republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Fast TCP story update » ok
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


DSLTech

join:2000-12-30
San Jose, CA

reply to lazarus_
Re: ok

The way TCP works now is not optimal, since it was designed long ago on networks that were rather buggy and full of errors.

These days there are at least 3 points during network movement that a packet/frame/message is verified for errors or missing/out-of-order items.

What I understand of Fast TCP is that the only changes will be made at the Transport layer. What layers do routers, switches, etc work at? Well, Network(below TCP), Data-link (below Network) and wire. No changes will need to be made do these devices, only perhaps some changes to the far end systems at the sockets level or something. Software upgrades to end-systems and servers, and the programs/drivers that interface with them.

I dont see there being a huge upgrade in speed, however. If you take a look at the speed tests on this website, you'll notice a fat amount is "overhead". Instead of using UDP for streaming, we could use Fast TCP, and have a "reliable" transmission. Instead of sacrificing 15 to 30% for overhead, we could utilize that for actual data, and maybe only have 5% overhead.

Remember that all that "overhead" also includes lots of data that your system sends back to the other system to acknowledge receipt. If you have a program like UD Meter, you'll see when you dload a 100MB file, you've SENT them probably 5MB of acks and stuff.. actually i dont know the details on that but it uses your UPload bandwidth. And these days most upload bandwidth is pretty small.


lazarus_

join:2002-08-31
Resolute, NU


reply to UnKown
Its nice to have those theoretical speeds, but what I want to know is if it say you have 1Mbit normal TCP and 1Mbit over "fast TCP" will it take up the same amount of resources on uBR's or will it take up less? (or maybe more)

If it takes up less resources that means ISP's would be able to use fast TCP to relieve congestion in congested areas w/ out hardware upgrades ;D Maybe they could raise from say the 6Mbits down (thats the fastest account my ISP offers) to 10Mbits down for customers and still have the same network stability! (that would be cool!)

[text was edited by author 2003-06-05 16:21:01]
Forums » Fast TCP story update


Friday, 27-Nov 14:47:14 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [119] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [109] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [95] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [70] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [68] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [60] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [38] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
· [38] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
· [36] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Only firefox accesses Internet? [Security]
· Newegg Black Friday Sale started [Users Find Hot Deals]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Leveling to 85 [World of Warcraft]
· Bell Response to PIPEDA Request [TekSavvy]
· Not strictly "Home" related - but WOW anyways... [Home Repair & Improvement]
· [ Classes] Druid tanking: rotation and glyphs [World of Warcraft]
· HOW-TO: QoS and Tomato (fixes "choppy voice") [MagicJack]
· What if I only paid 46% of my bill? [Charter HSI/CATV]