  tidal Tidal Premium join:2001-01-18 Madison, AL | SWEET sweet! now if they would only allow us to host websites. | |
|
 |   Maxo Your tax dollars at work. Premium,VIP join:2002-11-04 Tallahassee, FL clubs:
| Re: SWEET Right on. The day they stop blocking ports I'll start waiting for my contract to end to switch over my service. -- "Knowhutimean, Vern?" - Ernest P. Worrell »www.maxolasersquad.com | |
|
 IcyFire Flammable Ice
join:2001-05-30 Somewhere | I'm waiting I'll be here waiting from Time-Warner to up my RR speed any day now, wake me when it happens. | |
|
 |  buddasahn
join:2000-11-27 Akron, OH
| Me too... Same here. Speeds that at one time were a consistent 2000/384 connection has dropped to a 1700/130 connection. My ping times have gone to hell AND my price gone up. I'd love to see these new speeds come to fruition but I have this gut feeling that the "pigs flying" dream will come true 1st!!!! | |
|
 |  |
 Kommie
join:2003-05-13 East Haven, CT | Who Writes This?
"Cox CEO Brian Roberts"
LOL..... | |
|
 |   Karl Bode News Guy join:2000-03-02 | Re: Who Writes This? I do. A human being. Corrected, thanks. | |
|
 |  |   Smokey Even drunk on a bet ya make it to Canada Premium join:2003-05-20 Va Beach clubs: | Re: Who Writes This? and it was a good read, thx levi! | |
|
 |  |  |
 |  |  |   UnKown The Underground Network
join:2002-09-08 Orlando, FL | Re: Who Writes This? just to add something. u forgot Avout Adelphia Powerlink whos bandwidth caps have always been 3mbps since the dawn of docsis.  | |
|
  Tomek Premium join:2002-01-30 Brooklyn, NY | First let me have 3MB download then I will be more than happy to have at least 756kB -- The Truth is out there | |
|
 |   gate1975mlm Premium join:2001-09-30 Philadelphia, PA | Re: First let me have 3MB download 3000/384 Would be so great! | |
|
 |  |   Bagnon Snoogans
join:2000-11-19 St Catharines, ON | Re: First let me have 3MB download quote: 3000/384 Would be so great!
I already get that  -- ----gg's and happy gaming---- | |
|
 |  |  |
 alfnoid Premium,MVM join:2002-02-18
| What about the price? quote: According to Comcast spokeswoman Sarah Eder, who recently spoke to CNet, the trials exist to "determine how the change affects the network, how users value increased speeds and to help us develop the broadband experience for the future." Reality sings a different tune however. With cable executives facing bell price cuts and unwilling to reduce profit margins, they need to throw consumers a bone. Doubling their downstream speeds is a good start.
yeah doubling down speeds would be a good start if they don't raise the price. "how users value speeds" and them not commenting on whether the price will stay the same are telltale signs here that the price is going up.
You know they would brag their asses off if they planned to keep the prices where they are and raise speeds.
peace | |
|
 |  |
 |  |
 |  |   J D McDorce Premium join:2001-12-29 Westland, MI
| Re: What about the price? The 500 up would be a tough pill for Comcast's network to swallow.
It would be interesting to see more cable companies take an approach similar to WOW's in offering four different tiers of service (3000/500, 1500/300, 500/300, and 112/112) to allow subscribers to select a package that matches their use needs and budgets.
As for competition based price cuts for cable service, I have not seen this as common (other than some localized price matching and retention deals). However, The Detroit News ran a series of articles last summer showing how local competition does have a effect on fractionally reducing local cable rates: »www.detnews.com/2002/business/02···ndex.htm | |
|
 |  |  |   Goober Premium join:2000-12-17 Naperville, IL
·Comcast
·WOW Internet and C..
| Re: What about the price? I know that here in Naperville, WOW prices are very significantly less than Comcast's. That is actually a remnant from the Americast days it seems to me. When Americast first started up, it was free installation, $120.00 rebate in 4 $30.00 Ameritech certificates that could be used towards phone or cable and fairly frequent PPV for free certificates.
