  jgkolt Premium join:2004-02-21 Lakewood, OH clubs:
| boo So should the phone company censor me if i say fire on the phone since that could cause public panic which is illegal? What if someone was referencing a usatoday article and said terrorist should they be censored since terrorism is illegal. just some food for thought. | |
|
 |  Cogdis
join:2007-03-26 Floral Park, NY | Impossible? Do they expect ISP's to have people monitoring downloads at random? | |
|
 |  ackman
join:2000-10-04 Acworth, GA
·AT&T Southeast
| Re: boo said by jgkolt :So should the phone company censor me if i say fire on the phone since that could cause public panic which is illegal? What if someone was referencing a usatoday article and said terrorist should they be censored since terrorism is illegal. just some food for thought. AT&T will happily forward that information to the jack-booted NSA thugs, who will show up promptly on your doorstep to usher you off to the offshore torture center in Poland. Doesn't matter if they got it right on every case, or that we occasionally torture an innocent, it just matters that they're helping to keep you safe from terrorism. The Reich would have it no other way. | |
|
 |  |  NormanS Premium,MVM join:2001-02-14 San Jose, CA
·Pacific Bell - SBC
edit: September 19th, @10:44PM
| Re: boo said by ackman :AT&T will happily forward that information to the jack-booted NSA thugs, who will show up promptly on your doorstep to usher you off to the offshore torture center in Poland. Pure hyperbole...
I can't find any information that the NSA even has any powers of arrest. | |
|
 |  |  |   jhboricua ExMod 2000-01 join:2000-06-06 Minneapolis, MN clubs:
| Re: boo said by NormanS :said by ackman :AT&T will happily forward that information to the jack-booted NSA thugs, who will show up promptly on your doorstep to usher you off to the offshore torture center in Poland. Pure hyperbole... I can't find any information that the NSA even has any powers of arrest. Where did he say arrest?  -- "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." - Albert Einstein Jose A. Hernandez * System Admin * MPLS, Minnesota, USA * | |
|
 |  |  |  |  NormanS Premium,MVM join:2001-02-14 San Jose, CA
·Pacific Bell - SBC
| Re: boo said by jhboricua :]Where did he say arrest? He said: quote: AT&T will happily forward that information to the jack-booted NSA thugs, who will show up promptly on your doorstep to usher you off to the offshore torture center in Poland.
"Arrest", by any other name, is still "arrest". -- Norman ~Oh Lord, why have you come ~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum | |
|
  cableties Premium join:2005-01-27 Levittown, PA
| Spin away from the real truth: MPAA abusing judicial system for its own gains as it failed to have a competent business model. (aka missed the boat).
Corn farmers? They are making more selling for ethanol than the crappy, chemically-preserved styrofoam that theaters sell at a 200% markup (along with 500% markup beverage).
Whaaaa. GO EFF yourself MPAA. And your movies suck. | |
|
 |   AZ_OGM
join:2007-01-12 Phoenix, AZ | Re: Spin away from the real truth: MPAA abusing judicial system But piracy hurts the corn farmers twice. First, for not buying overpriced popcorn at the overpriced theaters. Second, for not using an ethanol guzzling SUV to go to the theater or your neighborhood Blockbuster/Hollywood Video. | |
|
 |  |   antwanp Hoo Hoo, Fred. I invented everything Premium join:2002-05-14 Cedar Hill, TX clubs:  | Re: Spin away from the real truth: MPAA abusing judicial system NIce! | |
|
 nasadude
join:2001-10-05 Rockville, MD | dead industry the sooner the current incarnation of the MPAA and RIAA and the business models they are trying to protect die, the better consumers and the nation will be.
until then, suck it up and don't pay for any of their crap. | |
|
  MagMan Life is simpler when you tell the truth. Premium join:2003-10-01 Westlake, OH | What crap! If it happens with AT&T they will definitely loose me as a customer.Once again more big brother!!!  | |
|
 |  |
  ChaosLurker
@fdn.com
| Encrypted Links Anyone?
