 | | Already upgraded I put in my upgrade order this morning. It's supposed to be done today. | |
|
 |  | | Re: Already upgraded It is not available everywhere definitely not in my area, and I am guessing I am one of the unlucky ones for paying too much for the lousy service I am getting from AT&T. | |
|
 |  |  Reviews:
·AT&T Southeast
| Re: Already upgraded Yah, me too. No UVerse in my area and probably no hope of ever seeing it or anything like decent broadband speeds... that is until they put cable lines into my subdivision. But considering the state that Charter is in, I wont hold my breath on that either. -- Does Microsoft mean small and squishy? | |
|
 |  |  | | Here, Here....it is not available in my area either....so I am switching to Comcast phone and interenet....I was told by a Att rep that it is expensive to get fiber optics so I will just have to wait....tough!!!!am switching.... | |
|
 |  | | ATT has already hit the brickwall with U-Verse. My U-Verse service recently has been upgrade to the new vdsl2 32/5 profile with a max sync rate around 40k. There is not much more headroom for an higher profile.
Now in an copper milking fantasy world ATT will try to somehow magically increase their vdsl2 max sync rate with pair-bonding. But in really in the near future ATT will have to upgrade their U-Verse service from FTTN to FTTP. | |
|
 tacomaBleeding Dodger BluePremium join:2001-05-18 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 1 edit | 2500-3000' from CO? Is it supposed to say RT/VRAD, or whatever? | |
|
 |  | | Re: 2500-3000' from CO? VRAD, more appropriately. | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: 2500-3000' from CO? said by Oedipus:VRAD, more appropriately. Could be the CO in same cases. | |
|
 |  |
 |  |  sapoCruising Down Memory LanePremium join:2002-09-16 Sacramento, CA kudos:1 | Re: 2500-3000' from CO? Me and the guys from the co (local co) have breakfast together everyday. -- Purple Drink | |
|
 deadzonedPremium join:2005-04-13 Baton Rouge, LA | Same mistakes It's unfortunate to see AT&T making the same mistakes with their broadband division as they made with their wireless division.
Their backs will be against the wall before long and then the excuses will start and then finally at some point they decide to actually address the problem while subsequently admitting that they may have made some mistakes.
It's the AT&T version of the circle of life and it sucks for the consumer. | |
|
 |  | | Re: Same mistakes Surprisingly enough, AT&T now has the fastest broadband service in my area. TW refuses to upgrade, and Insight is stuck running on TWs network here. WOW isn't any better. | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: Same mistakes Insight isent stuck, they can allways scrap the relationship with RR and cut everyone over to their own HSI product like every outher market they are in. They chose RR as it was an established network, and well known in Columbus. | |
|
 juilinsandarTexas GoonerPremium join:2000-07-17 San Benito, TX | not yet... U-verse availability checker says that there is still no u-verse love in my area.  | |
|
 |  | | Re: not yet... Don't feel too bad I barely have a telephone in the rural area I am in with at&t. | |
|
 woody7Premium join:2000-10-13 Torrance, CA | hmmmmm.... As I stated in another thread, I live in uverse territory, and There is a vrad just up the street, a couple of blocks,the techs said it is turned on , and just checked availability and it said it would notify me, so the "AT&T Says 24 Mbps U-Verse Now Available Everywhere" is %crap -- BlooMe | |
|
 |  | | Re: hmmmmm.... It is only turned on and made an option for those who are getting UVerse at this time. If a location is not getting UVerse service of any type, this announcement of 24Mbps does not apply to that unserviced location. | |
|
 |  |  woody7Premium join:2000-10-13 Torrance, CA | Re: hmmmmm.... The techs told me that people were  -- BlooMe | |
|
 GbcueAlmost P.E.Premium join:2001-09-30 Santa Rosa, CA kudos:8 | Yeah, 3 HD streams! Can't wait!
I hope they'll have upgraded DVRs with more space. -- My Blog 2.0 | |
|
 |  | | Re: Yeah, 3 HD streams! im sorry but tv service should not have a restrictions on hd channel . i should be able to watch 5 hd channel at the same time if i want to. there hd channel in cali are so bad looking. they compress it to much. | |
|
 |  |  GbcueAlmost P.E.Premium join:2001-09-30 Santa Rosa, CA kudos:8 Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
| Re: Yeah, 3 HD streams! said by jt74589 :
im sorry but tv service should not have a restrictions on hd channel . i should be able to watch 5 hd channel at the same time if i want to. there hd channel in cali are so bad looking. they compress it to much. I'd rather take way more HD channels, not jargon "hd choices" on U-Verse over Comcrap any day.
