republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   News
newer
story category Comcast Wishes You A Happy Rate Hike Season
It's that time of year again....
10:47AM Friday Sep 04 2009 by Karl Bode
tags: prices · business · bandwidth · cable · consumers · Comcast
It's once again cable rate hike season for Comcast customers, who'll be seeing higher bills depending on where you live, and depending on what competition Comcast sees in your market. Washington state residents will be the first lucky winners, given that Qwest is the primary phone company and telcoTV is a non-issue. In Washington, Comcast will be issuing a flurry of higher rates starting October 6. The hikes will cover not only TV service (traditionally blamed on higher broadcaster fees), but also assorted other hardware fees.

Click for full size
According to a memo obtained by Broadband Reports, Limited Basic customers will see an average increase of $1.17 per month, while Comcast's entry level digital cable tier will jump $1.70 from $55.75 to $57.45. Comcast's digital additional outlet fee, used for customers with additional modems or set top boxes, will increase $1 from $5.10 to $6.10. Customers who rent modems or eMTAs for digital voice will also see their $3 monthly rental fee bumped to $5.

The memo, which provides talking points to employees when dealing with consumers, rhetorically asks: "does it make sense for us to raise prices given the state of the economy?" The memo responds to its own question with an unequivocal yes, though executives in the memo insist that imposing additional rate hikes during a sour economy was "discussed at the highest levels of the company" (you know, by the guys making nearly $25 million annually) and "was not taken lightly" by said millionaires.

Comcast reminds employees that DirecTV's basic tier jumped 30% this year, while several FiOS tiers have jumped $10 a month. As is usually the case, Comcast blames the higher costs on the higher costs of programming (specifically sports), but also lays the blame on "new advanced set top boxes and modems" and DOCSIS 3.0 network upgrades. The same upgrades the company in 2007 proudly proclaimed could be funded by "couch change." Comcast's second quarter earnings jumped 53%, and the carrier posted a three month net income of nearly a billion dollars.

On the positive side, the hikes are slightly less than they've been in years past, something recently predicted by at least one analyst, who claimed this year's cable rate hike season would be only 50% as potent as in recent years due to recession and telcoTV competition. Comcast customers outside of the Washington market upset they're being left out of the festivities will likely soon get hikes of their own. If your provider is raising rates, please drop us a line.

Related:
  1. Comcast Expands DOCSIS 3.0 In Bay Area
  2. Comcast 50Mbps To See Price Cut
  3. UK: 50Mbps For $46
  4. Comcast Wireless Broadband Hits Atlanta
  5. Time Warner Cable GETS MORE EXTREME!!!
  6. Comcast DOC 3.0 In Augusta Sept. 2
  7. Cox Brings 50Mbps To Arizona
  8. Comcast DOCSIS 3.0 Hits Denver
Forums » Comcast Wishes You A Happy Rate Hike Season
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

Cheese
Premium
join:2003-10-26
Naples, FL
clubs:

Sooooooooooooo

If I only have internet and phone, my rental fee for the EMTA is going up 2 bucks? I don't see mention of internet price going up?

Morac

join:2001-08-30
Riverside, NJ
·Comcast

Re: Sooooooooooooo

The modem rental fee used to be $5 when Internet service was first introduced. That's why I bought my own modem. A few years later (about 6 or 7 years ago), they raised the Internet rates from $39.99 to $42.99, but lowered the rental fee to $3. So people renting were hit with a $1 hike, while people who bought their modem, like me, were hit with a $3 rate hike.

Now that I'm forced to rent their eMTA, since you can't buy one, they're going to stick it to me again.
--

The Comcast Disney Avatar has been retired.

Cheese
Premium
join:2003-10-26
Naples, FL
clubs:

Re: Sooooooooooooo

said by Morac See Profile :

The modem rental fee used to be $5 when Internet service was first introduced. That's why I bought my own modem. A few years later (about 6 or 7 years ago), they raised the Internet rates from $39.99 to $42.99, but lowered the rental fee to $3. So people renting were hit with a $1 hike, while people who bought their modem, like me, were hit with a $3 rate hike.

