Mac Security: Don't Fall Asleep Keeping Your Mac Protected From Emerging Threats It's important not to forget that we are just a month beyond what was the worst week for security in the Macintosh platform's history. It is estimated that at one point over 600,000 Macs were infected. This represented 1% of the Mac user base, however it was reported that most of the infected computers were in the USA and Canada. The 1% figure matches the damage done by the disastrous Conficker virus for Windows that hit a few years ago. Courtesy of Allison Sheridan, host of the Nosilla Cast - Mac Podcast, and guest Bart Busschots (Mac Security Expert), an overview of the FlashBack Trojan was provided on their April 08 podcast. It started off last fall exploiting Flash on your Mac. If you'll remember, you don't use Flash directly, but it plays video and other media on websites that you visit. At times, the various clickable buttons on a website are also designed using Flash. Many would argue that that represents poor site design. If you regularly use Flash, make sure your Flash player is up to date, so that the old vulnerabilities get patched. If you are not sure what version of Flash you have you can check in your System Preferences -- by going to the Apple menu >> System Preferences. If you see it there -- please make sure that updates are set to Automatic. If you have purposely removed Flash from your Mac -- please note that you can always visit Flash websites by using the Google Chrome browser, an alternative to Firefox and Safari. Chrome has Flash built in and they keep it updated for you (very safe). So if you still don't see Flash in your System Preferences and don't remember uninstalling it, then you probably have it installed but an old version (very unsafe). So either uninstall it using the link above (ie. you have no use for it) or do yourself a favor and install version 11. Update: Mac users running Lion 10.7 may want to go ahead and download the Flash 11.3 beta. This release will put you on par with the Windows version which includes automatic background updating. About the Flashback TrojanWhile it is called the Flashback Trojan -- Flash really isn't the issue anymore. Between last fall and recently, it mutated into giving you fake notifications for Mac Software Updates. Official Mac software updates are very important and when they are available, Apple notifies you weekly. You can also manually check for updates by clicking Apple menu >> Software Update. The way to spot the fake Software Update is if you never selected any updates to be installed yet you are being asked for your Mac system password with a box that says Software Update. FAKE. However, a real Software Update will show real programs that are checked off for you to update. Do any and all of those. However, this is yesterday's news, because the vulnerability which resulted in those fake updates has been patched. Patched just like a flat tire! Last months's variation of the Flashback Trojan was unique in that it did not require ANY user interaction. And -- Apple had not updated its software in time to protect you. A lot of the infections occurred through ads encountered on websites, which likely were bad ads on legitimate websites. They came in through Java -- an application that you don't run directly but helps other applications on your Mac. From my experience, most of you likely HAVE Java on your Macs. I use Java every day and not in specialized programs made for computer pros (Libre Office and Moneydance). Since early April, Apple has updated Java for Mac 3 times and if you have 10.6 or 10.7 version of the Mac OS you should have gotten these updates. If you are unsure: Apple menu >> Software update. Starting with Java 7, Oracle is making their platform for the Mac a stand alone download that can be obtained from and updated by them (just as it is for Windows). It is available now - as Java 7 update 4, but does will not include the Web Start components until update 6. Protecting YourselfYou should really Anti-Virus software on your Mac. This isn't an option anymore. I predicted there would be a day when this would come. I will give you two options -- free but more self-maintenance required or paid subscription which is managed for you. Free options (you must routinely check for updates and do scans on your own) include Sophos AntiVirus Mac Home Edition and ClamXav. As for paid options (updates for you, scans files as they come into your computer, scheduled scans, telephone support), I think one program captures the idea of a Mac-centric AV program very well --- Intego Virus Barrier X6. The service will run you $50 a year ($80 for 2 years) -- and covers 2 Macs. However, it should be noted that industry standards Norton, ESET, F-Secure, and Kaspersky also publish Mac specific products. We've Been WarnedIn closing -- Mac users can't say that they haven't been warned. Personally, I have been downplaying the security advantages of buying a Mac for a few years, and would honestly not bring this up when discussing a new computer purchase with a client. Ultimately, I think the selling points of a Mac over a Windows computer are A) Easy of use, B) Enjoyment, C) User experience / warranty support. A Windows computer of EQUAL quality to a Mac nearly the same price as a Mac or in some cases more. However, many people can get by with a decent, but not great Windows machine especially when home warranty support is tossed in (a benefit not offered through Apple care). For the few of you still using OS 10.4 or 10.5 -- the time has really come to buy a new computer (or upgrade to 10.6 and 10.7 if you are on an Intel Mac). There are no more security updates for Mac OS 10.4 and 10.5. You are naked an unprotected. You can always keep your existing Mac running, but not use it on the Internet. You also have the option of installing Linux mint on some PPC Macs. The least expensive Mac desktop with monitor will run you roughly $1000 (ie. Mac Mini with basic DVI monitor) . A "decent" Windows consumer desktop will run you $650 to $750. I am not against anyone buying a Windows computer, if they cannot afford a Mac. Being up to date on software transcends having an attractive paperweight on your desk. This article is part of an effort to solicit content from the Broadband Reports community. If you'd like to participate, please contact us.
