Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » US Telco Support » AT&T » AT&T Southwest » How does SBC stand RE: recent RIAA activity?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
Are speed fluctuations normal? »
« Question to dfw sbc users  
AuthorAll Replies


prosecutor
Do Your Duty--Be A Juror
Premium
join:2002-11-15
Plano, TX


reply to DFWDraco76
Re: How does SBC stand RE: recent RIAA activity?

A legitimate debate, though, don't you think?

To give greater detail to the above post, SBC has always, at least since 1996, required a subpoena for the records I've sought from them.

I sincerely hope that SBC will not notify users suspected of criminal conduct of the existence of the subpoena. That could subject the company and its officers to civil and criminal liability, depending on the circumstances. It could also inform real, live, hard core criminals that law enforcement is closing in. Targets of lawsuits and defendants in criminal investigations have ample means to protect their rights and privacy in court in this country, without limiting the legitimate use of subpoenas and similar instruments.

Again, part of the problem is that the same system is used to prosecute murderers and persons stealing candybars. The solution is to change the consequence of stealing candybars, not screw up the the system used to prosecute murderers and pedophiles.

You also need to remember that the subpoena is a right that every citizen enjoys when they go into court, whether as plaintiff or defendant. Do you want to limit your own ability to defend yourself or obtain redress against another who has injured you or your interests?
[text was edited by author 2003-07-28 14:41:33]


DFWDraco76
Premium
join:2001-02-21
Plano, TX
clubs:
·Verizon FIOS

reply to DFWDraco76
from »www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.c···6516.DTL :

...
And in the wake of such suits, many Internet service providers (including SBC Communications) agreed to first notify users when they received a subpoena, giving them a week or so to hire an attorney to try to quash the order.
...


I didn't mean to start a debate--I won't touch it with a ten foot pole myself. I was just curious as to the official policy of SBC.
Forums » US Telco Support » AT&T » AT&T SouthwestAre speed fluctuations normal? »
« Question to dfw sbc users  


Tuesday, 24-Nov 14:09:03 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [96] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [79] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [30] Earthlink Suffers From Major E-mail Outage
· [30] AT&T Offers New Prepaid Wireless plans
· [28] Frontier Increases Modem Rental Fee
· [17] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
· [17] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [16] Vivendi In Way Of Comcast's NBC Desires
· [15] Charter Still Fighting With Creditors
· [11] Time Warner Dallas Customers Get WiMax December 1
Most people now reading
· Big Bank Alternative to Bank of America? [General Questions]
· What to use while demonoid is down? [Filesharing Software]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Killing the source - Google bans advertisers, not just ads [Security]
· hawaii in thanksgiving [General Questions]
· ACTA - "stick as closely to U.S. law as possible" [TekSavvy]
· NDP - Jack Layton email on broadband [TekSavvy]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Firearms: Ammo question. [General Questions]
· Here's a chart comparing the top VoIP providers. Comments? [VOIP Tech Chat]