Now that I'm forced to rent their eMTA, since you can't buy one, they're going to stick it to me again.
I have the eMTA and a RCA modem!
Corydon
Cultivant son jardin
Premium
join:2008-02-18
Denver, CO
clubs:

Re: Sooooooooooooo

My understanding is that if you have both (and they both come from Comcast) they still just charge you one fee.

cypherstream
Looking forward to the future of things.
Premium,MVM
join:2004-12-02
Reading, PA
clubs:

Yeah that's bogus. I'm using the same exact eMTA since 2008. I could see upping the rental if swapping it out for a DOCSIS 3.0 eMTA, but the capital cost has already been put in my home, and will eventually be paid off. So why raise that price, nothing's changed with it.
biglittlewil

join:2009-04-02
Seattle, WA

said by Cheese See Profile :

If I only have internet and phone, my rental fee for the EMTA is going up 2 bucks? I don't see mention of internet price going up?
No increase for the internet. Just the eMTA.

Geminimind
Premium
join:2003-12-20
Sacramento, CA
People still have Cable?

Conductor

@comcast.net

from:
CO_Chris See Profile

All Aboard!!!

The Comcast bashing train is leaving the station. Hurry up and get on!!!
jester121

join:2003-08-09
Lake Zurich, IL

Re: All Aboard!!!

You've only been around a month, trust me you'll get used to it. Most of us don't even raise our eyebrows any more.
fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
"why don't you like fun?"

NOVA_Guy
Obama- Commander in Thief
Premium
join:2002-03-05

Re: All Aboard!!!

Perhaps some of the bashing is warranted. There are plenty of things that Comcast does wrong, and plenty of people (myself included) who aren't exactly thrilled with them... but who have no other real choice for things like high speed internet.
dogo88

join:2001-09-24
Old Bridge, NJ

As expected

And the main reason I went to DirecTV. Plus the better quality broadcasts can't hurt either. Cable just plain sucks!
rid0617

join:2003-07-20
Greer, SC

Re: As expected

Another reason why I went to nothing. Plain ole HD subchannels work fine for me considering the prices and the quality of programming.

badtrip
East Bay
Premium
join:2004-03-20
Albany, CA
·Unwired Ltd
·Comcast

Re: As expected

said by rid0617 See Profile :

Another reason why I went to nothing. Plain ole HD subchannels work fine for me considering the prices and the quality of programming.
No doubt. Plus, I don't get pissed off for having to pay for shoddy programming with my time (commercials) as well as my checkbook (cable bill). I just pay with my time now.

Plus the high definition broadcasts look better OTA than OTC IMO.
neufuse

join:2006-12-06
Indiana, PA
·Comcast

let us buy...

gawd... this is why we will never be able to buy emta's or cable boxes that arn't tivos... comcast likes to jack up the rates!... I came to the conclusion the only reason we can't buy eMTA's is because it has a battery in it and if the power goes out and you need 911 they dont want to be sued when it doesnt work just because you bought your own and you didnt replace your battery when it died......

NOVA_Guy
Obama- Commander in Thief
Premium
join:2002-03-05
·VOIPo

Here's an idea or two...

Comcast blames the higher costs on the higher costs of programming (specifically sports), but also lays the blame on "new advanced set top boxes and modems" and DOCSIS 3.0 network upgrades.
Simple solution, Comcast (and all other providers): move all sports channels to a sports tier where they belong. Then drop the cost of basic cable without the sports tier down to reflect the savings. Those who are interested in having the sports tier can then purchase it as a premium package, just like movies and pay-per-view. This way those who do not care about receiving channels like ESPN don't have their bills inflated because of it.

These companies could also offer access to the sports tier on a pay-per-view type basis, charging some fee for 48 hour access over weekends or the like, for casual sports viewers. (Weekend access fees, when measured on a per-day basis, would be higher than just buying monthly access to the sports tier of course.)

Or, even better yet, why not just offer ala carte access to all channels-- like many users have been requesting for many years? The technology required to do this is in place, for the most part. The only thing stopping it is broadcasters, who bundle channels together to force viewers into paying for channels they neither want nor care about.
--
ObamaCare encourages euthanization of the old, pays for abortions of the almost-new, and rations care for all those in between while raising your taxes to pay for it. Government rationed, government controlled health cartels screw the middle class.

Rob
In Deo speramus, God Bless the USA
Premium
join:2001-08-25
Kendall, FL
·Comcast

Re: Here's an idea or two...

said by NOVA_Guy See Profile :

Comcast blames the higher costs on the higher costs of programming (specifically sports), but also lays the blame on "new advanced set top boxes and modems" and DOCSIS 3.0 network upgrades.
Simple solution, Comcast (and all other providers): move all sports channels to a sports tier where they belong. Then drop the cost of basic cable without the sports tier down to reflect the savings. Those who are interested in having the sports tier can then purchase it as a premium package, just like movies and pay-per-view. This way those who do not care about receiving channels like ESPN don't have their bills inflated because of it.
Comcast did that and the FCC, after complaints from the NFL, forced them to move it back to regular channel lineup.
--
CheckSite.us | YourIP.us | Reverseip.us
AVonGauss
Premium,MVM
join:2007-11-01
Boynton Beach, FL

Re: Here's an idea or two...

