republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   News
newer
story category Mapping American Broadband
New mapping bill inches forward, with compromises
(old news - 03:54PM Thursday Oct 11 2007)
tags: coverage · business · bandwidth · Op/Ed · Politics
For most of the past decade, the FCC has failed almost utterly to correctly track broadband penetration levels in the United States. In addition to considering a 200kbps connection broadband, the agency has consistently stated that if a zip code has just one home or business with broadband service, that zip code is "wired" for broadband. Obviously, this method has made broadband penetration look better than many of us know it actually is -- particularly in rural markets. That makes mega-ISPs happy, so reform has been a long time coming.

Click for full size
Even FCC Commissioners agree. "Finding one high-speed subscriber in a zip code and counting it as service available throughout is not a credible way to proceed," stated Commissioner Copps back in 2003. The GAO also issued several reports (pdf) that found fault with the FCC's methods. Independent parties that tried to get accurate data were rebuffed by the FCC and incumbent operators.

It's now almost 2008, and a House subcommittee today gave initial approval for The Broadband Census of America Act, a bill by Representative Edward J. Markey (D-MA). The bill (original discussion draft pdf) initially stated that if a connection wasn't 2Mbps, it technically wasn't broadband. That provision has since been removed in a compromise with Republicans.

Click for full size
It will, however, still eliminate the FCC's zip code metric, instead tasking the NTIA with giving grants to communities in order to -- get this -- actually head into the American wilds and see who has broadband.

The cable industry's largest trade group, the NCTA, has come out in favor of the bill -- because they likely feel that improved broadband mapping will highlight their faster speeds and somewhat superior rural neighborhood broadband penetration when compared to DSL.

That rural penetration is thanks, in part, to the local franchise system the phone industry has been successfully eliminating -- in order to remove build-out requirements as they enter the TV market. Expect the phone industry to vehemently oppose the bill, lest it highlight the deployment limitations of their next-gen deployment efforts (FiOS, U-Verse). If it's any good, it should highlight limited DOCSIS 3.0 deployment as well.

"This is a very consumer-friendly mapping function and 'demand-side' identification that the high tech and telecommunications industry also supports," Markey says in a statement on his website. For now, the bill moves forward, with a bipartisan understanding that the FCC's methods have been flawed. Of course, knowing you have a problem is only the first step on the long road to recovery.

Related:
  1. We Demand 100Mbps For All
  2. Nation's Largest ISPs Crafting Fake National Broadband Policy
  3. Consumer Group Wants $44 Billion For U.S. Broadband
  4. Verizon's Open Development Initiative? So Far It's A Joke
  5. A Novel Idea: Actually Visiting America's Broadband Gaps
  6. Here Comes The Connected Nation Sales Pitch
  7. Avoiding A $300 Million Broadband Mapping Boondoggle
  8. Verizon Continues Proud History Of Denial
Forums » Mapping American Broadband
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

Neyland85

join:2003-02-04
North Augusta, SC

Great... sorta

So what exactly is the definition of broadband then?

LiamJunket
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Ocean City, NJ
·Comcast

Re: Great... sorta

said by Neyland85 See Profile :

So what exactly is the definition of broadband then?
The original draft was a MINIMUM 2/1 mbps. The marked up final committee draft removed any mention of broadband speeds.
--
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page

sirwoogie
Blah
Premium
join:2002-01-02
Carleton, MI
·AT&T Midwest
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

Re: Great... sorta

Oye! Then this stops before it starts. If you have no bar to measure to, then how do you measure success?


Them: How many widgets can you produce?
Me: What is a widget?
Them: We're not sure. How many can you produce?
...


Guess I have to go read this thing.
lastmile

join:2007-09-08
Robertsville, MO
·Cingular Wireless
·WildBlue

I wonder if they take latency into consideration? I certainly hope so.

Although you can acceptable bandwidth on Satellite, the high ping times defeat many applications suited for Broadband such as gaming, voip, vpn, etc.