DirecTV & Dish has a similar restrictions on HD streams.
Are you saying with Comcrap I can do 10 HD streams at once? -- My Blog 2.0 | |
|
 |  |  |  1 edit | Re: Yeah, 3 HD streams! said by Gbcue :
DirecTV & Dish has a similar restrictions on HD streams. Are you referring to multi-room dvr streaming? otherwise, i was under the assumption that with directv you are not limited to any number of simulatneous HD channels. I have 3 dvrs and have recorded 6 different hd shows simultaneously before. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  GbcueAlmost P.E.Premium join:2001-09-30 Santa Rosa, CA kudos:8 | Re: Yeah, 3 HD streams! Back when I had DISH, we could only do 2 HD streams, maximum, period.
3 DVRs? How many physical dishes + receivers did you have? -- My Blog 2.0 | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  | | Re: Yeah, 3 HD streams! I have a relatively new install, one slimline dish, SWM, and 3 dual-tuner DVR's. I've never had DISH btw. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | | Re: Yeah, 3 HD streams! Did you pick it up at the local emporium? | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium join:2005-05-20 kudos:3 | said by Gbcue:Back when I had DISH, we could only do 2 HD streams, maximum, period. 3 DVRs? How many physical dishes + receivers did you have? PLEASE stop calling them "streams".. they're not "streams" in the case of dish or cable... only IPTV or other internet based delivery...
Dish, Direct, Cable, Fios, etc is all limited by the equipment you chose to take... or they can provide.. but they're not "streams".... | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium join:2005-05-20 kudos:3 | Re: Yeah, 3 HD streams! In the sense of Satellite and cable, they're not streams... not in the sense that is U-Verse. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  djrobx join:2000-05-31 Valencia, CA kudos:1 1 edit | Re: Yeah, 3 HD streams! Data does not need to flow in from an IP source to be considered a stream. -- AT&T U-Hearse Your funeral. Delivered.
| |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium join:2005-05-20 kudos:3 | Re: Yeah, 3 HD streams! So, then the same can be said about "OnDemand Choices" too... it can't be both ways guys... when we're talking about "streaming" or "streams" in the sense of what AT&T does.. that's IP based streams... when you're talking about how many "streams can" as they said "Comcrap do" we're talking about RF delivery - they are TWO TOTALLY different things..
Ever heard of context based terminology? Satellite and cable don't "stream" to your home... they're fixed delivery methods... in the case of U-Verse, YouTube, etc.. those are "streams"... | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  Anonymous_AnonymousPremium join:2004-06-21 127.0.0.1 kudos:2 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
·Comcast
·Time Warner VOIP
2 edits | said by djrobx:PLEASE stop calling them "streams".. they're not "streams" in the case of dish or cable... only IPTV or other internet based delivery... Umm, what do you think the "s" in MPEG2-TS stands for? um they are using a mpeg-4 embedded into the MPEG2-TS (they do the same thing with blu-rays)
MPEG transport stream aka: M2T or Mpeg2-T/S | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  TierX join:2009-01-20 Canada kudos:8 | Re: Yeah, 3 HD streams! U-verse uses RTP encapsulated MPEG2 transport streams, its not an m2ts (which adds 4 bytes for a time stamp) like what is used on Bluray. Carrying mpeg4 content in a mpeg2 ts stream is defined in ISO 14496-1. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  scoobyPremium join:2001-05-01 Schaumburg, IL kudos:1 | One dish, two Dish 722 dvrs equals being able to record 8 things in HD simultaneously using OTA (where the wife records most of her stuff anyhow).
I tried U-verse but at 3200ft they could only offer 1 HD channel and 12 mbit/s max internet. Back to Dish was a no brainer and Comcast Business is an improvement over the 12 mbit/s from U-verse. | |
|
 |  |  |  | | said by Gbcue:DirecTV & Dish has a similar restrictions on HD streams. The only limit on the number of HD "streams" at once with DirecTV is how many boxes you have. I believe you can get at least 16 (8 boxes x 2 tuners each). | |
|
 |  |  |  cramer join:2007-04-10 Raleigh, NC kudos:4 Reviews:
·AT&T Southeast
| DirecTV & Dish has a similar restrictions on HD streams. Says who? The only restrictions on the number of streams is the physical number of receivers. All of their modern receivers have 2 tuners. I've seen DISH systems record 3 things at a time -- 2 sat plus 1 ota. DTV has never programmed their systems for such "edge cases." | |
|
 |  |  |  fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium join:2005-05-20 kudos:3 | Hmmmmm.. so you don't want to be told the truth huh?
