 doppler
join:2003-03-31 Blue Point, NY | Tried to get DSL But the service sucks. They could not get the line to work for DSL. I am Less than 5000 Feet from CO. On A F1 line. Thats a direct connection into the frame.
Verizon can't get anything right. | |
|  |   BIGMIKE Premium join:2002-06-07 Westminster, CA | Re: Tried to get DSL It will NOT work because of the copper's "bad condition", NOT because of the 5000 FEET, the phone line where I live must be over 50 yrs old or older. There good what there where mint for phone line not BROADBAND. | |
|  |  |  |  |   Vamp 5c077 Premium join:2003-01-28 MD | fiber to the home.. can't wait for fiber to the home, im to far to get fast dsl (or any dsl at all).. | |
|  |  |  sunpost
join:2003-11-23 Allentown, PA clubs:
| Re: My mobile home said by Cousin Dave : I sure hope the Postman can find me on Monday.
You can bet your Verizon bill will be in the mailbox :P | |
|   zoom314 Superman Premium join:2001-04-30 Yermo, CA
| I really do live in a real Mobile Home, And to think that I really do live in a real Mobile Home (Made by Redman Mobile Homes in 1978), One with Axles too, Now having those stick built homes(Built on site, instead of in a factory) being considered a Mobile Home is really strange. Me I'm 6,000' from My CO, It's a new one and It's not visible to broadbandreports.com, Verizon says It's for Security reasons of course. What speed would I get? I don't know, $29.95 is tempting, But I would only switch If I could get that rate and get 3000k/256k at the very least, As that is what Charter Pipeline gives Me, That and 5 Free email boxes, Free Setup and of course Free Install too. -- Charter Pipeline rules in Hesperia, CA, Verizon (ex-GTE) sucks... | |
|  |  Crazeman87
join:2004-04-05 Brooklyn, NY | Re: I really do live in a real Mobile Home, the max speed for the $30 a month deal is 128/384 for verizon. | |
|  |  |  Marckus0513 Just Because
join:2003-01-11 Vernon, VT
·Verizon Online DSL
| Re: I really do live in a real Mobile Home, said by Crazeman87 : the max speed for the $30 a month deal is 128/384 for verizon.
Ahhhhh, i think you are incorrect about that. The $30 dollar price is for 1.5/384, assuming you have the freedom package, otherwise it is $35. | |
|  |  |   Justin Playfair
@dal1-4-13-140-235.ds
| the max speed for the $30 a month deal is 128/384 for verizon.
Huh? There is no "128/384" plan from Verizon that I'm aware of and in any case, the $30/month deal (which I have) was for 768/128 (which I'm currently getting) and now is for 1.5/384 (which billing said I should soon be receiving). | |
|  |  |  |   EnzonE
join:2000-03-23 Indiana, PA
| Re: I really do live in a real Mobile Home, Just curious, how far from the CO are you to qualify for the 1.5/384 ? I know I'll never see those kind of speeds since I'm so far out now to almost the point of not receiving DSL anymore, interesting isn't it? -- Verizon 768k/128k @ 16,200 feet from CO.Activated June 13 2001.Now at 17,047 feet! | |
|  sharksfan3 Premium join:2004-02-16 Poughkeepsie, NY | . Could this bring a lawsuit? I think Verizon is playing games. | |
|   ropeguru Premium join:2001-01-25 Bridgeport, WV clubs:
·VOIPo
| Seems about right.... They finally up and raise speeds. THey make themselves look good in the media and with their customers because they are finally coming around.
But wait, lets up the distance of all our customers so we do not actually have to give it to them.
I see them doing this very easily. Verizon is nothing but a bunch of crooks. | |
|   orldf
@verizon.net
| dsl temporary answer before fiber I'll be the first to admit Verizon moves slowly, sometimes painfully so, and the new DSL speeds are way overdue (3mb/784kb) along with the new distances achievable for minimum spec. I also think that if someone can only get a minimum spec line they should have a lower price point for that spec, and let those of us who have the top lines pay the full price. But moreso, they need to get lines competitive with cable, and cable seems quite able to provide 5-6mb down, where DSL seems to make up for the lower down 3 now, maybe 6 later, with a better up 768k, which is a welcome refresh. People who send pictures to relatives know what upspeed slowdown is all about I think right?
But fiber is the ultimate answer, and, providing they can learn to move fast in implementing it, will overcome so much of this line quality issue. It stands to put them in the forefront of the speed race, and, imo, its kind of sad to watch cable making money hand over fist but with so little vision as to implementing fiber themselves. Perhaps they feel they can squeeze more out of the cable they have to keep up (limited knowhow on that tech side of things for my part honestly).
But while I urge folks to make sure Verizon gives up competitive spec (3-6mb down) now, keep eyes on the fiber thing, because quite honestly I'd rather have a 3 down, skip 6 and go to fiber after. So that means if getting DSL requires rerouting an entire line to your neck of the woods, you might want to figure a way to give them more incentive to run fiber to you. Practically speaking it should be easier and the service should be better. If you only face getting a few kinks worked out of your copper line, well then by all means remind them that the customer has needs 
Love DSL, but I want fiber badly. | |
|  | |  |
|
|