Of course Ameritech was sued later for $120 rebate, but it was their way of trying to get customers away from the incumbent carrier Jones (subsequently Cox, then ATT now Comcast). Not really a price drop, but the rates were lower than Jones and more channels were provided.
Anyway, competition does make a difference. But all cable companies seem headed in an inexorable march towards higher cable rates. I want to see a DSL-esque drop.
I'm not complaining though, since my rates are still pretty good, even though $15.00 extra a month is a little higher than I like.
Thanks for the articles. | |
|
 |  |  biteman
join:2001-02-02 Grand Rapids, MI
| When comcast took over att cable they raised there broadband prices by $15.00 a month. They gave you some kind of a break if you also got there TV service. Even if they up there speeds they will still have speed problems as cable shares bandwidth with people in your area. DSL does not have that problem but DSL does have the problem that you have to be like 16,000 cable feet or less to get service. [text was edited by author 2003-08-06 16:24:11] | |
|
 |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |   J D McDorce Premium join:2001-12-29 Westland, MI
| Re: What about the price? said by Goober : In addition, a cable company like WOW is pretty aggressive in preventing the typical cable overload problems.
Which is not to say that WOW hasn't had it's fair share of growing pains (which are hopefully now behind them). | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  |   J D McDorce Premium join:2001-12-29 Westland, MI | Re: What about the price? The Great Chicago Redback Fiasco? | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |   Goober Premium join:2000-12-17 Naperville, IL
·Comcast
·WOW Internet and C..
| Re: What about the price? Yep. What a NIGHTMARE. I did get 1.5 months of free service out of it though after b!tching about it for a week straight.
Problem was that the pain lasted for more several more weeks after that for me. So, the first day that WOW became available in Naperville, I bailed. It was several months after that the EL/MS thing went away for the rest of the people that stayed with them. | |
|
 |  |
  oliphant5 Got Identity? Premium join:2003-05-24 Corona, CA
| Of course bandwidth hogs exist But that's a problem of the provider not having enough capacity for the number of accounts they sell. But the bandwidth hog...those small percentage of users who use the majority of bandwidth of course exist...but THEY aren't the real problem.
Now that a lot of cable companies are upgrading their old networks and having to compete is some limited markets with DSL...they find their own solutions.
Unfortunately some providers like Cox missed the competitive boat that providers like Comcast and Bell Sympatico realize. Daily, monthly caps aren't attractive and are easily gained as fodder for advertisements from competitors. -- "Countries...have a right to be free, and we a right to aid them, as a strong man has a right to assist a weak one assailed by a robber or murderer." --Thomas Jefferson, 1816. | |
|
  panth1 The Coyote
join:2000-12-11 Boca Raton, FL | 3Mbps, the New Standard? Except for Adelphia, who is changing their standard $40 tier from 3Mb/128kbps to 2Mbps/256kbps. -- ISPs: Road Runner/Powerlink Current Status: Powerlink
| |
|
 |   Jetta392 Premium join:2002-07-14 Martinsville, NJ | Re: 3Mbps, the New Standard? If OOL lowers from 10 down to 3 down they better lower their price as well..... | |
|
 |  |
 |  |   UnKown The Underground Network
join:2002-09-08 Orlando, FL | Re: 3Mbps, the New Standard? in a mere half of a state. | |
|
 |  |  |  |
  hello123454 Premium join:2002-02-02 Wilmington, DE | Speed Changes Since @Home I've went from 7200/900 with @Home >>>> 1500/128 >>>> 1800/128 >>>> 1800/256 >>>> 3000/384 (possibly)
Just a rollercoaster | |
|
 |   J D McDorce Premium join:2001-12-29 Westland, MI | Re: Speed Changes Since @Home I haven't seen any indication of Comcast proposing an increase to 384 up for standard Comcast High Speed Internet service. | |
|
 |  jj nobody
join:2000-08-31 Lakeland, FL
| said by hello123454 : I've went from 7200/900 with @Home >>>> 1500/128 >>>> 1800/128 >>>> 1800/256 >>>> 3000/384 (possibly)
Just a rollercoaster
I lived in wilmington, de and had @home from sept. 99 - may 2000. Me and my neighbor were the only ones in our apartment to have it since it was so new. God, that connection was the best!!! Upstreaming and sending stuff faster than we could burn it on a cd-rw and give it to each other. Those were the days. | |
|
  Gun Nut
@intel.com
| Who cares about 3 meg down when you're up capped? The real internet is about two way communication. 128 - 256k upload speeds don't cut it. All I have to do max out my bandwidth is do a video conference, or upload a file, or play a game online.
