Search:  

 
 
   News
newer
story category Should the FCC be Closed or Dismantled?
'Mission Accomplished!', claim deregulation fans
(old news - 01:20PM Monday Feb 28 2005)
tags: competition · fcc · business
Congress's original charge to the FCC in 1934 was to "ensure that the American people have available -- at reasonable costs and without discrimination -- rapid, efficient, nation- and world-wide communications services." This Op/Ed over at Computer World seems to suggest that things are going so well in the telecom sector, we should consider scaling back the FCC. CNET's Declan McCullagh, who also believes the Broadband Sector has achieved Techno-Nirvana, recently proposed abolishing the FCC altogether.

Related:
  1. FCC Engineers Say White Space Broadband Works
  2. Friday Evening Links
  3. What ISP Transparency?
  4. Clearwire CEO: FCC Approval Would Be 'Good Policy.'
  5. Congress: FCC Boss Martin Abused Power
  6. White House Opposes Free Wireless Broadband Plan
  7. Tech Media Discovers FCC Staffed With Dunces, Lobbyists
  8. USF: Uncle Sam's Blank check
Forums » Should the FCC be Closed or Dismantled?
view: topics flat text 
Post a:
page: 1 · 2

Neil
Stop All The Downloadin

join:2003-08-20
New York, NY

edit:
February 28th, @01:11PM

yeah!

Shut 'em down!

Half the country still doesn't have broadband but I'm still sick of them.

Andrew J
Premium
join:2001-11-09
Lancaster, PA
clubs:

Re: yeah!

All they do is party in Vegas, so shut them down.

ogar

join:2001-12-05
Ephrata, PA
clubs:
Yes they are a waste of tax money and all they do is hold back technology upgrades.
xistent

join:2001-05-29
Santa Ana, CA
close there doors. They are a waste of tax money.

goldy

join:2000-11-14
Augusta, GA
·AT&T DSL Service
·AT&T Southeast

"ensure that the American people have available -- at reasonable costs and without discrimination -- rapid, efficient, nation- and world-wide communications services."

Interesting... At reasonable cost....Is that what they were (and will be doing) auctioning off all that bandwith to the highest bidder.
hskrfan23

join:2004-03-18
West Sacramento, CA

Re: yeah!

nah, they'll use that money for all the secret wiretapping and monitoring projects the government imposes. I guess the 82 dollar toilet seats and 27 dollar screws just arent cutting it anymore. LOL
pacbowl

join:2005-02-12
Riverbank, CA

said by Neil See Profile:

Shut 'em down!

Half the country still doesn't have broadband but I'm still sick of them.

yeah .... SHUT 'EM DOWN!!!!

"DOG HOUSE"

BonezX
Basement Dweller
Premium
join:2004-04-13
Canada

hell why not

well they aren't doing their jobs as it is, why not just shut them down.

ronpin
Imagine Reality

join:2002-12-06
Nirvana
·AT&T Southwest
·Charter Pipeline


edit:
February 28th, @01:33PM

Re: hell why not


...and God said "The FCC shalt punish wardrobe malfunctions"
:::
AquaBlaze
Premium
join:2004-02-02
Encino, CA

Re: hell why not

And this has what to do with the FCC, other than neutering media who don't conform to the current propaganda scheme?
joebear29

join:2003-07-20
Alabaster, AL

Re: hell why not

Ignore the troll.

ronpin
Imagine Reality

join:2002-12-06
Nirvana

Re: hell why not

Oh ye of little satire...
joebear29

join:2003-07-20
Alabaster, AL

Re: hell why not

I don't mind satire, but unrelated Bush-bashing trolling is just annoying.
AquaBlaze
Premium
join:2004-02-02
Encino, CA

Re: hell why not

Honestly, there are so many legit reasons to Bush-bash...at least wait until your topic is relevant 'fore launching the flames.

ronpin
Imagine Reality

join:2002-12-06
Nirvana

edit:
February 28th, @02:59PM

I rest my case...

