 russotto
join:2000-10-05 Collegeville, PA
| Legal jurisdiction applies where the government says it does When it comes down to it, it's all about force -- who can apply it to whom. Google could have its data on the moon and the Brazilian government could legally force them to give it up, provided the Brazilian courts agreed and they could apply enough force to Google. Google's only way around that is to cease operations in Brazil. | |
|  |  BarneyBadAss Badasses Fight For Freedom Premium join:2004-05-07 00001
·Verizon FIOS
| Re: Legal jurisdiction applies where the government says it does your correct... it's about force...
Now, did the governements get the data in an encryped format; and keep it that way?
I doubt it. Bet the data these companies are giving to the g'ments will find it's way into the wild... won't that be luverly? -- ---Barney | |
|  |  |   ronpin Imagine Reality
join:2002-12-06 Nirvana
·AT&T Southwest
·Charter Pipeline
| Re: Google caved into Brazil over Orkut when profits threatened quote: is there ever a compelling reason to afford data access to the legal system?
...only when you need to curry regulatory favors from the government (i.e. AT&T) :0 -- "Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country" - and stop the NeoCons | |
|  |  holmantp
join:2003-12-20 Rosamond, CA
| The link you provided just rehashes what was said in the first link above. Did you even read the second link.
And your link is covered with Goggle ads. it makes me wonder "media company" seeking more ways to make money, let's see any publicity is better then none. -- Tim | |
|   jgkolt Premium join:2004-02-21 Lakewood, OH clubs: | minimal contact doesn't there have to be minimal contact and then through the long arm statute they could pull them into court in thier native land? Or does that only apply to the United States? -- www.LakeSemaJ.com | |
|   R4M0N Brazilian Soccer Ownz Joo
join:2000-10-04 Glen Allen, VA
·Comcast
| Google put itself in this predicament Had they complied from the start, they would have come out ahead. The Brazilian court wasn't asking for wholesale data, it was asking for specific accounts with strong evidence of pedophilia and other criminal offenses. What google was doing was aiding criminals by keeping their information from the courts.
I have an orkut account to keep in touch with my Brazilian friends and the stuff you see in some accounts is outrageous and downright criminal. There was this one community blatantly selling illegal drugs from their forum.
Google's stance was unsustainable. It was basically saying "We don't care what they do, we're not telling you who they are". | |
|  |  BarneyBadAss Badasses Fight For Freedom Premium join:2004-05-07 00001
·Verizon FIOS
| Re: Google put itself in this predicament Your correct, Google put itself into this position.
And the reason they got there was becasue they were capturing data about search requests and storing it.
If they had never done that in the first place, now these g'ments woudn't be asking for the data.
Personally; I think they shouldn't capture the data at all. -- ---Barney | |
|  |  |  | |  |
|
|