Sprint Cable Venture Now Named 'Pivot'Available in 40 markets by year's end, says Sprint ( old news - 12:01PM Wednesday Mar 28 2007) tags: business · wireless · cableSprint recently joined forces with Comcast, Cox, Time Warner Cable and Advance/Newhouse Communications to spend $2.4 billion on wireless spectrum -- enough to technically make cable companies the nation's fifth largest wireless phone provider. They've since started offering wireless phone service to cable customers; $15-$25 on top of a traditional Sprint mobile phone plan will net you mobile video content, e-mail access and web browsing. The selling point to consumers is supposed to be the simplicity of one bill and the idea of convergence (control your DVR via phone, etc.). The ultimate goal, of course, is to help them better compete with the unified telco services like U-Verse and FiOS. At first the companies were simply offering the service under the individual cable brands -- but this week they unveiled a unifying brand for the service: Pivot. While many are reporting this as a "quadruple play" bundle, so far it isn't. Cable CEOs like Brian Roberts haven't been sold on the idea of bundling wireless phone service with VoIP, data and video. As we've mentioned, the quadruple play is an accountant pipe dream, with most customers preferring to bundle usually just two services. Sprint will offer Pivot bundles to businesses, however. According to Sprint, "Pivot" is currently available in eight metropolitan areas: Raleigh, NC; Austin, TX; Boston; Portland, OR; San Diego; Phoenix; Cincinnati; and Dayton, OH. It is expected to be available in 40 markets by year's end. Related:- Telcos Lost Both Voice and Broadband To Cable in Q2
- Cox Hints at Wireless Plans
- Comcast Promises WiMax Bundles
- Free Cablevision Wi-Fi To Offer VoIP, Video
- Comcast WiMax Femtocells
- Cox To Build Wireless Voice/Data Network
- Should Cable Operators Offer Wireless?
- Cox Discusses Their Wireless Plans
|
 moonpuppy
join:2000-08-21 Glen Burnie, MD | Didn't we go through this before? Lower cost > one bill.
Let's see if the numbers really work out.  | |
|  |   dvd536 as Mr. Pink as they come Premium join:2001-04-27 Phoenix, AZ
| Re: Didn't we go through this before? said by moonpuppy :Lower cost > one bill. Let's see if the numbers really work out. Lower cost, NO. early termination fees, YES theres really no reason to not go straight to sprint here. -- You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth | |
|  |  |  moonpuppy
join:2000-08-21 Glen Burnie, MD | Re: Didn't we go through this before? I was saying lower cost "is greater than" one bill.
 | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  bcunningh
join:2005-04-01 Seattle, WA | Re: Lots of bells and whistles for too high a price Honestly, that happens to me ALL THE TIME!!! | |
|  |   hayabusa3303 Over 200 mph Premium join:2005-06-29 clubs: | pointless The cable companies get digital phone so they can get people off the bells aqnd on to there system.
Now they turn around and say "hey the bells are not that bad after all, they are beating us, we might as join up with them" | |
|  |   Dezbend Premium,MVM join:2001-04-20
| Re: pointless Sprint is not a bell and has spun off its local division. Sprint now only sells wireless and long distance; this was one of the major reasons Sprint spun off the local division so that when they went to bed with the cable companies they would not be competing with themselves. -- If it is not recorded, it simply does not exist. | |
|  |  JSRoman Premium join:2005-03-10 Callahan, FL
| said by hayabusa3303 :The cable companies get digital phone so they can get people off the bells aqnd on to there system. Now they turn around and say "hey the bells are not that bad after all, they are beating us, we might as join up with them" Are you drunk? This is Sprint! It has nothing to do with "the Bells". -- www.seabee.org | |
|  |  |  jervin123
join:2005-04-14 Philadelphia, PA | Re: pointless they did operate in many rural areas of this state under sprint/united tel. | |
|   inteller Sociopaths always win.
join:2003-12-08 Tulsa, OK | pivot...the motion of getting bent over. does anyone find that a little ironic? | |
|   Healbot Premium join:2003-07-16 Vancouver, WA | Sprint I'm not surprised cable companies are going to use sprint, already guessed a while back. | |
|  |   inteller Sociopaths always win.
join:2003-12-08 Tulsa, OK | Re: Sprint yeah, they whore out their network to all comers. brand dilution be damned! | |
|  Eric Martin
join:2005-06-19 66308
| Wimax = ground microwave.
It's nothing new!!! »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WiMAX
What pisses me off is that wireless should be something the public should be able to pull off without big greedy corrupt businesses who want total ownership of spectrum.
Every one that isn't owned like a slave is considering it for communities. »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesh_network | |
|  |   MacLeech The one and only Premium,MVM join:2001-07-14 SoCal
| Sprint gets last mile access, cable gets PSTN access. The whole point of these sorts of deals are so the companies involved can scratch each others backs while avoiding having to use the local incumbant phone companies' pipes.
Sprint often needs last mile lines to service it's cell tower locations... usually it gets them from the local bells. Now it can turn to local cable fiber runs...
Local cable needs backhaul to get from local headends to peering points and PSTN access, often the local bells are the place they get them from. Now they can use Sprint...
Skip AT&T and Verizon... the biggest competitors and often the biggest hold up when getting more bandwidth... for both Sprint and cable. -- Don't mind me, I'm just trying to help...
| |
|   Daryl
@af.mil | Not worth it On the phone right now for an hour going around in circles because they can't tell me what I am being charged for. I was supposed to be saving 20 bucks a month, but ends up costings me more that 50 extra dollars. | |
|  | |  |
|
|