So...how does the MPAA propose the ISPs should break encrypted links? Encrypted P2P might be vulnerable, but there are other 'sources' that are probably being used that aren't P2P. I know that one major 'discussion group' provider has SSL. And they aren't the only one. | |
|
 |   TK Junk Mail Go ahead, make my day Premium join:2002-03-03 Margate City, NJ clubs:
·Comcast
| Re: Encrypted Links Anyone? said by ChaosLurker :
So...how does the MPAA propose the ISPs should break encrypted links? Encrypted P2P might be vulnerable, but there are other 'sources' that are probably being used that aren't P2P. I know that one major 'discussion group' provider has SSL. And they aren't the only one. You can encrypt your link all you want, but you can't hide WHERE the data is coming from. And if ISPs start deciding which IP addresses are providing pirated data, they can block them - provided the Berman law backs their move. -- -- Internet News My BLOG My Web Page | |
|
 |  |  phantom6294
join:2002-02-27 Abingdon, MD
·RoadRunner Cable
·Comcast
·Cablevision
| Re: Encrypted Links Anyone? said by TK Junk Mail :You can encrypt your link all you want, but you can't hide WHERE the data is coming from. And if ISPs start deciding which IP addresses are providing pirated data, they can block them - provided the Berman law backs their move. What about VPNs? If one were to create a VPN to some other network, all the ISP should ever see is packets going to the VPN server and doesn't have a clue what is in them... or am I mistaken? Obviously, the ISPs could block the IPs of VPN providers... | |
|
 bamabrad
join:2006-01-27 Port Orange, FL | The way I see it- Is that I lease private space from my provider-therefore I am responsible for the content on my site-not the ISP. | |
|
  jgkolt Premium join:2004-02-21 Lakewood, OH clubs: | outsourcing They may just outsource the monitoring to the chinese.
"think about it" | |
|
 |  Mark F
join:2007-08-01 Fort Wayne, IN | Re: outsourcing
Getting Chinese involved as "net nannies"? Could that mean that anything I printed off the web would be either be heavily censored or come out printed with lead paint? MF | |
|
 |  |   jgkolt Premium join:2004-02-21 Lakewood, OH clubs: | Re: outsourcing funny | |
|
 dougau Premium join:2007-08-09 Dickson, TN
·AT&T Southeast
| The MPAA and RIAA should be responsible for themselves The MPAA and RIAA should be responsible for protecting their own products. The broken court system we have needs to issue a injunction on the IRAA and MPAA releasing new content until they take steps to adequately protect their own content. Maybe the Government should tax them ten million or so per album or movie the studios release that use any type of infrastructure whatsoever that is not owned by the studio like Roads, phone lines, Etc. to help recoup some of the cost in protecting their copyrights. While I don't condone piracy I don't believe ISP's (and their for all internet users) should have to incur the extra cost of protecting the MPAA and RIAA's content for them. Maybe the ISP's should sue the MPAA and RIAA for usinf their networks to distribute their products for profit while they don't get anything. | |
|
 |   mrchris Stop deleting my posts Premium join:2002-10-01 North Babylon, NY | Re: The MPAA and RIAA should be responsible for themselves Products? That's what the artists should be responsible of, not the record execs that sit on their asses all day doing next to nothing. | |
|
 moonpuppy
join:2000-08-21 Glen Burnie, MD | The MPAA and RIAA needs to worry about other things.... How about getting your stars off of drugs for one.  | |
|
  Jameson 1010 Premium join:2004-05-28 Fallbrook, CA clubs:  | ISPs: Let the MPAA & RIAA do their own dirty work. | |
|
 |   gaforces United We Stand, Divided We Fall
join:2002-04-07 Santa Cruz, CA | Re: ISPs: If MPAA and RIAA want isp's to filter for them, they should pay a profit sharing % from the revenue. | |
|
 |  cornelius785
join:2006-10-26 Worcester, MA
| i agree, why should the ISPs be forced to be proactive against piracy when it is not their music, movies, applications etc. that is being shared? all ISPs should be forced to do is cooperate with the police by supplying needed logs related to a particular piracy incident, not some stuff that a company wants them to do. | |
|
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |   Dan2007
@comcast.net | They must not be paying off the right people; they don't really expect this is going to free to them do they  | |
|
 maxpower
join:2006-10-09 Providence, RI | Glickman Does anyone else think Glickman looks like George Bluth?? | |
|
 |   Transmaster Onward Through The Fog
join:2001-06-20 Cheyenne, WY
| I am farting in your general direction YOU Evil Pirates you are ripping Nick off and he needs the money, dope ain't free. |
snort, cough, drool, Hey man Go MPAA, cough, cough, hack gag........ -- Eat a BLT for Iran | |
|
 |
  johnarama
join:2007-02-15 France
| Encrypted file sharing... I think this sort of nonsense will end once everyone catches on to the encrypted file sharing solutions that are available. With GigaTribe, for example (»www.gigatribe.com), all exchanges are encrypted, so the ISP can't tell that a user is sharing "x.mp3", the ISP will only know what software the person is using, and as we all know, software doesn't break laws - people do - but they'll have no way of knowing who's being naughty and who's being nice! | |
|
 |  openbox9
join:2004-01-26 Navarre, FL
·AT&T Southeast
·Mediacom
| Re: Encrypted file sharing... said by johnarama :I think this sort of nonsense will end once everyone catches on to the encrypted file sharing solutions Hmm, I think that this sort of nonsense will end when copyrighted material is no longer distributed without the copyright holder's consent.said by johnarama :the ISP will only know what software the person is using As well as the originating and destination IP addresses and some other "fun" information. The ISPs may not know the actual content passing through the encrypted tunnels, but that doesn't mean they can't throttle/block connections for the sake of "managing their networks". | |
|
 |  |   bky Premium join:2002-07-05 Austin, TX | Re: Encrypted file sharing... johnaramam, you must reeeallllyy like this software to be using these forums to push/spam/promote the living hell out of it: »/postlist/1439···tart&p=1 | |
|
 |
  DOStradamus MVM join:2003-11-04 Santa Rosa, CA | The MPAA is Obsessed With "Corn" They want to save the "corn farmers" by assaulting our ISP's, and therefore our, "corn holes".