|
 MikePremium,Mod join:2000-09-17 Pittsburgh, PA kudos:1 Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS Host: W.O.W. FairPoint World of Warcraft Site Tools Verizon Wireless
| exactly don't fall asleep If you don't update any OS there are security vulnerabilities that will bite you in the ass eventually.
If you updated, you were fine.
For the record Google Chrome has built in flash updates.... aka don't use Safari it's bad. -- "If something about the human body disgusts you, complain to the manufacturer" - Lenny Bruce What this country needs is a good five dollar plasma weapon. | |
|  CheesePremium join:2003-10-26 Naples, FL kudos:1 | I thought Mac's just.... worked, and didn't have all these problems "windows" pc's have...lol.... | |
|  |  | | Re: I thought Mac's just.... As someone who has used, owned and supported Apple products for nearly 20 years, I can say with experience that they are not what some of their delusional followers claim them to be. Mac's die, have hard drives fail, need OS re-installs, have annoying quirks (both hardware and software related).
To me it's always been a lot like a BMW (or similar) owner. You paid a ton of money for a car that when all is said and done is not really much better than a nice sedan that costs half as much, but often times is more reliable, or at least is less expensive or time consuming to repair. And if that's what they want, that's wonderful.
Mac's aren't bad, but what is unhealthy is not seeing them for what they are. A regular computer, built with all the same parts and manufacturers as the other computers, fancied up and priced at a premium that offers really nothing more than much less expensive competitors can give you.
You shouldn't need to make justifications or delusions to feel good about buying a mac. It used to annoy me, but now I just chuckle under my breath whenever I see a mac user try to claim that they cost the same as regular pc's, or that they never crash, or that they "just work". I know later these same people will come to me and have me fix another iTunes hose, or accidental user account wipe, or failing hard drive. Then they ask me which laptop to get for their careless teenager headed to college and bristle when I tell them that if they spend more than around 500-600 dollars they wasted money. | |
|  |  |  CheesePremium join:2003-10-26 Naples, FL kudos:1 | Re: I thought Mac's just.... said by delusion ftl :Mac's aren't bad, but what is unhealthy is not seeing them for what they are. A regular computer, built with all the same parts and manufacturers as the other computers, fancied up and priced at a premium that offers really nothing more than much less expensive competitors can give you.
Bingo! Had some idiot on dailytech one time trying to argue that Apple used higher grade parts such as higher grade soldering and shit...I about fell over....some people are just too fanatical about Apple. | |
|  |  |  |  ThalerPremium join:2004-02-02 Los Angeles, CA kudos:3 | Re: I thought Mac's just.... Ever had to tell a Mac fanatic that their hard disk has failed, only to be called names because "Apple disks don't fail"? I've been there, and I honestly didn't know what to tell them.