(Ya'll really don't see the hand of "His Holiness" all over the FCC ??? -- oh maybe you think censorship from Big Brother [Falwell] is all part of God's Plan? )

pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD

Re: hell why not

said by ronpin See Profile:

(Ya'll really don't see the hand of "His Holiness" all over the FCC ??? -- oh maybe you think censorship from Big Brother [Falwell] is all part of God's Plan? )
Why haven't you moved to Canada already?
--
Hey Fast Eddie... you're next!
AquaBlaze
Premium
join:2004-02-02
Encino, CA

Re: hell why not

said by pnh102 See Profile:

said by ronpin See Profile:

(Ya'll really don't see the hand of "His Holiness" all over the FCC ??? -- oh maybe you think censorship from Big Brother [Falwell] is all part of God's Plan? )
Why haven't you moved to Canada already?
It's f***ing cold.
pacbowl

join:2005-02-12
Riverbank, CA
AHAHAHAHAHA

EdibleTarget
Real Gamers Dont Use Consoles

join:2004-12-02
Lowell, MA
that picture is just awesome...=D
AquaBlaze
Premium
join:2004-02-02
Encino, CA
Can we blow them up, just to be creative? Or is that not an elective choice here?

BonezX
Basement Dweller
Premium
join:2004-04-13
Canada

Re: hell why not

said by AquaBlaze See Profile:

Can we blow them up, just to be creative? Or is that not an elective choice here?
wouldn't be able to televise it without a delay so they can digitally edit out the flying bodyparts, but hey they let the gore stay during 9/11 why not on the distruction of a governing corperation.

AtomicZero

join:2004-11-24
West Palm Beach, FL
·Comcast

what I would really like to know is who/what do they think they are protecting or shielding with all that censorship? All the playground kids curse worse than sailors and truckers combined. and if they come of age where they want to take a peek at boobies, they'll find away...usually dad's or big bro's stash. The current standards for regulation/censorship is beyond hypocritical. It's futile.
DonLibes
Premium,ExMod 2001
join:2003-01-19

but could we live without FCC censorship?

I wouldn't mind if we at least abolished censorship from the FCC's responsibilities. Speaking of which, when did the FCC get responsibility for censoring the airwaves? And for that matter, why does it only have that ability for some media and not others?

KoolMoe
Aw Man
Premium
join:2001-02-14
Annapolis, MD
clubs:
·Verizon FIOS
·Speakeasy

Re: but could we live without FCC censorship?

I agree censorship is well outside their 'mandate'.
However, just because the last few years were not very productive from a consumer standpoint, I don't think they should be abolished.
I believe the Telecomm Act of '96 was crucial to the competition we have now. Who knows if we'd have DSL available if not for that act? We could all be on non-competitive cable waiting for the ILECs to do their fiber buildouts!
As I understand it, the FCC was crucial to the passage of TA'96.

Just because the FCC under Powell's, um, leadership existed largely for the benefit of Big Business - that doesn't mean it's time to abolish them...especially as Mr. Copps seems to have a better understanding of the issues.
KM
--
eLearning and Website Design | Need an LMS? | Need an LMS & eCommerce solution?

calvoiper

join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA

said by DonLibes See Profile:

Speaking of which, when did the FCC get responsibility for censoring the airwaves? And for that matter, why does it only have that ability for some media and not others?
Congress gave it the authority.

It has the authority only for airwaves because airwaves are a limited, public resource which is extended to broadcasters on a basis more in the nature of a "loan", "lease", or "trust". The airwaves are not permanently sold, and the government retains more control over them than media which do not gain legally exclusive use of government owned property--such as newspapers, magazines, or cable TV.

Calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies!

LetsRok

join:2001-01-21
Clinton, TN

Abolish It

I think it is really and outdated agency that needs to go. Just one less government agency we can do without.

zoom314
Superman
Premium
join:2001-04-30
Yermo, CA

Re: Abolish It

said by LetsRok See Profile:

I think it is really and outdated agency that needs to go. Just one less government agency we can do without.
Never abolish the FCC, Unless You don't care about new devices interfering with each other(Frequency Anarchy would result If You ask Me), You may as well ask that the US Government be abolished and that will never happen.
--
Firefox forever!»mysite.verizon.net/zoom314/
docsane

join:2005-02-17
Winthrop, MA

said by LetsRok See Profile:

I think it is really and outdated agency that needs to go. Just one less government agency we can do without.
It's at times like this I wish everyone would watch the old Alf Tales cartoon which explains why the FCC is a good idea. You know, the one about the evil witch who tries to buy up all the newspapers, TV, and radio stations in the kingdom so that her views would be unopposed.

"We need a commission. A communications commission. A FEDERAL communications commission!"

