Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Purging the Weak Link » common sense
Uniqs:
25
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
what to do »
« And that's how it should be.  
sdd75

join:2001-10-14
Maryville, TN


1 edit

common sense

Lease private ip's to all customers initially. (If the ISP does not want the customer to run a server, then that is the easiest way to enforce the rule so to speak. It avoids the touchy issue of account termination.)
It would be hard to relay off a computer that isn't publicly routable.

Perform stateful packet inspection on port 25. Log all outbound requests, and send a weekly email to the customer containing the information. The default address is the customer's primary address. (Viruses don't have to 'relay') This would appear more as a service to the customer rather than aggressive enforcement of vague policy. Offer the customer the option of blocking port 25 at the ISP level. This would allow the person who is actually advertising via email to continue to work. If someone is intentionally sending numrous emails, thus electing to leave port 25 unblocked, the report should include a polite warning that complaints made against the account will be reviewed and will potentially result in an ISP enforced block of port 25 on that account. Hey, the ISP wants to make money too. It does them no good to just cancel accounts.

The customer pays a little extra for a public and static ip. Port 25 is still inspected.

This would require almost zero additional resources.
cbs228
Geeks Of The World, Unite

join:2000-09-04
Saint Louis, MO

Re: common sense

There are some protocols which simply don't play nice with NAT, and giving users a non-routable IP address is bound to complicate things. For instance, IM-client file transfers or almost any IM function other than chat might not work. RTSP streams could not be set up for videoconferencing. Customers could not make VPN connections. Although UPnP can mitigate this somewhat, it won't fix everything. Could ISPs even claim to offer internet access, since it wouldn't work as it should? I, for one, would not pay for broken internet service only to pay more to have it unbroken.
--
"If you stare too long into the abyss the abyss stares back at you." -Nietzsche

GENERAL FAILURE READING ©: DRIVE
(A)bort, (R)etry, (F)rivolous Lawsuits, (B)ribe Congress?
Forums » Purging the Weak Linkwhat to do »
« And that's how it should be.  


Saturday, 28-Nov 03:39:38 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [121] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [112] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [96] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [71] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [69] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [66] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [62] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [50] Weekend Open Thread
· [40] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [ PVP] 3.2 DK PvP D/W Spec... [World of Warcraft]
· Backstab vs screws (not which to use) [Home Repair & Improvement]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· DIR-655 New Beta 1.32b09 [D-Link]
· 5 hour energy for diabetic [General Questions]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· Leveling to 85 [World of Warcraft]
· HOW-TO: QoS and Tomato (fixes "choppy voice") [MagicJack]
· how to reset Mikrotik with Netinstall [Wireless Service Providers]