
·RoadRunner Cable
·MegaPath
·Verizon west (ex G..
·Time Warner VOIP


1 edit
I never bought into the redlining deal until now. This deal lays out in deal how they're permitted to red line and mark my words...they'll do the best areas first and will be apologetically late with the others.

Meanwhile they will get their goodies like only paying $25 to blow off an appointment.
myokitis

join:2004-06-19
Alexandria, VA

Re: Why bother

said by Dogfather See Profile :

they'll do the best areas first and will be apologetically late with the others.
I don't get it . . . you're saying they should do the WORST (least profitible) areas first? Riiiight.
EPS

join:2008-02-13
Hingham, MA

Re: Why bother

Otherwise is clear proof that Verizon hates poor people and/or minorities.
myokitis

join:2004-06-19
Alexandria, VA

Re: Why bother

said by EPS See Profile :

Otherwise is clear proof that Verizon hates poor people and/or minorities.
So if a business chooses to deploy their capital first where it makes the most economic sense, they're racist. Okay.
EPS

join:2008-02-13
Hingham, MA

Re: Why bother

I wasn't entirely serious (or serious at all, actually) in my earlier post...

The concern is not so much that less profitable areas will get deployed later, it's whether they'll get deployed to at all.

Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
·Cox HSI
·Verizon FIOS
·Cox VOIP
·ViaTalk
·RoadRunner Cable
·MegaPath
·Verizon west (ex G..
·Time Warner VOIP

said by myokitis See Profile :

said by EPS See Profile :

Otherwise is clear proof that Verizon hates poor people and/or minorities.
So if a business chooses to deploy their capital first where it makes the most economic sense, they're racist. Okay.
NYC is planting a money tree for Verizon. Verizon, in exchange for access to this very lucrative market should have to follow some basic rules, like EVEN deployment...deployment to all different types of economic areas to insure it all gets done in a timely manner.

Otherwise Verizon is given the opportunity and incentive to break their promises just as they did as BA in Pennsylvania.

SIFIOSTV

@gs.com

said by myokitis See Profile :

said by EPS See Profile :

Otherwise is clear proof that Verizon hates poor people and/or minorities.
So if a business chooses to deploy their capital first where it makes the most economic sense, they're racist. Okay.
Actually, in this country even poor people watch plenty of cable TV. So while there may be some economic incentives for wiring the rich areas first, they probably aren't as strong as a lot of people seem to be assuming.

Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
·Cox HSI
·Verizon FIOS
·Cox VOIP
·ViaTalk
·RoadRunner Cable
·MegaPath
·Verizon west (ex G..
·Time Warner VOIP


1 edit
Yeah, I'm saying they shouldn't deploy in rich neighborhoods first and then get to the others they promise whenever they feel like getting around to it which means a week after never.

This is the same type of shit they pulled in Pennsylvania. They got their goodies first and that gave them the opportunity to just completely blow off their requirements.

elbm

join:2000-08-03
Reisterstown, MD
There is no evidence of Verizon red-lining in it's current deployment of fttp.

As for the PA thing and those saying BA/Verizon "took the money" and ran-- it is a bunch of mis-truths and a distortion of the facts.

Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
·Cox HSI
·Verizon FIOS
·Cox VOIP
·ViaTalk
·RoadRunner Cable
·MegaPath
·Verizon west (ex G..
·Time Warner VOIP


3 edits

Re: Why bother

said by elbm See Profile :

There is no evidence of Verizon red-lining in it's current deployment of fttp.

As for the PA thing and those saying BA/Verizon "took the money" and ran-- it is a bunch of mis-truths and a distortion of the facts.
The article has a chart showing exactly how they're redlining.

You're obviously not very familiar with what Chap 30 required BA to do and in 2002, the PA PUC had an opinion differing from yours...

said by PA PUC :
...this Commission has a legal obligation to reject Verizon PA’s 2000 Update and require it to submit a new update specifying its plans to satisfy its legal obligation to provide a modernized network with broadband capability of at least 45 Mbps upstream and downstream, to be available within five days from the customer request date.
That update that was required of Verizon was never done and finally the PA PUC let them off the hook for Chap 30 while VZ got to keep all the money.

As to how much money all means, I would welcome your attempt to refute the testimony of industry expert Dr. Lee Selwyn who lays out the goodie numbers in great detail.

»www.econtech.com/library/LLS%20P···2002.pdf

The fact is, in the mid 90's BA laid out plans for FTTH. To facilitate this, the PUC deregulated and gave other perks that netted BA BILLIONS of dollars. BA then abandoned those plans, opting to follow the DSL path instead.

And when it finally came time for Verizon to deploy fiber, they slapped PA in the face and deployed first in Texas. BA/VZ didn't meet any of the Chap 30 requirements.

Pathfinder
Dazed Confused
Premium
join:2000-03-26
Mount Vernon, NY
·Verizon Online DSL

Re: Why bother

said by Dogfather See Profile :

said by elbm See Profile :

There is no evidence of Verizon red-lining in it's current deployment of fttp.

As for the PA thing and those saying BA/Verizon "took the money" and ran-- it is a bunch of mis-truths and a distortion of the facts.
The article has a chart showing exactly how they're redlining.

