 
baineschile
2600
Premium
join:2008-05-10
Sterling Heights, MI | If it can be done... ...ATT will find a way to charge for it. | |
|
 | |
kevinm5
join:2008-05-27
Willows, CA | Coverage? I'll want them to expand their coverage first. Work on making the current 3G network faster and more available. | |
|
| 
kilometers
join:2007-01-24
Sacramento, CA
 ·SureWest Internet
 ·AT&T U-Verse
| Re: Coverage? 3G coverage seems very good out here in Northern CA. I get 3G everywhere including the freeway driving between Sacramento and San Francisco. Webpages on my iphone load pretty quickly too when on the 3G network.
I heard 3G coverage is pretty bad in other states though and only available in cities and what not. =\ | |
|
| 
JasonOD
@comcast.net | Naw... ATT has put the brakes on 3g spending and is about done with the 3g buildout. With 4g coming in the next year or two, any money ATT throws at 3g coverage would be a waste. | |
|
| | brad
join:2007-09-06
Etobicoke, ON
| Re: Coverage? said by JasonOD :
Naw... ATT has put the brakes on 3g spending and is about done with the 3g buildout. With 4g coming in the next year or two, any money ATT throws at 3g coverage would be a waste.
That would be pretty dumb when 4G is still 3-4 years away. | |
|
ltship
join:2002-08-11
Sturgeon Bay, WI | and... the chip they want to insert in the back of your neck??
no thank you | |
|
| 
wifi4milez
Big Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace
join:2004-08-07
New York, NY
·Verizon FIOS
 ·Sprint Mobile Broa..
 ·RoadRunner Cable
 ·BroadVoice
| Re: and... said by ltship  :the chip they want to insert in the back of your neck?? no thank you What exactly are you talking about?
--
If history teaches us anything, it teaches that simple-minded appeasement or wishful thinking about our adversaries is folly.
-Ronald Reagan-
| |
|
| |
morbo
Complete Your Transaction
join:2002-01-22
00000
clubs: | this makes sense, since they are avoiding .... real investment in fiber deployment. they are betting the farm on wireless. u-verse is their finger in the damn so they don't lose their shirts in the meantime. | |
|
iLive4Apple
Hybrid power
Premium
join:2006-07-13
Helena, AL | Alabama Well I come to Alabama with some LTE on my knee... Oh wait, we barely have EDGE/GSM service over here.
--
I get 29 MPG in my Toyota Highlander Hybrid! | |
|
xenophon
join:2007-09-17
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
1 edit | No way unless tied into the IEEE The consumer electronics industry is tied into the IEEE. HSPA/LTE is controlled by the 3GGP, the telcom industry. Just ask Apple how fun that has been.
LTE would have to give themselves up to IEEE in order for the consumer electronics industry to adopt it broadly, but WiMAX is already there, which is essentially the same core platform.
They might pay some makers to put HSPA/LTE in their devices but they won't be able to get makers to naturally accept it. Verizon/Sprint would have a much greater chance of success doing this since they have 5x greater EVDO coverage than ATT 3G, ie Kindle.
When Intel gets WiFi/WiMAX chipsets down to the same price as WiFi, current WiFi product makers will naturally drop in the chipset, ideally not having to deal with the carrier. | |
|
| 
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME
| Re: No way unless tied into the IEEE Very true.. I wonder how they plan to attempt to integrate LTE into devices?
I wonder if the scale the GSMA will come into play on this (ie. attempt to strong arm the industry).
I think in the 'cost' arena, WiMAX/WiFi will be the lower cost, at least until the mobile industry finds a way to separate mobile telecom from mobile consumer electronics.
The only advantage for LTE/HSPA is the highly controlled (and already purchased in many countries) spectrum.
WiMAX's advantage is that it can use just about any spectrum, which is also its scalability issue (outside of the U.S. at least).
I do think WiMAX will do better in the embedded/consumer devices, while AT&T (and possibly others) will do well in the 'walled garden' mobile telecom.
--
Canada = Hollywood North | |
|
goalieskates
join:2004-09-12
Knoxville, TN | No thank you, AT&T Once again, people should be able to opt-in for this. I can promise right now this is something I won't buy. | |
|
|
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | Re: No thank you, AT&T At some point, your car may have a WiMAX or LTE (or other) device built in.
--
Canada = Hollywood North | |
|
zardoz86
join:2008-10-15
Chicago, IL
| have hspa want wimax - lte I would like to use wireless to provide broad band to wired customers. I dropped dsl because it did not work and use hspa for lan internet and voip phone. xohm will sell wholesale, direct it to a mini dslam and sell dsl that works. I would like to do that. or 3.65 Ghz
at&t has 700 MHz spectrum which is wireless for home
with what they will call lte in 2012. 802.16j (relay) is lte. you shouldn't deploy a wimax network without it. | |
|
dave6544
@shawcable.net
| Of course AT&T wants this They want to charge you full price for each separate path to the internet.
Instead of your computer accessing the internet through your cell-phones "unlimited" plan, they want you to pay another $40/month + $100 for the card that plugs into your computer.
It's the ideal plan for AT&T. Not so good for those who get it in the rear, namely their customers... | |
|
|
|
|
AT&T Wants HSDPA/LTE In....Everything
Re: If it can be done...