I'd much rather have real T1 speeds at 1.5 meg up/down or even something like 2 meg down / 768k - 1 meg up than have 3 down / 128 - 256k up.
Your download don't mean squat if your upload is pegged. | |
|
 |  See 20 replies to this post |
|
  jarablue Always be true to yourself
join:2001-06-11 Worcester, MA | LOL tell that to Charter slowband Yah I'll believe it when Charter offers it. Which isn't in the near future. And make no mistake there will be a price hike if and when it ever comes. | |
|
 |   Jaime Premium join:2001-06-03 Huntington Beach, CA | Re: LOL tell that to Charter slowband Charter users are the abused broadband kids of the neighborhood, we get no bandwidth love . | |
|
 |  |   zoom314 Superman Premium join:2001-04-30 Yermo, CA | Re: LOL tell that to Charter slowband Ditto.... | |
|
 |   dvd536 as Mr. Pink as they come Premium join:2001-04-27 Phoenix, AZ
| HAHAHA. Charter struggles to even get you 1.5mbps. 3megs is out of the question until they let loose of some of that cash and do some major upgrading to their network. -- You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth | |
|
 |  |  stridr69
join:2003-05-19 San Luis Obispo, CA | Re: LOL tell that to Charter slowband Depends where you live, Sport..
 | |
|
  Eat Me
join:2002-09-25 Sussex, NJ | RCN megamodem to 5000? Hmm. RCN should raise my speeds with megamodem to like 5000 or something now, since 3000 or so will be like the standard... | |
|
 |  biteman
join:2001-02-02 Grand Rapids, MI | Re: RCN megamodem to 5000?
I got a good question for you all. Will it ever be enough???? If they raise it to 3000 will then you complain that is not enough. You will like it at first but then complain AGAIN win the file sharing users raise there use even HIGHER. | |
|
 |  |   xdeadhead 220, 221, Whatever It Takes. Premium join:2000-11-08 Mechanicsburg, PA
·Verizon FIOS
·Comcast
| Re: RCN megamodem to 5000? what file sharers? havent you heard the riaa subpoena rally is making everyone stop trading? kinda like when there was a war on drugs and now you cant get drugs anymore.
---sarcasm off--- -- lack of planning on your part does not constitute an emergency on mine. | |
|
 |  |  |  biteman
join:2001-02-02 Grand Rapids, MI | Re: RCN megamodem to 5000? I do not understand your reply. What planning are you talking about??? | |
|
 |  |  |  |   xdeadhead 220, 221, Whatever It Takes. Premium join:2000-11-08 Mechanicsburg, PA
| Re: RCN megamodem to 5000? it's a posting tagline...it means nothing to you. it really has more to do with ID10-T problems. [text was edited by author 2003-08-07 20:10:25] | |
|
  eite
@12.144.x.x
| New MCI DSL... Well, now that MCI is offering a 1.5/768 DSL package for as low as $45/month cable providers will start losing customers. There are even some reasonable DSL providers offering 3/384 speeds for less than some of the going cable plans. All this and no line sharing with your neighbors. Well, I had been a huge fan of Optimum Online over the 5 years that I have been with them, but with all the recent rate hikes and now upload capping that they are implementing, I am dropping them for the freedom of knowing that I have a 1.5/768 circuit that I can use how I want, when I want, without fear of capping and allows running servers. Cable providers should get smart or they will quickly lose customers. | |
|
 |   Smokey Even drunk on a bet ya make it to Canada Premium join:2003-05-20 Va Beach clubs: | Re: New MCI DSL... if you can get dsl! there are allot of us who can not! | |
|
 |   herdfan Premium join:2003-01-25 Hurricane, WV
| Unless you are a big downloader speed doesn't really matter as there is very little difference between surfing with a 768 DSL and a 3Mbps cable connection.
