 
GNXPower
Got Boost?
Premium
join:2003-12-18
Huntington Beach, CA
| Better be $12 a month 'Cause that's what other VoIP providers are getting down to. I was talking to Comcast about their upcoming digital phone service (not VoIP) and the pricing wasn't that different from Verizon. Meanwhile Cox entered the Orange County market years ago undercutting what was then Pacbell by 30-50% for the first line and 50%+ for the second.
Look at Optimum voice, $35, while competitors are at $20-$30. VoIP is just data and an ATA can be put anywhere. Anti-consumer companies like Comcast are going to be in for quite a shock when they actually for the first time have to compete on an even playing field with other providers. I wouldn't put it past Comcast to interfere with other VoIP traffic, just as they started these anti-DBS penalties a while back.
--
10.98@121 | |
|
digiblur
Got Sipura?
Premium
join:2002-06-03
Louisiana
| Others to remain? The question remains: with the entry of the cable giants and eventually the bells, will there be enough room for the smaller VoIP operations currently enjoying early success?
Yes, if the bigger boys keep charging $40 a month plus junk fees. You just can't beat getting a phone line for around $15 a month for unlimited regional calling. | |
|
ropeguru
Premium
join:2001-01-25
Bridgeport, WV
clubs: | But... If they want to offer VoIP they STILL need to raise the upload speeds. Or anytime someone in the house is talking on the phone and some one surfs they will get choppy voice on the conversion. The current 256k still isn't enough. | |
|
 | hescominsoon
join:2003-02-18
Brunswick, MD | Re: But... actually the VOIP data uses a different channel than the inet upload so the two will not effect each other.
--
God Blesshttp://www.emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com | |
|
| |
ropeguru
Premium
join:2001-01-25
Bridgeport, WV
clubs: | Re: But... That is only if they are doing digital phone though. For VoIP it would use your internet connection just like Vonage and all the others.
Unles they are doing something totally different that I do not know about. | |
|
| | | Kommie
join:2003-05-13
East Haven, CT | Re: But... Its going to be based like the current Digital Phone. Box outside house connected to current phone lines in house but they will use VOIP switches insted of the current circut based ones. | |
|
| | | |
| | | 
Corvus
Flaming Tards Since 2003
Premium,VIP
join:2003-11-26
| hescominsoon  is right, cable companies will sell VoIP as another Internet access on his own QUAM wich is a plus against third party VoIP providers.
--
Jesus saves, but only Buddha makes incremental backups. | |
|
| | 
enOehT
Premium
join:2003-05-17
Langhorne, PA
2 edits | actually it depends what kind of VOIP implementation you are talking about. 
without QoS on your router, you will run into this issue. | |
|
| |
| |
enOehT
Premium
join:2003-05-17
Langhorne, PA | Re: But... it is still VoIP, the voice data is still going over an IP network, it is just not using your upstream, like a vonage type setup will. | |
|
| ABitCrazy
join:2003-07-14
Elkridge, MD
 ·Verizon FIOS
 ·Comcast
| If they roll out true VoIP, I would expect this would be done in conjunction with an implementation of DOCSIS 1.1 features. They have already upgraded most systems with DOCSIS 1.1 headend equipment, still running like a DOCSIS 1.0 system. This means they can implement DOCSIS 1.1 service flows specifying QoS for VoIP, completely independent of QoS features supported by subscribers' routers. Consequently, upstream data rates will not necessarily need to be upgraded. | |
|
shellenberg
Premium
join:2003-12-20
Salmo, BC | To my friends "down south"... Do you know if there are any plans for the FCC to start jumping in on voip providers with all sorts of regulations? Right now, I'd assume its regulation free (as the internet). | |
|
| WolfJaguar
join:2003-03-20
Portland, OR | Re: To my friends "down south"... That's in prelim right now. Since NY decided to try and regulate Vonage. The FCC might be looking into that. | |
|
| 
techguyga
MCSE, DCSE
Premium
join:2003-12-31
Cumming, GA | Most states have ruled that VoIP cannot be regulated because it is a data service, not a phone service. | |
|
| | 
J D McDorce
Premium
join:2001-12-29
Westland, MI | Re: To my friends "down south"... Once their current tax revenues start fading from folks changing over from POTS to VoIP, I fully expect the States to change their tune. | |
|
navalpatel
join:2003-07-28
Lubbock, TX
| The Exception Presenting the brand new VoIP Phone service by Comcast! Call as much as you want and whereever you want for one low monthly rate!*
* - You are not to abuse the service by making as many calls as you want and you may not exceed 1 MB transfer monthly or 10 calls.
The Invisible Cap is EVIL! | |
|
| 
Voyager2K2
join:2001-10-04
Wayne, PA
·Verizon FIOS
| Re: The Exception said by navalpatel :
Presenting the brand new VoIP Phone service by Comcast! Call as much as you want and whereever you want for one low monthly rate!*
* - You are not to abuse the service by making as many calls as you want and you may not exceed 1 MB transfer monthly or 10 calls.
The Invisible Cap is EVIL!
Amen Bro'
My thoughts exactly.
Just how much more junk does Comcast intend to try and push through their pipe?
Seems like they can't handle what they offer already. | |
|
raye
Premium
join:2000-08-14
Orange, CA | So now I will be getting SPAM from VoIP? If Comcast does as good a job with securing and educating their customers on VoIP as they do with computers, I suspect I will be adding a block list of VoIP numbers to go along with my Comcast IP blacklist... | |
|
darthur2000
join:2002-01-02
Middletown, CT
clubs:
| 2006? If it's anything like the roll out of broadband it'll be a long wait. Lets see, they first said it would be available in 1999 and it was actually available in my area in 2003 so I guess this will be an option for me by 2010 if past performance is any predictor of how this will play out. | |
|
IHATEINCOMPECAST
@speakeasy.n
|  40 Million homes...hmmm
| |
|
| Kommie
join:2003-05-13
East Haven, CT
| Re: 40 Million homes...hmmm Buddy, you need to think a little before you post. Because of Comcast your DSL and phone price is stable. And do you know why ?
Comcast is actually serving 90% of its market with High Speed Internet unlike the Telcos who are not expanding DSL. And Comcast is actually brining competition to the local phone market which for years has been a monopoly, which is causing the telco to fire back with TV Service(See SBC and Verizon announcements). The more competition the better. | |
|
jdeh
join:2005-12-19
Pleasant Hill, CA
| VOIP I have COMCAST cable and TV but am using Packet8 VOIP using my COMCAST line. there is absolutely NO interferene when using both, I got a UNIDEN VOIP corede phone with a satellite for $29 after rebate at FRY's and it's the best phone I have ever had>>>crystal clear (I have a hearing disability) even on speakerphone.
The service is $22 complete with all the bells and whistles that you pay xtra for with COMCAST such as call waiting, caller id, 3 way, etc etc PLUS unlimited domestic long distance 24/7. I doubt if COMCAST WILL BE ABLE TO COMPETE WITH THAT? mY TYPICAL comcast phone bill was around $60 a month. | |
|
|
|
|
Comcast VoIP
·