AT&T Raising Wholesale Loop PricesIf you're on an indie DSL ISP, you will be seeing hikes... ( old news - 09:44AM Thursday Feb 28 2008) tags: dsl · prices · bandwidth · AT&T Midwest · SONIC.NET · DSL EXTREMEWe're hearing from several sources over the past few days that AT&T is raising the wholesale loop charges for ISPs who do business with them. It looks like the changes should officially start on May 16, 2008, but you may start seeing your independent ISP raising DSL prices before then if they work with AT&T (some may be noticing the price hikes already). Small ISPs, for whom it's already hard enough to do business, aren't pleased. "The interesting thing is that even if you sold DSL service through AT&Ts "Term Pricing Plan" -- your rates are still going up," a high-level executive at one ISP tells us. "Even though you pay a higher price premium wholesale versus their "Zero Volume Commitment" (aka month to month), and they still can raise your rates." A document obtained by Broadband Reports confirms the May 16 hikes, and shows that while AT&T is lowering the wholesale price of their highest tier slightly, they're raising the price of the majority of their wholesale tiers by 44-46%. This of course comes on the heels of AT&T raising their own retail DSL prices by $5. The problem for many ISPs is that they've given customers 12 months assurances of price, and they won't be able to pass this price hike along until those contracts are up. -Industry Executive |
"The problem for many ISPs is that they've given customers 12 months assurances of price, and they won't be able to pass this price hike along until those contracts are up," says a high-level executive at another ISP. "For ISPs that offer customers some sort of re-rate contract it could mean nearly 12 months of down side." Said exec gives us a concrete example of the kind of financial hit this incurs based on the new rates. "For an ISP with 5,000 customers, they'd be out $16,500/mo, for an "average" of nine months (presuming an average 3/4 of a year contract worth of liability per customer). That's potentially a $150,000 hit to the small example ISP." All of this of course eventually gets passed on to you, the consumer. And as you are seeing rate hikes, this is a service that's getting less and less costly for AT&T to deploy. "Bandwidth is getting cheaper, DSLAM ports are cheaper, modems are cheaper and fiber infrastructure (from RTs to COs, and between COs to POPs where Internet bandwidth is purchase) now has virtually limitless capacity thanks to DWDM," says one source. Of course he reminds us that hikes aren't based on cost, but what the market will bear. In other words, AT&T is simply raising rates because they can. And they can because they aren't seeing healthy competition in the U.S. market. It's good to be the king. "If you take a $20 retail product and make it $25 -- as they have done -- you've got $5 more in your net - but the costs might be $15 - so while your profit was $5, now it's $10 - a doubling in profit," says one exec. "Then, even if 10% of the customers depart, you've still got a $9 profit, way over your $5 starting point. Your costs actually FALL because of the departures too." "It's like minting money," he says. Related:- Tuesday Evening Links
- Thursday Morning Links
- Thursday Evening Links
- Friday Evening Links
- 18Mbps U-Verse
- More Specifics On AT&T's Cap Plans
- Verizon DSL Customers Getting Free Upgrades
- Sonic.net Online Backups, ADSL2+ Expansion
|
 flycuban
join:2005-04-25 Homestead, FL
·DSLi
·Speakeasy
| Just the beginging I see no point in this merger with Bellsouth, Cingular, SBC. This was supposed to lower prices? And now that at&t is in the position to do whatever they want - the smaller ISP's that use at&t for wholesale DSL service are really going to get screwed.
What tickles me to death is that Comcast uses at&t as there main backbone internet provider.... | |
|  |   TK Junk Mail Go ahead, make my day Premium join:2002-03-03 Margate City, NJ clubs:
·Comcast
| Re: Just the beginging said by flycuban :I see no point in this merger with Bellsouth, Cingular, SBC. This was supposed to lower prices? And now that at&t is in the position to do whatever they want - the smaller ISP's that use at&t for wholesale DSL service are really going to get screwed. What tickles me to death is that Comcast uses at&t as there main backbone internet provider.... Actually, Comcast doesn't - ANYMORE. They built their own fiber backbone and mostly just peer to AT&T like they do with many other backbone providers. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page | |
|  |  |  flycuban
join:2005-04-25 Homestead, FL
·DSLi
·Speakeasy
| Re: Just the beginging 99.999% of there peer goes to at&t... Just funny that they use there competitor for there main transit peering...They complain about at&t, but they use them on the back end. You would think they would use level 3 or some other company and not use at&t at all. Go Figure! | |
|  |  |  |  BosstonesOwn
join:2002-12-15 Everett, MA clubs:
·Comcast
·Comcast Formerly ..
