 moonpuppy
join:2000-08-21
Glen Burnie, MD | One way or another....... .....companies will pay for bad customer service.
Holding onto unhappy customers will cost you more in the long run than if you just let them go. | |
|
 | EliteTimeWas
join:2004-02-19
Zephyrhills, FL | Re: One way or another....... Of course, the three million is a drop in the bucket compared to the money AOL probably made by making cancellation a living hell, | |
|
| | 
Slidetbone
Mazin Go
Premium
join:2002-11-10
Land O Lakes, FL
| Re: One way or another....... AOL isn't the only company doing this. Many service and wireless providers are using this tactic. AOL just so happens to be in the sights of so many that booed their service. But little do people know is that we owe what the internet is today due to the strategies of AOL. It gave many folks an easy way to get online.
Bash me all you want, but look at yourself in the mirror and tell yourself "I never used AOL" and watch your nose grow!  | |
|
| | | 
pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
| Re: One way or another....... said by Slidetbone  :Many service and wireless providers are using this tactic. This practice is prevalent in the credit card industry as well. The last credit card that I cancelled over the phone, back in 2002, took 3 hours of my time (thank goodness for speakerphones). For credit cards at least, I have had to change my tactics. I simply mail a letter instructing the credit card company to cancel my account to the account's service (not billing) address. This has worked both times that I have tried it.
Perhaps this method might also work with ISPs, especially if such a letter is sent via Certified Mail with some sort of delivery confirmation.
--
Only SHATNER is Kirk. | |
|
| | | | moonpuppy
join:2000-08-21
Glen Burnie, MD | Re: One way or another....... I tried to cancel 2 cards in one day due to membership fees. One refunded the fee and the other cancelled with no problem.  | |
|
| | | TheWickerMan
join:2002-04-09
Enola, PA
| said by Slidetbone :Bash me all you want, but look at yourself in the mirror and tell yourself "I never used AOL" and watch your nose grow! I never used AOL.
(Waits for it...)
Nope. My nose is still the same size. | |
|
| | | 
MrMoody
Liberal Capitalist
join:2002-09-03
Smithfield, NC | I never used AOL, not even once. I had heard too many horror stories. I went straight from BBSs to dialup direct internet and Mosaic. | |
|
| | | 
RARPSL
join:1999-12-08
Suffern, NY
| said by Slidetbone :But little do people know is that we owe what the internet is today due to the strategies of AOL. While that is true, I'd be happier if AOL at least did not treat the Internet (and its users) as second class citizens compared to ITS users and provided the same email functionality to email sent to and/or received from the Internet as that which is created on the AOL side of the Email gateway and sent to another AOL user.
Examples of the failure to support Internet Email correctly include:
1) An attempt to request a RR gets silently ignored for mail addressed to an Internet address as opposed to inserting RRT and DNT headers into the created RFC2822 format email.
2) An Internet Email that has a RRT and/or DNT header has it ignored as it passes into the AOL Email system and does not have the AOL Email RR flag set (so a RR can be sent back to the sender as would occur if the Email was created on the AOL side in the first place).
3) An Internet Email that has more than one attachment gets converted into a MIME Format attachment file of the full RFC2822 message and attached to a Boilerplate message saying (in effect) "We refuse to handing multiple attachments correctly and it is your job to unMIME the data in this attachment which contains the message as it was delivered to our Gateway". A message created on the AOL side would have an Archive attachment containing all the files. The gateway is just DELIBERATELY configured/designed to not create this archive (the Internet User must do it for AOL to get it delivered/converted correctly).
4) Talking about an Archive attachment, if a message is created on the AOL side and sent to the Internet, the Gateway does not pass the attachment as-is but expands it and appends it to the message body (at least if it is Text or HTML).
5) Trying to fetch a message with attachment via IMAP gets the same mangling as 4 above.
6) Trying to submit a multi-attachment message via AOL's SMTP MSA Servers addressed to an AOL address gets the same malformed AOL message as in 3 above.
I could go on but this type of DELIBERATE mishandling of Internet Email is par for the course with AOL. | |
|
| | | travelguy
join:1999-09-03
Albuquerque, NM
| said by Slidetbone :Bash me all you want, but look at yourself in the mirror and tell yourself "I never used AOL" and watch your nose grow! I never used AOL, but I did cancel my 10+ year Compuserve account a few years after AOL bought them out and it became obvious that they were using CIS as a cash cow.
Compuserve's one main asset was their forum software. I remember a CIS manager blowing me off when I called to ask if they would consider licensing that software to companies for internal use. Wonder what he's doing these days... | |
|
| | | 
capecoddah
join:2005-03-18
Yarmouth Port, MA | I never used AOL Service
I DID use the coasters they sent in the mail | |
|
| |
| |
pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
|  Old News?