With the current climate, maybe it is time to do that again?

NOVA_Guy
Obama- Commander in Thief
Premium
join:2002-03-05
·VOIPo

said by Rob See Profile :

Comcast did that and the FCC, after complaints from the NFL, forced them to move it back to regular channel lineup.
That's too bad. When did that happen-- it should have been more widely publicized. And Comcast should include a sentence like "Complaints from the NFL to the FCC, forcing us to carry sports channels, are part of the reason your bill is increasing this year." in every bill each time the price they charge their consumers increases.

If the NFL can use the government as their tool to force consumers to pay higher prices, then cable/satellite companies should be able to fight back by making inflammatory statements in their literature that is distributed to the public.
--
ObamaCare encourages euthanization of the old, pays for abortions of the almost-new, and rations care for all those in between while raising your taxes to pay for it. Government rationed, government controlled health cartels screw the middle class.

Morac

join:2001-08-30
Riverside, NJ
·Comcast

Re: Here's an idea or two...

said by NOVA_Guy See Profile :

That's too bad. When did that happen-- it should have been more widely publicized.
They resolved their difference a few months ago and it was pretty widely publicized. See this page for details.

That's why digital plus subscribers now get NFL Network, MLB, NHL, etc as part of regular package. Comcast is making lemonade out of lemons though by now promoting the sports channels in their commercials and raising rates (NFL costs 45 cents per subscriber) to compensate.
--

The Comcast Disney Avatar has been retired.
Kearnstd
Elf Wizard
Premium
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ

that is the sad thing, the NFL went crying like a baby they didnt get to be on the normal digital.

but really did the FCC even have a right to force comcast to take NFL off the sports tier? i know the FCC has must carry channels but i doubt they could must carry an optional channel.
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports

asj7

@comcast.net
no the fcc did not force comcast to put it in a digital package. comcast and the nfl network worked out a deal .

joako
Premium
join:2000-09-07
/dev/null
1) Wasn't it the NFL Network?
2) Didn't Comcast continue to offer THEIR sports channels in the basic tiers?
--
PRescott7-2097
openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
·AT&T Southeast

said by NOVA_Guy See Profile :

Simple solution, Comcast (and all other providers): move all sports channels to a sports tier where they belong.
I don't believe most of the sports content owners/distributors allow that. Do you really think Disney wants ESPN off of the basic tier?

NOVA_Guy
Obama- Commander in Thief
Premium
join:2002-03-05
·VOIPo

Re: Here's an idea or two...

There's a simple solution to that too. How long do you think Disney would last before they caved in if Comcast, Time Warner, Dish, and DirecTV dropped all Disney channels from the lineup? A week? A month? During that time period, the cable/satellite companies could compensate consumers by dropping prices on their service dramatically.

Disney relies on the income from pimping out this entertainment very heavily. I think that they would give in quickly if there were an organized boycott of their programming by the major players in the cable and satellite industry.

It's too bad this will never happen. Sometimes reality sucks.
--
ObamaCare encourages euthanization of the old, pays for abortions of the almost-new, and rations care for all those in between while raising your taxes to pay for it. Government rationed, government controlled health cartels screw the middle class.
openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
·AT&T Southeast

Re: Here's an idea or two...

I agree and would quickly welcome such a move, but how well do you think Comcast, Time Warner, Dish, and DirecTV would fare in the face of their irate sports- and Mickey-loving customers?

I plan to do my part when my Dish time runs out next year by cancelling service. My family simply doesn't watch TV that much. In fact, I can't remember the last time my wife watched a program and I only rarely watch CNBC. OTA does more than enough for us.

See 7 replies to this post
SunnyD

join:2009-03-20
Madison, AL
Too bad that can't ever happen. Disney would just take all the cable operators to court and win megabux and an injunction because of the cable operators committing collusion.
openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA

Re: Here's an idea or two...

It's not collusion if the distributors don't sign/renew contracts with content owners. But, you're right, it still won't happen because the distributors aren't willing to deal with consumer backlash....the price increases are easier to handle.