-NK | |
|
 |   cableties Premium join:2005-01-27 Levittown, PA | Re: The MPAA is Obsessed With "Corn" "Pop! They are "corn-dogging" the ISPs! Butter get over here!"  | |
|
 jericho
join:2001-07-20 Halifax, NS | hurting theater renenue?? hurts theater revenue??? that is so damn funny , look at the profits the movie industry makes every year and you tell me if there hurting or not, these ppl are just incredible. | |
|
 |   SRFireside
join:2001-01-19 Houston, TX edit: September 20th, @09:47AM
| Re: hurting theater renenue?? If the movie studios are so concerned about theatre profits how about they lower their costs to lease those movies out so the theaters can actually make ends meet without having to resort to price gouging snacks?
//Edit for spelling | |
|
 |  XknightHawkX
join:2003-02-13 Morton, IL clubs:
| From what I read a while back. Not sure where. But I thought the theater doesn't get any of the money from the viewing of the movie. All the money that the theater gets if from popcorn, soda and snack sales. I may be wrong. Just have a thought that I read this somewhere at one time. | |
|
 |  |  rangerlg
join:2006-05-10 Houston, TX | Re: hurting theater renenue?? Close. The theatre usually gets anywhere from a dime to a quarter per ticket sale. The rest goes to the studio. | |
|
  Kilroy Premium,MVM join:2002-11-21 Sterling Heights, MI
| How bad do they want it? Are the RIAA and MPAA willing to supply the necessary funds to implement and maintain what they are requesting? Do they even have a clue as to what they are asking?
I'm having a hard time even coming up with anything else that could be used to relate to this request. Essentially they want someone else to bear the costs involved with detecting and protecting their content. They don't seem to have a clue as to what is required to accomplish what they are asking. Especially when in reality the task is impossible. -- How hard does DRM have to bite before business abandon it? | |
|
 Sammer
join:2005-12-22 Pittsburgh, PA | No ISP wants to open this can of worms! The minute an ISP decides to censor any type of data they might as well get out of the business. If they give in to the MPAA demand to become censors then who is next? | |
|
 |  margaf77
join:2000-12-22 Rego Park, NY
edit: September 19th, @02:18PM
| Re: No ISP wants to open this can of worms! said by Sammer :The minute an ISP decides to censor any type of data they might as well get out of the business. If they give in to the MPAA demand to become censors then who is next? And when they "get out of the business" who are you going to get your access from?
This isnt the time of dozens of ISPs to choose from. I have 2, both huge companies who have the attitude "you'll take whatever we give you and like it" Time Warner or Verizon arent going anywhere if they did implement this. Sad but true. | |
|
 |  |  Sammer
join:2005-12-22 Pittsburgh, PA | Re: No ISP wants to open this can of worms! Actually they would end up spending a lot of time in court and paying a lot of money to lawyers. | |
|
  SteveLV702 Premium join:2004-04-22 Henderson, NV | Movie Theatre Revenue Well it its hurting movie theatre revenue maybe movie theatres should have their own Investigation Unit and they should police the internet and they should arrest the pirators and make them serve free labor at the theatre... | |
|
  KrK Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy Premium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southwest
| ...and monitor by IRS, Justice, FBI, DEA, CIA, Immigration.. ... and let's not forget they need to prevent their users from saying anything that any Corporation considers "Bad" public relations! In fact let's just censor the hell out of everything and sue all users who say anything anyone doesn't like, no matter how TRUE.
Something embarrassing or harsh? Yank it down, and ban/censor/arrest the poster!
Why would an ISP want to take on the costs, but more important, the LIABILITY of doing these things?
SAFE HARBOR FTW! Please don't destroy the Internet (and further damage the USA in general.) -- "Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!) | |
|
 |
|
 |