Psychephylax
Purveyor of common sense
Premium,VIP,MVM
join:2000-10-29
Smithtown, NY
clubs:
| reply to shaner
Re: Fantastic!
said by shaner  :
We've had that kind of DSL basic service for $29.95 here in Canada for a few years now. Through the phone line.
The problem is that you need to live close to the Central Office. People in rural locations do not have a CO next to them. Which is why it's not an option for them. BPL has a range of 500 miles which is significantly further than what DSL can provide.
--
Stupidity, like hydrogen, is one of the basic building blocks of the Universe.
I'm re-moo-ing!!!
My Gallery * My Journal |
|
shaner
Premium
join:2000-10-04
Calgary, AB | Oh, I see. I forgot the US has DSL deployment issues. |
|
Nightfall
My Goal Is To Deny Yours
Premium,MVM
join:2001-08-03
Grand Rapids, MI
clubs:
 ·AT&T Midwest
 ·Comcast
 ·Site5.com
| reply to Psychephylax
500 miles is a long ass way compared to DSL. I am 12,500 feet (over 2 miles) and I can only get basic DSL package. If I was 18,000 feet or over, I would only qualify for speeds that were right around the same as this BPL.
I do see your point though, but 500 miles is quite far in comparison to DSL. DSL does seem to have them beat on throughput for now though.
--
My Domain
Nightfall's Hockey and Life Journal |
|
Transmaster
Onward Through The Fog
join:2001-06-20
Cheyenne, WY
| reply to Psychephylax
I would suggest you check out the new DSLAM equipment being used by Qwest for their DSL deployment. »www.adtran.com I suspect this deployment is a, Look see we are deploying in the rural area, but they know in house they can't make any money out in the sticks they still need to muscle their way into urban markets to do this.
--
"Remember when hacking a loogy it comes not so much from the lungs but from the soul." |
|
Vamp
5c077
Premium
join:2003-01-28
MD
 ·Verizon FIOS
| reply to shaner
said by shaner :
Oh, I see. I forgot the US has DSL deployment issues.
What the hell does that suppose to mean? you think dsl is in every single spot of canada? dont think so.
Well... canada has cable development problems 
--
:: My current desktop :: |
|
kfolsom
Top of the foodchain.
Premium
join:2003-01-31
clubs:
·Verizon west (ex G..
| reply to Psychephylax
said by Psychephylax :
BPL has a range of 500 miles which is significantly further than what DSL can provide.
That would not be possible without a string of repeaters... But it is impressive if comparing only range.
--
"Maybe" is twice as good as "No", but only half as good as "Yes"... »www.folsomtech.com |
|
rf_engineer
join:2003-08-04
Lehighton, PA
| reply to Psychephylax
said by Psychephylax :
said by shaner :
We've had that kind of DSL basic service for $29.95 here in Canada for a few years now. Through the phone line.
The problem is that you need to live close to the Central Office. People in rural locations do not have a CO next to them. Which is why it's not an option for them. BPL has a range of 500 miles which is significantly further than what DSL can provide.
The native range of BPL is not 500 miles, so you can't compare this figure to the range of DSL. BPL's range is around 200 meters without repeaters.
For BPL to cover 500 miles, you need the BPL equivalent of a DSLAM every 200 meters (a feedpoint), or repeaters in combination with a feedpoint.
From a technical standpoint, BPL is technically inferior to DSL and cable. |
|
Nightfall
My Goal Is To Deny Yours
Premium,MVM
join:2001-08-03
Grand Rapids, MI
clubs:
·AT&T Midwest
·Comcast
·Site5.com
| said by rf_engineer :
said by Psychephylax :
said by shaner :
We've had that kind of DSL basic service for $29.95 here in Canada for a few years now. Through the phone line.
The problem is that you need to live close to the Central Office. People in rural locations do not have a CO next to them. Which is why it's not an option for them. BPL has a range of 500 miles which is significantly further than what DSL can provide.
The native range of BPL is not 500 miles, so you can't compare this figure to the range of DSL. BPL's range is around 200 meters without repeaters.
For BPL to cover 500 miles, you need the BPL equivalent of a DSLAM every 200 meters (a feedpoint), or repeaters in combination with a feedpoint.
From a technical standpoint, BPL is technically inferior to DSL and cable.
Do you have any links to the actual native range of BPL? Someone say 500 miles, you say 200 meters. I would like to read more about it. So far I haven't found any information on the actual range.
--
My Domain
Nightfall's Hockey and Life Journal |
|
gotnocable
@rr.com
| I think that I read somewhere that degradable range on the native lines was in the 400 meters or just about 1300 feet -range without repeaters or additional amplifications. And extended coverages where an estimated 500 miles of line coverage (500 miles of actual line not a 500 mile range) Or about 4 times the basic DSL coverage cable lengths. I am not sure if this are true. Does anyone have a link to some specs? |
|
rf_engineer
join:2003-08-04
Lehighton, PA
| reply to Nightfall
said by Nightfall :
said by rf_engineer :
said by Psychephylax :
said by shaner :
We've had that kind of DSL basic service for $29.95 here in Canada for a few years now. Through the phone line.