And before anyone asks, the disk was truely dead. When it booted up, it sounded like someone was grinding coffee. | |
|  |  |  |  |  CheesePremium join:2003-10-26 Naples, FL kudos:1 | Re: I thought Mac's just.... No, I haven't. Lol. That sucks | |
|  |  |  |  |  ExecProPremium join:2002-06-07 Long Beach, NY | said by Thaler:Ever had to tell a Mac fanatic that their hard disk has failed, only to be called names because "Apple disks don't fail"? I've been there, and I honestly didn't know what to tell them.
And before anyone asks, the disk was truely dead. When it booted up, it sounded like someone was grinding coffee. I had a client that over the years had 2 PC laptops that had hard drives failed. Both of those laptops have Toshiba hard drives in them. He swore off PCs and switched to Mac. Well a couple years later his hard drive failed in his Macbook, and what kind of hard drive was in there? A Toshiba! He just can't seem to get away from them! Haha -- Information Technology Solutions | Computer Help Desk | Free Online Backup | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  CheesePremium join:2003-10-26 Naples, FL kudos:1 | Re: I thought Mac's just.... It's not possible! Apple just works! He must have been holding it wrong! | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  ThalerPremium join:2004-02-02 Los Angeles, CA kudos:3 | Murphy's law is apparently cross platform.  | |
|
 |  |  | | quote: Mac's aren't bad, but what is unhealthy is not seeing them for what they are. A regular computer, built with all the same parts and manufacturers as the other computers, fancied up and priced at a premium that offers really nothing more than much less expensive competitors can give you.
If you do posess the credentials you say you do them you do realize there are differences. It's the same thing that goes on at HP, Dell, Lenovo, Acer, etc. there is a difference between the manufacturer's $300 and $1000 machines even though the specs may be similar.
Heck, Dell got busted a while ago for installing different and custom video firmware on their cards to reduce performance on the low end systems.
They all may have Intel, Seagate, ATI, etc. inside but there are parts, firmware, and other differences in manufacturers cheap, mid, and top tier lines.
what gets me is people will botch about Apple being the same parts as a Windows PC at a premium price and then compare to some cheap Dell. Completely ignoring spec differences and the fact that Dell also has a cheap, medium, and top end line that ate all close in specs.... Somehow it's ok when Dell does it but not Apple.... | |
|  |  |  |  ThalerPremium join:2004-02-02 Los Angeles, CA kudos:3 | Re: I thought Mac's just.... Only problem with that argument is when you can buy medium-line PCs under the price of an entry-level Mac, or a top end PC under the price of the medium-level Macs. Its been several computer generations now where an inferior Apple hardware solution would have cost me 125-150% of the PC I bought instead. | |
|  |  |  |  |  | | Re: I thought Mac's just.... So please send some links to these PC's. Last time I ran the #s it was relatively close. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  ThalerPremium join:2004-02-02 Los Angeles, CA kudos:3 | Re: I thought Mac's just.... Next time I'm in the market, I will. I just know that for many past generations of computer purchases (as late as a year ago), taking a gander at the Apple side of the market made for laughable price differences. (ie. paying ~$500 less and getting more hardware muscle to boot) | |
|
 |  | | You just had to start it didn't you cheese? | |
|  |  |  CheesePremium join:2003-10-26 Naples, FL kudos:1 | Re: I thought Mac's just.... said by michieru:You just had to start it didn't you cheese? Yep  | |
|
 exocet_cmI am the law - Judge DreddPremium join:2003-03-23 New Orleans, LA kudos:2 | Nice Article Written in a way that I can pass on to my non tech saavy friends and they'll have an understanding of what happened.
Thanks for the writeup. | |
|  |  | | Re: Nice Article Thanks for the compliment mate ..... | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: Nice! said by spewak:"There are no more security updates for Mac OS 10.4 and 10.5. You are naked an unprotected."
What is so wrong with that?  It's not a problem for me -- I hope most of those Mac users have moved on to 10.6 or 10.7 or as I alluded to a Windows 7 machine, if cost was preventing them from upgrading to a new Mac | |
|  |  Rogue WolfReally Ties The Room Together join:2003-08-12 Troy, NY | Well, not everyone wants their... data... out swinging in the breeze, y'know?  -- I may have been born yesterday, but I've spent all afternoon downtown. | |
|
 amungusPremium join:2004-11-26 America Reviews:
·KCH Cable
·AT&T DSL Service
| social engineering The infection seems interesting to me due to the social engineering aspect; tricking people into installing.