The only "lesson" that this teaches Vonage is to hope for a class action lawsuit where they can simply pay the lawyers some cash and give coupons to customers who were defrauded.
--
Only SHATNER is Kirk. | |
|
| 
Siryak
join:2005-11-26
 ·WildBlue
| Re: Old News? I think it should be MANDATORY for a company to have easy online cancellation. I have been through the AOL cancellation bit and that has to be the worst experience with customer service I have EVER had and believe me I have talked to a lot of CS. 
--
Wildblue Pro Pack / Beam 40 / Laredo NOC / Windows MCE SP2 | |
|
| | markrubi
join:2004-08-11
Weatherford, OK
| Re: Old News? Back in the early days of AOL one could cancel online. A screen at KW: cancel had a button. IF you clicked it you heard GOODBYE and you were canceled. This didn't hang around long as you can imagine the birth of the saves department came. Give em a free month or two instead of canceling. Being able to say we have XXXXXXX members meant better stock prices etc.. | |
|
| 
Noah Vail
Premium
join:2004-12-10
Lorton, VA
 ·RoadRunner Cable
 ·Verizon BroadbandA..
 ·VoicePulse
| VERY Old News Back when people were just catching on to dial up, I used to play clean-up to AOL's Marketing Strategy. AOL would heavily CD Spam some areas, knowing that there was no local dial up number for those users.
AOL's software would choose a dial up number for the customer, and if there was no local number, it would choose some outlying exchange. That is, AOL would connect to a Long Distance Number without notifying the user.
If a user were computer savvy enough, they would go into the connection properties and discover what AOL had done. But in nearly all cases, a savvy user wouldn't sign up with AOL at all.
The end result was huge and unexpected phone bills. If the billing timed out right, those bills would reach $400+ before the customer found out. I would get the service calls and have to explain to the customer what kind of company AOL was.
Since then, it's been a goal with me to remove every customer I can from AOL. Also to let as many people know, what a deplorable entity they are, one that probably shouldn't exist.
My best guess is that I've effected a few hundred customers or potential customers in the last 15 years.
If we all do our part......
NV
--
The More Alike 2 Religions are, the Stronger the Hate between them. | |
|
| | markrubi
join:2004-08-11
Weatherford, OK
| Re: VERY Old News One had to choose an access number from the very beginning. It was the customers fault for not checking if the number was LD or not. It was this way from the very beginning. There even was a warning about the access number might be long distance and to check with the phone co if you were not sure. If AOL would have chosen a number for you and picked a LD number there would have been lawsuits long ago. AOL has done some shady things but what you posted is not one of them. | |
|
| | | |
| | | | markrubi
join:2004-08-11
Weatherford, OK
| Re: VERY Old News I've used aol since DOS (pcaol) days. I even worked for them for 7.5 yrs. The software always asked your area code then provided you a list of numbers. The user chose upto two of them. AOL did not send out floppies or cd's hard coded with phone numbers for a certain zip code or area code. They blanketed the entire us with floppies/cd's. They did not send extras to an area which didn't have an access number. It was pretty much the same everywhere. Flood gates wide open. I wish I still had an old 1.0 version floppy. | |
|
| | | | |
Noah Vail
Premium
join:2004-12-10
Lorton, VA
·RoadRunner Cable
·Verizon BroadbandA..
·VoicePulse
| Re: VERY Old News I never said the the software came hard coded with phone numbers for a certain area. I never said they sent any extra anything anywhere.
It was the same software they shipped nationwide. When the software ran, it called a toll free number, downloaded a list of phone numbers in and around your area code. You then had a choice of accepting whatever number they chose for you (without preview and by choosing next) or you could select viewing the list of numbers they downloaded and make a different choice. You could choose up to 2 numbers, or not.
I've always related the California Class Action Suit with the change in the software behavior, but I've never been sure. Suddenly, the access number list was displayed by default. I'm nearly certain there wasn't a version change. There was lots of different behavior within versions. I remember 4 being the last version that held your stuff (emails, contacts, etc.) on the local drive and it was around forever; so I'm guessing 3. This would have been about 1995 or so.
If you're defending AOL by saying AOL had no idea that they were distributing sign up software to areas with no local access number, it'll be a tough sell anywhere. There's no way AOL spends that ocean of marketing and market research money and never bothers to check where any of their access numbers are.
I don't know, but I'll wager they spammed us over a billion times.
Speaking of Ultra Mass Marketing, any one remember the campaign to send 1M AOL CDs back? »news.zdnet.co.uk/emergingtech/0,···6,00.htm
I've always regretted that didn't work out.
Well, there's always insignificance followed by bankruptcy, here's hoping.
