Mentat Premium Member join:2001-02-25 Houston, TX |
Mentat
Premium Member
2004-Jul-15 2:49 pm
IRC > *Everyone needs to just switch to IRC.
I suspect lots more would if it wasn't for the pompous attitude of many IRCers. | |
|
| b34tBoX Premium Member join:2003-12-28 Ontario, CAN |
b34tBoX
Premium Member
2004-Jul-15 2:52 pm
Re: IRC > *said by Mentat: Everyone needs to just switch to IRC.
I suspect lots more would if it wasn't for the pompous attitude of many IRCers.
IRCers = RICers. | |
|
| | stateq2control the code Premium Member join:2003-03-27 Jackson, MS |
stateq2
Premium Member
2004-Jul-15 3:01 pm
Re: IRC > *said by b34tBoX:
said by Mentat: Everyone needs to just switch to IRC.
I suspect lots more would if it wasn't for the pompous attitude of many IRCers.
IRCers = RICers.
| |
|
| AdamB0 join:2001-01-07 Columbus, OH |
to Mentat
"IRC > *" is a great example of pompous attitude...
I use both IRC and BitTorrent quite regularly and together I get what I want. Kazaa was nice for like single mp3s, but not much else. | |
|
| | Mentat Premium Member join:2001-02-25 Houston, TX |
Mentat
Premium Member
2004-Jul-15 2:56 pm
Re: IRC > *What I meant was the seeming unwillingness of veteran IRC users showing newbies the ropes.
As to the title, IRC has a huge advantage on all current p2p programs, the anonymity factor.
I do still use *za programs, they're much easier to use.. that's their draw.
IRC takes a certain amount of dedication to be able to find what you really want. | |
|
| | | markofmayhemWhy not now? Premium Member join:2004-04-08 Pittsburgh, PA |
Re: IRC > *Would you show me the ropes? I've been getting Fedora through the mirrors, maybe I should give BT a try. Anything more than 4k/s would be welcomed | |
|
| | | | Mentat Premium Member join:2001-02-25 Houston, TX |
Mentat
Premium Member
2004-Jul-15 3:03 pm
Re: IRC > *said by markofmayhem: Would you show me the ropes?
I've been getting Fedora through the mirrors, maybe I should give BT a try. Anything more than 4k/s would be welcomed
Sorry, I'm busy removed has written a great IRC faq here, check it out. | |
|
| | | 1 edit |
to Mentat
said by Mentat: What I meant was the seeming unwillingness of veteran IRC users showing newbies the ropes.
IRC is very simple.. Its just hard for people to grasp you can download files using a chat program. This site gives all the help a newbie could ever need.. | |
|
| | | steelgaze Premium Member join:2002-02-01 San Francisco, CA |
to Mentat
I personally feel that IRC shouldn't be experiencing those "growths" that kazaa and BT are getting (or in some cases, had gotten :P ).
How I feel IRC should be kept is closed off from the "normal" users, so that there's a place for people like me to go and hangout without drawing too much attention. Then again that's my weirdo elitist complex or something. I'm sure someone will flame me for that. | |
|
| | | | |
Re: IRC > *said by steelgaze: I personally feel that IRC shouldn't be experiencing those "growths" that kazaa and BT are getting (or in some cases, had gotten :P ).
How I feel IRC should be kept is closed off from the "normal" users, so that there's a place for people like me to go and hangout without drawing too much attention. Then again that's my weirdo elitist complex or something. I'm sure someone will flame me for that.
I couldn't agree more. The veterans are sequestering themselves in private keyed or invite only channels, most centered around trusted users who have been part of the circle for years and several good FTPs. The DCC protocol is grossly inefficient. The channels which have public fserves are silly as the wait time is astronomical - a handful of servers try to service hundreds of people, that's to be expected. No, IRC is about making contacts, not finding files.Beth Eris-Free veteran | |
|
| | | |
ircisnotanon to Mentat
Anon
2004-Jul-15 3:42 pm
to Mentat
>>>As to the title, IRC has a huge advantage on all current p2p programs, the anonymity factor.