And for the majority of people who don't download excessively, they really don't need that extra bandwidth. But 256 up to send pictures to the grandparents would be great.
None of this will matter when we all get FTTH. LOL...
But I think for the near future, DSL will make inroads into cable's dominance due to price. -- Non calor sed umor est qui nobis incommodat. | |
|
 hgnslngr
join:2003-08-06 Baton Rouge, LA
| 3Mbps doesn't matter Why shouldn't they worry about hiking it up? I seriously doubt most people would come anywhere close to it on a regular basis. The limiting factor is always the upload limit on the server you're trying to download something from. How many people would download multiple files to get to the 3Mbps limit? I think its a smart move on their part. You get a larger download max and they don't had to worry about any significant increase on the bandwidth over their customer base.
If they really wanted to do something great for their customers, it would be to increase their upload speed and allow them to have servers. But I don't think that will happen until competition increases. | |
|
 |   SandShark So it goes Premium,MVM join:2000-05-23 Santa Fe, TX clubs: | Re: 3Mbps doesn't matter I couldn't agree more! | |
|
 |   dvd536 as Mr. Pink as they come Premium join:2001-04-27 Phoenix, AZ
| I can pull 600KB/s off the optonline ftp but in real world usage average downloads are around 200KB/s or ~1.6mbps so 3mbps is plenty. where good speeds count is when downloading large things like a 5 cd linux set. those servers generally can push to you as fast as you can pull it. -- You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth | |
|
 |  DONKEYKONG01
join:2003-03-21 Metairie, LA
| Upload is not something that we have a privilege to, they just don't want us using much of it. Because then, your download would max out 24hrs a day, the trick is to keep you starving as much as possible. I thinking thats it just for marketing purpose. Its like a car that does 200 MPH but with upload capping thing is like speed limit to keep you from going too fast. LOL. We all love that. heh. | |
|
  kba4
join:2001-10-23 Canton, OH
·RoadRunner Cable
| upload needs to be addressed as well bandwidth hogs are p2p/file-traders, and to remain a strong player a good upstream speed will be needed. why is it an ISP can increase the download and yet leave the upload untouched? in the end they end up making a mess of their network, with the 'worst case scenario' being everyone uploading at their max and reducing the downstream availability to whatever that max is. -- the USA is a weapon of mass destruction. | |
|
 |   Smokey Even drunk on a bet ya make it to Canada Premium join:2003-05-20 Va Beach clubs: | Re: upload needs to be addressed as well the upload requires allot more work. DOCSIS 2.0 will help, when it come in to effect. | |
|
  Julio Bachatero y Que? Premium join:2003-03-19 Brooklyn, NY clubs: | Upload first...then Download i think that the Upload speeds should be raised first to match the download speeds. | |
|
 |   dvd536 as Mr. Pink as they come Premium join:2001-04-27 Phoenix, AZ
| Re: Upload first...then Download said by Julio : i think that the Upload speeds should be raised first to match the download speeds.
never happen (at least in america where the corporate greed machines are well oiled) -- You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth | |
|
 |  DONKEYKONG01
join:2003-03-21 Metairie, LA
| said by Julio : i think that the Upload speeds should be raised first to match the download speeds.