Which article?

Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
·Cox HSI
·Verizon FIOS
·Cox VOIP
·ViaTalk
·RoadRunner Cable
·MegaPath
·Verizon west (ex G..
·Time Warner VOIP

Re: Why bother

»www.gothamgazette.com/article/te···/19/2539

The chart shows the richest areas like Manhattan see full deployment right away, while other 'hoods are left to see deployment later (if ever as we saw in the case of PA).

Pathfinder
Dazed Confused
Premium
join:2000-03-26
Mount Vernon, NY

Re: Why bother

100% of single family homes in Manhattan? That's probably about 100. Not a big deal.
Staten Island would be done first.

IM1811

join:2001-08-20
Haverstraw, NY
·Verizon FIOS

Finally some competition

This is a great deal for everyone. Since when did the Cable Companies think they were going to operate in a competitive vacuum? Now all Verizon has to do is offer A La Cart TV services to go with the 'no caps' on data plan and we'll be getting somewhere.

NOZIREV

join:2008-07-10
New Bedford, MA
·Comcast

Its only a matter

of time before verizon implements there own caps on there service. I will bet that it happens within a year. Any takers? That is good news that they have a goal(wiring the entire city with FiOS by 2014) and even better that they have a way out(those who've actually read the monster say that by and large it's a gift to Verizon, allowing them to wiggle out of those promises down the road). Either way competition is good for business and lets see where verizon takes it.

IM1811

join:2001-08-20
Haverstraw, NY
·Verizon FIOS

Re: Its only a matter

Why are you so sure Verizon will "CAP"?
Caps are being employed by cable companies in an attempt to scare people away from on demand online services like XBox 360, Netflix and Hulu. The Telco's like Verizon know this and will continue with the unlimited data plans. Its called competition in the marketplace and I'm sure the consumer will benefit.
As to Verizon hating poor people, It isn't happening here in NY.
EPS

join:2008-02-13
Hingham, MA

Re: Its only a matter

Well the thing is Verizon offers their own VOD and cable TV service with FiOS, so they have the same incentive that the cablecos do- except that they're less dependent on cable TV for revenues. (They're instead dependent on landline telephone, which is a much worse market to be in and can't be eliminated with caps anyway)

dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ

Business as usual

Cherrypick the rich areas and pay the fines for not doing the other areas which will filter down to those rich peoples bills while you get to write off the fines as a biz loss. a win/win for verizon!
--
When I gez aju zavateh na nalechoo more new yonooz tonigh molinigh - Ken Lee

Pathfinder
Dazed Confused
Premium
join:2000-03-26
Mount Vernon, NY

Re: Business as usual

Any proof of that?
CopperMux

join:2005-01-18
·Comcast

said by dvd536 See Profile :

Cherrypick the rich areas and pay the fines for not doing the other areas which will filter down to those rich peoples bills while you get to write off the fines as a biz loss. a win/win for verizon!
Might want to take a stroll through the areas with FIOS in NYC before you spout off incorrectly.

just visiting

@rr.com

Proof of cherrypicking

Proof of Cherry Picking?

Ha,

just ask anyone in Vermont, NH, or Maine........
EPS

join:2008-02-13
Hingham, MA

Re: Proof of cherrypicking

How is that cherry picking? They sold off all of the markets in those states, not just the unprofitable ones- some in southern NH even had FiOS deployed.

FinallyFIOS

@verizon.net

Done Deal

»newscenter.verizon.com/press-rel···ise.html
sneakaround

join:2001-06-19
Staten Island, NY
·Verizon Wireless B..
·Verizon FIOS
·ViaTalk

Cherry Picking?????

Verizon is a business and it needs to make decisions that will allow them to see a return on their investment. That being said, Verizon will not be able to cherry pick easily or at all in NYC. When Verizon rolls out FiOS in the area served by a Central Office it rolls out to the entire area served by that central office, in NYC it would be rare to find a CO that only serves an affluent area without also serving areas that are much less affluent. For example, on Staten Island (which is a part of NYC), the Central Office that serves homes in the Todt Hill section of Staten Island also serves the Park Hill section of Staten Island. While Todt Hill has multi-million dollar homes Park Hill is much more economically depressed. Yet, both areas have FiOS service available to them.

Pathfinder
Dazed Confused
Premium
join:2000-03-26
Mount Vernon, NY

Re: Cherry Picking?????

You'd better keep that quiet. Don't confuse the argument with facts. It doesn't work here.

just visiting

@verizon.net

Verizon is a business

yeah,

Verizon is a business ,

(I thought it was regulated too)

Cherry picking ? ha - if this isnt, than what is???

go take your Cisco pill.........

sneakaroundnow

@myvzw.com

Re: Verizon is a business

said by just visiting :

yeah,

Verizon is a business ,

(I thought it was regulated too)

Cherry picking ? ha - if this isnt, than what is???

go take your Cisco pill.........
Please be a little clearer in your response because I fail to understand you point.
Forums » NYC FiOS Deal Should See Final Approval Today


Thursday, 26-Nov 09:12:16 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.