dslreports logo
 story category
AT&T, Verizon Get Immunity For Illegal Wiretaps
Senate fails to pass immunity-stopping amendment

The Senate today gave AT&T and Verizon retroactive legal immunity for their roles in handing over consumer voice and data information wholesale to the NSA without a court order. Telecom providers face billions in lawsuits for their decisions to participate in the Bush Administration's warrantless wiretapping program, and have been lobbying DC relentlessly in order to derail these suits.

The highest profile case involves 22-year former AT&T employee turned whistle-blower Mark Klein, who documented AT&T's use of entire rooms (pdf) to ferry data from multiple carriers directly to the NSA. With retroactive immunity, the Electronic Frontier Foundation's case against AT&T all but disintegrates.


According to the Associated Press, the Senate voted 31 to 67 to reject an attempt to include an amendment that would have eliminated immunity. Salon has a little more detail on how voting broke down. Republicans voted unanimously for telecom immunity, while Democrats split, 31-18. Presidential candidate Barack Obama voted against immunity, while Presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton was a no show. Salon opines:
quote:
That's really the most extraordinary aspect of all of this, if one really thinks about it -- it isn't merely that the Democratic Senate failed to investigate or bring about accountability for the clearest and more brazen acts of lawbreaking in the Bush administration, although that is true. Far beyond that, once in power, they are eagerly and aggressively taking affirmative steps -- extraordinary steps -- to protect Bush officials. While still knowing virtually nothing about what they did, they are acting to legalize Bush's illegal spying programs and put an end to all pending investigations and efforts to uncover what happened.
Bush has said he'd veto any renewed FISA bill that did not include retroactive immunity for the phone providers. Qwest was the only baby bell to reject Uncle Sam's advances out of concern that the program was not entirely legal. That's apparently no longer a problem, as AT&T and Verizon have the lobbying muscle to make it so. There's now two FISA bills that need resolving; one in the House without immunity, and this Senate bill that includes it. Barring some last minute show of intestinal fortitude on the part of Congress, it doesn't look good for opponents of immunity.
view:
topics flat nest 
page: 1 · 2 · next

TheHelpful1
Premium Member
join:2002-01-11
Upper Marlboro, MD

TheHelpful1

Premium Member

I feel sick.

I think I just threw up a little in my mouth....

dks7
join:2004-05-31
Omak, WA

2 recommendations

dks7

Member

Re: I feel sick.

Why can't those guys who sit on rooftops sniping college students ever change up and take out some politicians and corporate execs.
amigo_boy
join:2005-07-22

1 recommendation

amigo_boy

Member

Re: I feel sick.

said by dks7:

Why can't those guys who sit on rooftops sniping college students ever change up and take out some politicians and corporate execs.
I just reported this to the Secret Service.

Mark
The Antihero
join:2002-04-09
Enola, PA

1 recommendation

The Antihero

Member

Re: I feel sick.

said by amigo_boy:

I just reported this to the Secret Service.
In other words, "I'M TELLLLLLLLIIIINNNNNNNG!"

But I do have to congratulate you on actually making about post without using the words, "Self-styled freedom fighters."

morbo
Complete Your Transaction
join:2002-01-22
00000

morbo

Member

Re: I feel sick.

said by The Antihero:

"Self-styled freedom fighters."
good one!
jc10098
join:2002-04-10

2 edits

jc10098

Member

Re: I feel sick.

Amigo boy WOULD NOT PROVIDE THE DETAILS requested in previous conversation.

Name
Address
Social Security Number
List of websites visited
Credit History Etc

Yet he wants to defend our government for handing out the same data but doesn't wish to provide his.

As for this bill. WHY DIDN'T THOSE TWO... DODD AND FINEGOLD FILBUSTER!!!!!!!!!!!!! I mean WTF..
MyDogHsFleas
Premium Member
join:2007-08-15
Austin, TX

MyDogHsFleas

Premium Member

Re: I feel sick.

said by jc10098:

As for this bill. WHY DIDN'T THOSE TWO... DODD AND FINEGOLD FILBUSTER!!!!!!!!!!!!! I mean WTF..
RTFA, the vote was 67-31. It only takes 60 to invoke cloture.
MyDogHsFleas

MyDogHsFleas to jc10098

Premium Member

to jc10098
said by jc10098:

Amigo boy is a HYPOCRITE. Ignore him. He holds no credibility as HE WOULD NOT PROVIDE THE DETAILS requested in previous conversation.