| Re: Just the beginging said by flycuban :99.999% of there peer goes to at&t... Just funny that they use there competitor for there main transit peering...They complain about at&t, but they use them on the back end. You would think they would use level 3 or some other company and not use at&t at all. Go Figure! They do it the same reason why my company uses it. When you request multiple pops from them it is much cheaper to get connections out all over the place. Main issue is when they upgrade core routers and they take a dive , it brings down the whole network.
AT&T is just cheaper if you want diverse pops. I wish Verizon would do something to lower their diverse pop prices. I hate seeing my work traffic all going over at&t , I want to see diversity. -- "It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!" | |
|  |  |  |  NormanS Premium,MVM join:2001-02-14 San Jose, CA
·Pacific Bell - SBC
| The AT&T loop price hike is for their last mile service in the 13-state legacy SBC region. It should only affect DSL prices related to the DSLAM and ATM networks for at&t Yahoo! HSI subscribers. There should be no impact on the ILEC DSL prices in AT&T Southeast (the former Bellsouth FastAccess, which is now called, "AT&T FastAccess), or the reselling of CLEC services outside of the AT&T ILEC footprint (AT&T Worldnet DSL Service, which resells Covad connections; and their prices are controlled by the regional ILECs serving Covad). Nor should it directly impact the AT&T Tier 1 backbone (AT&T Worldnet Services, or ATTW), which provides transit to Comcast in Florida.
Do remember, before AT&T bought Bellsouth, SBC bought AT&T. The only thing SBC changed was the name of the company; management is still the same as it was under SBC. -- Norman ~Oh Lord, why have you come ~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum | |
|  |   dadkins Go For It Premium,MVM join:2003-09-26 Hercules, CA
·Comcast
| said by flycuban :What tickles me to death is that Comcast uses at&t as there main backbone internet provider.... Ok...
Me to N.J. then me to DSLReports. To N.J - all Comcast
I see Comcast all the way from here(S.F. Bay Area, California) to Ashburn, Virginia, then Tiscali to NAC.net for DSLReports
Yes, on occasion Comcast does peer with AT&T for some things, but Comcast does have Nation Wide backbone itself. Look for cbone and ibone.
-- Think outside the Fox... Opera | |
|  |  |  flycuban
join:2005-04-25 Homestead, FL
·DSLi
·Speakeasy
| Re: Just the beginging NOT FROM MIAMI - Almost all of our traffic is on at&t bro.
Tracing route to msnbc.com [207.46.245.61] over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 4 ms 16 ms 7 ms 192.168.1.1 2 * * * Request timed out. 3 103 ms 7 ms * ge-1-2-ur01.perrine.fl.pompano.comcast.net [68.8 5.229.57] 4 11 ms 12 ms 9 ms te-9-2-ar01.miamimetro.fl.pompano.comcast.net [6 8.86.165.37] 5 10 ms * 10 ms po-1-ar02.pompanobeach.fl.pompano.comcast.net [6 8.86.164.13] 6 19 ms 24 ms 20 ms 12.116.114.13 7 100 ms 100 ms 100 ms tbr1.ormfl.ip.att.net [12.122.106.6] 8 107 ms 108 ms 107 ms cr1.ormfl.ip.att.net [12.122.21.1] 9 101 ms 99 ms 105 ms cr2.attga.ip.att.net [12.122.31.29] 10 101 ms 101 ms 100 ms tbr1.attga.ip.att.net [12.122.17.14] 11 100 ms 100 ms 100 ms tbr2.dtrmi.ip.att.net [12.122.10.197] 12 100 ms 100 ms 100 ms tbr2.