AT&T Tells Us They'll Hit 1 Million U-Verse Mark By Year EndThough wireless remains the real cash cow... ( old news - 09:15AM Wednesday Oct 22 2008) tags: business · telco · AT&T U-VerseAT&T spokesman Seth Bloom tells me this morning that as per the company's just released third quarter earnings, there were 232,000 U-verse TV net adds in the quarter, bringing the company to 781,000 subscribers in service. "We expect to exceed our target of more than 1 million by year end," says Bloom. There had been some doubt about that, with some analysts predicting a slow economy and home sales would slow deployment. Of course while U-Verse continues to see strong growth, things aren't quite as rosy for traditional DSL. Last quarter the telco posted the lowest growth in vanilla DSL subscribers in company history, though they ended the quarter with 14.7 million broadband customers. This quarter they added 148,000 total broadband customers, ending the quarter with 14.8 million. Clearly gone are the days where the telco would add half a million new DSL subscribers. Of course things are faring worse for landlines, with the telco having lost 10.6 percent of its copper voice lines since this time last year. On the positive side, wireless continues to be a cash cow for AT&T, with the telco adding 2 million new subscribers on the quarter. AT&T's wireless data revenues grew 50.5 percent versus the year-earlier quarter to $2.7 billion. The telco also says they activated 2.4 million 3G iPhones. Related:- AT&T Adds Record Number Of U-verse Customers
- AT&T Slows U-Verse Build Out
- AT&T Brings 3,000 Support Jobs Back To U.S.
- More Towns Grumble Over AT&T VRADs
- AT&T Slowing U-Verse Deployment?
- AT&T Brings Pop Up Ads To U-Verse TV
- AT&T U-Verse Drops In Baton Rouge
- AT&T Officially Launches Hulu Clone
|
 |  |   en102 Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26 Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME
| Re: Price/performance ratio too high I agree. Neither are 'cheap', however, cable has become fairly competitive (at least here in SoCal) for the basic price.
Eg. (1 year) TWC: 'All the Best': $89.99 - 6Mbps/512kbps - Digital 'Choice' and Analog TV (as many TV's as you can attach) - Unlimited VoIP
AT&T: 30/30/30 (only where VoIP exists) - 1 year - U100 (1 TV) - Uverse VoIP - 3Mbps/1Mbps
The problem with AT&T is.. they STILL don't have VoIP service available, adding another $25-$30 to the overall price. -- Canada = Hollywood North | |
|  |  |  hihi
join:2007-05-06 Port Orange, FL
| Re: Price/performance ratio too high Cable speed is superior Even thought I use DSL, I believe cable has a lot more potential In the future DSL is obsolute Now it's just an an alternative to dialup Not an alternative to cable it really is slow compared to most cable speed sorry about the vent yea uverse is already dead in the water it was failed to being and will fail in the future it is a no brainer to avoid it and go cable most PPL have cable and dsl service | |
|  |  |  |   60529262
join:2007-01-11 Chicago, IL | Re: Price/performance ratio too high Most of Comcast's footprint barely sees six megs, not the headline-grabbing speeds a small minority of markets with competition (see: FiOS) gets. Hardly competitive at over fifty bux a month. | |
|  |   60529262
join:2007-01-11 Chicago, IL | Way to be a Comcast whore there, lev. Still pouting about not getting U-Verse, eh? | |
|  |  |   lev Napoleon is always right Premium,Ex-mod 2002-08 join:2001-05-30 Chicago, IL clubs: 
·AT&T Midwest
1 edit | Re: Price/performance ratio too high said by 60529262 :Way to be a Comcast whore there, lev. Still pouting about not getting U-Verse, eh? 1. I don't have Comcast. Still an AT&T Customer at present. 2. UVerse service STILL doesn't support static IPs. 3. I'm at the fringe for service for AT&T DSL, and have an 1984/512 sync, which is far below what the comparable money would get for a Comcast static package. 4. Traditional DSL 's recent price increases were a bad idea, and contributed to AT&T's high customer churn.
I'm telling AT&T to get off their butts on deploying static IPs on Uverse, as well as deploying Uverse itself, and reverse its price increases.
How that translates to being a whore, I'd love to hear.  | |
|   fatmanskinny Premium join:2004-01-04 Wandering | How about adding more DSL tiers??? We have a business DSL account and the highest tier is 6MB/512K. Pathetic. -- God saved me from myself! Thank you, Lord, in the Name of Jesus! | |
|  |   tad2020
join:2007-07-17 Orange, CA
·AT&T DSL Service
| Re: How about adding more DSL tiers??? I just had one installed at my old office, highest tier is 3Mb/386Kb for $40 for 1 dynamic IP. I had to talk the CSR in to that price from the new $52 rate for the pro tier. Now that's pathetic!
ATT's website still shows the 'old' rate of $35, but you'd have to get full on phone service on the line to get that. ATT also tried to stick me with their $135 phone drop installation fee to put a phone jack 3 inches from the MPOE, at least the tech found the line for the drop I ran for it. Plus I have to deal with ATT's typical problems of only completing orders half way, totally wrong, or not at all; they managed to only get the order in for having the POTS line and totally lost the one for having DSL turned up on it. | |
|  Tcomp
join:2008-07-29 Greenbelt, MD
| Closer look at DSL
Although the heady days of 500k DSL net adds may be over, at least for 3Q08, they are reversing the dramatic slowdown in DSL. They only had 34K net DSL adds, but in 3Q08, they had 148K. I think this could be driven in part by wireless/DSL bundles, sans a voice wireline.