- Kindly, old King Ronnie in the Alf Tales episode

one_bored_si

join:2003-03-10
Montebello, CA
·AT&T Yahoo

I agree, why not abolish it. Only one of two things can happen 1)the Bells, wireless providers, cable providers (those with a strangle hold on consumers) will either get worse thanks to the eventual disappearance of the FCC, so people will stop overpaying for shit they don't really need or are satisfied with the service they receive 2) or people are so atrophied that they simply don't care how they are charged, what quality of services they receive or just don't care if one company owns all the airwaves, that it would be advisable to invest your social security funds in telecommunications as soon as possible. That is if you even cared about that.

DrewCapu
Giant Diehard

join:2001-12-19
California
clubs:

It should be handed over

to broadbandreports.com

so that its members/mods/mvms can make all the necessary decisions


TK Junk Mail
Go ahead, make my day
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Margate City, NJ
clubs:
·Comcast


edit:
February 28th, @01:18PM

Re: It should be handed over

said by DrewCapu See Profile:

to broadbandreports.com

so that its members/mods/mvms can make all the necessary decisions


Suck up!!:p;)
AquaBlaze
Premium
join:2004-02-02
Encino, CA

Re: It should be handed over

Considering that a large rock is more effective at ruling out decisions than the FCC, the BBR members couldn't exactly do harm by taking them over.

oliphant
I Have 8 Boobies
Premium
join:2004-11-26
Corona, CA
Yeah so we can all be forced to run Linux and FF and other nerdware. No thanks.
--
Don't get it, demand it! The Anime Network www.theanimenetwork.com

Matt
You can't fix stupid
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..
·Corporate Colocation

Re: It should be handed over

said by oliphant See Profile:

Yeah so we can all be forced to run Linux and FF and other nerdware. No thanks.
Just imagine it, 24x7 broadcasts of how "M$ sux0rz, Linux r00lz the f00lz", interrupted by 5 minutes of real content.

You think the little advertisements every 5 minutes at the bottom of the screen for an upcoming show on TBS are bad now? Wait until they position a PERMANENT FireFox advertisement there!

Ahhh, the horror!
AquaBlaze
Premium
join:2004-02-02
Encino, CA

Re: It should be handed over

said by Matt See Profile:

said by oliphant See Profile:

Yeah so we can all be forced to run Linux and FF and other nerdware. No thanks.
Just imagine it, 24x7 broadcasts of how "M$ sux0rz, Linux r00lz the f00lz", interrupted by 5 minutes of real content.

You think the little advertisements every 5 minutes at the bottom of the screen for an upcoming show on TBS are bad now? Wait until they position a PERMANENT FireFox advertisement there!

Ahhh, the horror!
And sadly enough, that would STILL be better than the trash we have on TV now.
B
Premium,MVM
join:2000-10-28

Re: It should be handed over


This was tried, actually. It was called "TechLive" and the banners took up 3/4 of the screen.

-- B
--
In a realm outside causality and function

TK Junk Mail
Go ahead, make my day
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Margate City, NJ
clubs:
·Comcast


edit:
February 28th, @01:28PM

NO; bandwidth allocation still needed

Maybe the scope of what the FCC is responsible for should be looked at. But there are still technical and regulatory reasons for its existence. The get rid of it altogether position is just an overreaction to the decency initiative. The same people who say get rid of the FCC over censorship are the same ones decrying the deregulation steps the FCC has taken. There is no pleasing everyone. The reason we have a Congress is so that the majority get to have a say in how the government is run. Let the Congress tackle the issue.
--
My Web Page
My Blog
Join Red Room Forum

cdru
Go Colts
Premium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN
·Verizon FIOS

Re: NO; bandwidth allocation still needed

I second your comment. The FCC I think is required as a regulatory body. Without them acting as "airwave police", I think it would be just a free for all in the RF spectrum. Some type of a central body needs to exist to keep things organized and responsibly used.

That being said, they don't need to be the molality police. Let the public decide what we do and don't want to see. In all honesty I bet the majority, if not more, really could care less if they here Tom Hanks yell "Fuck" in Saving Private Ryan or if they see Janet Jackson's tit. Whoop-de-do. There is only a few *cough*Parents Television Council*cough* people that throw everything into a tizzy. CBS, NBC, et al aren't going to turn prime-time TV into the Playboy channel. If parents are too much of a prude to tell little Johny that Rob likes Amber on Survivor, then we really are in trouble in the future.
--
Win some of $250 in prizes. Try your luck with The Amazing Race Contest.

cdru
Go Colts
Premium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN
·Verizon FIOS

Re: NO; bandwidth allocation still needed

I find it slightly ironic that my post about morality police was itself put in the queue before it got posted. I'm assuming this was because I said a 4-letter word and it flags it automatically. Sigh.
--
Win some of $250 in prizes. Try your luck with The Amazing Race Contest.