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.10.134] 13 99 ms 98 ms 101 ms cr1.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.17.201] 14 106 ms 100 ms 100 ms cr1.st6wa.ip.att.net [12.122.31.162] 15 104 ms 99 ms 100 ms tbr1.st6wa.ip.att.net [12.122.23.130] 16 100 ms 100 ms 100 ms 12.127.6.33 17 91 ms 92 ms 91 ms 12.124.173.42 18 92 ms 97 ms 91 ms ge-5-3-0-56.tuk-64cb-1a.ntwk.msn.net [207.46.44. 1] 19 102 ms 91 ms 91 ms ten2-1.tuk-76c-1b.ntwk.msn.net [207.46.36.201]
-------------------------------------------------
Tracing route to www.yahoo-ht3.akadns.net [209.191.93.52] over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.1.1 2 * * * Request timed out. 3 9 ms 9 ms * ge-1-2-ur01.perrine.fl.pompano.comcast.net [68.8 5.229.57] 4 9 ms 10 ms * te-9-2-ar01.miamimetro.fl.pompano.comcast.net [6 8.86.165.37] 5 11 ms * * po-1-ar02.pompanobeach.fl.pompano.comcast.net [6 8.86.164.13] 6 18 ms 18 ms 19 ms 12.116.114.13 7 52 ms 51 ms 50 ms tbr1.ormfl.ip.att.net [12.122.106.6] 8 50 ms 51 ms 51 ms cr1.ormfl.ip.att.net [12.122.21.17] 9 52 ms 51 ms 50 ms cr1.hs1tx.ip.att.net [12.122.31.241] 10 50 ms 50 ms 50 ms cr2.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.122.5.233] 11 52 ms 50 ms 51 ms tbr2.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.122.18.206] 12 51 ms 49 ms 50 ms gar8.dlstx.ip.att.net [12.122.100.81] 13 53 ms 52 ms 52 ms 12.86.20.18 14 107 ms 54 ms 54 ms ge-0-1-0-p110.msr2.mud.yahoo.com [216.115.104.10 1] 15 54 ms 52 ms 51 ms te-8-1.bas-c2.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.193.7] 16 57 ms 53 ms 52 ms f1.www.vip.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.93.52]
------------------------------------------------- Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600] (C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>tracert www.cnn.com
Tracing route to www.cnn.com [64.236.16.20] over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 20 ms 2 ms 5 ms 192.168.1.1 2 * * * Request timed out. 3 60 ms 199 ms 199 ms ge-1-2-ur01.perrine.fl.pompano.comcast.net [68.8 5.229.57] 4 9 ms 9 ms * te-9-2-ar01.miamimetro.fl.pompano.comcast.net [6 8.86.165.37] 5 10 ms * 11 ms po-1-ar02.pompanobeach.fl.pompano.comcast.net [6 8.86.164.13] 6 18 ms 18 ms 19 ms 12.116.114.13 7 28 ms 27 ms 28 ms tbr1.ormfl.ip.att.net [12.122.106.6] 8 28 ms 28 ms 26 ms cr1.ormfl.ip.att.net [12.122.21.9] 9 27 ms 28 ms 28 ms cr2.attga.ip.att.net [12.122.31.29] 10 28 ms 28 ms 28 ms tbr1.attga.ip.att.net [12.122.17.6] 11 27 ms 26 ms 26 ms ggr3.attga.ip.att.net [12.122.96.9] 12 27 ms 26 ms 25 ms br1-a340s7.wswdc.ip.att.net [192.205.34.162] 13 26 ms 26 ms 26 ms bb1-atm-P4-0.atdn.net [66.185.147.208] | |
|  |  |  |   dadkins Go For It Premium,MVM join:2003-09-26 Hercules, CA
·Comcast
edit: February 28th, @01:21PM
| Re: Just the begingingYou stated that "Comcast uses at&t as there main backbone internet provider..." I showed you that in most cases, they do not - at least from here in California.
For that Yahoo address you used: 209.191.93.52...
No AT&T here - I see Level3. Comcast will peer with whomever is closest if needed. Not just AT&T. For most national backbone tasks, Comcast will use their own - for many of us!
