  dadkins Can you do Blu? Premium,MVM join:2003-09-26 Hercules, CA
·Comcast
| Meh Just new pretty toys. If I want to transfer large files, I have ethernet. 22mbps from my "g" router is fine for now, if I want faster, I have several CAT5 cords lying around. -- Think outside the Fox... Opera | |
|
 |  |
 |  |   nixen Rockin' the Boxen Premium join:2002-10-04 Alexandria, VA
·Cox HSI
·Speakeasy
| Re: Meh said by exocet_cm :What can businesses do when nearby homes or whatever deploys this draft gear and it interfers with the businesses' networks? Given that it's unregulated spectrum, they will pretty much have to just cope with it.
-tom -- "Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the government's purposes are beneficial. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well meaning but without understanding." -Louis D Brandeis | |
|
  jbob Reach Out and Touch Someone Premium join:2004-04-26 Little Rock, AR | Not Finalized yet? Not that I really follow it but I thought the 802.11N standard had already been finalized. If not guess I better pay more attention. I had wondered why some of the articles were still calling these new routers Pre-N or first draft. | |
|
 |   72276539 Premium join:2001-01-19 Atlanta, GA
| Re: Not Finalized yet? said by jbob :Not that I really follow it but I thought the 802.11N standard had already been finalized. If not guess I better pay more attention. I had wondered why some of the articles were still calling these new routers Pre-N or first draft. No, it has not been finalized, not even close. Yes, you better pay more attention. -- RIP Dimebag- August 20, 1966 to December 8th, 2004. | |
|
 |   Jigsaw Stardust We Are Premium join:2000-10-21 Cleveland, OH
·Cox HSI
1 edit | said by jbob :Not that I really follow it but I thought the 802.11N standard had already been finalized. If not guess I better pay more attention. I had wondered why some of the articles were still calling these new routers Pre-N or first draft. No just like everything else they want to push it out the door and let it work itself out.all while they line there pockets lol. -- »www.auralmoon.com/html/ Stimulating ears for 6 years | |
|
 |  |   richardpor Fur it up
join:2003-04-19 Portland, OR
| Re: Not Finalized yet? It is case of engineering vs. marketing: think Dilbert.
Engineers want to tinker on the product but marketing rules the corporate world, the lords of chaos. Engineers say we need to work on the 802.11N but marketing say no it good enough get it out the door today; I promised customer we will have 1000 unit on his shelf by last week. We can patch thing up later. | |
|
 |  |  |   Jigsaw Stardust We Are Premium join:2000-10-21 Cleveland, OH
·Cox HSI
| Re: Not Finalized yet? said by richardpor :It is case of engineering vs. marketing: think Dilbert. Engineers want to tinker on the product but marketing rules the corporate world, the lords of chaos. Engineers say we need to work on the 802.11N but marketing say no it good enough get it out the door today; I promised customer we will have 1000 unit on his shelf by last week. We can patch thing up later. That about sums it up!!!!  -- »www.auralmoon.com/html/ Stimulating ears for 6 years | |
|
 |  PDXPLT
join:2003-12-04 Banks, OR
| It's "finalized" in the sense that there's a draft that was sent to letter ballot. It ain't perfect; there are bound to be errors in a document that big and complex. People vote "no" to ensure that their comments are considered by the group. This is SOP in the IEEE; the draft will go through a couple of iterations of balloting until the group agrees that all the non-negligible errors have been rung out.
But the press have magazines to sell and websites to promote (like this one), so they spin this like it's some big thing. | |
|
  nixen Rockin' the Boxen Premium join:2002-10-04 Alexandria, VA | Who's Early? And why are they shipping draft gear to him? 
-tom | |
|
  BellBoy Hit the dope with a shoe--win jail time. Premium join:2001-02-20 Los Angeles, CA clubs:
·Pacific Bell - SBC
| Paying for the 'bleeding edge' You wanna first adopt, then get ready for the consequences. They don't call it the 'bleeding edge' for nuthin' y'know!
Anyone that buys this gear deserves what they get...so so performance and a nice looking paper weight by the end of the year. -- "When the day comes that anyone can bend our country's laws and lawmakers to serve selfish, competitive ends, that day democratic government dies." -- Preston Tucker, June 1948 | |
|
 Asmodeus
join:2004-05-26 Spring Valley, CA | oh my... what's the problem... they've already ratified the .11n standard right...? so start developing till you drop... it's good for everyone who wants this type of equipment... otherwise why are these people in business...? | |
|
 |  Devistater
join:2004-02-13 Clovis, CA
| Re: oh my... No, the draft standard was up for a vote to move it to next level and it didn't pass. Thats what the news thing above says, RTFA. Hint: Check out the timeline on the 802.11g standard At this point we are at today, it took 1 more year to get the final standard.
So, expect to wait a year from now to be able to buy 802.11n standardized stuff. Until then, you are playing russian roulette. Its highly unlikely that any pre-N stuff you buy will work completly with the final standard, and its even more unlikly that you will be able to upgrade it. So if you dont mind replacing equipment in a year, go ahead. | |
|
 jdir
join:2001-05-04 Santa Clara, CA
| 100M WIFI ?
Oh great, 100Mbits WIFI, and my broadband pipe is still 1.5Mbits. I guess I like to transfer gigabits of file between couple of my PC?
Dude! - I can transfer a whole hard drive between my two PCs!!! Wooooooooooooohoooooooooooo.  | |
|
 |   Anonymous_ Anonymous Premium join:2004-06-21 127.0.0.1 clubs: | Re: 100M WIFI ? Super G is faster it's 108mbps :P | |
|
 |  |   koolman2 Premium join:2002-10-01 Anchorage, AK | Re: 100M WIFI ? 802.11n is said to give at least 200-300 Mbit of true throughput. 108 Mbit gear is the same as 54 in that it really only gives 25-50% of the rated speed. | |
|
 |  |  |  Devistater
join:2004-02-13 Clovis, CA
| Re: 100M WIFI ? The fact that almost all 802.11n stuff is shipping with a 10/100mbit ethernet interface rather than a gigabit means thats very unlikely 
54g stuff topped out at around 35mbit of real throughput, even the super G stuff only hit about 45mbit. I would expect n stuff to hit 60 or 80 mbit if we are really lucky. | |
|
 |  |  |  |   trooper100
join:2005-05-23 Louisville, KY
1 edit | Re: 100M WIFI ?
i have a Linksys EG1064 Instant Gigabyte Network card with Full-duplex capability at speeds up to 2000 Mbps so it claims in combo with D-LINK dgl-4300 108mbps 802.11g wireless gaming router with 4 ports on g band but in reality im good to get half of that at best. what one claims and what one gives is two different things now in days lol
like i really would believe the hipe "as if" that's why I have expensive junk know.
learn from my mistakes
the new N is not much more thin hipe | |
|
 |
|
 |