GenBlood

@attbi.com


thumbs down from:
Andrew J See Profile

close the FCC and us the money for something ELSE

Close the FCC and take that money an give it to Social
Security.... The FCC is a waste of resources ...

New tech would roll-out faster if the FCC ... wasn't
overlooking and forcing them to share with others ...
I figure if they spend billions on a network, they shouldn't
be forced to share. Smaller ISPs get a free ride off the
big companies. They should spend there our money and design
their own network. If they can't then they shouldn't be in
that business.

Playing nice and all the crap isn't always the best
solution. Bottom line the FCC is a waste .....
CLOSE THEM DOWN ....

ctceo
Premium
join:2001-04-26
South Bend, IN
clubs:

Uh, ok.

{not seriously}

If they did this we wouldnthave to worry about part 15 gripes anymore. BPL could finally achieve it's long time goals.
RayW
Premium
join:2001-09-01
Layton, UT
clubs:
·XMission

Re: Uh, ok.

said by ctceo See Profile:

{not seriously}

If they did this we wouldnthave to worry about part 15 gripes anymore. BPL could finally achieve it's long time goals.
And the next time you needed a cop for some reason, you may not get him since his radio is screwed up by not only BPL, but by all the other possible emitters that could be tossed out there.

Granted the current FCC admin is not well thought of, but the FCC rank and file are still doing enforcement on people who think that Powell is 'The FCC' and throwing up what ever transmitter they can find. Look beyond the issue of BPL interference at what goes on in real life.

And for a real life situation, ham radio played a part in a major incident here not long ago when a dual tanker full of butane went up and they had to evacuate a bunch of people. If BPL was active, it had the potential to block signals to and from hand held radios of both the official and volunteer systems. Cell phones are fine, but when you need to co-ordinate activities of people over a wide area, then you need something like radio. And for a 10 hour incident, you can not be running battery operated devices at 5 watts, you need to use quarter watt or less transmissions whenever possible.
--
I am not lost, I find myself every time.

ctceo
Premium
join:2001-04-26
South Bend, IN
clubs:
That I'm not worried about because the BPL that I refer too does not cause harmful interference when deployed correctly.

TheMadSwede
Premium
join:2001-01-30
Holland, MI

Zzz.....

This is a good information, but the responses to it are dull and predictable. Welcome to the wonderful world of groupthink -- it works both ways.
--
home

See 6 replies to this post
Dirtyping

join:2001-10-30
West Haverstraw, NY

Airwaves and Interference Chaos without FCC

My guess is the people clamoring to have the FCC shut down are the same ones who are screaming about not being able to hear the f word or some nudity on the public airwaves. How awful for you

Without the FCC there would be all kinds of issues of interference across the board. Over air broadcasting would be a mess not to mention the issues of household appliances interfering with your computer, telecom, etc and vice a versa.

btw - If you want what the FCC considers indecent there is nothing stopping you from buying a subscription to XM, Sirius for radio and pay cable, i.e HBO, Playboy, etc.

See 15 replies to this post

Transmaster
Don't Blame Me I Voted For Bill and Opus

join:2001-06-20
Cheyenne, WY


edit:
February 28th, @04:17PM

If you think

things are bad with the FCC wait till you have no FCC. Just because it isn't doing what YOU want it to doesn't mean it doesn't have a propose. The problem started when they started to auction off RF spectra and suddenly this obscure government department turned into a real political plum. What needs to happen is the again have a department which is run by people trained and competent in what they are administering. BPL is a prime example of what is wrong with the FCC. If they had engineers running the joint such as in the old days this would have been laughed out of the building.
--
Low voltage Tech's are wimps, Real tech's use 45 pound filament transformers, plate voltages no less then 2400 volts with at least 10 amp's lighting 8877 triodes...BPL I'm coming to get you.

