TexasGuy
49 States And Texas
Premium
join:2002-12-02
Houston, TX | So?
So? |
|
justin
Australian
join:1999-05-28
Brooklyn, NY | said by TexasGuy  :
So?
and your question is? |
|
aztecnology
O Rly?
Premium
join:2003-02-12
Murrieta, CA |  Your update didn't clarify anything... |
|
DSLTech
join:2000-12-30
San Jose, CA | reply to justin
Its not use to try and educate those who don't understand the technicalities of the transport layer.  |
|
TexasGuy
49 States And Texas
Premium
join:2002-12-02
Houston, TX
| said by DSLTech :
Its not use to try and educate those who don't understand the technicalities of the transport layer.
That is it. I'm jumping off the bridge now. If only I had a a book on TCP/IP, then I wouldn't have to make such an extreme step.
--
Who drank has died, who drinks will die. Is he immortal who is sober? |
|
FFK
join:2003-06-14
| reply to TexasGuy
What is the matter with you people?
The Tech docs on this subject clearly state that test were performed using existing equipment accross the internet!
This is short my friends means that there is only a change in the software that controls the TCP stack. As protocols under the GNU of the net are free and do not belong to anyone, where is the extra cost?
I rest my case.
Oh and the chap that wrote the artical these replies are to, you maybe should think about either doing your research more carefuly instead of plagurising other peoples work. |
|