One thing - I thought 10.5.x was still getting updates, such as the one for this exploit??? Is there a reference to the "no more updates" claim at the end??? | |
|  |  Anzio join:2008-11-22 Canada | Re: social engineering 10.5 and 10.6 both received security updates in the past month or so, so the article is flawed in this area. | |
|  |  |  amungusPremium join:2004-11-26 America | Re: social engineering 10.5.x got the update a little later, finally, but I just wonder if it really is reaching the end. Thing is, Apple generally doesn't specify quite like Microsoft, but will support at least the previous version for some time. | |
|  |  |  |  | | Re: social engineering 10.5 is no longer supported. Apple only supports the two latest branches - currently 10.6 and 10.7. Apple took the unprecendented step of releasing a flashback fix for it anyway given the seriousness of the problem (> 1% of all Apples were infected). Also disabled Java; folks that need Java on 10.5 will have to reenable it.
When 10.8 comes out this fall, 10.6 will no longer be supported. | |
|  |  |  |  |  | | Re: social engineering you are right about that based on their "policy" from September 2011 -- 10.6 will no longer be supported when 10.8 comes out. Two updates for 10.5 did come out last week, but they were not true security updates like those that have been put out for 10.6 and 10.7. The Leopard updates merely disabled Java and outdated versions of Flash. | |
|
 | | Sky is NOT falling... ...instead are space debris, satellites,...
Seriously. Keep the Mac updated. Keep it backed up.
I dislike "self-proclaimed Mac-Prophets" (typically AV companies that want piece of the Apple pie) that use scare tactics. Flaws with the Mac are Adobe, Microsoft and Java (aka Sun now Oracle) failures that Apple has to verify and implement. Is Apple slow to update holes? That is the question. Ironic it is non-apple software...
But I do appreciate they (Apple) do make updates available. And atleast we have options (Symantec-the processor hog called Nortons, 3rd party AV like ClamXAV, betas like Avast, and utilityware like Cocktail that update and protect). I'm also skeptical of Kapersky and Dr Web (if you know there is something, and you don't do anything to stop it, why is it that I suspect they approached Apple with "hand out first, tell/fix later"? Smells of something rotten). I'm also grateful to the (forums here and mods like LilHurricane) the removal tools of Windows Malicious software to be prepared incase something hits the mac world (out of 7 dozen various macs I support, none had this).
I tell my clients, don't be admin user (just like Windows), have password login and do update/change it annually. If visiting links in email make sure the URL is that link. If they want protection, they can buy it. Heck, OpenDNS is a cheap option and smart one for some. But I make them invest in a TimeMachine drive and keep Software Updates automatic.
Thoughts? -- Splat | |
|  | | Hyperbole " just a month beyond what was the worst week for security in the Macintosh platform's history"
The author apparently wasn't around for the contagion that plagued Mac floppy disks. It was not uncommon for every diskette in a user's library to be infested with something, and the problem persisted for years. | |
|  |  | | Re: Hyperbole What's a floppy disk? | |
|
 Reviews:
·Charter
| OSx security wouldn't be such an issue if... Apple admitted that OSx could get viruses and had vulnerabilities. Their "doesnt exist, deny at all costs" crap that they did when they KNEW this existed baffles me. Their image is tarnished more by the bad press and PR than it is by its admission that a single virus is doing massive damage(dont get me wrong, there are many, but this is the one that got the most press because of apples tactics with it.
It doesnt help that their updates for vulnerabilities are slow or non-existant. As OSx's market share grows, so too does the threat of viruses. OSx is the perfect target right now, since Apple refuses to admit its flaws, and thus, will not patch them, and virus makers are starting to realize that its an easy target for infiltration and exploitation because of Apples' views on security. | |
|  |  | | Re: OSx security wouldn't be such an issue if... said by Chubbysumo:Apple admitted that OSx could get viruses and had vulnerabilities. Their "doesnt exist, deny at all costs" crap that they did when they KNEW this existed baffles me. Funny they have almost always said no PC viruses. And that's true.