CHOICE is a defined term and used properly - so please.. kindly get over it. They have their linear channels and then they OnDemand "Choices"... or Selections.. what do you want them to call it? do I dare ask you?
Second.. Um.. yea.. Comcast CAN provide you 10 HD streams at once... are you shocked yet?? oi. Their regular cable isn't a "stream" anyway.. it's an RF/QAM that's locked into by the box.. they can have hundreds of HD "streams" as you call them at any given time in any node.. and as for YOUR home specifically, sure.. if you had 10 boxes, you could get 10 HD channels at one time.. Further, if they were all DVR boxes, you could get 20 if you wanted.... as for their OnDemand.. well... yea.. they can certainly push out the HD if your boxes order them...
So.. while you sit here and slam, I mean TRY to slam Comcast with their HD and their "jargon".. maybe you should spare the "comCRAP' part of it becuase you only look silly doing so - especially when you are wrong in your assumptions.

hint: steer away from the term "stream" as a universal "jargon" term when you make these kinds of post there..  | |
|
 |  |  cramer join:2007-04-10 Raleigh, NC kudos:4 Reviews:
·AT&T Southeast
| You still have to live in the real world. If it's a 30M link and each HD stream is 10M, you cannot fit 5 f***ing streams. Or do you *like* TW's oversubscribed method of HD -- where you get no data when there's no room for it.
On cable, traditionally, that single cable carries everything all at once. The only thing limiting what you can watch is how many tuners you have. (SDV screws that up.) The same is true of DISH/Directv. | |
|
 |  |  |  fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium join:2005-05-20 kudos:3 | Re: Yeah, 3 HD streams! said by cramer:On cable, traditionally, that single cable carries everything all at once. The only thing limiting what you can watch is how many tuners you have. (SDV screws that up.) The same is true of DISH/Directv. SDV doesn't impact the number of channels you watch at any given time either... If there were 200 digital channels available and all 200 were tuned in to at the same time by any box connected in that node, all 200 channels would be available. SDV just holds the channels off at the edge router that are not in use at that time freeing up available frequency for other things like Data.. | |
|
 baineschile2600 ways to livePremium join:2008-05-10 Sterling Heights, MI | Why Why is the upload so slow? I thought cable was the only one that had that issue, and FTTN woulld be able to offer more mirrored connections | |
|
 |  See 11 replies to this post |
|
 amungusPremium join:2004-11-26 America Reviews:
·AT&T DSL Service
| watching TV Wow, that little pic actually says that 12Mbps is good for "Watching TV" (/video clips...)
One could almost infer from said image that they are fine with using a computer to pipe video to a TV  | |
|
 | | U-Verse 24mb service I live in Austin, TX and the 24mb service launched here months ago. I cannot get it even though ATT has advertised it heavily. When you call in to get the service you find out the real story.
It is smoke and mirrors from ATT. Well, at least Clear and TW are here so there is "competition." | |
|
 |  iansltx join:2007-02-19 Golden, CO kudos:2 Reviews:
·Comcast
| Re: U-Verse 24mb service You're likely too far away from the VRAD. Gotta love copper-pair technologies.
Granted, fiber technically has similar limitations, but the bandwidth available is increased by several orders of magnitude and the rate falloff due to distance is spread much more thinly. | |
|
 io chicoPremium join:2003-12-30 Magalia, CA | Of course... No U-Verse in my area. You city folks have all the choices. | |
|
 |  See 6 replies to this post |
|
 kenn10 join:2003-09-10 Kennesaw, GA | I can't get 18 Meg Uverse Internet Here Perhaps the web site is not updated yet but neither 18 or 24 speeds are available to me. Still hanging in here with Comcast. | |
|
 | | Hmm hmmm, no U-Verse in my area that is false advertisement, then again I can't get any wired service in my area  | |
|
 | | Not in Mississippi... Still not in Mississippi... That's not "everywhere" | |
|
 |  JonPremium join:2001-01-20 Lisle, IL Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
| Re: Not in Mississippi... said by inferno:Still not in Mississippi... That's not "everywhere" They mean everywhere uverse is available. But you knew that. sheesh. | |
|
 | | You mean.... You mean it is available everywhere they can support it.