Name
Address
Social Security Number
List of websites visited
Credit History Etc

Yet he wants to defend our government for handing out the same data but doesn't wish to provide his.
OK we'll try this one more time. Based on our previous go-round, I doubt this one-note joker will change his tune, but at least others reading these posts may get it.

Your request is absurd and nonsensical. It's like saying that if I believe that the police should be given greater freedom to search suspects, that I should allow anyone who knocks on my door to search my house. Well, no. The two things are quite different.
jc10098
join:2002-04-10

jc10098

Member

Re: I feel sick.

My request is NEITHER ABSURD OR NONSENSICAL. It is a REALISTIC request. If you feel this information is not private then PROVIDE IT FOR ALL TO SEE since it would be no different than handing it to strangers in the government. Otherwise SHUT YOUR PIE HOLE. Simple now isn't it?

As for the Filibuster, they didn't try or so the article said. So who would know if it would have been overridden or not. My guess, it would have BUT STILL there's a different type of respect that goes into breaking one. If you break my filibuster, then next time you have issues, count on yours to be broken too. Hence, it still should have been given an ATTEMPT.
amigo_boy
join:2005-07-22

1 edit

amigo_boy

Member

Re: I feel sick.

said by jc10098:

My request is NEITHER ABSURD OR NONSENSICAL. It is a REALISTIC request. If you feel this information is not private then PROVIDE IT FOR ALL TO SEE since it would be no different than handing it to strangers in the government.
I consider my tax return private, but I support the idea of paying for the cost of government which includes providing this information.

Face it: Your position (like many, frankly) is absurd. I can respect opposing greater government authority, or supporting better checks and balances. But, your reasoning indicates you are so partisan that even the most tenuous thoughts become absolute principles for you. It places you in the irrelevant fringe.

Mark
jc10098
join:2002-04-10

1 edit

jc10098

Member

Re: I feel sick.

Still waiting for my REQUEST. Now we want that information since you have 0 objections go handing it out. As per tax return, I didn't ask just for that. However, nothing is private according to you. Therefore hand out or hush up. Simple isn't it. You have no regard for privacy and don't mind prying eyes seeing your life (IE anyone working for the government, and all third parties involved), then why I am more of a threat? You can't control what they do with said information, which is much more dangerous than an individual.
SurfaceUnits
join:2007-09-29
Hot Springs National Park, AR

2 edits

SurfaceUnits to amigo_boy

Member

to amigo_boy
The senator from Louisiana uses your tax dollars to enrich her political associates who in return enrich the senator from the proceeds they received from her. She likes your paying of taxes as well. She might even enjoy your paying of taxes more than you do.

S_engineer
Premium Member
join:2007-05-16
Chicago, IL

1 recommendation

S_engineer to jc10098

Premium Member

to jc10098
said by jc10098:

My request is NEITHER ABSURD OR NONSENSICAL. It is a REALISTIC request. If you feel this information is not private then PROVIDE IT FOR ALL TO SEE since it would be no different than handing it to strangers in the government. Otherwise SHUT YOUR PIE HOLE. Simple now isn't it?

Dude. seek help. There was an executive decision made in a time of national crisis. Several corporations complyed with requests from OUR gov't in order to prevent anymore attacks. They not only deserve immunity, they deserve our Thanks. This has nothing to do with an ordinary law abiding citizens private information, unless of course he/she are accomplices.
Skippy25
join:2000-09-13
Hazelwood, MO

Skippy25

Member

Re: I feel sick.

It was an abusive executive decision that was made and should not have been followed by anyone because current laws said otherwise. No government entity has any right to violate our rights like that because it is convenient for them.

