republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Blocking Port 25 Traffic » Thanks Idiots!
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Comcast SMTP not needed here? »
« Other port 25 checks  
AuthorAll Replies


keith2468
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-03
Winnipeg, MB

reply to Steve
That is what REPLY-TO/reply address is for

quote:
I am in the same boat. This will prevent all users from being able to say, send email from their work address at home. Anyone with a Road Runner accoun tfor example can only send email from their rr email address.
That is what the REPLY-TO (in OE accounts, the "reply address") is for.

SENT-BY (FROM or, in OE accounts, the "email address") is formally supposed to be the email address on the ISP the computer is actually on. As noted by another poster, only a few ISPs check this.

ISPs should not be limiting the REPLY-TO (unless maybe the customer has been a problem), but to follow the original intent of the standards, they all should have been limiting the SENT-BY.

My personal feeling is that ideally such filtering (port 25, spam, email virus) should a user configurable, and default to filtering for new accounts.

I think the problem is technical:
1. It increases overhead to add a bunch of individual IP addresses to port blocking rules in the router.
2. There is a bit of manual effort involved in updating the rules for individual customers.

It isn't dumb users that are responsible for "reduced functionality", it is the hackers and spammers who exploit them.


Steve
I'm a PC, so shut up
Consultant
join:2001-03-10
Yorba Linda, CA

said by keith2468 See Profile:
That is what the REPLY-TO (in OE accounts, the "reply address") is for.

SENT-BY (FROM or, in OE accounts, the "email address") is formally supposed to be the email address on the ISP the computer is actually on.
Says who?

This premise cannot possibly hold water, and it's hard to even know where to start.

First, and most broadly, your online identity is anything you want it to be, and in my book, you "are" any email address to which you have valid access to the mailbox. This gives me probably a half a dozen email addresses, none of which is the "real" address unless I say one of them is.

Second, many people purchase IP services with the sole intent of routing IP packets, and they do not buy into the additional services (email, web space, home page) that the ISP may offer. I have Pac*Bell DSL, but as far as I know I don't have a @pacbell.net email address.

Finally, there is no required connection between "email address" and "physical location" - otherwise this premise would play havoc with the salesman on the road: does he get a new "Sent-From" email address in every hotel?

Steve
--
Stephen J. Friedl * Security Consultant * Tustin, California USA * my web site
Forums » Blocking Port 25 TrafficComcast SMTP not needed here? »
« Other port 25 checks  


Sunday, 08-Nov 20:54:38 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [156] Cable Uncapper Faces Criminal Charges
· [140] AT&T Sues Verizon Over 3G Ads
· [112] Why Run Fiber When You Can Run Ads That Pretend You Do?
· [108] Comcast Is Simply Getting Huge
· [93] Apple Cooking Up New $30 A Month TV Service?
· [83] Bits Of ACTA Agreement Leaking Out
· [80] Will 'Three Strikes' Come To The United States?
· [78] Verizon To Double Smartphone ETFs?
· [77] Verizon: Droid Tethering Will Cost $30 Extra
· [73] Comcast, NBC Deal Almost Complete
Most people now reading
· My cat is reluctant to exercise. [General Questions]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· [Rant] Brand New 'Jasper' Xbox360 - RRoD Hardware Failure [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· no Globalive/Wind Mobile in Canada [TekSavvy]
· [NFL] Week 9 Games Thread [Sports Chat]
· for all the bell haters out there. [TekSavvy]
· Hit and run [General Questions]
· [WotLK] Whats the level 80 pve spec for mages? [World of Warcraft]