i hate this restriction but there's not much you can do about it unless you can set your own speed based on your line quality, which is really out of our reach. Not to mention is is owned by the big corporation who we are just renting their service. Something we need to consider. | |
|
 Mr Natural
join:2003-03-30 Hallandale, FL
| Download,Upload, like sport cars
Except for file sharing and game playing the whole deal on speed is overated. I get 1500/128 and seems to fit all my needs. I remember these discussions with Pontiac GTO's and Chevy Corvettes. I know, I'm showing my age. As with cars if ya got the money you can usually find the speed. Mr. Natural | |
|
 |  jj nobody
join:2000-08-31 Lakeland, FL
| Re: Download,Upload, like sport cars said by Mr Natural : Except for file sharing and game playing the whole deal on speed is overated. I get 1500/128 and seems to fit all my needs. I remember these discussions with Pontiac GTO's and Chevy Corvettes. I know, I'm showing my age. As with cars if ya got the money you can usually find the speed. Mr. Natural
I guess in a couple or few years, my 1500/128 VOL DSL line will be like a '76 AMC pacer!  | |
|
 |  |  Mr Natural
join:2003-03-30 Hallandale, FL
| Re: Download,Upload, like sport cars
I had a 50's something Nash Rambler. No I am not that old. My dad wanted something cheap and safe. and your right today's speeds are going to seem very slow in a few years. Just remember how fast everyone thought 56k was over 28k Mr. Natural [text was edited by author 2003-08-06 17:04:07] | |
|
 |  indigo
join:1999-08-22 Covina, CA
| With cars though you don't need to move to another state to get the service. I live in the land of exiles, and here there is no other DSL choices other than the rural telco. There never will be either, because the biggest town in the state is 60,000 people and that is not even big enough for the CLECs to decide it's worth it.
So in order for someone like me to get the service I've always dreamed of (minimum 768kbps upload, low latency, allows servers), I need to pay $800 a month for a T1, which is right up there with mortgage payments. I don't have that kind of cash. I for one cannot wait for the day I move out of this cursed backwater and can get REAL broadband. | |
|
 |  |  jj nobody
join:2000-08-31 Lakeland, FL
| Re: Download,Upload, like sport cars said by indigo : With cars though you don't need to move to another state to get the service. I live in the land of exiles, and here there is no other DSL choices other than the rural telco. There never will be either, because the biggest town in the state is 60,000 people and that is not even big enough for the CLECs to decide it's worth it.
So in order for someone like me to get the service I've always dreamed of (minimum 768kbps upload, low latency, allows servers), I need to pay $800 a month for a T1, which is right up there with mortgage payments. I don't have that kind of cash. I for one cannot wait for the day I move out of this cursed backwater and can get REAL broadband.
So what are ya running now? Dial-up? | |
|
 dsanders16
join:2001-02-24 Auburn, AL | oh man Im on bellsouth adsl, $45 a month. 1.3mb/256k and charter is the only cable company in my area and they are god awful. | |
|
  Camelot One Premium,MVM join:2001-11-21 Sarasota, FL clubs:
| What good does it do? What good does it do to raise a users bandwidth from 1.5Mbps to 3Mbps, if you are going to penalize anyone who uses the increased bandwidth? To qualify as their "normal" user, you do nothing but some web browsing and email checking, and the fact of the matter is, 1.5 is plenty for that...more than enough in fact.
If I am paying for a 3000/256 line, I EXPECT to be able to have the right to max it out 24/7 if I so desire. Anything less is just false advertising in my opinion. That is not to say I would, or that I even think I could (not 24/7 anyway) But I do EXPECT the right to do so should I choose. -- AMD XP2500+ @2520mhz/ Asus A7N8X Deluxe rev 1.04/ 2x 512Mb Kingston HyperX PC3500/ WD 800JB 80Gb on serial/ Gainward GF4 4600/ Enermax 465P-VE/Custom water cooler | |
|
 |  See 9 replies to this post |
|
  Evil_Icon Digital Pimp
join:2003-02-24 Bossier City, LA | Hmm... If I ever have to go below 512K upload I'm going to cry. 3100/768 would rule.How come most isp's skip the 640K upload bit?Its like it doesn't exist. | |
|
  bigdaddy17
join:2003-05-08 Miami, FL | DSL should raise upload rates.. Well Im on DSL and my upload is capped at 256 :-( I sure wish they would rase the upload for DSL instead of this 256 crap but I cant complain about my download which is 2mbps. Now if only they did a little about the upload.. | |
|
 |  schmattie
join:2003-07-20 Florence, KY | Re: DSL should raise upload rates..
My DSL is set to 1536/768...I guess Cincinnati just has a good Telco | |
|
 |
|
 |