YMMV
-- Think outside the Fox... Opera | |
|  |  |  |  |   en102 Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26 Valencia, CA | Re: Just the beginging Similarly, DSL-Extreme uses multiple, including Level3 -- Canada = Hollywood North | |
|  |  |  |  |  flycuban
join:2005-04-25 Homestead, FL | I guess each "Region" has there own peering sites, because here in Florida most if not all the traffic goes thru at&t.. Hardly none of the traffic goes on the Comcast national backbone... | |
|  |  |  |  |  |   dadkins Go For It Premium,MVM join:2003-09-26 Hercules, CA
·Comcast
| Re: Just the beginging I'm not doubting that. Nearly all of Comcast traffic here used to go through AT&T a couple years ago. Not anymore! For some routes, sure! AT&T, Gblx, Level3... For *most* things, here in my part of the State, it stays on Comcast across the country. -- Think outside the Fox... Opera | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  NormanS Premium,MVM join:2001-02-14 San Jose, CA
·Pacific Bell - SBC
| said by flycuban :I guess each "Region" has there own peering sites, because here in Florida most if not all the traffic goes thru at&t.. Hardly none of the traffic goes on the Comcast national backbone... Indeed. However, isn't Florida one of the regions Comcast picked up from Road Runner? Perhaps Comcast hasn't, yet, built out their backbone in the Southeastern U.S.? One Global Crossing (Tier 1 backbone provider) hop between ATTIS (my provider's backbone) and Comcast's 'ibone' network. One Level 3 (Tier 1 backbone provider) hop between ATTIS (my provider's backbone) and Comcast's 'ibone' network.
All connections to West Coast destinations are made right here in San José, California. Seven Level 3 (Tier 1 backbone) hops between ATTIS in San José, California and the Comcast 'ibone' network in Chicago, Illinois.
I would guess that Comcast just has to put in their 'ibone' in the Southeast, based on trace routes to '.hsd1.ga.comcast.net' and '.hsd1.fl.comcast.net' from the West Coast.
-- Norman ~Oh Lord, why have you come ~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum | |
|  |  |  |  |  Doug135
join:2008-01-12 Laredo, TX clubs:
·AT&T Southwest
| i've got AT&T and i trace routed 209.191.93.52 and i got:
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 264 ms 274 ms 202 ms ppp-70-244-249-254.dsl.snantx.swbell.net [70.244.249.254]
3 151 ms 72 ms 127 ms dist2-vlan60.snantx.sbcglobal.net [151.164.17.163]
4 407 ms 155 ms 98 ms bb1-g9-3-0.snantx.sbcglobal.net [151.164.17.246]
5 385 ms 564 ms * 151.164.95.188
6 427 ms 496 ms 397 ms asn10310-11-yahoo.eqdltx.sbcglobal.net [151.164.250.202]
7 499 ms 334 ms 297 ms ge-0-1-0-p110.msr2.mud.yahoo.com [216.115.104.101]
8 147 ms 435 ms 252 ms te-9-1.bas-c1.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.193.9]
9 301 ms 349 ms 432 ms f1.www.vip.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.93.52]
Trace complete.
i tried 68.86.220.145 and it switches from sbc servers to level3 servers and then to the comcast servers. i take it as at&t peers with others as well. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  NormanS Premium,MVM join:2001-02-14 San Jose, CA
·Pacific Bell - SBC
edit: February 29th, @05:12AM
| Re: Just the beginging Mark the difference between AT&T Internet Services (ATTIS), which provides your network connections to other transit services, and AT&T Worldnet Services (ATTW), which is the Tier 1 backbone transit provider offering services comparable to Level 3, Qwest, and Verizon (Business); all of which are also Tier 1 networks.
ATTIS will only connect with ATTW when routing tables call for it.
You, as an at&t Yahoo! HSI customer, will be on the ATTIS network until it connects with a destination transit provider, as announced in BGP by the destination.
P.S. I forgot to mention that ATTIS will connect directly to Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo! networks, without going through any other transit. At least for all trace routes I have ever run to them.
-- Norman ~Oh Lord, why have you come ~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum | |
|  |  |  SoilFlames Premium join:2002-03-17 Andover, MN clubs: edit: February 28th, @02:31PM
| Does comcast really own their own lines from SF to NJ??
I have no idea. But I would assume the fiber along the way is owned by someone else. | |
|  |  nasadude
join:2001-10-05 Rockville, MD
·Comcast
| said by flycuban :.. This was supposed to lower prices? .... you know who thought the merger would lower prices?
NOBODY!
they figured if they said it people would believe it. turns out the regulators (or deregulators) didn't care whether it would raise prices or not. | |
|   gaforces United We Stand, Divided We Fall
join:2002-04-07 Santa Cruz, CA
·Cruzio Internet
| Higher prices My ISP sent out an email, stating that business were gaining a price increase, residential users are not.
Im already paying more than ATT charges for my tier by $15.00. I doubt if I could handle a price increase atm. -- Vista ~ Less functional every day! | |
|  |   graysonf Premium,MVM join:1999-07-16 Fort Lauderdale, FL
| Re: Higher prices said by gaforces :Im already paying more than ATT charges for my tier by $15.00. I doubt if I could handle a price increase atm. It's obvious to me that guys like you are who this type of thing is aimed at.
