 |  |   Bellundo
@teksavvy.com | Re: Most "fiddling" is by end users & NOT the ISPs Obviously you've never heard of rogers cable internet up in Canada. | |
|  |   swhx7 Premium join:2006-07-23 Elbonia
·RoadRunner Cable
| Yes, it's less than 1% so far, according to the researchers. That doesn't mean it's not a problem.
If ISPs can get away with altering content on its way to or from the subscribers, it won't stop with ad injection. Eventually they'll be substituting news articles, rewriting emails, and preventing access to information.
It has to be stopped now, because once it becomes a significant source of profit, the pipe owners will apply political influence to prevent anything being done to restrain it. | |
|   fcisler Premium join:2004-06-14 Riverhead, NY edit: April 21st, @10:00AM
| No AdBlock Plus? EDIT: OOOPS! Early, and I haven't had my coffee...ignore me.... | |
|  b10010011 Whats a Posting tag?
join:2004-09-07 Bellingham, WA
·Comcast Formerly ..
| I bet this sits well with the "Whyfirefoxisblocked" guy remember that guy that was blocking Firefox because user could have Adblock+ installed.
Now he will have to start blocking entire ISP's from accessing his page to make sure he gets his precious .0001 cent per ad view and .001 cent per click.
| |
|  |  Smith6612 Premium join:2008-02-01 united state | Re: I bet this sits well with the "Whyfirefoxisblocked" guy If people start doing that, all I have to do is go into Firefox's config file and change the User Agent to Internet Explorer.  | |
|  |  |  patcat88
join:2002-04-05 Jamaica, NY | Re: I bet this sits well with the "Whyfirefoxisblocked" guy He will then probe your DOM with Javascript. Try to defeat that. | |
|  |  Smith6612 Premium join:2008-02-01 united state edit: April 21st, @07:58PM
| NoScript + IETab + Linux machine in basement  | |
|  ossito16
join:2004-07-31 Whiting, IN
·RCN CABLE
| trying to understand why isnt this type of practice and technology not considered hacking. I would think that any manipulation of internet traffic to change what I expect to see on a webpage would be the same as phishing. How can an ISP change a web page to say something that is not on the originating server. Sooner or later some company is going to start paying ISP's to change negative comments about its services on some review site. Imagine comcast changing a consumer reports web page to show results that favor a particular company but in the printed magazine the results are different. | |
|  |  EPS
join:2008-02-13 Hingham, MA | Re: trying to understand It's not hacking if you agree to it- and I'm sure the companies doing this (and probably a lot of those who don't, just in case) have appropriate clauses in the TOS agreement. | |
|  | |  |
|
|