If you want to give up your rights so you can feel safer feel free, but don't expect nor require the rest of us to do the same to accommodate you and the panzies around you.
amigo_boy
join:2005-07-22

amigo_boy

Member

Re: I feel sick.

said by Skippy25:

It was an abusive executive decision that was made and should not have been followed by anyone ...
If that we're so *obviously* true (as the Commentariat constantly insist), it should be a cinch to impeach the President. Or, to get the DoJ to file criminal charges against the telcos. Or, to recall Senators who support immunity. Or, to replace them during reelection, and change the laws, etc.

Instead, all we're hearing about is *civil* court. That's your right. But, it's hardly the high road we'd expect you to take if it were such a clear abuse of power.

Mark

morbo
Complete Your Transaction
join:2002-01-22
00000

morbo

Member

Re: I feel sick.

oh brother. you and your futile attempt to downplay "civil court".

what you suggest is impossible because the usual recourse in this situation, DoJ filing criminal charges, is impossible because the DoJ / attorney general is in bed with the Whitehouse. have you been sleeping the last 7 years?
jc10098
join:2002-04-10

1 edit

jc10098 to S_engineer

Member

to S_engineer
Prevent more attacks? So they happen every day? So can we use this argument arbitrarily. I think more will occur. Give me the information I request with no oversight. The only thing we have to fear is fear itself and an overzealous government. Why do you think states were given rights, so the federal government couldn't make all the decisions. Now they are, and we're left being LESS SAFE. IE if we're so GOD DAMN PARANOID the big bad boogeyman is out to get us, then why remain a democracy? We can become an authoritative country and then supersede the need for more than one person to make a decision in the time of emergency? Sounds better to me. Better yet, let's be like china where people have no right to protest wrongs. Even better, then if this single figure makes a bad decision, we can't complain or we're arrested / shot. Here's the best, if we're so eager to trade our rights, doesn't it mean they terrorists won? After all, terrorism is meant not to simply cause panic but CHANGE the way people live! Notice how your argument has a lot of slippery slopes involved. Hence, I prefer my good old checks and balances, NO MATTER the situation.
deadzoned
Premium Member
join:2005-04-13
Cypress, TX

deadzoned to S_engineer

Premium Member

to S_engineer
Except for the fact that the wiretapping happened before 9-11.
jc10098
join:2002-04-10

jc10098

Member

Re: I feel sick.

Yes.... WITH A COURT ORDER!!

FFH5
Premium Member
join:2002-03-03
Tavistock NJ

1 edit

FFH5

Premium Member

Re: I feel sick.

said by deadzoned:

Except for the fact that the wiretapping happened before 9-11.
said by jc10098:

Yes.... WITH A COURT ORDER!!
It was done without court orders since the 50's. You ought to read a little more history.
jc10098
join:2002-04-10

jc10098

Member

Re: I feel sick.

Depending on the Era and generally courts still gave permission. In the 1950s with McCarthy, the FBI did so but they did with oversight. Granted, they targeted EVERYONE but they did with permission. In the 1960s with the Monitoring of peace groups, courts still oversaw such activities. I'm not going to think for one moment that ALL were done with court orders. I'm only saying those that WEREN'T then or NOW broke the law. Plain and simple.

meister_sd
Premium Member
join:2006-01-29
La Mesa, CA

meister_sd to S_engineer

Premium Member

to S_engineer
said by S_engineer:

Dude. seek help. There was an executive decision made in a time of national crisis. Several corporations complyed with requests from OUR gov't in order to prevent anymore attacks. They not only deserve immunity, they deserve our Thanks. This has nothing to do with an ordinary law abiding citizens private information, unless of course he/she are accomplices.
"Those who are willing to give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither, and will lose both." Benjamin Franklin
amigo_boy
join:2005-07-22

1 recommendation

amigo_boy

Member

Re: I feel sick.

said by meister_sd:

"Those who are willing to give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither, and will lose both." Benjamin Franklin
Why do self-styled freedom fighters always misquote the Founders? Franklin wrote:

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

The addition of those adjectives make his comment less absolute. Logically, it means it's not wrong to give up "non-essential liberties" and/or, for "permanent safety."