»www.apple.com/why-mac/better-os/#viruses
And Apple has not denied at all costs. They have worked (albeit slowly) to get things fixed. They do need to improve their response though.
quote: As OSx's market share grows, so too does the threat of viruses.
BS. stop thinking like a Windows user. Few run AV on Linux and it is the most widely used server platform on the Internet. Why? The risk of a threat is small and the hit by running AV software is too much. Same with OSX.
Market share by itself does not alone increase your risk. If that were the ase Apache and Linux would be hacked all the time. That is not happening.
Yes there is a risk there but with careful computer usage and staying on top of updates you can mitigate that risk. Not so on Windows.
I'll stick with my Mac and no AV and I suspect I'll do just fine. | |
|  |  |  ThalerPremium join:2004-02-02 Los Angeles, CA kudos:3 1 edit | Re: OSx security wouldn't be such an issue if... Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't PC stand for Personal Computer? Are Apple computers then not personal computers?
It really makes it sound like a garbage claim if that's the case. This is like airlines bragging that their planes have no automobile accidents.
said by itguy05:Yes there is a risk there but with careful computer usage and staying on top of updates you can mitigate that risk. Not so on Windows.
I'll stick with my Mac and no AV and I suspect I'll do just fine. Total bunk. Someone with entry level IT could easily rig up their own personal windows box to run AV-less and bug-free.
However, since not every computer user out there is 100% verse in computer security (or just doesn't want to worry about things), this advice of running minimal security essentials is good advice for the masses. Modern computers are beasts anyways, so nobody's going to notice the 0.05% system resource use by security software/solutions. | |
|  |  |  |  | | Re: OSx security wouldn't be such an issue if... said by Thaler:Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't PC stand for Personal Computer? Are Apple computers then not personal computers? Yeah but it's generally accepted it's Windows. Heck, a server could be considered a PC since the OS is pretty much the same as your desktop.
quote: Total bunk. Someone with entry level IT could easily rig up their own personal windows box to run AV-less and bug-free.
Really? That's doubtful.
quote: Modern computers are beasts anyways, so nobody's going to notice the 0.05% system resource use by security software/solutions.
BS. I have a Dell Precision M4500 - Core i7 that is provided to me by my work. Every Thursday when they do McAfee scans the computer grinds to a halt. You can set your watch by it. And it's not just me, it's a common complaint here at work.
And I also have an Acer Netbook. I have MS Security Essentials on it and it's slower than $hit.... Dual booting with Linux I get better performance. | |
|  |  |  |  |  ThalerPremium join:2004-02-02 Los Angeles, CA kudos:3 | Re: OSx security wouldn't be such an issue if... said by itguy05:Yeah but it's generally accepted it's Windows. It's still pretty questionable to make one's "fact" sheet based on assumptions, especially when they are inaccurate by their literal definitions.
said by itguy05:said by Thaler:Total bunk. Someone with entry level IT could easily rig up their own personal windows box to run AV-less and bug-free. Really? That's doubtful. Start here: How to Create a New User Account in Windows
said by itguy05:BS. I have a Dell Precision M4500 - Core i7 that is provided to me by my work. Every Thursday when they do McAfee scans the computer grinds to a halt. You can set your watch by it. And it's not just me, it's a common complaint here at work.
And I also have an Acer Netbook. I have MS Security Essentials on it and it's slower than $hit.... Dual booting with Linux I get better performance. I don't know what to tell you on these. I have an Acer Aspire One Netbook 722 as well with MSE on it and the sucker sings. The most I did to the thing was uninstall bloatware. Hell, I've HDMI-ed the thing to our big screen to play some SNES emulation for laughs - worked just fine. As for your work computer, it's a muscle machine compared to my netbook, so that's beyond me. Other than the way the software is configured on these machines, both should be butter smooth. | |
|
 |  |  Reviews:
·Charter
| Re: AV on Mac is killer said by elefante72:Started a new job. All IT apps run on windows, so I had to run a windows VM to do anything. In any case they put McAfee on my brand new macbook 2011 and it made it run like a x286. I disabled it (for 5 min) and it was running at least 4x faster--or so it seemed.
