AT&T Introduces New Home Manager SystemBrings wireless functionality to landline service.... 02:41PM Monday Sep 22 2008 by Karl Bodetags: business · wireless · hardware · VoIP · networking · AT&T U-VerseTipped by Tcomp  Apparently, AT&T's "three screen initiative" (linking TV, Internet & cellphone) is actually a four screen initiative if you include the company's new Home Manager system. The system, like the Verizon iobi and Embarq eGo services, is intended to keep people from dropping their landlines and going cell only by incorporating more mobile phone like features. With a $299 price tag for the Samsung-made device (plus $69 for each additional handset), it's unlikely to sway those who dropped their landline to save money, but it might appeal to someone who already has AT&T services from shifting to cable VoIP. Maybe. Some of the functionality: •Address Book Synchronizing - synchs address books across the touch screen and home handset with AT&T mobile phone contacts •Web Based Information Listings - access to weather, e-mail, stock profiles, sports, news, photos, movie listings, recipes and more •AT&T Yellow Pages - free, unlimited access to White Pages and Yellow Pages online directories, which can also be uploaded to cell phones and email •Visual Voice Mail - see and listen to messages via a single wireline-wireless mailbox on both the touch screen and cordless handset, which is compatible with AT&T U-verse Voice and AT&T Unified Messaging •Digital Picture Frame displays digital photos on the frame as a slide show or screen saver A lame effort to try and keep AT&T's dying landline offerings relevant and bundled customers loyal, or a useful integration of AT&T services? If you can't decide, here's the AT&T press release, a demo, a blog entry at Telecompetitor (who alerted us to the new device), and here's a video unboxing and review of the unit hooked in to a customer's U-Verse setup. Note that the touch-screen device will sync your AT&T wireless phone data, but the service is not compatible with the iPhone. One bit of good news is there's no monthly fees for the device. So far the Home Manager service is only available in nine AT&T markets: Chicago; Atlanta; Austin, Texas; San Antonio; Houston; Dallas; San Francisco; San Diego and Los Angeles. Related:- T-Mobile UMA Service Expanding
- World’s First Skype Video Phone Disappoints
- Battle Over U-Verse VRADs Continues
- Broadcom Puts 802.11n Wi-Fi In Cell Phones
- AT&T Femtocells in 2009
- AT&T's 2G Customers See A Downgrade
- AT&T Looking For Femtocell Testers
- Verizon's Open Development Initiative? So Far It's A Joke
|
  baineschile
join:2008-05-10 Sterling Heights, MI | Just need one more thing... A biotech company to invent a USB port that we can stick in our skin, and wire to our brains | |
|  |   Duramax08 Oy, Pass It on.
join:2008-08-03 San Antonio, TX | Re: Just need one more thing... Maybe even processors in our brain. Intel Inside Anyone? | |
|  |   sapo Computer Love Premium join:2002-09-16 Sacramento, CA | I personally am waiting for a bluetooth headset integrated into our heads. -- UON Internet Loyalist | |
|   ztmike Premium join:2001-08-02 Michigan City, IN | Dandy That's all nice and dandy..but what about the internet speeds of U-Verse? -- ZZPERFORMANCE | |
|  |  |  |  |   ztmike Premium join:2001-08-02 Michigan City, IN
·Comcast
·AT&T Midwest
| Re: Dandy said by supergirl :said by ztmike :That's all nice and dandy..but what about the internet speeds of U-Verse? Hey, 1.5 megs is all anyone will ever need. -Former AT&T CEO. I have 1meg upload now from Comcast and it still takes a long time uploading medium sized files.