The problem is that you need to live close to the Central Office. People in rural locations do not have a CO next to them. Which is why it's not an option for them. BPL has a range of 500 miles which is significantly further than what DSL can provide.
The native range of BPL is not 500 miles, so you can't compare this figure to the range of DSL. BPL's range is around 200 meters without repeaters.
For BPL to cover 500 miles, you need the BPL equivalent of a DSLAM every 200 meters (a feedpoint), or repeaters in combination with a feedpoint.
From a technical standpoint, BPL is technically inferior to DSL and cable.
Do you have any links to the actual native range of BPL? Someone say 500 miles, you say 200 meters. I would like to read more about it. So far I haven't found any information on the actual range.
I think the 500 mile figure came from the article and it actually means they're going to light up 500 miles of line.
BPL uses radio energy on an unshielded medium, power lines. Unlike copper twisted pair (phone lines and DSL) or coaxial cable (Cable Modem), it severely attenuates and radiates radio signals on the line. So due to physics it can't carry the signal far without regeneration using repeaters.
I have yet to see a BPL equipment vendor publish their exact distances on the web, but some good information can be gleaned from the FCC Notice of Proposed Rulemaking comment filings »www.arrl.org/~ehare/bpl/hyperlinks.html . An Ambient system in my area uses feedpoints every 100 yards or so. The exact distances are going to vary between vendors, but it's no where near 500 miles. If the same logic were applied to cable and DSL, all of Antarctica could have broadband next week  |
|
IGotThePower
Samsung Sucks
Premium
join:2003-06-07
Japan Inc. | reply to shaner
Wow, Canada ownz... |
|
Dragasoni
We're All Mad Here
Premium
join:2001-12-14
Clearwater, FL
| You forgot to mention that Candian's can drive either! You all drive slow in the left lane down here in Florida, and annoy me to hell.
I'll take our "DSL deployment issues" and you take a driving course! 
-Dragasoni-
--
»www.livejournal.com/users/dragasoni/ |
|
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | reply to shaner
There are still quite a lot of areas in Ontario that don't have any form of broadband (DSL or Cable). I think hell will freeze over before they get dsl in White River, Ontario |
|
shaner
Premium
join:2000-10-04
Calgary, AB
| reply to Dragasoni
said by Dragasoni :
You forgot to mention that Candian's can drive either! You all drive slow in the left lane down here in Florida, and annoy me to hell.
I'll take our "DSL deployment issues" and you take a driving course!
-Dragasoni-
Hahahha!! Those are the old ones we set adrift to die. In the old days, we used ice floes. Today, we use Crown Victorias, Impalas, and Caddys'. |
|
shaner
Premium
join:2000-10-04
Calgary, AB
| reply to en102
said by en102 :
There are still quite a lot of areas in Ontario that don't have any form of broadband (DSL or Cable). I think hell will freeze over before they get dsl in White River, Ontario
Haha!! The brithplace of the true Winnie the Pooh!
White River is only a hop north of Thunder Bay. It's not out of the question DSL may be available there down the road. At the very least, Thunder Bay is the first municipality in Canada to attempt the whole BPL thing on a large scale. |
|
SumDumGuy
The Truth Is Out There. Got The Url??
Premium
join:2002-06-16
Auburn, CA
clubs:
·RoadRunner Cable
 ·Packet8
| reply to shaner
said by shaner :
said by Dragasoni :
You forgot to mention that Candian's can drive either! You all drive slow in the left lane down here in Florida, and annoy me to hell.
I'll take our "DSL deployment issues" and you take a driving course!
-Dragasoni-
Hahahha!! Those are the old ones we set adrift to die. In the old days, we used ice floes. Today, we use Crown Victorias, Impalas, and Caddys'.
LMFAO!!!!
Seriously though, BPL is in its infancy, if they can get it depployed into more rural areas it'd be a big boon for the carriers and possibly get the Telcos to speed deployment as well as whip the Cable companies into shape.
--
This life is a test. It is only a test. Had this been an actual life, you would have received further instructions as to what to do and where to go. |
|
Hayward
K A R - 1 2 0 C
Premium
join:2000-07-13
Key West, FL
edit:
March 28th, @03:57AM
| reply to shaner
said by shaner :
Oh, I see. I forgot the US has DSL deployment issues.
Well if you Canadians ever decided to move more than 5 miles from the US border and populate the Great White North so would you. 
I know a SLIGHT exaggeration, but 90% of the Canadian population is concentrated along the US border and coastlines.
--
»haywardm.com (Hayward's Key West)
|
|
shaner
Premium
join:2000-10-04
Calgary, AB | Yeah, within 200 miles of the border. With only 30 million people. The DC to Boston corridor has that many people. But I do understand what you're saying. |
|
RFJock
join:2004-01-13
Norfolk, VA | reply to Psychephylax
Lets see....
500 miles
That's 2,640,000 feet
1 repeater every 1000 feet
at about $750.00 each
that's just short of 2 million bucks
2 million bucks worth of fiber would go a loooong way. |
|