If you couldn't handle an increase, would you disconnect the service and not pay anybody anything, or take it from ATT at a price lower than you pay now? | |
|  |  |   chris Whimmy Wham Wham Wazzle Premium join:2000-08-13 Middletown, CT
| Re: Higher prices said by graysonf :said by gaforces :Im already paying more than ATT charges for my tier by $15.00. I doubt if I could handle a price increase atm. It's obvious to me that guys like you are who this type of thing is aimed at. If you couldn't handle an increase, would you disconnect the service and not pay anybody anything, or take it from ATT at a price lower than you pay now? I am sure that is what ATT is counting on | |
|  |  |  |   graysonf Premium,MVM join:1999-07-16 Fort Lauderdale, FL | Re: Higher prices And what are they going to do after they have driven all the indies out of business? | |
|  |  |  |  |  openbox9
join:2004-01-26 Navarre, FL | Re: Higher prices Compete against cablecos. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |   Karl Bode News Guy join:2000-03-02 | Re: Higher prices And buy boats. | |
|  |  |   gaforces United We Stand, Divided We Fall
join:2002-04-07 Santa Cruz, CA | Id probably disconnect my ATT landline and go Sprint CDMA till they get Wimax. -- Vista ~ Less functional every day! | |
|  jimbo2150
join:2004-05-10 Youngstown, OH | Of course... Of course they need to raise rates, all that handing over your personal information to the NSA costs money. With all the tax breaks, you think the government is handing over your tax money fast enough? --
- "Techie" Jim | |
|   wruckman Ruckman.net
join:2007-10-25 Northwood, OH | Business Mongers Sounds like a silent move to put others out of business. | |
|   nanananana ynon
@swbell.net
| when was the last increase?
I'd like to know when was the last increase on wholesale loop charges. Copper has quadrupled in price over the last 5 years. Don't see anyone mentioning that. | |
|  |  BosstonesOwn
join:2002-12-15 Everett, MA clubs: | Re: when was the last increase? Yeah because they should keep sticking with copper and not moving to fiber anytime soon. | |
|  |  |  openbox9
join:2004-01-26 Navarre, FL | Re: when was the last increase? Moving to fiber only serves to kill of the indies quicker. | |
|  |  |  |   nnaananna ynon
@swbell.net
| Re: when was the last increase? said by openbox9 :Moving to fiber only serves to kill of the indies quicker. That is correct. The only thing the Telco offers, and is required to offer, is unbundled copper. They move to all fiber and the indies are really dead. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  BosstonesOwn
join:2002-12-15 Everett, MA clubs: | Re: when was the last increase? Verizon isn't yet.
Matter of fact they sometimes leave the copper drops , and they definitely will if you ask them to. -- "It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!" | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  See 11 replies to this post | |
 |  |  |  |   supergirl
join:2007-03-20 Pensacola, FL
·Cox VOIP
·Skype
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southeast
·magicjack.com
| said by qworster :said by openbox9 :Moving to fiber only serves to kill of the indies quicker. Yep, Because thanks to the FCC, the telcos don't even HAVE to provide fiber access to independents. Another UNREGULATED monopoly! And PLEEAZE, don't trot out that overused excuse that the indys could put up their own fiber if they wanted to. The fact is this: The poles are FILLED! Most telcos that are putting in fiber are taking down their older copper lines at the same time and replacing them with smaller guage wire. Why exactly should VZ allow ISP's to resell their fiber? VZ is investing $100 billion to implement FIOS.
And, if you must know, if the DSLAM is inside the CO, AT&T, et al doesn't have to "rent" DSL lines period.
The 1996 Telecom Act was meant for competition to USE RBOCs lines until they built their own. They were given time to do so then the FCC said enough of the UNE-P, UNE, etc. crap since nobody, including CLEC phone cos., were building their own networks.
The 1996 Telecom ACT just weakened the RBOCs. It was crap law in the first place. I don't think all these mergers should have happened, especially since Bellsouth was stronger financially than AT&T, but all the line-sharing should be profitable for the RBOCs. Failure to build their own networks is killing off indie ISPs and killed off most indie telcos.
