Global StatsDSL continues to reign supreme ( old news - 10:14AM Wednesday Mar 24 2004) tags: stats · worldAccording to the latest figures from broadband stat farm Point-Topic, DSL continues to outgrow cable modem connectivity world-wide. The group notes that 2003 was a banner year for global broadband, providers adding 21 million lines in the second half alone. These additions brought the total number of broadband lines in service to 100.8 million. The group notes that the number of DSL lines increased by 79% to 64 million during 2003, while all other technologies combined increased by only 41% to 37 million. While cable dominates the broadband race in the United States, the reverse is true in the majority of other global markets. While cable has a 60% market share, analysts predict that 2004 will be the year DSL closes this gap in the U.S. According to the report, the broadband industry is leaving the crib and maturing as an industry, evident by the fact the number of broadband lines in use is closely proportional to each country's gross national product. All of the G7 countries are now in broadband's top-ten, with the addition of China, South Korea, and Taiwan. Source: Point-TopicThe group notes that DSL price reductions by U.S. providers are helping to fuel a boom in DSL adoption. The U.S. retains its lead as the highest volume consumer of broadband, with 25.1 million lines. While the U.S. has the highest broadband volume, Asia continues its domination in terms of broadband penetration. While South Korea continues to lead in this regard, the country has apparently hit its broadband saturation point, only adding 300,000 subscribers in the second half of 2003. The group indicates that Europe, the Middle East and Africa are the fastest growing of the three regions (Asia, North America). This region grew by 35% in the second half of 2003 alone. The report indicates countries such as Denmark, Belgium, Switzerland, the Netherlands and Sweden are quickly catching up to other nations. It also indicates that while many European countries saw 40% growth rates (Italy saw 57%), Germany lagged behind in 2003 with 16% growth in the second half of the year. Related:- Wednesday Evening Links
- The GPS Sky Is Falling
- Broadband Hardware Market To Shrink 36%
- Jackson Memorial Sees Huge 'Net Use
- Akamai: U.S. 33rd Fastest Broadband Country
- 650 Million Broadband Households By 2013
- WiMax Is (And Will Remain) A Niche Player
- The "Death Of P2P" Is Relative, Possibly Wrong
|
 Tuvok9 Rangcor The Great Premium join:2004-03-04 Fairview Heights, IL clubs: | DSL vs Cable
It seems like more and more people want DSL because cable rates may be going higher. I think that dsl is coming down in price and in 2004 may go even cheaper. | |
|  |   ViviTheMage vivi Premium join:2002-10-28 Minneapolis, MN clubs: | Re: DSL vs Cable if dsl DOES go any cheaper....and there speeds get a little faster, i might have to switch over. | |
|  |  |   ronpin Imagine Reality
join:2002-12-06 Nirvana | I converted and recanted I had said some bad things about DSL's overhead. But when I got a 6mbs connection from SBC and used it for video-phone -- BAM! I saw how much better in terms of time sensitive packet delivery it was. I'm a DSL convert. | |
|  |  indysz Premium join:2003-07-26 Valparaiso, IN | If DSL goes any cheaper it will put local ISP's @ 19.95/mo out on the curb. | |
|  dsless
join:2001-05-16 Pittsburgh, PA | DSL will not Catch Cable
Verizon is not willing to make the capital investment needed to rewrire area beyound 18K. So no DSL. Don't even talk about fibre. I am luckly the my Verizon pots line works. Just took them 8 truck rolls to fix it between Jan and Feb. | |
|  |   ronpin Imagine Reality
join:2002-12-06 Nirvana
·AT&T Southwest
| Re: DSL will not Catch Cable I'm looking at Verizon FTTP's rollout -- right here in Keller. I was cynical too about ANY telco doing FTTx -- but Verizon is really doing it -- they deserve our highest praise and admiration if they really turn-out to have that kind of vision and foresight. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |   erin1 Premium join:2002-02-22 Buford, GA | Re: DSL will not Catch Cable Keller-TEXAS Nice!
White Non-Hispanic (90.7%) WOW i wanna live there!
| |
|  |  |   Pseydtonne Premium join:2003-01-25 Melrose, MA
| Vz deserves praise? That's only in one state. In Pennsylvania, where they promised FTTH by 2004 and didn't even try, there is no progress. Why praise them, for slacking and ripping off governments. "We failed on our rebuild so please give us more money." What, are they a dot-com?