Also, keep in mind that the Founding generation embraced "big government" (relatively speaking) more than any generation since their time. They gave up the Articles of Confederation after 12 years for the Federal Constitution.

They did it for a good reason. But, it's a myth to ascribe a perfect baseline to them. Should we use the very limited government of the Articles? Or, the relatively *gigantic* Federal government which they choose instead? (The one with all the qualifiers, such as "reasonable" searches and seizures?

Mark
The Antihero
join:2002-04-09
Enola, PA

The Antihero

Member

Re: I feel sick.

said by amigo_boy:

Why do self-styled freedom fighters always misquote the Founders?
He said it again! Everybody drink!
jc10098
join:2002-04-10

jc10098

Member

Re: I feel sick.

If we drank to every ignorant statement amigo boy said, we'd be dead from alcohol poisoning by now. Best take a sip of alcohol free beer or something. You'll live much longer. To that, cheers.
jc10098

jc10098 to amigo_boy

Member

to amigo_boy
Amigo, do you simply copy and paste your replies? None of them have anything of substance within them. Seriously, you'd be better off not posting, than pretending like anyone cared about what you had to say. At this point, we've all called you for what you are... Someone that spouts off, provides no proof, and best of all doesn't want to be held accountable for the same things he supports time and time again.
amigo_boy
join:2005-07-22

1 recommendation

amigo_boy

Member

Re: I feel sick.

said by jc10098:

Amigo, do you simply copy and paste your replies?
That's ironic coming from the person who's last 40 replies has been "Where's the personal and private information I asked for?"

Mark
jc10098
join:2002-04-10

1 edit

jc10098

Member

Re: I feel sick.

And for the 41st time Im still waiting from the man who claims to advocate for something yet, wants privacy himself. Repeating is the only thing you seem to understand since you repeat your freedom fighter line 100000000000 times every post.....So point stand.. Give us that information Mr. Hypocrite. How come you won't? You keep finding every excuse not to. Anyhow, this issue has been beaten to the ground. Ever notice how hardly anyone agrees with you? It's not because you are fighting a righteous battle. It's because you're fighting an uphill one that you won't win.
amigo_boy
join:2005-07-22

amigo_boy

Member

Re: I feel sick.

said by jc10098:

... since you repeat your freedom fighter line 100000000000 times every post ...
Self-styled. It's an important distinction.

Mark
jc10098
join:2002-04-10

jc10098

Member

Re: I feel sick.

la di freaking da. Glad you got that off your chest? I hope so. Now we'll all go back to chastising your unwinnable battle and ridiculous comments.

NOCMan
MadMacHatter
Premium Member
join:2004-09-30
Colorado Springs, CO

NOCMan to dks7

Premium Member

to dks7
Unfortunately even natural selection hits a wall when it comes to politics.

Does not matter. Just heard on the radio today that in schools where you can vote at 17 the students were sitting apart from eachother based on party preference.

If our political parties do nothing this will end up hurting our country in a big way. We do not need a Northern Ireland going on here.
patcat88
join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY

2 edits

patcat88

Member

Re: I feel sick.

said by NOCMan:

We do not need a Northern Ireland going on here.
Its easy to prevent a Northern Ireland when all Email/Telephones/IM/maybe postal mail/internet traffic is recorded by CIA/NSA, so they would catch plots very easily, now why they didn't catch 9/11, go ask Bush about it. I invite conspiracy theorists to join in this thread. All else fails you can claim "unlawful combatants" and just carpet bomb and do an Iraq, if the "evil side" has planes/tracking missiles, its easy, just rotate the super secret ray gun that sits on a secret satellite in outspace into place and fire.

Remember that secret military technology is always 10-30 years ahead of what the public knows, think of all those blackbird spy planes, if rumor said it was true in the 1980s, im sure it has been fully R&Ded by now. »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St ··· programs

Other ways of dealing with civil unrest include night time disappearings, Nazis and Communists and Military Regimes in South America perfected it and it worked pretty well. Heck, even our CIA acknowledges its an effective tool. »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex ··· endition

If the govt doesn't want to/can't murder you, a cop can always pull you over and find a Kilo of cocaine in your trunk, now the Govt is safe from you. Simple as day. TRY AND DISPROVE THAT.