High latency shouldn't be considered broadband.
benc
Premium
join:2007-06-17
Glen Carbon, IL
·Charter Pipeline
·Future Nine Corpor..
·Callcentric
·AT&T Midwest

said by Neyland85 See Profile :

So what exactly is the definition of broadband then?
I don't know, and that's what's bothersome.

There not only has to be a minimum transfer rate requirement, but there needs to be a price requirement as well.

I suggest a minimum speed of 768kbps, and a maximum monthly cost of say, 15 x Min. Wage. That figure would currently come out to $77.25/mo. There also needs to be a latency requirement, and a requirement of the minimum percentage of street addresses that have access.

Why all these requirements?

SPEED:
384kbps DSL currently fits the guidelines, but it's hardly what I consider broadband. 768k is barely there, and even that will seem slow.

PRICE:
Suppose I live in Dinkyville, WY or SmallTown, MT. No offense to Wyoming or Montana residents of course. Then suppose I was loaded with money and financed the build-out of an OC3 line out to my house. Then, according to the present guidelines, I would be the one house with a connection faster than 200kbps, and then the zip code will "have broadband." Thing is, an OC3 costs far more than $100/mo.

LATENCY:
Without a latency requirement, anywhere with EDGE access counts since it's *theoretically* faster than 200kbps. Again, no latency requirement means the ability to use satellite Internet counts as broadband. Satellite Internet also sometimes fails the price requirement.

MINIMUM PERCENTAGE OF STREET ADDRESSES:
I think this speaks for itself. Going back to my previous example of the OC3, it would mean that the zip code is "broadband ready," even if a next door neighbor can't pay for the connection. How "broadband ready" does the zip code look to average people in that zip code?

Of course, I don't really have an OC3, though I wish I did. I've always considered small-town living as very expensive since A) you have to drive long distances to do anything (time, maybe gas), and B) needing a T1 since DSL and Cable probably won't be available. Locally available goods will also be expensive due to transportation costs.

Thankfully, where I live can't be considered really rural, although it's the most rural area I've ever lived in.

tad2020

join:2007-07-17
Orange, CA
·AT&T DSL Service

Re: Great... sorta

An OC3 in so. California, 2 blocks away from from a Level 3 interchange, is over $1000/mo non-wholesale.

Some one that works "at" my office works from her home in Montana, she can get a 10Mbps cable connection for under $49/mo while I can't even get cable TV service at the office in one of the "technology capital" of Orange county, go figure.

BF69

join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

said by benc See Profile :

I suggest a minimum speed of 768kbps, and a maximum monthly cost of say, 15 x Min. Wage. That figure would currently come out to $77.25/mo.
Redo your math, 15 X $5.85 is $87.75
benc
Premium
join:2007-06-17
Glen Carbon, IL

Re: Great... sorta

Thanks.

I forgot that the minimum wage increased from $5.15/hr.

tiger72
SexaT duorP
Premium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
clubs:
·T-Mobile US
·RoadRunner Cable

2nd graph is kinda pointless

It implies that certain countries are heavily investing in broadband, regardless of their apparently very low population densities... That is, however, false because in most of those countries their population is heavily centered in a select few cities, while the rest of the country goes broadband-less but drives down the overall density figure...

just wanted to throw that out there...
--
|- The LP »www.lp.org/issues/issues.shtml -|
|-
Cato @ Liberty »www.cato-at-liberty.org -|

chlen
Ethically Challenged
Premium
join:2001-01-16
Albany, NY
·RoadRunner Cable

Re: 2nd graph is kinda pointless

said by tiger72 See Profile :

It implies that certain countries are heavily investing in broadband, regardless of their apparently very low population densities... That is, however, false because in most of those countries their population is heavily centered in a select few cities, while the rest of the country goes broadband-less but drives down the overall density figure...