Not true at all. While some IRC networks do not show your IP or censor the end of it, if you are downloading (via dcc) from another computer your IP IS KNOWN! You never know who you are downloading from and they do have your IP. | |
|
| | | | |
Re: IRC > *said by ircisnotanon: >>>As to the title, IRC has a huge advantage on all current p2p programs, the anonymity factor.
Not true at all. While some IRC networks do not show your IP or censor the end of it, if you are downloading (via dcc) from another computer your IP IS KNOWN! You never know who you are downloading from and they do have your IP.
But i believe by law once they offer it up for aa download whether it be via DCC IRC or what ever form of downloading there is they lose the rights to complain about it and sue since technically they are the holder of the copyright and they are the one allowing it to be uploaded. Would sort of be like the pot calling the kettle black. | |
|
| | b34tBoX Premium Member join:2003-12-28 Ontario, CAN |
to AdamB0
said by AdamB0: "IRC > *" is a great example of pompous attitude...
I use both IRC and BitTorrent quite regularly and together I get what I want. Kazaa was nice for like single mp3s, but not much else.
It's also good for porn! | |
|
| |
to Mentat
IRC requires you to beg for uploads,wait for queues.BT and Kazaa Lite doesn't have long queues and can hit near max speeds almost instantly if there is sufficient upload bandwidth.
I'm a BT supporter.Yeah! | |
|
| | Doctor FourMy other vehicle is a TARDIS Premium Member join:2000-09-05 Dallas, TX |
Re: IRC > *That's where newsgroups come in handy. Speed is always maxed out, no queueing (except maybe locally on a user's machine - most Usenet providers limit the number of simultaneous connections), and no waiting a long time to get what you want. Plus, you can leech all you want, and not worry about the riaa, mpaa or bsa (unless you upload copyrighted material of theirs using your ISP's news server). | |
|
| | | |
AnonMan
Anon
2004-Jul-15 5:04 pm
Re: IRC > *shhhh don't tell anyone | |
|
| | | ssj4androidRedefining Reality join:2002-04-14 Wyoming, MI |
to Doctor Four
It's not free though. A lot of the time at least. | |
|
| | |
to Centrilium
yes IF there is sufficient bandwidth...... which there rarely is... it takes me usually more than 30 mins to get an OK speed on BT (more than 100k) and that just sucks.... id rather be in a xdcc queue for 20 mins and get 200k+ right off the bat | |
|
| F walkerHey Intern, Get Me A Campari Premium Member join:2003-04-10 Anchorage, AK |
to Mentat
"It's surprising that the RIAA has not applied much legal pressure on the increasing number of torrent related websites that direct users toward pirated software, films, and music."
They will now..... I can't believe that so many people, most if whom are illegally trading files via P2P networks, keep posting about, touting, and otherwise giving press to these networks that work best if kept somewhat under wraps...... I guess it is good for the RIAA and MPAA that no one will just shut up and down/upload files quietly....... | |
|
| | ssj4androidRedefining Reality join:2002-04-14 Wyoming, MI |
Re: IRC > *Good thing I use DC hubs. It would be hard for the RIAA to even get into one. | |
|
| jeraden join:2002-06-10 Coraopolis, PA |
to Mentat
Everytime I've tried IRC it was an exercise in futility. The file server bots had huge queues which would take about half a day to finally get into a position where you could download something. And if it was a larger file that was split up into pieces, you could only queue maybe 3 of the 30 pieces at one time making it ridiculous to even bother trying to get a whole file. I admit I'm a n00b when it comes to IRC. Am I missing something or am I just on junky channels and lack the inside connections to find good channels? | |
|
| | b34tBoX Premium Member join:2003-12-28 Ontario, CAN |
b34tBoX
Premium Member
2004-Jul-15 3:59 pm
Re: IRC > *Sorry, you're just a n00b! | |
|
| | |
to jeraden
I have no trouble getting what I look for 9/10 times on IRC. You have to spend more than 30 seconds with it to realize how great it really is. | |
|
| clorets join:2001-12-12 Oklahoma City, OK |
to Mentat
dont use bt for much but small things like music videos. usenet will always be my daddy | |
|
| l33t Premium Member join:2003-01-23 Indianapolis, IN |
l33t to Mentat
Premium Member
2004-Jul-15 10:42 pm
to Mentat
IRC is useful for Internet Relay Chat nothing else. | |
|
rchandraStargate Universe fan Premium Member join:2000-11-09 14225-2105 |
rchandra
Premium Member
2004-Jul-15 2:53 pm
lamentableBT seems to me to be such a good system, and distributes some of my favorite (and perfectly legitimate) things...like Fedora Core. I'd hate to see some entity like the {RI,MP}AA squash BT and take down FC as collateral damage. | |
|
| |
Re: lamentablesaid by rchandra: BT seems to me to be such a good system, and distributes some of my favorite (and perfectly legitimate) things...like Fedora Core. I'd hate to see some entity like the {RI,MP}AA squash BT and take down FC as collateral damage.