Technology could allow putting all Americans under a lie detector to prove their loyalty, if they fail, shot on the spot, political Darwinism. Sounds like something Hitler would do.

The chance for a revolution in the USA would be the Military attacking the President/Congress, or another superpower secretly funding a revolution, EU, Asia, and Russia don't seem open to doing that any time soon. Look at other countries, its plain as day.

Also President could legally as "commander-in-chief" send the army to congress and 3/4ths of the state Houses/Senates and forces to pass an amendment making him Supreme Dictator for life. 232 years of democracy gone in a second. Basically a President organized Military Coup, happened so many times in other countries.

GTaylor95
Premium Member
join:2002-12-14
Frisco, TX

GTaylor95 to dks7

Premium Member

to dks7
Or instead of advocating violence you can do what I did - write your senator and tell them how upset you are for their vote.

Shack
join:2002-01-17
Bloomington, IN

Shack

Member

Re: I feel sick.

I am doing the same, but sadly I doubt it has any affect. the save us all from the terrorist lot will lead us into Orwell's 1984. He was right, just off by several decades.
patcat88
join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY

1 edit

patcat88 to GTaylor95

Member

to GTaylor95
People vote based on looks, and tidbits they remember from previous candidate ad campaigns of that party, and whatever Fox News/CNN says. If that fails you can just have Tony, Sal, Anthony, and Vito show up with a couple crowbars at the CEO of Diebold's house to change the votes, end of problem, or program your Lexus's onboard computer to floor the pedal at a certain time while your driving home, after the crash pour some vodka on you and throw the bottle in the car, a sad end to an alcoholic right?

With mechanical voting machines/paper voting it requires a much bigger conspiracy to pull off election fraud, which means the process is safer.

KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium Member
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
Netgear WNDR3700v2
Zoom 5341J

KrK to dks7

Premium Member

to dks7
While I understand the frustration, I guess I can't go that far to support such a sentiment.

Sometimes I wonder tho, what the outcome would have been if instead of crashing planes into the Twin Towers, they'd merely waited until the State of the Union address and then crashed them into the Capitol Building instead.

Makes for interesting debate, at least.

•••

superdog
I Need A Drink
MVM
join:2001-07-13
Lebanon, PA

1 recommendation

superdog to TheHelpful1

MVM

to TheHelpful1
This is the biggest pile of BS I have ever seen, and I no longer trust anyone or anything associated with the Gov't, EVER!

cork1958
Cork
Premium Member
join:2000-02-26

cork1958

Premium Member

Re: I feel sick.

said by superdog:

This is the biggest pile of BS I have ever seen, and I no longer trust anyone or anything associated with the Gov't, EVER!
You mean to tell you HAVE been trusting them? That makes you one of the VERY FEW that probably EVER have!

Staplegun
join:2005-04-20
Flower Mound, TX

Staplegun to TheHelpful1

Member

to TheHelpful1
Phone companies weren't trying to do anything wrong. What's the big deal?

••••••••••••••••••••••
Kearnstd
Space Elf
Premium Member
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ

Kearnstd to TheHelpful1

Premium Member

to TheHelpful1
ive learned to simply never trust the government long before this.

mainly due to how they lie about our tax system.

gas taxes: they will go into the DoT for road repairs, two years later they somehow now go into the general fund.

and that is just one example.

•••••
jc10098
join:2002-04-10

jc10098 to TheHelpful1

Member

to TheHelpful1
Did this pass in the house too? Or only the senate?

woody7
Premium Member
join:2000-10-13
Torrance, CA

woody7

Premium Member

Pffttt....

what a bunch of spineless wusses....

sporkme
drop the crantini and move it, sister
MVM
join:2000-07-01
Morristown, NJ

sporkme

MVM

HRC/Obama

That's a bit of a switchup there... Previously Obama was not showing up for big votes and Hillary was. Now we've got Obama showing up and Hillary absent. Curious...