You pay more for cable modem but it works. Believe it or not, and I know this will blow some of your minds here, but high-speed internet connectivity actually costs money. When ILECs lower their prices, they are only doing it to keep the POTS money. Be aware of this: they'll jack the rates again once they've snared enough folks.
However, I think all of this misses the best point about the article: broadband is growing dramatically in an otherwise shrunk economy. How can we translate this growth into growth of other businesses? How can this fuel a recovery? There's money out there somewhere...
-annoyed by ILEC flunkies, Ps/d | |
|   Julio Bachatero y Que? Premium join:2003-03-19 Brooklyn, NY clubs: | ..... yeah sure it is. | |
|   TechSponge
join:2001-05-14 Hillside, NJ
| Another Convert Back to DSL here I started out back in 1999 with DSL from Bell Atlantic(Verizon). That lasted 1 month. I was working in NetOps at a BLEC at the time, Building out our own SDSL network, so I knew what was and what wasn't possible with DSL. Verizon simply failed at every opportunity to turn it up and keep it stable. I then Moved to @home(Comcrap). I stayed with them till last month. Nothing but 4 years of HELL from them. I placed an order with Speakeasy for 3000/768 Business ADSL. I cant be happier! 8Ip addresses, DNS hosting for 5 domains, 100 emails@ speakeasy, 100emails for 1 of my domains, VPN ok, Servers ok, Share my bandwidth with others ok! DSL is going to make huge moves this year. All of my old and new clients are getting DSL and cancelling cable. Not only a plus for DSL, but a minus for cable...All at the same time!!!! Speakeasy is AWESOME so far. Give em a looksee. | |
|  |  Freezone
join:2000-09-29 Southfield, MI | Re: Another Convert Back to DSL here 3.0/768 ws recently upgraded to 6.0/768 for speakeasy. | |
|  |   steelgaze Premium join:2002-02-01 San Francisco, CA clubs: | Too bad that line costs a pretty penny.. or else I would be on it :P | |
|  |  |   TechSponge
join:2001-05-14 Hillside, NJ
| Re: Another Convert Back to DSL here Yes it does cost a pretty penny, but compare the capabilities on an a la carte basis and it ends up being much cheaper than anything else i have found. 1- DNS hosting for 5 domains. Can be found for 8-15$ per domain/per year elswhere. 2-100 email addresses. Who else gives you 100??? 3-100 email addresses @your domain w/unlimited aliases! 4-Just got upgraded to 6000/768kbps. 5-Technical support is the BEST I have ever seen. Sales people are on the Ball too. Nothing like those Morons@comcrap. 6-I have run Ethernet to 3 neighbors this week. 2 are next door on either side. (less than 50 ft. each) I have given them each their own Linksys which I will manage. They also have use of a routable IP. With unlimited tech support I will charge them $15.95/month.(15.95 x 3= $47.85) 7-I am in the process of ordering an installing a small roof-top tower and antenneas for Wi-fi for those too far for ethernet. Point to points and an Omni on another channel. I will charge 9.95 for that/month. I've got 2 signed up for that once it is live. (9.95x2=$19.90) 8- $19.90+$47.85=$67.75 Then- $119.95-$67.75=$52.50 ( 7$ more expensive than comcrap so far) but I get 8IP's, double the bandwidth on the Dwn and triple the BW on the UP, dns for 5 domains, VPN is ok, servers are ok...etc. 9- I get a kickback from Speakeasy for anyone I refer for their own line. Who else can provide broadband speeds @$9.95 and $15.95 with on-prem support? | |
|  |  |  |   TechSponge
join:2001-05-14 Hillside, NJ
| Re: Another Convert Back to DSL here
Oh yeah, that 3rd neighbor 2 doors down(135 ft). I'm debating whether or not to run fiber over to her or piggyback off the other neighbors router(50 ft). They get along well, so i dont think it would be too much of a problem for either party involved. I figure fiber would be too delicate to be out in the weather without extensive trenching or conduit. 1/4 inch PVC conduit will not be too expensive for the short ethernet runs and easy to trench over. | |
|   dadkins Can you do Blu? Premium,MVM join:2003-09-26 Hercules, CA
·Comcast
| LMAO! DSL? Yea, right! Here's one for ya, I'm on Comcast(great service, for me at least)and for kicks I just did a "Lookup" here for DSL service...»/prequal_watch···K/48586a
Tell me, should I switch? Right now I'm getting these speeds for $42.95(yes I have basic cable)»/archive?zip=9···t=Search
Hmmm... | |
|  |   steelgaze Premium join:2002-02-01 San Francisco, CA clubs: | Re: LMAO! DSL? Yea, right! Well if you think your service is good, I don't really see the need for you to change your ISP. | |
|  |  |   dadkins Can you do Blu? Premium,MVM join:2003-09-26 Hercules, CA
·Comcast
| Re: LMAO! DSL? Yea, right! The point that I'm trying to make is, these "faster than cable" dsl deals are not available for everyone. A few people here in Hercules might get dsl at or above Comcast's speeds(if they are close enough)...but, everyone in Hercules(if they are wired for cable) can get pretty much the same speeds as me. DSL is not an option for some of us.