Being that I have UVerse and couldnt get 2 HD or their top speed 3 months ago, I doubt I can get this now. | |
|
 gigahurtzPremium join:2001-10-20 Palm Coast, FL | Tried it... no thanks.
I had U-Verse for a few months and was not impressed. I'm very close to the VRAD (less than 1,000 ft) and had issues with pixeling. The prices were higher than the cable company the technology had not been fine tuned. I felt as though I was AT&T's personal beta tester but I wasn't getting compensated for it. I was paying about $180 after taxes for three TVs, HD service with DVR, 10Mbps internet and unlimited phone.
For the same package through Brighthouse, I pay about $45 less a month. | |
|
 |  | | Re: Tried it... I stayed away from the TV offering because of the limited number of simultaneous HD streams and compression problems. I may switch to U-Verse voice in the next couple of months, since I've been very happy with the Internet portion. | |
|
 |  |  gigahurtzPremium join:2001-10-20 Palm Coast, FL | Re: Tried it... said by digitalfreak:I stayed away from the TV offering because of the limited number of simultaneous HD streams and compression problems. I may switch to U-Verse voice in the next couple of months, since I've been very happy with the Internet portion. Did you pay their ridiculous installation fee? | |
|
 | | "all" of their markets? I think not... read the u-verse forums...AT&T is pulling a PR blanket out on this one. Many users are reporting that this is truly not available today for "all" markets. | |
|
 |  60127178K.U. Sweet 16Premium join:2001-02-15 Wichita, KS kudos:1 | Re: "all" of their markets? I think not... said by BullyRED:read the u-verse forums...AT&T is pulling a PR blanket out on this one. Many users are reporting that this is truly not available today for "all" markets. [/BQUOTE It is available in the Wichita market, I am considered the same market though I am 35 miles away and will never see Uverse.  | |
|
 DoubleKDoublek join:2003-03-04 Beloit, WI | Price Check, Aisle UVerse I will stick with Charter as they have been solid the last 30 months for me!
20/2 for $43 a month opposed to 24/2 for $67 a month UVerse? Sorry AT&T maybe you noticed a recession? Your value in bundling is a JOKE. | |
|
 |  | | Re: Price Check, Aisle UVerse That's a bundled price right? I haven't seen cable pricing this low on Internet as a standalone thing. | |
|
 |  DoubleKDoublek join:2003-03-04 Beloit, WI | No, surprisingly they dropped the $10 penalty for me having Dish Network and no home phone :P | |
|
 | | UVerse Availability I would not put too much stock in the online availability tool - I am still listed as "not available," although the AT&T tech who installed UVerse at my neighbor's house told me - "yes, it's available here." An my neighbor seems to like it.
If I did not already have so much invested in TiVo... | |
|
 | | Uverse..... I pay $55 a month for 18mb/2mb Uverse Internet only in Missouri City, TX (Houston Suburb). I switched for DSL Elite after having problems being to far from the RT. Very Happy. I don't use Uverse TV because I need 6 HD streams (3 HD DVRs with Dual Tuners), so I stick with Directv. At some point, I will need 4 to 6 more HD streams......Directv can do that. | |
|
 |  | | Re: Uverse..... There is AT&T in Missouri City? I thought it was all Verizon or En-Touch? | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: Uverse..... Missouri City, Texas is ATT and Comcast at in Quail Valley East. I have never seen Verizon. | |
|
 kba4 join:2001-10-23 Canton, OH Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
·AT&T U-Verse
| not in Canton, OH I checked as soon as I saw this news story but there has been no change to available services when I input my address at the ATT U-Verse availability site. -- "I saw Matlock in a bar last night; the sound was off, but I think I got the gist of it..." | |
|
 |  AMDUSERPremium join:2003-05-28 Earth kudos:1 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
| Re: not in Canton, OH It is available locally, in Milwaukee,WI.. used to only be 18 Meg available. [Unfortunately, the cut off is my neighbor across the street- this side of street - U-verse not available.]
The VRad is about 1/2 block from my house.. about 2,500 feet or so. [Not as the wiring is installed.] | |
|
 |
|