They would just shut down the servers setting up the downloads for illegal materials. I don't think many who are downloading movies and mp3's off it are using it to download Linux too. But I can be wrong there. | |
|
steelgaze Premium Member join:2002-02-01 San Francisco, CA |
Just waitJust wait until the RIAA/MPAA(sp?) Start targeting BT more. Then people are going to star coming here and complaining and be like, "OMG, how'd they get my IP man?" sorta like the stuff going on with comcast and there letters they send out.
I personally hate going on BT, it's much more public then I want it to be, but then again it's like most P2P clients, they need to broadcast your IP so you can receive the file.
If you're going to pirate, at least take into consideration you might get caught. | |
|
| stateq2control the code Premium Member join:2003-03-27 Jackson, MS |
stateq2
Premium Member
2004-Jul-15 3:03 pm
Re: Just waitsaid by steelgaze: If you're going to pirate, at least take into consideration you might get caught.
I'll never get caught :p | |
|
| |
weeeman to steelgaze
Anon
2004-Jul-15 3:13 pm
to steelgaze
Irc is the best hands down. Thank God alot of people dont know how to use it. Let's keep it like that =] | |
|
YowzaaahOurs Go To Eleven join:2000-12-14 DamnFlat, OH |
May be a silly question....butCan BT be socksified to work through a SOCKS 4/5 Proxy? I haven't seen anyone mention this approach and thought it could work. | |
|
| mnaber join:2003-12-11 Centreville, VA |
mnaber
Member
2004-Jul-15 3:20 pm
Re: May be a silly question....butDefinitely not if everyone were to do it. But for just one person yes. | |
|
| | YowzaaahOurs Go To Eleven join:2000-12-14 DamnFlat, OH |
Re: May be a silly question....butOkay, I'm the one...now the rest of you bastards pretend you didn't see this. | |
|
|
It's my ball and you can't play It is true that there is a "I was here first go away" attitude on IRC.KInd of like the NIMBY thing. | |
|
| steelgaze Premium Member join:2002-02-01 San Francisco, CA |
Re: It's my ball and you can't playIt isn't that type of attitude I would say goes on on IRC, but I wouldn't recommend people go on it, especially newbies. | |
|
alamarco Premium Member join:2003-06-18 Windsor, ON |
alamarco
Premium Member
2004-Jul-15 3:44 pm
IRC pwns BTIRC is good, especially for people that leech (hint, hint @ Suprnova.org). All you do is download, unless you create an fserv for a channel. If your in a country like Canada then you can't get into any legal action since your just downloading and not uploading.