If you are one of the few that can get those speeds,at or below the $42.95-$57.95 that Comcast(or other cable ISP)offers...I am truly happy for you.
$199.00 per month + having to change my phone service for 1100/1100kbps, or $35.95 per month + changing phone service for 384/128kbps...I just can't see it. | |
|  |  |  |   lakino Premium join:2003-04-03 Campbell, CA
| Re: LMAO! DSL? Yea, right! I'm glad cable is around. Even though I can't hate Comcrap any more than I do and even though it's undisputed that cable technology for broadband is obviously inferior to DSL, I am more than happy to see Comcrap live and last and endure. I want competition. I want to see Comcrap around so that my SBC prices don't go up like crazy. We need competition and I'm happy we have Cable and DSL, and I hope to see PG&E in the future involved as well. --
In an uncertain world, there is absolutely no security in banding together. -- Robert X. Cringely | |
|  jammmin
join:2000-12-14 Upper Marlboro, MD
| internet service The only reason why DSL reigns supreme worldwide is that most of the world do not have a well developed cable TV system like the US. In Europe, satellite television is much more popular than cable since it has been around much longer.
And since telephone systems are in basically every country and these telephone carriers basically use the same copper wiring as for your phone service(only central offices need to be upgraded), it makes sense why DSL is much more popular than cable.
DSL providers here in the US kick themselves in the foot when they decided that they werent going invest millions of dollars to extend their DSL coverage beyond several thousand feet. SBC a couple of years ago started its Project Pronto to bring DSL to virtually 100% of its service region but reneged on their commitment. SBC complained that it wasnt going to go ahead with Project pronto because the FCC forced it to share its lines with rivals. Too bad, competition is a good thing and it keeps prices down.
There will never be true competition is some people can get DSL and others cant while most if not all cable systems have been upgraded to offer high speed internet. I think cable will always have the advantage in the sense that it offers more bandwidth than traditional DSL(not fiber) so there will always be a speed advantage with cable even though its nodes are shared. My cable modem speed used to drop during heavy primetime usage but not anymore since Comcast have upgraded its system. Now I get consistent speeds through out the day.
To be honest, I really do believe that if there were truly real competition between cable and DSL meaning(both were available to everyone who wanted it and they offered the same speeds), prices would be lower because every consumer would have a choice between the two and whoever offered the lowest prices for a comparable service will win consumers hearts. | |
|  |   datguy
@verizon.n | Re: internet service How is that competition if SBC was forced to share its lines with project pronto??
Why build an apt building if you are forced to let joe schmo resell YOUR apts that YOU built against YOU!!! | |
|  |  |  kauiman3
join:2002-08-16 Redondo Beach, CA | Re: internet service If the apartment bldg developer has been getting Public funds for 100 yrs then I say anyone can sell the apartment.
FYI SBC can list it, but any licensed real estate agent can sell it. Wow what a new concept!!! DUH! | |
|   Spazmoto Dark Flow
join:2003-08-22 | Even I have DSL I live in the boonies and I have DSL. No cable lines, but I'm close enough for DSL, so there ya go. Got it this year. -- "...They don't know...They can't see...Are you one of them?..." | |
|  |   country boy
@swbell.ne | Re: Even I have DSL If you are close enough to civilization to have DSL, you are not in the boonies in my judgement  | |
|   Geminimind Premium join:2003-12-20 Sacramento, CA | Reach They need to reach more customers then people can decide if they want dsl or cable. For some of us cable is the only option. | |
|  | |  |
|
|