  wruckman Ruckman.net
join:2007-10-25 Northwood, OH | WOW This is definitely the next step towards high speeds and availability! -- William Ruckman »ruckman.net | |
|  |   thongsai
join:2002-07-04 Santa Rosa, CA
| Re: WOW wow is correct.. hopefully they mass produce the product(s) to bring costs down even more.
This gives telcos less and less reason to stick with copper. -- ---------------------------------- »www.TongSat.com | |
|  |  |   S_engineer
join:2007-05-16 Chicago, IL
| Re: WOW Most telcos will stick with copper until they are forced to switch. Then they will have the gov't partially or fully subsidize that deployment. The telco circle of life!! -- Let's pluck 'im and see if he's ripe!" - Larry (MEN IN BLACK, 1934) | |
|  |  |  |  joker5656
join:2006-06-23 Greenville, SC | Re: WOW and for AT&T it will be forever, "cause there is no demand for it" | |
|  |  |   tater_gunz Shoot to kill Premium join:2003-08-22 Toledo, OH
·buckeye cable
| said by thongsai :wow is correct.. hopefully they mass produce the product(s) to bring costs down even more. This gives telcos less and less reason to stick with copper. I agree, but I want to point out that in my personal experience, most "copper" services are actually delivered via fiber anyway. For example, the DS1's we sell are fiber to the prem, then typically less than 100 ft of copper at the demarc point. The same thing applies to our DS3's and so on. About the only time that I encounter a circuit with more copper on it than that is when we are providing a P2P DS1 to someone outside our footprint; we'll go fiber to a multiplexed handoff point, and then the other LEC (usually AT&T) picks it up from there and delivers it the rest of the way as a copper circuit. For the record, I *hate* troubleshooting those circuits...
- Tate
-- Happiness is an OC-48 in your basement... | |
|   pv8man999
@sbcglobal.net | hmmm... This is possibly something we will definitely see advancing and also becoming a standard in the future of home/office networking? | |
|  tmc8080
join:2004-04-24 Floral Park, NY
| Smaller node boxes? So, will we see smaller node boxes any time soon? Loads of customers in AT&T land really don't like the exploding refrigerators of death creating eye sores across the land.. this would also be great if central offices that serve 15-20k customers could operate at half the square footage that it already does and need maybe 1/2 the workers to maintain.
| |
|  |   dmeyer
join:2002-08-14 Avon, IN
·Insight Communicat..
·RoadRunner Cable
| Re: Smaller node boxes? The fiber components are just a small part of a DSLAM/VRAD. What takes up a lot of the space is the power components like the batteries, fans, security mechanisms, etc... and all the rest is for cross connects for all the copper pairs. Then there's all the switching gear and misc electronics. This is just a guess as I've not actually been inside one of them, and the YouTube video of inside the VRAD has "suspiciously" been removed recently. | |
|  |  |   tater_gunz Shoot to kill Premium join:2003-08-22 Toledo, OH
·buckeye cable
| Re: Smaller node boxes? said by dmeyer :This is just a guess as I've not actually been inside one of them, and the YouTube video of inside the VRAD has "suspiciously" been removed recently. Your guess is absolutely correct!
- Tate
-- Happiness is an OC-48 in your basement... | |
|  |  |  |  tmc8080
join:2004-04-24 Floral Park, NY
| Re: Smaller node boxes? said by tater_gunz :said by dmeyer :This is just a guess as I've not actually been inside one of them, and the YouTube video of inside the VRAD has "suspiciously" been removed recently. Your guess is absolutely correct! - Tate They could probably make the rest of the vrads smaller as well.. this is first generation AT&T refrigerator dslams.. No doubt that when Verizon finally switches to gpon.. the ONT's will be half the size.. | |
|  bbbrain
join:2005-03-20 Phoenix, AZ | 800 per mm^2 Ah, but how do they keep that millimeter square, eh?
Merry Xmas from the Audio Dungeon 
Al | |
|  | |  |
|
|