BT is too easy to get caught. You can just hit advanced (I think it's that button) and you'll see a list of IP's that your connected to. The RIAA, MPAA, etc. just need to go on BT and hit that button take a screenshot and they got a bunch of people they can sue. Couldn't be any easier for them. BT has no anonymity at all. | |
|
|
Never worked well for meAs I have mentioned a couple of other times, I could never get bit torrent to work well for me. 98% of the time the download were ultra slow or did not finish at all. I tried tons of different files and it just sucked! IRC was always more succesful and faster. | |
|
| •••••••••• |
NYR 56 Premium Member join:2000-12-05 Smithtown, NY |
NYR 56
Premium Member
2004-Jul-15 4:08 pm
Don't Use BT for MusicI've been using BT (with Shareaza) and it sucks for music. Which may be a good thing. You don't get sued for Games/Apps so it's great for that. For music, I'll grab that single song off of Piolet. | |
|
Chump6Support Bbr Rc5 Premium Member join:2002-10-27 |
Chump6
Premium Member
2004-Jul-15 4:18 pm
BTBT best use is for porn. plenty of it, and alot better junk then of kazza and such | |
|
| reub2000 Premium Member join:2001-12-28 Evanston, IL |
reub2000
Premium Member
2004-Jul-15 4:51 pm
Re: BTNo, it's best use is for distributing Linux distributions on the first day they come out. Usually when a real popular Linux distribution is released, ftp mirrors are overloaded. BT on the other hand thrives on all this traffic. Though, sometimes it so much the tracker can't handle it. | |
|
| | Chump6Support Bbr Rc5 Premium Member join:2002-10-27 |
Chump6
Premium Member
2004-Jul-15 6:17 pm
Re: BTthats just another good purpose | |
|
whamel Premium Member join:2002-05-09 Evergreen Park, IL ·AT&T FTTP
|
whamel
Premium Member
2004-Jul-15 5:14 pm
It's surprising......how many people use bit torrent now. I use it to get live Dave Matthews Band shows via bt.etree.org and the use of this site is just massive. I have alos looked into other torrent sites, like suprnova.org and see that they have movies, applications, music, etc and there literally *thousands* of leechers for movies and music with *hundereds* of seeders. It is pretty crazy, but the worst part is the lack of anoninmity (sp?). We'll see where the MPAA and RIAA tke their course of action against these users. -Bill | |
|
rstrandbHowl at the moon Premium Member join:2003-04-17 Albany, GA |
rstrandb
Premium Member
2004-Jul-15 5:29 pm
They'll be targeted nextWith bittorrent you are forced to share files, thereby making it easier for the RIAA. Most people shy away from IRC because it looks too complicated....Fairly easy once you learn the rules of the game. | |
|
zemus join:2001-01-13 Brooklyn, NY |
zemus
Member
2004-Jul-15 5:32 pm
usenetgo on usenet. irc is for fills only i think. i mean how desparate are you to get 0 day stuff. wait a day and it'll be on usenet. full speed no waiting on queues. i only use irc when i need a fill. and with par2's that's rarely neccessary. oh no ip logging by the 'uploader' on usenet, unlike irc and bt, where the uploader can see the ip of the person downloading. I don't know about you ppl, but I just downloaded 27 gigs (dvd's) in the last 24 hours. my downstream is 3Mbs (around 350 KiloBytes per second). Giving that limit when was the last time u did 27 gigs on bt in 24 hours.. irc cant even come close to that. | |
|
| •••••• |
TzaleProud Libertarian Conservative Premium Member join:2004-01-06 NYC Metro |
Tzale
Premium Member
2004-Jul-15 6:03 pm
I like BT, BUT.......I love BT, it's awesome. I downloaded 55 GB in 2 days. The only problem is I got a letter from the MPAA 8 days later. BT is not safe, it'll take the RIAA or MPAA seconds to find out your IP, and report you to your ISP. Followed by possible lawsuits. This is the reason why I now stick to IRC, it's almost 100% fool proof from the RIAA and MPAA.
