  CO_Chris Premium join:2001-08-28 Broomfield, CO | reply to Sid Re: Spbot is fine for me.
I Use Ad-aware and it works great . If there is better i would try it to |
|
 Doubledee32
join:2002-06-20 Charlotte, NC | SpySweeper works great!! |
|
 Cod
join:2000-07-05 Greensboro, NC | reply to CO_Chris Not to make this a spybot vs. ad-aware dispute, spybot finds a heck of alot more spyware on a PC the the latter. Plus its ability to download updates to detect new spyware makes it incredibly accurate. |
|
 tdkyo
join:2002-12-07 Rochester, NY | Heck, both of them do a good job. What I do is run ad-aware first then spybot to double check. |
|
  Unregistered user
@cofs.net | reply to Cod Actually, Ad-Aware can now download updates as well.
I do have to agree, though. Spybot seems to catch more spyware, although I run both, just to be sure. |
|
  Hall Premium,MVM join:2000-04-28 Dayton, OH
| reply to Cod said by Cod : ...spybot finds a heck of alot more spyware on a PC the the latter.
I'm curious how you tested this... If you ran SpyBot first and cleaned spyware out, that doesn't leave Ad-aware much to find. Say you've got 50 items of spyware and SpyBot finds 45 of them. Clean them out and then run Ad-aware. It finds the remaining 5. That doesn't mean SpyBot is better.
I run both actually. I don't care or think one's better than the other. I know Ad-aware doesn't consider c-dilla spyware, but Spybot does. At the same time, there's probably items that Ad-aware considers spyware that SpyBot doesn't... They're both small, unobtrusive, and free, so like I said, I use them both. |
|
 jsouth Jsouth
join:2000-12-12 Wichita, KS
| I think it was Maximum PC that said that Spybot removed a few more "spyware" apps than adaware. Notice a said a few and not "a heck of a lot more" like the previous poster. I believe this is due to spybot having more updates put out than adaware. That said I use both. |
|
  Omega Displaced Ohioan Premium join:2002-07-30 Santa Maria, CA clubs:  | reply to CO_Chris I also use ad-aware, it works fine. |
|
  Piobaireachd Happy Halloween Premium join:2000-09-21 Port Orchard, WA
| reply to tdkyo said by tdkyo : Heck, both of them do a good job. What I do is run ad-aware first then spybot to double check.
I run them both as well. -- "Re-elect Bush/Cheney, November 2004." - obodhisattva |
|
  Rejected One I Suffer From Id10t Errors Premium join:2003-07-31 Darby, PA clubs: 
·Juno Express
·Comcast
| reply to CO_Chris ad-aware is good but the only draw back i found was that on certain adware it didnt remove all the spyware witch removed access from the internet. i backup what i removed and reinstalled it and i was back up. found spybot and ran it worked like a charm. spybot isn't perfect by all means but no program is but spy bot is damn close. i run both on my comp still adware 6 plus and spybot 1.3 beta 4 ( witch kicks ass ) -- Assumptions Are The Mother Of All F*&% Ups :P down with RIAA The Rejected Few² |
|
  cork1958 Cork
join:2000-02-26 Fruitport, MI | reply to tdkyo Ditto for me. Plus Spywareblaster for preventive measures. |
|
 fixrman
join:2003-02-10 Hatboro, PA | reply to Cod AdAware is updateable as well. |
|