Check out my analysis at '»telecompetitor.com/node/887' | |
|  |  DGLewis
join:2006-03-10 Freehold, NJ
| Re: Closer look at DSL In their analyst call, they cited an attach rate of "over 85%" for U-verse broadband. That means that about 200k of the 232k U-verse video adds also added U-verse broadband.
Total broadband net adds were 148k.
That means that vanilla DSL had a net loss of about 52k. (Disregarding WildBlue.)
OK, that's better than 2Q, when the same math puts DSL with a net loss of about 100k, but I wouldn't say that the slowdown in DSL was by any means "reversed". "Attenuated", perhaps. | |
|   djrobx
join:2000-05-31 Valencia, CA
·PHONE POWER
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T CallVantage
·Time Warner VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable
| Slow economy Analysists who thought AT&T U-verse would miss their target probably didn't think it through.
A slower economy may very well slow deployment, but the big stock market crash didn't happen until almost October. At a minimum, AT&T would at least finish out whatever they had started so they can begin to recoup their investment. That sort of pinch is something we'd see more next year.
However, more immediately, people are looking to save a quick buck, and AT&T's generous promotions do just that. They're essentially offering you $200 just to give their services a try, without a contract. AT&T retentions was also offering very aggressive incentives to keep existing customers.
AT&T is no longer offering the first free month of TV, and from what I've read, they've significantly clamped down on the retentions promos. That's a good sign that things are going as planned. They've managed to get their Total Home DVR going and it looks like faster internet speeds and signficantly more HD channels are coming in November. They may not have the most cutting-edge network, and the system still has bugs to be worked out, but overall things are looking pretty good for AT&T U-Verse right now. -- AT&T U-Hearse Your funeral. Delivered.
| |
|  |   en102 Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26 Valencia, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME
| Re: Slow economy We'll have to see how many are going to 'keep' service in the coming months. This is becoming a pretty bleak quarter, and I don't expect things to turn around until spring/summer.
Its been a long time since I've seen stores in Valencia with 'For Rent' that were not new buildings. -- Canada = Hollywood North | |
|  |  |  |  jkeelsnc
join:2008-08-22 Boone, NC
| Asheville area I noticed driving around the Asheville, NC area over the weekend that there was a brand new big metal box near where my mother lives. It does not appear like the regular boxes that have been used for DSL before. In fact, it appeared there was already a DSLAM at that site before. In fact, the new box was much bigger, the size of a refrigerator or even larger. It appeared very similar to pictures I have seen of AT&T VRAD's for U-Verse. I wonder if this means that AT&T will be offering U-Verse in the Asheville area within the coming months and year. | |
|  |  |  decifal
join:2007-03-10 Bon Aqua, TN
| Re: meh Hmm Dsl addons slowing down... Hmmm Oh... They aren't building out dsl anymore... Its all Uverse/dsl capable equipment now.. And from what i've seen, they are only putting it in places with cable/dsl service already in place... NO build out deployment equals "much" less DSL subscribers.. I mean hell man its basic math... Deploy in areas that aren't serviced by anyone and BAM you get the market there first!... I'm seriously starting to believe that there are some major tards in the mix screwing things up with over guessed plans.
In short, want more subscribers? Deploy to areas not service by anyone yet, and you will get them.. Till then hold back the fake tears of "lack of interest" and get to work! | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |   CaptainRR Premium join:2006-04-21 Blue Rock, OH | Re: meh Gosh I hope that is the case with me. I am in a rural area with ATT dialup with no cable and DirecTV for my TV. Hell I don't even have cell service!!! You never know these things take time and money I am sure it will make it every were someday. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |   db19
@sbcglobal.net
| ATT Uverse I live in Houston and just cancelled my ATT U-Verse. We had the 200 channel package, but 50 of the channels were for religious preachers & tele-evangelists.
Nothing ruins a weekend faster then 50 preachers telling you what NOT to do for fun. | |
|  |  hihi
join:2007-05-06 Port Orange, FL
| Re: ATT Uverse said by db19 :
I live in Houston and just cancelled my ATT U-Verse. We had the 200 channel package, but 50 of the channels were for religious preachers & tele-evangelists.
Nothing ruins a weekend faster then 50 preachers telling you what NOT to do for fun. I totally agree
Wise move lol | |
|  |   60529262
join:2007-01-11 Chicago, IL | Yup. None of them on cable. No sir!

Just cut the cable entirely. Expand your mind instead. | |
|   anthonyNtx
@sbcglobal.net | Google search I just googled in. I don't understand this website. The name is dslreports Yet everyone here is badmouthing DSL technology and And praising cable technology. It seems everyone here are cable people So why bother coming here hating on DSL. | |
|  |   60529262
join:2007-01-11 Chicago, IL | Re: Google search They pretend to be customer-centric but in reality it's mostly just a place for small minds to vent and google Adsense hits. Stay out of the forums though. There are people there who can't think for themselves at all. | |
|  | |  |
|
|