EddieNash187

join:2005-02-09
Moss Landing, CA

HELL YEAH

The FCC is such a worthless organization. Im sick and tired of the same old disgruntled womens grops complaining in to the FCC trying to dictate whats exceptable to watch or listen to for the rest of us. All the reports one month (98%)about something "bad" they showed on TV one month were tracked down to a club of bitchy moms acting like Kyles mom on southpark. Do you really want an organization that alows itself to be pushing around by these control freaks out there? The majority of us dont care about the FCC regulations, though everytime you turn on the news its some new scandal. uck!
WyoNative

join:2005-01-31
Enfield, CT

Re: HELL YEAH

The FCC needs to be radically restructured and restaffed and the issue of indecency needs to be challenged in court to define exactly what is indecent and when and these regulations need to be administered evenhandedly.

mrchris
America the pitiful
Premium
join:2002-10-01
North Babylon, NY

They..

Need a major rehaul as posted previously....they should do what they were made for...making sure devices don't give off interference and such, not censoring media!

Jameson
1010
Premium
join:2004-05-28
Fallbrook, CA
clubs:

bah

bye bye :P

calvoiper

join:2003-03-31
Belvedere Tiburon, CA

Grow Up, People!!

C'mon, people. Whether you agree or disagree with the FCC's efforts to set decency standards, they aren't reasons to get rid of the agency.

As several commentators have pointed out, without someone doing some of the FCC's tasks, we'd have airwave chaos.

Additionally, in telecom, somebody still has to resolve the fights between companies about interconnection, etc. Even if you think the FCC's been doing a lousy job (and I do) it's still a job that has to be done.

Saying we should abolish the FCC makes you sound like a third-grader saying we should eliminate all classes except recess. Maybe we should purge the agency's leadership, or maybe we should change its authorizing legislation, but totally getting rid of it makes no sense at all.

calvoiper
--
VoIP--the death knell of remaining voice monopolies!

rawgerz
In Debt we trust
Premium
join:2004-10-03
Grove City, PA
·Verizon Online DSL
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

Re: Grow Up, People!!

ditto, but when i see all these news posts about BPL and how the fcc is pushing it it makes me wonder whats going on there.
it seems like they are trying to set themselves up for their own down fall, after i saw a interview with one of the people working there saying what they did he mentioned how there was a baby monitor inter fearing with airport radios, almost like that was the only serious thing that happened to them in years
--
Read this!
Dirtyping

join:2001-10-30
West Haverstraw, NY

Re: Grow Up, People!!

I hope BPL dies before it has a chance to wreck havoc with interference in the shortwave and ham bands. Not to mention kill new growth in digital shortwave.
rahvin112

join:2002-05-24
Sandy, UT

Re: Grow Up, People!!

said by Dirtyping See Profile:

I hope BPL dies before it has a chance to wreck havoc with interference in the shortwave and ham bands. Not to mention kill new growth in digital shortwave.
BPL died when the FCC declared it had to comply with part 15. Yes the FCC did it's job regardless of what you see posted around here.

asdfdfdf

@xtraport.net


from:
Xure See Profile

declan is frequently so disingenuous

Firstly, by the time the fcc came about, competition had already pretty much collapsed and there had been a de facto monopoly. There had also already been antitrust action a few decades earlier. It is far too simplistic to suggest that monopoly is the result of government activity. It does sometimes reinforce monopoly, but implying that the market would be awash in marvelous competition if the government would get out of the way is nonsense and requires one to completely rewrite the history of how governmental involvement in the economy developed in the last century.

Since his article we are now dealing with the end of at&t and mci and their absorption into the baby bells. The rebuilding of the pre-divestiture bell system has to be obvious at this point to anyone not completely blinded by the desire to deregulate everything.

He is full of it in claiming that antitrust law is enough. People of his ideological bent would largely eviscerate antitrust law to any extent possible.

Most especially his notion of converting frequency spectrum into permanent corporate property is utterly appalling. Talk about locking in backward ideas that can permanently entrech concepts that may be made technologically obsolete. The idea of parcelling out frequency spectrum for exclusive use and using government power to shut down any "trespassers"(notice how these people have no problem with using governmental power to protect particular interests from competition for resources) are concepts derived from 100 year old technology and inadequate receivers. Receivers can be made much more intelligent today and we have concepts like uwb that are getting attention again(though they are not new).

