jplove71
IBEW 113
Premium
join:2001-03-16
Colorado Springs, CO | reply to Eat Me
Re: FTTH yes, BPL no.
BPL is not bad. They just need to switch frequencies.
--
Browsing with Mozilla 1.4 and Mozilla Firebird 0.6.1 |
|
Eat Me
join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ
 ·PenTeleData
 ·Future Nine Corpor..
·VOIPo
·Vonage
| said by jplove71  :
BPL is not bad. They just need to switch frequencies.
Huh?
I wasn't even talking about the interference problem with BPL. I was talking about availability and bandwidth.
Elementary physics will tell you that signal loss in fiber optic cable is way below any form of metal cable. A fiber optic signal can go for over 90 miles before needing a repeater. BPL is limited to 5000 feet from the CO before needing a repeater.
BPL is limited to 20 Megabits per second. DOCSIS 2.0 using 64QAM is capable of a maximum bandwidth of 30 MBps. FTTH on the other hand is capable of gigabit speeds. Quite a difference! |
|
BosstonesOwn
join:2002-12-15
Everett, MA
clubs:
 ·Comcast
| even the purest fiber needs repeating at 50 to 70 miles and needs to be patched at points with a speed shifting fiber and this costs lots of money. how ever i do agree this is the best solution for the last mile.
--
Need a web host try us at www.servercentral.net... message me directly and we can make you some killer deals. |
|
zabes63
join:2003-04-05
Batavia, IL
| reply to Eat Me
Hey either one is fine with me. Anything that will kill the duopoly/monopoly stranglehold that SBC/Comcast holds on my community. Although I think that fiber's capacity for will allow it to remain the relevant media far longer than any copper.
--
Click here to visit Tri-City Broadband |
|