just wanted to throw that out there...
I was in scarcely inhabited parts of Finland and was able to get broadband via GSM. 1.5/256. I was in the north about 150 miles from Savonlinna near the Russian border. There are virtually no people there but I picked up 3 different GSM providers and broadband. For what its worth.
--
"He who is not afraid today to say 'no' to the repressive machinery of a criminal bureaucracy earns the right to be called a Human Being."
»lp.org/
»www.ronpaul2008.com/
PDXPLT

join:2003-12-04
Banks, OR

said by tiger72 See Profile :

That is, however, false because in most of those countries their population is heavily centered in a select few cities, while the rest of the country goes broadband-less but drives down the overall density figure...
Not true. These countries actually have broadband policies that encourage deployment to all citizens, not, as in the U.S., just a select class. Examples: BT has wired all CO's in Scotland, even in the Highlands. A farmer in the countryside in Korea has broadband access to sell his product, just as his city brethren.

This was years ago and before DSL was deployed, but I remember being amazed having ISDN in tiny hamlet way up in the French Alps.
xenophon

join:2007-09-17
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

EVDO

EVDO technically can do over 2Mbps but averages about 600K-1.4Mbps. If you call that broadband, then the US has over 2/3 broadband coverage as Sprint/Verizon cover over 210m population out of 300m with EVDO, and Sprint expects to reach 240m by end of this year.

And Sprint/Alltel roam EVDO to each other, which combined will cover much much more than 240m pops.
Nuts

join:2006-04-27
Forest, OH

Re: EVDO

I wouldn't count on it. Looking at their coverage maps for my area, most of their coverage overlaps.

sirwoogie
Blah
Premium
join:2002-01-02
Carleton, MI
·AT&T Midwest
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

I agree that EVDO would be considered broadband. But, they still need to more carefully define what broadband means.

EVDO has the speed, but it doesn't necessarily have the latency that most would "consider" broadband. Granted, it'll squeak by for VOIP, even for many FPS games. But, it's still not as good as a wired solution. WiMax and others obviously will improve it. But, it goes to show that just having broadband doesn't mean you can take advantage of all the ways it can be used for.

The trap with the definition is that you can say satellite is broadband if you compare speed only. But it has a FAP and latency is in the toilet. Nonetheless, it can reach 99% of the lower 48. Is that considered available broadband? That's why I think certain telco's partner with satellite providers. They can get away with saying "Hey, we have a product offering partnership to provide broadband... by Satellite!!!"

The devil is in the detail.

PhoenixDown
-- Wants FIOS
Premium
join:2003-06-08
Fresh Meadows, NY
clubs:

Mapping the Speed

How about:

- Location
- Providers (limited to facility providers)
- Technology
- Approx Speed

They can extrapolate the date however they wish to see if "broadband" is universally available while actually seeing if there is true competition!
--
{Insert Something Witty Here}

PhoenixDown
-- Wants FIOS
Premium
join:2003-06-08
Fresh Meadows, NY
clubs:

Maybe we need to map it?

DSLR reaches a wide audience -- how about a drive among users to really map out the broadband penetration?
--
{Insert Something Witty Here}
PAB

join:2007-07-27
Woodridge, IL

Re: Maybe we need to map it?

The Communications Workers of America have a broadband map based on their Speed Matters test. Check it out at www.speedmatters.org
patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY

cell phones

In addition to considering a 200kbps connection broadband, the agency has consistently stated that if a zip code has just one home or business with broadband service, that zip code is "wired" for broadband.
A T1 used by a cell phone tower, is faster than 200kbs. A cell phone provider is a "business". Does that mean that in any zip code with a cell phone tower has "broadband"?

marigolds
Gainfully employed, finally
Premium,MVM
join:2002-05-13
Saint Louis, MO

And who will do the mapping?

NOAA has quality mappers, but this is not there area.
I hope its not the census... have you seen what TIGER line files look like up close?
Forums » Mapping American Broadband


Saturday, 04-Jul 22:03:29 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9.5 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.