Our friend Bernie Arnason over at Telecompetitor makes the argument that with DOCSIS 3.0 relatively inexpensive to quickly deploy (75 million Americans should have it by the end of the year) and many telcos clinging to aging copper last mile connectivity, the cable industry should have it pretty good competitively over the next few years. Comcast added more broadband customers (608K) in the last two quarters than AT&T, Verizon, and Qwest combined (401K), and cable's triple play continues to gobble up fleeing copper landline customers. Cable also dominates more than 90% of the VoIP market.

Cable's traditional weak spot -- upstream bandwidth, looks to get some help later this year as cable operators perfect upstream channel bonding. Comcast recently noted that they're seeing 75 to 100 Mbps upstream in tests. While Verizon's decision to spend $23 billion on FTTH to the home puts them in a decent position for now, there's a huge swath of America served by telcos using aging copper infrastructure that many of these companies can't afford to upgrade to fiber. DOCSIS 3.0 means telcos will up their game somehow:Can Qwest seriously compete with DOCSIS 3.0 with no money for serious upgrades? Marketing that pretends last mile copper is FTTH can only go so far. When does AT&T decide to stop waiting on VDSL bonding and pony up the cash for the move to FTTH? 3-7 Mbps is the fastest speed offered by Verizon in roughly half of its broadband territories. Luckily for most carriers, they'll be sheltered from the "perfect competitive storm" Arnason mentions by the simple fact that many of their markets don't see decent competition. When you're the only game in town (be it cable, telco, satellite or carrier pigeon), you get to charge whatever you'd like for last-generation service.