-Tzale | |
|
| |
lols
Anon
2004-Jul-15 6:23 pm
Re: I like BT, BUT.......dont feel so safe.... sooner or later they'll infiltrate it and suppliers will go down... no suppliers means no leeching | |
|
| | Alphy join:2001-12-31 Troy, MI |
Alphy
Member
2004-Jul-15 6:28 pm
Re: I like BT, BUT.......Topsites 4 evar | |
|
DaMaGeINCThe Lan Man Premium Member join:2002-06-08 Greenville, SC |
IRCI just downloaded Spiderman 2 the movie from an IRC server. Dident have any queue's and maxed my download. Uncompressing the archive now. w00t | |
|
dml_68He Who Laughs Last Thinks Slowest. join:2002-01-09 Vancouver, WA |
dml_68
Member
2004-Jul-15 7:28 pm
Usenet Binaries GroupsI reccomend you get yourself a good usenet provider if your ISP does not offer usenet or only holds a few days worth of messages per server. you can find EVERYTHING you could ever want in the alt.binaries groups. I use X-News and find it very useful. If there is something you want and don't see post a polite REQ: message and somone will post it. | |
|
| jarablueAlways be true to yourself join:2001-06-11 Worcester, MA |
Re: Usenet Binaries GroupsUsenet is by far the safest way to get stuff. Anything I ever wanted is on there. | |
|
KeepOnRockinMusic Lover Forever Premium Member join:2002-11-08 Beaverton, OR |
Usenet I love usenets. Comcast offers a subscription to some usenet (I think it's giganews) for 1GB a month free.
I may break down a pay a monthly fee for a good usenet someday. It will have to be fast and have a good collection of binaries (with good retention times too).
Any recommendations?
| |
|
| jarablueAlways be true to yourself join:2001-06-11 Worcester, MA 2 edits |
Re: UsenetI use www.usenetserver.com . It gives you UNLIMITED downloads and 2meg per connection. I connect 6 times to the same server and always get my 6 megabit speed. It has 20 day retention and costs 14 bucks per month. I pay 40 for 3 months. There is nothing like dl'ing at 6 megabit for whatever you want. Very good service in my opinion. I have been using them for awhile now. 94% completion rate and good retention. If you are into downloading alot of stuff I think this is by far the best usenet provider.
Actually the retention is going up to 24 days. So that makes it even better. | |
|
tadmaz29 join:2002-05-30 Mount Prospect, IL |
yea buyI got one of those letters from my ISP. I think they packet sniffed me and I was using IRC. I rarely use bittorrent but I guess it's possible that's how they "got me." Nevertheless, no one is safe, no matter what you use. | |
|
1 recommendation |
Wasn't BT designed to be easy to track?I actually find it a little funny that people are using BT to trade illegal files. Why? Because my understanding is that BT was specifically DESIGNED to be "easy to track"! So anyone using BT to trade illegal files, is essentially putting a bulls-eye on their backs, and saying "here I am, come and get me"!
Yes, BT is apparently a well functioning P2P system. But I seem to recall that the original authors of BT planned for it to be for "legal content", and therefor designed it to be easy to track the IPs involved. This "easy tracking" is fine when you are sharing legal content (Linux ISOs for example), but it strikes me as being rather "foolish" for someone to use an "easy to track system" to trade illegal content (it's almost like asking the authorities to come knocking at your door)....
NOTE: There is still a LOT of "legal content" being distributed by BT. For example, a co-worker of mine frequently uses BT to get the latest Linux ISO images (instead of hitting overloaded FTP sites). And many people still use BT to distribute their own multi-media creations (for example, the video serial "Red vs Blue" is legally distributed "for free" on BT, by the owners/creators of those videos). | |
|
| B04 Premium Member join:2000-10-28 |
B04
Premium Member
2004-Jul-15 11:56 pm
Re: Wasn't BT designed to be easy to track?Right, right, and right! I have nothing else to add.
The move towards BitTorrent almost defines the word "fad" -- a mass movement for no legitimate reason other than trendiness/word-of-mouth. And it's self-fulfilling -- because more people flock to BT, there are more media choices (and more "seeds") and BT works better, so then more people flock to BT...
Of course, no one really cared about their privacy or the security of their own files when they all started wildly jumping on the first Napster bandwagon...
-- B | |
|
|
| ••• |
|
oh man ricers i love itaaahahaha mIRCers=RICers i LOVE IT AAAHAHAHAH | |
|
|
|