I know McAfee may be a poor example, but man did it slow this machine to a crawl.
As for Usability-- corporate IT infrastructure are very PC based. I turned in my brand new 6lb Macbook for a brand new 3lb Lenovo x220-- and no VM And it is way faster than my Macbook with that same crappy McAfee and full HDE.
For every IT issue I had, our techs had a very difficult time dealing w/ OSX because they were used to dealing w/ PC's.
Just saying that while I liked my Mac (I use iphone, ipad) as a corporate tool, it was killing my productivity.
BTW - Flash just should be shot. It's security model sucks. Lots of corporate players bought into Apple laptops a few years back(via sales reps that overhyped the product, i got the unfortunate service of listening to a sales pitch for the company I now work for), and regretted it shortly thereafter, and either sold or gave them away. Their AV solutions are crappy at best, Apple does not admit viruses and thus, does not fix flaws, leaving sensitive information vulnerable. Their hardware is overpriced, and largely outdated the day its released, and their corporate support is horrid, and a nightmare to work with. Ugh, i hated working with the Macbooks and MBPs in our IT department(i helped them out occasionally until they got outsourced). It got to the point that they just said fuck this, and installed windows on them permanently. Sorry, but Apple Laptops are not good for the corporate world. They dont support full HDE, dont have good security on their native OS(OSx), and their cross compatibility with other OSs is lacking. I didnt even get started with the software aspect. Many times, devs wont even program stuff for OSx because the market share is just not there to make it worth the extra effort. | |
|  |  |  | | Re: AV on Mac is killer I would say your IT people were idiots. Also hardware is not over priced or outdated. As for not working with other networks, again IT must not have a clue, probably a bunch of paper MCSEs. I have two Macs, two PCs and a Linux server running in my house and every works just fine. Yes i know its only my house but it can work just as easy in the corporate world. All you need to do is LEARN how to set it up. The problem is people are lazy and don't want to learn how to do something that they don't like. Most IT departments see a Mac and have no clue how to use one. I'm no Linux expert but I can read and ask questions. As for Macs not good for the corporate world. What if your office is all Macs and you try and add a windows machine or server, guess what you will have the same problem. Sounds like windows is not good for the corporate world  | |
|
 |  | | hahahaa well thats what happens when you become big | |
|  |  | | I've found both Sophos Free Edition for Mac and ClamX AV to be total non-killers on Macs running 10.7 with 4 GB of RAM> | |
|
 | | I dont believe it! That's just unpossible. Macs have perfect security and are never vulnerable to virus or hardware failure. Or at least thats what apple wants you to think. -- Does Microsoft mean small and squishy? | |
|  |  | | Re: I dont believe it! I would say that is what the "cultists" in the Mac community wanted people to think. Apple has actually advised people for several years to consider AV software. I remember these messages specifically in the Downloads section of their website prior to the launch of the Mac App Store in early '11.
I'm not a cultist. I would be thrilled to use a Latitude 64xx or Thinkpad T4xx as my next comp. I prefer an Android phone over an iPhone. I run Windows on my Mac every day. | |
|
 kxrm join:2002-07-18 Fort Worth, TX | I just read this article and... it appears the author didn't, so many grammar and spelling mistakes. | |
|  |  | | Re: I just read this article and... Thanks -- I'll make sure my publicist hires you as a grammar consultant for my next article. j/k The pay isn't great but the tips are fantastic 
Seriously though -- spelling I am concerned about -- less so with grammar.
I use a lot of ---- , >>>>> , ........ when I write because I like to write in a train of thought / stream of consciousness style. I'm not gunning for the NY Times or Oprah's Book Club. | |
|
 | | topic at hand just have a free backup setup,and a good free antivirus on pc/mac.....and you'll be alright | |
|
 | |
|
|