Jwobot

join:2002-08-14
Sterling Heights, MI
·WOW Internet and C..


1 edit
said by NOVA_Guy See Profile :

Comcast blames the higher costs on the higher costs of programming (specifically sports), but also lays the blame on "new advanced set top boxes and modems" and DOCSIS 3.0 network upgrades.
Simple solution, Comcast (and all other providers): move all sports channels to a sports tier where they belong. Then drop the cost of basic cable without the sports tier down to reflect the savings. Those who are interested in having the sports tier can then purchase it as a premium package, just like movies and pay-per-view. This way those who do not care about receiving channels like ESPN don't have their bills inflated because of it.

These companies could also offer access to the sports tier on a pay-per-view type basis, charging some fee for 48 hour access over weekends or the like, for casual sports viewers. (Weekend access fees, when measured on a per-day basis, would be higher than just buying monthly access to the sports tier of course.)

Or, even better yet, why not just offer ala carte access to all channels-- like many users have been requesting for many years? The technology required to do this is in place, for the most part. The only thing stopping it is broadcasters, who bundle channels together to force viewers into paying for channels they neither want nor care about.
A Education Tier, Music Tier, Kids Tier,ect…. That way people who want to watch those types of channels can and those who don’t wish to watch, don’t have to pay for them.
Mr Matt

join:2008-01-29
Eustis, FL
·Comcast
·Embarq

Re: Here's an idea or two...

Tier, Tier, Tier. The only tear that I know of is the tears I shed every month when I write a check for their overpriced service. I pay more to rent two HD Digital Terminals with DVR than I pay for premium programming. Your suggestion is too practical.

dragonjoe

@sbcglobal.net

said by Jwobot See Profile :

said by NOVA_Guy See Profile :

A Education Tier, Music Tier, Kids Tier,ect…. That way people who want to watch those types of channels can and those who don’t wish to watch, don’t have to pay for them.
SKY TV uk, small world media uk, foxtel aus, and most cable and sat co in Canada have that.
k1ll3rdr4g0n

join:2005-03-19
Homer Glen, IL

said by NOVA_Guy See Profile :

Comcast blames the higher costs on the higher costs of programming (specifically sports), but also lays the blame on "new advanced set top boxes and modems" and DOCSIS 3.0 network upgrades.
Simple solution, Comcast (and all other providers): move all sports channels to a sports tier where they belong. Then drop the cost of basic cable without the sports tier down to reflect the savings. Those who are interested in having the sports tier can then purchase it as a premium package, just like movies and pay-per-view. This way those who do not care about receiving channels like ESPN don't have their bills inflated because of it.

These companies could also offer access to the sports tier on a pay-per-view type basis, charging some fee for 48 hour access over weekends or the like, for casual sports viewers. (Weekend access fees, when measured on a per-day basis, would be higher than just buying monthly access to the sports tier of course.)

Or, even better yet, why not just offer ala carte access to all channels-- like many users have been requesting for many years? The technology required to do this is in place, for the most part. The only thing stopping it is broadcasters, who bundle channels together to force viewers into paying for channels they neither want nor care about.
Even better ideas -
* Drop commercials
* Allow customers to choose their own channels

This is the exact reason why I don't have cable TV. Not that I am admitting to piracy, but you have to wonder why people would rather pirate a TV show that doesn't have commercials vs pay to watch the TV show and commercials. It's kind of counter-intuitive if you think about it:
Free: Commercial free
Pay: Commercials
If the programming was commercial free, then I would most certainly consider cable TV.

devjonfos
Premium
join:2004-06-04
99999
·Comcast Formerly ..
·T-Mobile US

said by NOVA_Guy See Profile :

Comcast blames the higher costs on the higher costs of programming (specifically sports), but also lays the blame on "new advanced set top boxes and modems" and DOCSIS 3.0 network upgrades.
...
Or, even better yet, why not just offer ala carte access to all channels-- like many users have been requesting for many years? The technology required to do this is in place, for the most part. The only thing stopping it is broadcasters, who bundle channels together to force viewers into paying for channels they neither want nor care about.
Whoohoo! À la carte!

NOVA_Guy
Obama- Commander in Thief
Premium
join:2002-03-05

Re: Here's an idea or two...

Yeah, that's it!

Thanks for the correction.
cdbma

join:2003-01-19
Bolton, MA

wimps

Comcast is large enough to have its way with broadcasters (IMO), so the appearance (excuse?) that the broadcast fees are going up sounds a bit wimpy to me. Push back! Negotiate!

