site Search:


 
   
story category
Is Dish Serious About LTE or Just Playing AT&T?
New Filing Dishes More Detail On Possible Dish LTE Network
by Karl Bode Friday 03-Feb-2012 tags: business · wireless · bandwidth · AT&T · wireless
Back in August Dish Network made it clear that the company was very seriously interested in launching a wireless network, despite previous executive assurances that the company was accumulating spectrum just for fun. Run from a subsidiary, the company is hoping to launch an LTE-Advanced network under the brand "Ollo." Dish is planning to use the spectrum they acquired from DBSD North America and TerreStar Networks, but is waiting for FCC approval.

AT&T doesn't want the competition and wouldn't mind gobbling that spectrum up for themselves, and this week has been pushing for expedited build timeline requirements they know Dish can't meet. Fierce Wireless directs our attention to a new FCC filing from Dish that combats AT&T's efforts and holds a little more detail on Dish's plans. In it, Dish makes several new disclosures, among them that the company will be offering retail -- not wholesale -- service, and that they'll be jumping directly to LTE Advanced:

"A new, next-generation LTE Advanced retail network simply cannot be viably built in the S-Band at the pace AT&T suggests...Building a network before LTE Advanced devices are widely available would necessitate the use of an earlier standard, followed by a migration to LTE Advanced once network and consumer devices are available. Such a requirement would needlessly trigger backward compatibility and network modernization issues and costs for Dish's proposed network."

The filing also gives better insight into timelines, the company stating that the LTE Advanced equipment for its S-band spectrum they plan to use likely won't even be available until 2015. So, with LightSquared essentially D.O.A. AT&T could be positioning to crush the only real non-MVNO competitive threat that could surface in the next decade. Or, Dish's Charlie Ergen could just be playing everybody, never had any serious intent on building a wireless network, and is simply positioning itself for the biggest possible spectrum cash buyout with a specific eye on AT&T. Most likely? It's both.

view: topics flat text 
Post a:
BiggA

join:2005-11-23
EARTH

Bull

It makes no sense. They're going to sell it to AT&T.

Alex J

@jillyred.net

Re: Bull

It makes no sense.

What makes no sense? AT&T trying to pre-emptively crush competition? Sure it does.

They're going to sell it to AT&T.

Maybe. After AT&T makes Dish's network build path as difficult as possible.
BiggA

join:2005-11-23
EARTH

Re: Bull

The amount of capital required to get into that market for such a small piece of spectrum and relatively few potential customers? It makes NO sense.

firephoto
Facts hurt
Premium
join:2003-03-18
Brewster, WA

Re: Bull

They're a huge company, new equipment is not different than upgrading old stuff. They part some radios in markets with millions of people and they make money. And it's way cheaper than launching a satellite into orbit. Digital radios and antennas connected to that new fangled internets, it's not magic even though you are sold on it being super complicated and expensive.

AT&T doesn't want competition so they are whining about the possibility of some that isn't in the telco business. They'd rather see some penniless startup with buzz word filled press release that is destined to fail than a successful multi billion dollar business enter the market.
--
Say no to JAMS!
BiggA

join:2005-11-23
EARTH

Re: Bull

The barriers to entry are massive. No one has ever built a nationwide network before. AT&T and Verizon were pieced together out of many small, pre-existing companies.

KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK

AT&T

Threaten to break them up unless they back off.

We need Politicians who aren't sold out and have some balls (And don't believe what's good for MegaCorp USA is good for the people BS.)
--
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini
25139889

join:2011-10-25
Toledo, OH

Re: AT&T

threaten ATT and lose the data they're bringing in for the NSA.

digiblur
Premium
join:2002-06-03
Louisiana

Charlie Ergen?

Someone needs to stay with the times... Charlie hasn't been the CEO since last summer.
--

SouthWest Louisiana PC Users Group »www.swlapcug.com
NuShrike

join:2010-09-01

European-style "Build It or Lose It"

Why don't these "build it or lose it" rules apply to AT&T and their sequestered spectrum?

mech1164
I'll Be Back

join:2001-11-19
Lodi, NJ

Re: European-style "Build It or Lose It"

said by NuShrike:

Why don't these "build it or lose it" rules apply to AT&T and their sequestered spectrum?

That would be the smart thing. ATT would never let that happen. It would spend until it's killed.

USMCGrunt

@mycingular.net

Makes sense

Charlie may not be CEO but he's still majority shareholder on the board. Charlie also still heads Echostar I believe...the company that provides Dish with all its hardware. I agree with what's said before, it makes perfect sense for Dish to enter the wifi market. The company has been pushing Internet intergration for a few years now and believes traditional TV delivery on its way out with the Internet taking its place. Dish building an advanced 4G network would put it at a distinct advantage over its competitors in bypassing current bandwidth limitations from satellite and integrating a whole slew of services making Dish a "whole home" "all in one" entertainment service.

Wednesday, 19-Jun 05:00:00 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.