republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   News
newer
story category VoIP Spam
Automated services could pose threat
(old news - 06:35PM Tuesday Aug 10 2004)
tags: spam
CNET reports on the inevitable emergence of VoIP spam, which could mix the speed and efficiency of spam with the vocal irritation of traditional telemarketing. The article points to companies like Qovia, which has designed technology that seeks out the IP addresses assigned to phones, then sends each a 30-second recording at a rate of "1,000 synthetic calls" every five seconds.

Related:
  1. McColo Closure Forces BotNet Shift
  2. Can Spam Act Celebrates Five Years Of Ineffectiveness
  3. Google #4 On Spamhaus Spam Network List
  4. AT&T Slammed For Text Message Spam
  5. Verizon To Finally Crack Down On Spam
  6. Your Constitutional Right To Spam
  7. FTC Shuts Down 'Rogue' ISP
  8. Project Honey Pot: 1 Billion Spam Messages
Forums » VoIP Spam
view: topics flat text 
Post a:
elitedreamr
Premium
join:2003-06-24
Acworth, GA

great...

Just what we need....spam in the form of a voice recording...I wonder if VOIP phones are able to be on the Do not call list.
lafu

join:2004-06-25
Island Lake, IL

Re: great...

well i tell you what,if that is going to happen i will ditch my voip and go back to old fashion phone,they(vonage) better be prepared otherwise they will loose bussines...

Cal123AS

@comcast.net
I placed My vonage on the do not call list
vic102482
Premium
join:2002-04-30
Upper Marlboro, MD

Ask VOIP companies to black list the IPs

Of Spammers. Find anyone that is transmitting huge amounts of data across a network or scanning for phone IPs and shut them down. The activity just by its nature would make it stand out from a standard phone call on a VOIP network, of course that is alot of time and money for companies to invest. I doubt anythign will happen unless this becomes a major issue like email spam.
--
I tie a rope around my penis and jump from a tree, don't you wanna grow up to be just like me!!!!

Count Hogula3
John Forged Kerry
Premium
join:2004-07-10
Corona, CA

1 edit

How can they find it?

If the ATA is behind a router? If the ATA responds to anything, what stops a VoIP company from having their ATA only respond to calls originating from the VoIP companies IP?
kincobra1

join:2003-07-20
Sacramento, CA

Re: How can they find it?

lol crazy companies...does spam even work...geesh...lets bug 100000000000 people and maybe 0.00000000000000000000000000000000001 people will buy
krobar
Is this thing on?

join:2002-09-15
Columbus, OH

Re: How can they find it?

if you really think it doesn't work why do you think they keep doing it? Unfortunately lots of people every day do click on the links and buy the products.
--
Power corrupts. Absolute power is kinda neat.
nl4jy

join:2002-05-02
Brooklyn, NY

Re: How can they find it?

And those are the people that needs to be shot.

or.

Have their Internet Surfing / Emailing privelage taken away.
--
If it ain't broken, don't try to fix it. If it's broken, buy a new one.
Mele20
Premium
join:2001-06-05
Hilo, HI

Ugh

Spam over the phone would be a total turn off for me. I am on the "do not call list" and if there was any chance I would get spam with VoIP then I would not consider getting this service although my ISP will be launching it in November. I also wonder can you get an unlisted number like I have with my land line?
--
The first and foremost function of our jurors is to protect private citizens from a tyrannical and intrusive government...Jurors are the last line of defense for liberty. Thomas Jefferson 1789

paulhaskew
Unoffical Dominos Spokesman

join:2002-01-10
Vancouver, WA
clubs:

hmm

sounds like a lot 'o fun... Do I hear the VOIP laws coming soon...
rmdir

join:2003-03-13
Chicago, IL

Re: hmm

Our leaders will pass the Can VOIP Spam law, then it will all end, right?

Logan 5
Lastday
Premium,MVM
join:2001-05-25
The WasteLAN
·Pacific Bell - SBC


4 edits

It's only a matter of time......

Before the garbage starts hitting VOIP....

Can't rely on the "Do Not Call" list as that is applied to existing telephone infrastructure only at the present time.

Law's would have to be (re)written to include VOIP technology, so until that happens, looks like the spammers, scammers and scum will exploit this too..

Can't wait to hear from Mr. Mbutwipeu pitching one of those 419 Scams delivered right to my telephone....

IronChefMoto
Premium
join:2001-02-08
Alpharetta, GA

Wait a minute -- part of monitoring toolset?

Um -- has anyone thought to read about Qovia products? They produce VoIP management tools/services. And judging by this June 28, 2004 press release, they want to try and STOP VoIP spam with their products:

»www.qovia.com/company/news/06.28···inal.htm

Just a thought. I wonder if this tool/technology they talk about in the article is, in fact, a stress test tool for detecting/countering VoIP spam.