While I really don't want to pay more, I'd rather they say "we need to raise the rates to make more money and meet our corporate revenue objectives." rather than "boo-hoo, the broadcasters stole my ball and I'm going home."
gworkman7

join:2005-10-18
Vail, AZ

Couch Change

I remember that comment. Just didn't realize the couch they were talking about was mine.

NOVA_Guy
Obama- Commander in Thief
Premium
join:2002-03-05

Re: Couch Change

With the rate hikes, pretty soon their goons will be coming to your house to take the couch as well.

castsucks

@sbcglobal.net

what a joke direct tv does not rape you with box rent/outlet

what a joke direct tv does not rape you with box rent/outlet that high $6/m just for the outlet? and then box rent is on top of that? and Some system also have a hd cable card fee as per card.

direct tv only wants $5 per box for any box box 1 is free.

and there HD dvr pack cost about the same as comcast digital classic and comcast digital classic only comes with a SD box. adding a HD dvr can cost $10-$20/m per box on comcast.

also don't for get the sports pack to get speed in Chicago land while other comcast area have it in starter as well a sci-if.

also why is fox movie in the sports pack?
lew_jean

join:2005-05-13
Marietta, GA
·AT&T U-Verse

Re: what a joke direct tv does not rape you with box rent/outlet

With all the fee's Comcast keeps adding that's why I dropped them for AT&T U-Verse:
DVR Included (recorded 4 TV programs at once, Record or play back from any TV)
STB $5.00 each (STB are both SD and HD and a smaller foot print than Comcast)
HD Service $10.00 covers all the STB
No big deal its 2SD and 2HD
AT&T U-Verse SD is a lot better than Comcast
AVonGauss
Premium,MVM
join:2007-11-01
Boynton Beach, FL

Re: what a joke direct tv does not rape you with box rent/outlet

Not to detract from your statement, but I believe the STB rental fee is now $7.

cdru
Go Colts
Premium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN

Digital Outlet Fee

quote:
Comcast's digital additional outlet fee, used for customers with additional modems or set top boxes, will increase $1 from $5.10 to $6.10.
Does that include the digital box rental? Or what just the fee to have an outlet? If it's the former, still is expensive. If it's the latter, ouch.

castsucks

@sbcglobal.net

Re: Digital Outlet Fee

I think that is the basic sd box price + maybe $1-$2 more some systems.

cable card seems to be outlet + $1-$2 card rent + HD cable card fee (some systems) per card.

HD seems to be outlet + $4-$5 box rent (hd fee built in?)

HD dvr seems to be outlet + $10-$15 rent (HD fee and dvr fee built in?). there old full price seem to be any from $10 /m box 1 promo price to $15-$16 full price to $20-$22 full price box 2+

will tru2way be the same outlet + guide data fee + hd fee + drv fee (yes tru2way forces cable co software and control on you)

R4M0N
Brazilian Soccer Ownz Joo

join:2000-10-04
Glen Allen, VA
·Comcast

And here I was...

And here I was just needing that one extra nudge to get my butt off the couch and call DSL Extreme to move my cable internet over to Fiber...

I've done all the homework and it would make sense even now to move (faster and cheaper internet - No real need for TV)

Thank you Comcast.
Mannus
Premium
join:2005-10-25
Fort Wayne, IN

1 edit

Cut the cord

I cut the cord on PayTV months ago. Between Hulu.com and other streaming sites, torrents, my OTA PC digital tuner card, I can watch almost everything I used to watch on DISH. Plus. I'm saving 50.00 a month.
delusion ftl

join:2009-07-09

Re: Cut the cord

yep, i fell like i'm wandering around in crazy town with all these people complaining about programming fees, rate hikes, etc...

TV is so important it's worth 50-150 dollars a month? For a bunch of useless channels playing mostly useless content to deliver ads convincing us to by other mostly useless devices/products. Sure there are a couple good things on, but little that cant be rented/streamed from cheaper/free places.

I always get a chuckle at work when someone says. "Did you see that new iphone (or any other gizmo/product/fad) commercial? I need to get one of those!!" I just tell them I never see commercials anymore.

nomad3870

@comcast.net
I also "cut the cord" about a year ago from the glut of mind rot and higher costs of cable. Hulu, youtube, and Netflix provides all I need for TV. I can choose what I want to watch with little or no commercials. Much, much happier.

LeftOfSanity

join:2005-11-06
Felton, DE

Other rates

I saw somewhere that CHSI only customers will see a price drop of $2.00

And that Comcast is dropping the 2.00 rental fee for the router you get with their Home Networking Services.

