Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Universal Service Fee » Where's our fixed rate?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


boogie74

join:2001-06-19
Neenah, WI
clubs:

reply to KrK
Re: Where's our fixed rate?

So you've said,

quote:
SBC's USF is OUTRAGEOUS. Let's make no mistake here, SBC sets the pricing structure of the fee, not the FCC or someone else.

What SBC is essentially doing is placing an extremely high fee on their "heavily demanded" services while discounting and placing a very minimal fee on the basic services.
And then you've said,

quote:
So true... while at the same time, misleading. Regulators set the rate. As you mentioned, based on several factors, like revenue and expenses. Provided by the Telcos.
You seem to contradict yourself. Beyond that, however, the actual methodology isn't created by SBC. It's standard for all companies. At present it is figured as a percentage (around 9% total) of all revenue generated by interstate voice and data traffic.

This means that higher bandwith DSL creates more revenue from interstate data traffic in a month's time than lower bandwith DSL. You must realize that this isn't only retail customer associated revenue either. Any time data or voice traffic is handed off to another carrier, access charges are assessed.

This all adds up to the fact that higher bandwith and higher voice traffic makes for a higher USF charge.

It's too bad that you were relying on the "SBC is the devil" concept to support your entire method of thinking. Perhaps you should learn a bit more about how this sort of thing works and spend less time pretending to know what you're talking about.

Boogie


KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
·AT&T Yahoo
·AT&T DSL Service
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southwest

It's misleading to claim the charge is set by the FCC. It isn't, and you know it. SBC has decided how much to charge, and to whom. Period. It IS a rip-off. Period.

The USF is a giant slush-fund as it is. This stinks, but that's business as normal for SBC. Next thing you'll know they'll want to sue companies who "cheat" them by using the Internet to send voice encoded as data, rather then pay long distance fees. I can't wait.
--
"Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!)
Forums » Universal Service Fee


Friday, 27-Nov 15:25:07 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [119] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [109] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [95] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [70] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [68] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [60] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [39] Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
· [38] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
· [38] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Newegg Black Friday Sale started [Users Find Hot Deals]
· SSD [Computer Hardware Discussion/Reviews]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Leveling to 85 [World of Warcraft]
· Bell offering 175M service :) [TekSavvy]
· Bell Response to PIPEDA Request [TekSavvy]
· [Newsgroups] Newzleech down? [Filesharing Software]
· Only firefox accesses Internet? [Security]
· New exploit masquerades as Flash Player upgrade [Security]