IronChefMorimoto
--
Desktop #1: Abit NF7-S 2.0 | AMD AthlonXP 2500+ | 1GB PC3200 DDR | 256MB ATI Radeon 9800 Pro
Desktop #2: Shuttle SK41G | Athlon XP 1800+ | 512MB PC2100 DDR | Onboard Graphics
Laptop: Dell Latitude C810 | Intel PIII-M | 512MB PC133 SDRAM
underscore

join:2004-04-20
Fairfax, VA

hmm

I doubt it would be as efficient as mail spam. VoIP is about a 100kbit stream constantly, to send out 1000 calls at once would surely take a 100mbit connection to keep it going smoothly. It's possible, but costly.

IGGY
No Guru Just Here To Help
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-30
Chatham, IL

Re: hmm

said by underscore See Profile:
I doubt it would be as efficient as mail spam. VoIP is about a 100kbit stream constantly, to send out 1000 calls at once would surely take a 100mbit connection to keep it going smoothly. It's possible, but costly.

Well I can tell you from experience that FAX SPAM on VOIP - even for those of us without a FAX attached to the line or in use. Is alive and well. And even after blocking multiple numbers and taking the "stupid" step of calling there take you off the list number. The idiots are still pounding away. Many claim you can still make a report to the FCC on this. But as I read it. Since no paper or ink resources are used. The law governing this wouldn't be valid.
--
Test Your Security Benefit for Children's Oncology Group Cable Modem Diagnostics
hedyd4u
Premium
join:2003-12-16
Schenectady, NY


1 edit

Wait let the FCC save voip

Recipe to get people to fall for anything.
First make a mountain out of a molehill.
Second bring in a Savior.
Third all the people believe.
Fourth you are trapped and left wondering what happened.



run to the hills flee for your lives
the sky is falling
... Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror,
and you would not have been informed.

bbrlogue
Learning New Things Daily
Premium
join:2003-12-07
Alexandria, VA
·VOIPo
·LINGO

Why doesn't DNC apply? Not that easy.

First they have to find the IP. Then they have to send SIP packets to the adapter, which will only be packets simulating a call, but it won't go directly to your VM, so the TA will ring the phone first. I don't see how DNC does not apply here.

Unless you go through the backdoor of the VoIP's provider VM, you can't just 'leave' a voice message. Whatever the Qovia example uses, it probably doesn't use a real-world environment. Sure, you can guess numbers once you get on the VM's access numbers, but then again, that would be where DNC applies.

On the network, the bots or trojans that find the IP can be easily blocked, once a pattern emerges from the bot source.
cbs228
Geeks Of The World, Unite

join:2000-09-04
Saint Louis, MO

Overstated Threat

Any SIP UA or ATA is bound to have some sort of authentication feature where calls can only be initiated through whatever SIP proxy that device is using. To send a call to that device requires that a caller be connected to that SIP proxy or be a user of a service that that proxy peers with— you can't just run a service scan looking for SIP phones and then be able to call that device. For the nontechnical: SIP networks function more like IM networks than email. Since the caller must authenticate itself to the network, spam is easier to police and thus much less of a problem— IM networks aren't exactly flooded with spam, are they?

To send a voice-spam a person needs maybe 32 kbps - 64 kbps of bandwidth, depending on quality, and they must sustain that for at least 30 seconds (or however long the message is). Although there is plenty of bandwidth available for stealing courtesy of viruses, you can still reach far fewer people in any given time frame, with a given amount of bandwidth, with VoIP spam than you can with SMTP spam— and spam is all about bulk. There just aren't that many people who will respond to any given spam message, and the only reason that it works at all is that you can send lots of messages really quickly. Barring any drastic changes in response rates, VoIP spam will be far less effective— and thus far less lucrative for evildoers— than its email counterpart.

VoIP spam: I'll believe it when I see it.
--
"If you stare too long into the abyss the abyss stares back at you." -Nietzsche

GENERAL FAILURE READING ©: DRIVE
(A)bort, (R)etry, (F)rivolous Lawsuits, (B)ribe Congress?
gatzdon

join:2002-10-25
Lake Zurich, IL

This is just Hype

I believe the only people vulnerable to this are ones who don't use a SIP server. (Meaning they actually dial IP addresses to call another VOIP Phone). Most VOIP Services use a SIP server that requires authentication. That said, most people using VOIP services should have their Adapter behind a NAT router and not DMZ their router to their adapter.

This a lesson learned on how to configure your setup, not a warning that you will be barraged with telemarketing spam.
JPCass

join:2001-01-23
Denver, CO

What are we going to do?

My other concern is that VOIP will allow offshore telemarketers to call to the US so cheaply that they can flood us with calls, and ignore the Do-Not-Call list because they're overseas.

It seems to me that to keep both spam and telemarketing in check, is going to require legislation - and enforcement - that holds the advertisers responsible, and not just the lackeys who contract to do the spamming or calling. Almost all the advertisers who are ultimately responsible for these solicitations are US-based, and the minority that are offshore could be dealt with by enforcement mechanisms to intercept electronic payments flowing from the US to overseas. Otherwise, I don't know how we end up with anything other than an endless technology arms race.
Forums » VoIP Spam


Tuesday, 09-Feb 13:51:28 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10.5 years online! © 1999-2010 dslreports.com.