IGGY
No Guru Just Here To Help
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-30
Chatham, IL

Having to include a title is stupid fix this stupidity

"new advanced set top boxes and modems"

I would sure like access to at least the 1st one. So would many other Comcast customers. The current Motorola units of course are still giving me and many others problems on a fairly regular basis. These known issues have never been properly addressed by providers or the manufacturer. If you plan on charging me more you had best be offering me a quality service worth paying for in the first place.
--
Test PC Security
Cable Diagnostics
Blog
ZoneAlarm Help
Windows 7 Comcast BroadVox Direct

R4M0N
Brazilian Soccer Ownz Joo

join:2000-10-04
Glen Allen, VA

1 edit

Re: Having to include a title is stupid fix this stupidity

LOL... I always think the same thing. So I just put the first few words of my post.
Chaldo

join:2008-03-18
West Bloomfield, MI

57.45.. cool when will that change to 67.45??

I remember when cable was like 45 bucks... This is crazy
Curlee

join:2009-07-17
Issaquah, WA
·Comcast Formerly ..

Re: 57.45.. cool when will that change to 67.45??

said by Chaldo See Profile :

I remember when cable was like 45 bucks... This is crazy
My Mom went to the movies for a dime.

I don't like it either, but don't forget to adjust for inflation ...

Titus Pullo
I came, I saw, I slept

join:2004-06-26

God

they bring the "suuuuuuu" to suck
-

Native NWer

@transedge.com

Couch change

Maybe, but given the rate hikes over the years in the NW, how many couches they think we have?
QLR

join:2009-06-23
Tallahassee, FL
·Embarq

Just Great!!!

I wonder how much will my rates go up... I would switch to satellite, but my apartment lease forbids the dishes. I only have cable so I can look at the local channels. I was looking forward to the DTV until I couldn't pick up any channels; so I am stuck paying Comcast $13/month. I would like to upgrade my service but the only promo they are offering me is digital cable for $50/month for 3 months (I don't think so) and then it goes up to an obscene $70 monthly. I am in an area where there is no telco TV so they can charge whatever they want. The rep suggested I bundle my service but I only pay $40+ tax for phone and DSL... and $13 for the cable. For $70, I would only be getting only 1 or 2 of the services on Comcast. No thanks, I will pass...

I wish I could get a la carte channels as well without the strings.
Joe12345678

join:2003-07-22
Des Plaines, IL

Re: Just Great!!!

said by QLR See Profile :

I wonder how much will my rates go up... I would switch to satellite, but my apartment lease forbids the dishes.
The FCC has laws that say they can't do that.
nevtxjustin

join:2006-04-18
Dallas, TX

Re: Just Great!!!

said by Joe12345678 See Profile :

said by QLR See Profile :

I wonder how much will my rates go up... I would switch to satellite, but my apartment lease forbids the dishes.
The FCC has laws that say they can't do that.
In a some obscure ways, satellite dishes and broadband internet antennas can indeed be prohibited.

The FCC's OTARD rule primarily prohibits the indiscriminate banning of the placement of antennas. If a city ordinances adopt the National Electric Code recommendations, then those recommendations become law and are exempt from OTARD protection.

Can a an apartment complex prohibit you from mounting a dish on your patio railing? Yes, as it compromises the structure.

Can an apartment complex prohibit you from mounting a dish on your patio with its own unattached concrete block mount? No, they can't prohibit you.

Can an apartment complex prohibit you from mounting a dish on your patio with its own unattached concrete block mount that does not follow the NEC grounding recommendations? Yes.

Can an apartment complex prohibit you from mounting a dish on your patio with its own unattached concrete block mount that is properly grounding, but needs an outside wall entrance? Yes, as it compromises the structure.

Can an apartment complex prohibit you from mounting a dish on your patio with its own unattached concrete block mount that is properly grounding, and fed through your window? No.
Davy49

join:2007-04-10
Jacksonville, FL
·Comcast

Re: Just Great!!!

Hi All,
I keep reading in the forums where the nfl network has been moved to a different 'tier', I believe I read the digital classic / preferred tier. I live in the 32218 zip code area, as far as I know, the only way we can receive the nfl network is on the sports and entertainment tier that we are paying extra for. Does this apply to anyone else in here ?
David
Forums » Comcast Wishes You A Happy Rate Hike Season


Saturday, 21-Nov 05:45:06 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.