Covad couldn't make it on lines being sold below cost by the RBOCs and filed bankruptcy. So, exactly who are people kidding about Indie ISPs ability to make it in a world where they have to pay the RBOCs what the DSL lines are worth?
GM has gotten billions and billions of tax breaks and doesn't have to let Toyota build cars on their lines so why should the RBOCs? Cable Cos. that offer telephone and HSI built out their networks and don't have to lease anything. -- Saving the world keeps me busy. However, I find Earth very primitive from my home planet of Krypton. -Supergirl | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  See 7 replies to this post | |
 |  |  |  |  openbox9
join:2004-01-26 Navarre, FL
·AT&T Southeast
·Mediacom
| said by qworster :And PLEEAZE, don't trot out that overused excuse that the indys could put up their own fiber if they wanted to. Ok, how about I trot out the "it's a cost of doing business and if the indies can't afford to play and continue providing a value-added service, then maybe they shouldn't be playing" valid logic. Or better yet, maybe the indies should do what they "should" be doing and innovate and drive new technology instead of leaching off of their competitors' infrastructures. | |
|  |   dru
join:2000-09-14 Corona, CA
| This is actually the first increase in loop charges to ISPs, and my company has been doing this for 10 years.
There have been a few "promotions" that expired, but this is the first accross the board increase and keep in mind while many things are going up due to inflation and the economy, this increase is 46%, WAY beyond any justification regarding energy, credit, etc.
As for copper, 90% or more of DSL uses the stuff that was hung or buried decades ago. And because this increase pertains to "line share" the copper loops are irrelevant since they share the local telephone service.
Building new homes? That uses fiber to a nearby node, most greenfield deployments are "Uverse ready". Of course, you don't see a lot of construction. As far as copper pair depletion, do you really think they are exhausting pairs used for landlines these days?
One interesting thing about this is the excuse is the "higher cost and use of bandwidth". The ISPs affected don't use their bandwidth at all - they provide their own, and unless ISPs are stupid in their purchasing decisions, backbone connections at the gigabit level are flat or dropping.
Second interesting fact is the fastest tier offered to independents is NOT increasing - the 6Mx768k speed, generally purchased by businesses and power users. -- I feel like I'm diagonally parked in a parallel universe. | |
|  |  |   isee
@swbell.net
| Re: when was the last increase? said by dru :This is actually the first increase in loop charges to ISPs, and my company has been doing this for 10 years. so this is the first price increase in more than 10 years, doesn't seem that unfair to me. Considering fuel/copper/healthcare costs and overall cost of doing business increases over the last decade. I'm shocked this is the first increase.
said by dru :As for copper, 90% or more of DSL uses the stuff that was hung or buried decades ago. And because this increase pertains to "line share" the copper loops are irrelevant since they share the local telephone service. They still have to replace copper all the time. Those costs have quadrupled. It costs more just to have it in stock. Old plant goes bad, not all new construction is fiber. | |
|  |  |  |   ispjournalist
@pacbell.net
| Re: when was the last increase? Standard telco lies:
1) "We have not increased prices"
But costs have fallen and prices have not
2) "We need to get a return on our investment"
Smaller companies serve small customers better, and the telco charges ISPs _more_ than the retail rate. Either a) the telco is losing money on retail or b) they're squeezing the ISPs for more money than the telco can get out of the service -- I suggest b
3) "innovation"
That happens in Japan and France and in the richest suburbs where FIOS is being installed
4) "cost of infrastructure"
Bell infrastructure was built to gold plate the costs because the costs determined the revenues. Look around you -- every telco switching center is on prime real estate (tho some is in the dying center of town near the factories that were the town's life when the switching center was built).
Here in NYC, ONE BUILDING sold for $500 million
»www.nytimes.com/2006/02/22/reale···f=slogin | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  NormanS Premium,MVM join:2001-02-14 San Jose, CA
·Pacific Bell - SBC
| said by qworster :Cmon! Their copper is DECADES old! THAT excuse holds about a mm of water! Not around here. They replaced my drop when we had problems on the voice line. More recently, they replaced the F2 from the cross-connect box. I'd say the copper around here is more like mere months old. I'd also say that is probably true for most of the locales where AT&T is rolling out Uverse. -- Norman ~Oh Lord, why have you come ~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum | |
|   UnKown The Underground Network
join:2002-09-08 Orlando, FL | switch to Cogent Cogent is cheap as hell, and their a good backbone provider. its a win/win. | |
|
|
|