At&t doesn't offer u-verse here either, just their slow dsl packages. -- ZZPERFORMANCE | |
|  |  |  |   gdm Premium,MVM join:2001-06-15 Mchenry, IL clubs: | Re: Dandy AT&T offers 4 Internet packages with U-Verse
10 down 1.5 up = $55 6 down 1 up = $40 3 down 1 up = $30 1.5 down 1 up = $25 | |
|  |  |  |  |   en102 Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26 Valencia, CA | Re: Dandy Aren't they changing it to 6.1-10 down, 1.5 up = $55 ? -- Canada = Hollywood North | |
|  |  |  |  |   jimbo48
join:2000-11-17 Hayward, CA
·EarthLink
| AT&T offers 4 Internet packages with U-Verse-LMAO AT&T offers 4 Internet packages with U-Verse only in areas where they have competition that is hitting their bottom line. AT&T doesn't offer anything but a degraded DSL 1.5 line, no Uverse, a mediocre Cell service(read expensive and nothing to write home about) in my area and I'm less 30 miles form San Francisco and Silicon Valley. Why don't they offer so little if anything for ISP service- NO pressure in the form of meaningful competition is my belief. Cable is only offering UVerse performance Cable Internet and over-compressed video at premium prices and the infrastructure is so antiquated it would cost too much to upgrade to 21st century technology. Ah but someday we will/may have choices that matter---Hope springs eternal | |
|  |  |  Oedipus
join:2005-05-09 | Heh, I don't even have that. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  ISurfTooMuch
join:2007-04-23 Tuscaloosa, AL
| Why? Exactly what does this bring to the table that a computer doesn't? I suppose that it gives you access the AT&T's phone directories without needing Internet access, but how many people are going to drop that much money on this box so they can do that? The marketing is all wrong, since those who know how to access electronic services likely already have Internet access, and those who don't know how are the least likely to have access and the least likely to want this service.
If they offer free e-mail access to all the popular sites like Yahoo, Gmail. Hotmail, etc. with this device, then they might get some take-up from people getting it for their non-tech-savvy parents or grandparents so they can have e-mail, but I don't see that feature being included. | |
|  |   djrobx
join:2000-05-31 Valencia, CA
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T CallVantage
·Time Warner VOIP
·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME
| Re: Why? Exactly.
I don't understand who their target customer is with this. It sort of looks like something you'd see in a high end home (like a Crestron remote), but without any of the really cool features, and it only supports a single line, which would make it a non-starter for a lot of those sorts of homes.
It's too high tech for Grandma or "non-internet" people.
It might be a nifty next-gen cordless phone replacement, but it's way, way, way too expensive.
Like the U-verse interactive apps, they seem to think everyone needs more access to yellowpages, the weather, and their pictures. I have all those things on the internet and on my cell phone now. I don't need them on my TV or some big bulky touch screen device sitting on my end table. If I'm going to have a device like that I want it to be able to fully control everything, not just the phone.
-- AT&T U-Hearse Your funeral. Delivered.
| |
|  |  |   MisterMarcus
join:2001-11-10 San Diego, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
| Re: Why? said by djrobx :Exactly. I don't understand who their target customer is with this. It sort of looks like something you'd see in a high end home (like a Crestron remote), but without any of the really cool features, and it only supports a single line, which would make it a non-starter for a lot of those sorts of homes. It's too high tech for Grandma or "non-internet" people. It might be a nifty next-gen cordless phone replacement, but it's way, way, way too expensive. Like the U-verse interactive apps, they seem to think everyone needs more access to yellowpages, the weather, and their pictures. I have all those things on the internet and on my cell phone now. I don't need them on my TV or some big bulky touch screen device sitting on my end table. If I'm going to have a device like that I want it to be able to fully control everything, not just the phone. The target customer is the nerd who wants ready access to these utilities without having to deal with the nightmare that is Windows, or Mac incompatibilities. It's brilliant if you think about it.
The real problem: the device should be free or rented, like other provider-provided devices. The upfront cost is DEFINITELY a deterrent. | |
|  |  |   arizona
@bellsouth.net
| said by djrobx :... Like the U-verse interactive apps, they seem to think everyone needs more access to yellowpages, the weather, and their pictures. I have all those things on the internet and on my cell phone now. I don't need them on my TV or some big bulky touch screen device sitting on my end table. ... Well we have, and we do come up with other imaginative products. Its just that, for the most part, people do want access to the [phone]book, the weather, and their pictures. In as many ways as they can get it. | |
|  |  |  |  |   Sashimi
@bellsouth.net | Re: Why? Super Girl you can replace the three VOIPs you are using with POTS and Skype. | |
|  | |  |
|
|