Surely even the most deluded deregulationist can comprehend the irony of wanting to use governmental power to coerce a propertization scheme on a resource like the airwaves. Why protect exclusive use? If we really believe in competition why don't we just throw open the airwaves and let the situation hash itself out(after all we claim to have such faith in the market)? At least the public at large would have some participatory voice in such a situation, which is more than can be said for the idea of government handing out permanent control of frequency spectrum. Of course such a thing would decentralize control in a way that would cause all the powerful vested interests(both business and government) to shit their drawers, so hell will be freezing over before we see that happen.
Xure

join:2003-11-14
Beverly Hills, CA

Re: declan is frequently so disingenuous

Hell you brother!

Hell yeah!

Nappi

@optonline.net

FCC Hollywood's Lackeys

One thing they should definately do, is get the FCC out of Hollywood's pocket. These mandated HDCP DVI/HDMI connections, and Downrezzing proposals, so Hollywood can control people's TV's, DVR's etc. is such bullshit. If that's not over stepping their authority, I don't know what is. If they start downrezzing movies etc. on my 1 1/2 year old, $8,000 dollar, Panasonic 50" Plasma TV, because it didn't happen to come with a HDCP compatable DVI connection, just appease Hollywood(It was built just months before the mandate, no HDCP DVI add-on card is available for it either), I'm gonna be one pissed off mother...errr... I mean citizen.
flushls

join:2004-11-02
Joyce, WA

The whole discussion gives me

Flatulence !
GunnerTHB

join:2004-07-13
Cape Girardeau, MO

Re: The whole discussion gives me

This is bullshit! I don't have broadband and I'm in a good area for it. You know what, they don't do their jobs anyway. Damn FCC
Kearnstd
Elf Wizard

join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ


edit:
February 28th, @07:45PM

Remove the FCC from TV/radio regulation only. =p

the FCC exists to bring order to the chaos of controling who gets what air waves at what frequency, and they do a good job of this. but their power to control the content of TV and Radio should be removed as the industry can police itself just fine in that department. we dont see pornos on basic cable because no advertisers would sponcer the time for such a program and as such they dont show. big deal a boob jumped out during a superbowl and maybe some kids saw it, but they have allready seen full nudity from playboys their friends sneak into school. same thing with radio Stern is on the air because hes popular, remember ratings are the best control for content not the FCC. so let the FCC do its job of controling Telco mergers and Cable co assimilations and who gets what megahertz and what call sign or what cell frequency, but keep them away from TV and Radio content and maybe they would be able to focus on what they were founded to do.

owenhome
keeper of the magic blue smoke
Premium
join:2002-07-13
Wichita Falls, TX
·RoadRunner Cable
·AT&T Southwest


edit:
March 1st, @09:08PM

We can't do away with the FCC

If we take a good hard look at the FCC, and we put aside them telling us what not to say, what not to wear, etc. If we put aside the censorship, what's left?

Well, they are the only thing that keeps communications in the US from falling apart. There would be nobody to govern frequency use. Anybody could broadcast anything, on any frequency, at any time. There would be nobody to oversee and restrict interference created by electronics. Gawd, the list just rolls on.

Without the FCC, or an equally apt replacement, in short order we would loose all OTA communications. OTA television would be unwatchable, satellites would fail, Wi-Fi would fail, all devices susceptible to interference would fail, etc. etc. etc. There would be no limit to transmitter power, and you would need some monsters to overcome the interference, so people would be dropping dead from cancer all over the place from EMR exposure. You would have to run your computer in a lead-lined, RF shielded case IF it didn't interfere with itself. It would be insane. As another stated, frequency anarchy. Only optical technologies would be viable. Of course, it wouldn't matter because the devices they connect to wouldn't be. It's just not possible to do away with the FCC.

-but-

There is a lot to be said about scaling back their duties to what we really need them for. I need, we all need them to manage and oversee things like interference, frequencies, standards, etc. I/we do not need them to censor everything for us. Don't get me wrong, I don't want my kids watching pron on NBC, BUT we ALL see nakedness every day. We ALL know what the human body looks like, big deal! I don't need them to fine people for showing something that we all have seen. I don't need them to fine people for swearing. I don't have virgin ears and my kids go to school so they hear it every day anyway. Big deal!

Of course, we look at the bigger picture and see that the reason these fines even happen is because so friggin many people call and complain, send letters, etc. because they were soooooo damaged and offended for seeing a breast. I mean OMG! They must shower with their clothes on to guard their sensitive sensibilities.

Those people are the ones who really need help first. The FCC, as a matter of course, would follow.
Forums » Should the FCC be Closed or Dismantled?page: 1 · 2


Friday, 09-Jan 06:08:25 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole