Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Fast TCP story update » ok
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


lazarus_

join:2002-08-31
Resolute, NU


reply to UnKown
Re: ok

Its nice to have those theoretical speeds, but what I want to know is if it say you have 1Mbit normal TCP and 1Mbit over "fast TCP" will it take up the same amount of resources on uBR's or will it take up less? (or maybe more)

If it takes up less resources that means ISP's would be able to use fast TCP to relieve congestion in congested areas w/ out hardware upgrades ;D Maybe they could raise from say the 6Mbits down (thats the fastest account my ISP offers) to 10Mbits down for customers and still have the same network stability! (that would be cool!)

[text was edited by author 2003-06-05 16:21:01]


DSLTech

join:2000-12-30
San Jose, CA

The way TCP works now is not optimal, since it was designed long ago on networks that were rather buggy and full of errors.

These days there are at least 3 points during network movement that a packet/frame/message is verified for errors or missing/out-of-order items.

What I understand of Fast TCP is that the only changes will be made at the Transport layer. What layers do routers, switches, etc work at? Well, Network(below TCP), Data-link (below Network) and wire. No changes will need to be made do these devices, only perhaps some changes to the far end systems at the sockets level or something. Software upgrades to end-systems and servers, and the programs/drivers that interface with them.

I dont see there being a huge upgrade in speed, however. If you take a look at the speed tests on this website, you'll notice a fat amount is "overhead". Instead of using UDP for streaming, we could use Fast TCP, and have a "reliable" transmission. Instead of sacrificing 15 to 30% for overhead, we could utilize that for actual data, and maybe only have 5% overhead.

Remember that all that "overhead" also includes lots of data that your system sends back to the other system to acknowledge receipt. If you have a program like UD Meter, you'll see when you dload a 100MB file, you've SENT them probably 5MB of acks and stuff.. actually i dont know the details on that but it uses your UPload bandwidth. And these days most upload bandwidth is pretty small.
Forums » Fast TCP story update


Monday, 09-Nov 04:35:20 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [156] Cable Uncapper Faces Criminal Charges
· [140] AT&T Sues Verizon Over 3G Ads
· [112] Why Run Fiber When You Can Run Ads That Pretend You Do?
· [109] Comcast Is Simply Getting Huge
· [93] Apple Cooking Up New $30 A Month TV Service?
· [83] Bits Of ACTA Agreement Leaking Out
· [80] Will 'Three Strikes' Come To The United States?
· [78] Verizon To Double Smartphone ETFs?
· [77] Verizon: Droid Tethering Will Cost $30 Extra
· [73] Comcast, NBC Deal Almost Complete
Most people now reading
· Lots of problems lately? [Rogers]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Framed for child porn 151; by a PC virus [Security]
· Divorce advice... [General Questions]
· [Rant] Brand New 'Jasper' Xbox360 - RRoD Hardware Failure [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· [ Extreme] Problems with Connection, SMC Gateway/Router [Rogers]
· Is Gear Score now the new requirement to get pug invite? [World of Warcraft]
· Upcoming Games for 2009 [PC gaming GAMES]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]