NV
--
The More Alike 2 Religions are, the Stronger the Hate between them. | |
|
| |
pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
| said by Noah Vail :AOL would heavily CD Spam some areas, knowing that there was no local dial up number for those users. That seems quite odd. AOL would gain nothing by having people dial long distance numbers or intra-LATA numbers.
--
Only SHATNER is Kirk. | |
|
| | | |
| | | |
pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
| Re: VERY Old News said by Noah Vail :If my anecdotal experience is represtative, it was VERY successful for them. $20 - $60, plus termination issues that brought months more of unwanted service, plus there there those people who kept the service, added up to something. Hmm... I suppose another way to look at it then is that since these people are dialing long distance or intra-LATA to reach AOL, it saves AOL from having to set up a POP in these customers' local calling areas.
--
Only SHATNER is Kirk. | |
|
|
MrMoody
Liberal Capitalist
join:2002-09-03
Smithfield, NC | Re: Old News? Seriously old. How many of you still have these laying around? Never installed. Maybe I should eBay it.
 | |
|
| | 
reub2000
Premium
join:2001-12-28
Evanston, IL | Re: Old News? Or better yet, reformat it and put it to good use! | |
|
| | |
RARPSL
join:1999-12-08
Suffern, NY
| Re: Old News? said by reub2000 :Or better yet, reformat it and put it to good use! Assuming that your computer even has a Floppy Drive (or one that can even read that disk since I think they were 360K SS disks not 720K DS or 1.44M HDs). I'm not sure that the current Floppy drives can handle SS disks although I think that they do support DS ones. | |
|
| | | |
reub2000
Premium
join:2001-12-28
Evanston, IL
| Re: Old News? said by RARPSL :said by reub2000 :Or better yet, reformat it and put it to good use! Assuming that your computer even has a Floppy Drive (or one that can even read that disk since I think they were 360K SS disks not 720K DS or 1.44M HDs). I'm not sure that the current Floppy drives can handle SS disks although I think that they do support DS ones. My computer does have a floppy drive. Not sure if it works, since it's been years since I used it.You can clearly see from the picture posted that the disk is a HD.
I used to reformat the discs. Then I could store whatever I wanted on them. Then they decided to send out CDs, which where useless.
--
My pbase gallery | |
|
| | | | |
RARPSL
join:1999-12-08
Suffern, NY
| Re: Old News? said by reub2000 :said by RARPSL :said by reub2000 :Or better yet, reformat it and put it to good use! Assuming that your computer even has a Floppy Drive (or one that can even read that disk since I think they were 360K SS disks not 720K DS or 1.44M HDs). I'm not sure that the current Floppy drives can handle SS disks although I think that they do support DS ones. My computer does have a floppy drive. Not sure if it works, since it's been years since I used it.You can clearly see from the picture posted that the disk is a HD. I noticed that the image showed it as a HD AFTER I posted my message. I seem to remember that the installers were small and that they used to be on DD floppies (I'd have to see if I could find any in my collection to verify this). My real point was that I was not sure if the latest floppy drives support DD (or SS) floppies or only support HDs. | |
|
| | | | |
| | | TheWickerMan
join:2002-04-09
Enola, PA
| said by reub2000 :Or better yet, reformat it and put it to good use! That's what I always did. Other than the pack of floppies I bought with the PC originally, I never paid for a single one, thanks to AOL.
Then they started sending CDs, which as someone else pointed out, were useless. | |
|
| | | | ender7074
join:2006-11-21
Saint Louis, MO | Re: Old News? They weren't useless. I had a huge collection of coasters for company when they came over. | |
|
| |
Slidetbone
Mazin Go
Premium
join:2002-11-10
Land O Lakes, FL | Hold on to it for another 10 years. Maybe it will be worth more!!
| |
|
fddfs
@comcast.net | Now that AOL is free, this is kind of a mute point. Now that AOL is free, this is kind of a mute point. | |
|
Rob A
Same Old Jets
Premium
join:2005-01-17
Pompton Plains, NJ | Good Canceling AOL was never easy. The reps would make so many offers to make you stay instead of just canceling the damn service. | |
|
| jmikey
join:2005-11-09
Humansville, MO
 ·CenturyTel Inc.
·Cingular Wireless
·Mediacom
| Re: Good I remember the hell I went through to cancel AOL. This whinny guy kept asking me why over and over. I told him I wasn't satisfied with their service and he kept repeating why. I finally ended up using foul language and flat out stated that since I have now stated I no longer want their service that I consider it terminated. Well, guess what, I got a letter thanking me for deciding to stay with them and for upgrading my service with them. I sent the letter back and told them to stick it and that I was gonna sue em. They finally sent me a cancellation letter but still continued to try to bill my phone for the next 8 months. Luckily I had warned SBC and they kept blocking it. | |
|
|
|
|
AOL To Pay $3 Million For Cancellation Policies
·