••••••••
jay_rm
join:2002-04-12
Netville

jay_rm

Member

!

Gee, immunity from inevitable lawsuits for doing something the government "asked" them to do (yeah, sure - asked, as in, 'Do It - Right Now').

What a concept.

••••

Kilroy
MVM
join:2002-11-21
Saint Paul, MN

1 edit

Kilroy

MVM

Check here to see how your representatives voted

Washington Post Votes Database.

Make sure you let them know how you feel about businesses committing crimes and them letting them off the hook.

••••••

TheHelpful1
Premium Member
join:2002-01-11
Upper Marlboro, MD

1 edit

TheHelpful1

Premium Member

Protest

Protest this bill by signing the House bill
»action.firedoglake.com/p ··· SA/kvqbk

Detail of bill here ->http://thinkprogress.org/restore-act-summary/

•••••

Dogfather
Premium Member
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA

4 edits

1 recommendation

Dogfather

Premium Member

Nothing good would have come from it anyway

A bunch of blood sucking lawyer Sen. Edwards types would have gotten class action status.

Lawyers sue, get filthy rich

Telco customers get a coupon and a new "Wiretap lawsuit recovery fee" line item on their bills

You can't punish a corporation without punishing it's customers and in this case it was the customers who were potentially wronged.

Follow money when it comes to votes. They either take money from the telcos or the trial lawyer unions. Obama for example has historically gotten tons of campaign bribes contributions from the trial lawyer association (now the American Assoc of Justice) members.

••••••••••••••••

ftthz
If love can kill hate can also save
join:2005-10-17

ftthz

Member

meh...

what did you think would happen...
claco
join:2002-09-29
Tallmadge, OH

claco

Member

New Sig

Might as well fire up the new email sig and get it over with.

And don't feed me the 'whats the problem, terrorists new world we live in, government asked' bullshit. At least one company had the lawyers with common sense and balls enough to say no, and FISA worked perfectly fine before the telcos decided to break the law.

Spinless Bastards. Every one of them. Just remember, to those who are in office now and to chimpy who is on his way out: now we can spy on your calls and emails too.

Memo to the next president: tap chimpy's phone/email for all hints of self incriminating types of evidence.

What pisses me off even more is that while I love SBCDirect folk, ATT is my only option, and I need internet as that's what I do for a living. Were it not for that, I'd be dropping ATT like a bad habit.

--
Let them eat cake and false positives.

-----BEGIN NSATT SNOOP BLOCK-----
building bomb tower terrorist grenade c4 explosive plot hijack
plane police feds white house guns dirty device convoy president war chemical death drop off mule undercover launch rocket drug covert cell cerin mass infidel Allah package subway mass
------END NSATT SNOOP BLOCK------

••••••••••••••
ross7
join:2000-08-16

ross7

Member

Throw the BUMS out!

That's right, Democrats and Republicans alike, all who voted to provide protection for the scumbag Telcos who aided the Bush Administration in shredding the Constitution.

These arrogant assholes in Congress have acted against their constituent's interests, and the country's founding principles, for nearly eight years. They believe they are, like the Bush and the Telcos, above the law. They believe they are immune from redress through the ballot box, and they may well be, if electronic voting becomes the mandate across the land.

This is NOT the America I was born into. More and more, the government shows nothing but contempt for the rule of law, and the rights of its citizenry. The judiciary has been politicized to the extent that it is as corrupt, untrustworthy and despicable as our elected leaders.

At least Obama and a few others voted against immunity, so maybe there is some hope decency and rectitude haven't been extinguished altogether. However, the spineless fucks who run the Democratic side of the aisle have CHOSEN to look the other way, and join with unrepentant Republicans to sweep the criminal acts committed by the Bush Administration "under the carpet", and to prevent future investigation and prosecution of these criminals, and those who aided and abetted them, by the Justice Department of the next president.

Absolving the crimes of Bush, his cronies, and the corporate entities who aided them will not promote the healing of the body politic. The wounds will fester if not redressed.

KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium Member
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK

KrK

Premium Member

Re: Throw the BUMS out!

Here's how it shakes out:

McCain: FOR Immunity
Clinton: No show (Good as allowing it)
Obama: AGAINST immunity


Hmmm. Maybe I should take a second look at Obama. He's the only one who did the right thing in this case.

guitarzan
Premium Member
join:2004-05-04
Skytop, PA

guitarzan

Premium Member

Re: Throw the BUMS out!

said by KrK:

Here's how it shakes out:

McCain: FOR Immunity
Clinton: No show (Good as allowing it)
Obama: AGAINST immunity


Hmmm. Maybe I should take a second look at Obama. He's the only one who did the right thing in this case.
McCain, Clinton and Obama: Would erase the 2nd Amendment in a heartbeat. Examine their voting records concerning the Right to keep and bear arms. If they vote to limit or remove one Right. They will vote to limit and remove all Rights. How then can any be trusted, when they all have an axe pointed at the tree of liberty?

Politicians of either party can't be trusted as far as one could throw them. Obama is posing on this privacy issue to get votes, nothing else.

The 2nd Amendment is the sole Amendment keeping all our other Rights from toppling like dominoes. Enough with the F&*king political correctness. "Common sense" gun laws is civil disarmament

NRA: To See Where Gun Licensing Leads, Look To England

»www.youtube.com/watch?v= ··· =related

jgkolt
Premium Member
join:2004-02-21
Avon, OH

jgkolt

Premium Member

boooo

"Republicans voted unanimously for telecom immunity, while Democrats split, 31-18. Presidential candidate Barack Obama voted against immunity, while Presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton was a no show. "

The telco’s get immunity from being sued over their illegal wiretapping with the NSA. Guess congress gets bought again by lobbyists. And another note Obama took a stand and voted no even though he is a businessman and hillary clinton once again (a gripe of mine with her) doesn’t take a stand and doesn’t even vote. If we did it we would get arrested and charged but with all the big money they go scot free. I remember talking briefly to you about this and this is the final outcome. Clinton’s lost my vote.

jester121
Premium Member
join:2003-08-09
Lake Zurich, IL

jester121

Premium Member

Truly amazing...

I never thought anything could wake up the libs and make them realize that without adequate surveillance resources they're taking ownership of the next terrorist attack. When it came down to it, they were actually able to put the safety of the nation first and politics second. (Obama is a clueless ninny living in a dream world, it's amazing that he had the guts to take a stand on anything.)

••••

danclan
join:2005-11-01
Midlothian, VA

danclan

Member

FALSE - THeY Do NOT HAVE IMMUNITY yet

This bill still has to be reconciled with the house bill that does not give them immunity and then re-voted on by the full house and senate.

They are still a long way from having immunity but it sure does make for great headlines...

••••••••••
tiyuri
join:2001-06-06
Little Silver, NJ

tiyuri

Member

Depressing

Very depressing. As sad as it is that 18 Democrats would bow to the telecom lobby it wouldn't have mattered. The Final score was 31-67. If all 18 Dems that voted against it had voted the right way it would have been 49-49 which in the senate is a loss.

Corporations run this country. It gets proven over and over again. Noone should be surprised. I just wonder when they will push the envelope too far.

••••
Skippy25
join:2000-09-13
Hazelwood, MO

Skippy25

Member

Be Heard

Not sure how much this will help, but encourage the house to not side with the senate on this unlawful act.

»action.firedoglake.com/p ··· toreFISA
matrix3D
join:2006-09-27
Middletown, CT

1 edit

matrix3D

Member

Vindication

I thought the Democratic-controlled Congress were going to bring about the "change" that the Republicans couldn't/wouldn't? This just goes to show the Democrats are just as corrupt, inept, and stupid as the Republicans.

EDIT: Let's not forget the "ethics reforms" they talked so vigorously about enacting... and yet did absolutely nothing once they seized power. More broken promises by the Democrats... feels like Bill Clinton's 1992 speech saying "every kid in America who wants to go to college will be able to" promise.

