republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » D-Day for Municipals » Im all for it
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
The other dumb question »
« Giant sucking sound!  

pit_viper
1 Shot, 1 Kill, No Remorse, I Decide

join:2002-07-24
Play_Hockey

Re: Im all for it

Why should those who regulate the MSO's and Telco's be allowed to compete with them?

Unfair playing field isn't it? We already have city run utilities where I am (Water/sewer/electricity) so they own the poles. Would the city than be able to bypass the pole hanging fee's?

I'm not totally against the idea of municipalities operating a cable/broadband network, however I'm not sure if the playing field is level. If their is not cable operator in a town, by all means...go to it.
--
Bush/Cheney 2004

Unit649
I B U, Who U B?
Premium
join:2000-01-22
Stockton, CA
·Comcast

Re: Im all for it

I would think if the city owned the poles the city would be able to bypass the fees-they pay already for pole maintance, right?

I'm sure the city would have to pay if they had to use other poles they don't pay for and some other entity does-just like that other entity would pay the city for usage of city owned poles.

I'm sure if a municipal system used city poles they would probably use part of the municipal systems budget to charge a small fee-to go into another account for pole maintance.
--
U ::::Founder, ForeverChat IRC Network :::: »www.foreverchat.net
wtansill
Ncc1701

join:2000-10-10
Falls Church, VA

said by pit_viper See Profile:
Why should those who regulate the MSO's and Telco's be allowed to compete with them?

Unfair playing field isn't it? We already have city run utilities where I am (Water/sewer/electricity) so they own the poles. Would the city than be able to bypass the pole hanging fee's?

I'm not totally against the idea of municipalities operating a cable/broadband network, however I'm not sure if the playing field is level. If their is not cable operator in a town, by all means...go to it.

As I understand it, very few munis are doing their own installs, and they are, in general, doing so because they are not served by any incumbent service provider. It does not seem to me in this case that there is any concern over a "level playing field", since there is no existing service against which the muni would compete, fairly or otherwise. Have I missed something?
--
That which does not kill me merely prolongs the agony.
Forums » D-Day for MunicipalsThe other dumb question »
« Giant sucking sound!  


Tuesday, 24-Nov 14:20:37 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [96] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [79] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [30] Earthlink Suffers From Major E-mail Outage
· [30] AT&T Offers New Prepaid Wireless plans
· [28] Frontier Increases Modem Rental Fee
· [20] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
· [18] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [16] Vivendi In Way Of Comcast's NBC Desires
· [15] Charter Still Fighting With Creditors
· [11] Time Warner Dallas Customers Get WiMax December 1
Most people now reading
· Big Bank Alternative to Bank of America? [General Questions]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· What to use while demonoid is down? [Filesharing Software]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Getting ready to pull the trigger, still have cold feet. [VOIP Tech Chat]
· 23 years of Hell on Earth [Canadian Chat]
· Firearms: Ammo question. [General Questions]
· Several MS Updates today (11/24/2009). [Security]
· NDP - Jack Layton email on broadband [TekSavvy]
· ACTA - "stick as closely to U.S. law as possible" [TekSavvy]