•••
garmst
join:2000-09-17
New York, NY

garmst

Member

Hooray! Common sense wins!

Now, let's get down to tapping me first. Bore yourselves to death!

And get the bad guys while you're at it!

TheHelpful1
Premium Member
join:2002-01-11
Upper Marlboro, MD

TheHelpful1

Premium Member

Re: Hooray! Common sense wins!

If they do tap you first, give me a call and we can talk about what kind of sandwhich we would bring to a deserted island.
oldguy60
join:2003-11-04
Selden, NY

oldguy60

Member

The real issue

I am neither pro or con for At&T or any other corporation. To me the real issue is that there were rules (laws) in place for the President to follow. He could have gone thru the FISA court and if his request had merit a warrant would have been issued that the telco companies would have had to follow and our gov't would not be in the twisted situation it is in now. Warrants have been issued immediately (over cell phones) so time delay is not a valid argument.
But once again Bush has shown in his arrogant way that the laws and the constitution mean nothing to him. If our representatives really cared about us "we the people" this is a no brainer......you go with the existing laws. Of course this is not what is happening. History will speak about the representatives who tied their horses to the wagon called Bush regardless of what he did.I do not call myself a Republican or a Democrat because I choose not to blindly follow because of a "name". I am just a very concerned American citizen, in the later part of his life, that is very concerned with what is being done to our country by our politicians and our judicial system. I have no axes to grind and no pony in the race.
God Bless America !!!!!!!
amigo_boy
join:2005-07-22

1 edit

amigo_boy

Member

Re: The real issue

said by oldguy60:

To me the real issue is that there were rules (laws) in place for the President to follow. He could have gone thru the FISA court and if his request had merit a warrant would have been issued that the telco companies would have had to follow and our gov't would not be in the twisted situation it is in now.
That's true. But, Presidents have acted outside "what's legally available at the time" and were later justified. Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation broke existing property laws. It required the 13th Amendment to make his action legal. Roosevelt violated the Neutrality Act when he exchanged of "ships for bases." It required the Lend-Lease Act to make that legal.

Should those who followed the President in good faith (freeing slaves or piloting ships) be held to *civilly* liable? If the Presidents weren't considered to be guilty, why should those who followed them?

That's where I take exception with self-styled freedom fighters. They use words like "crime," but they can't rise to the level of a criminal trial of impeachment, nor criminal charges against the telcos. The wiretapping law has been amended to better accommodate the President's actions. But, self-styled freedom fighters are resorting to civil court (the same place where people win the lottery when they spill hot coffee on themselves). That seems to be as perverted as what they accuse the "system" of doing to them.

If they don't like it, they should work within the laws to change the system. Elect better politicians. Change the laws on surveillance. Etc. They're just looking for a cheap political shot which will do nothing except trickle down to customers (or taxpayers when the government recompenses the telcos with lucrative no-bid contracts).

Mark

morbo
Complete Your Transaction
join:2002-01-22
00000

1 recommendation

morbo

Member

Re: The real issue

face it mark: a crime (whether civil or criminal) was committed by AT&T (and VZ). they should be punished for it. their corporate lawyers had every legal reason to tell the government to go to hell BUT they didn't. they made the CHOICE to break the law.

stop being their Public Relations department cheerleader.

Goosestomper

Anon

America

...Would have made Hitler proud if he had lived long enough! Long live the Gestapo ! ...Err,I mean the justice department!
Joe12345678
join:2003-07-22
Des Plaines, IL

Joe12345678

Member

It time to take it to the us supreme court

How had will it be to push the lawsuit up to the us supreme court?
MyDogHsFleas
Premium Member
join:2007-08-15
Austin, TX

MyDogHsFleas

Premium Member

Re: It time to take it to the us supreme court

said by Joe12345678:

How had will it be to push the lawsuit up to the us supreme court?
You mean the EFF lawsuit? I think that the point of this bill is to stop that lawsuit, and others like it. So it would never be tried, much less appealed.

Maybe I'm not understanding your question?
page: 1 · 2 · next