SliderNC
Master Of Disaster
Premium
join:2002-12-12
Cornelius, NC
clubs: 
 ·Windstream
| reply to cbcalhoun
Re: OT: Why can't I have this speed at home?
said by cbcalhoun  :
Bah... Just do it right and get yourself a Cisco! 
I was about $50 short on getting a Nokia router from my old company. Great pieces of equipment. Thing wouldn't budge, especially with the things we were running through it.
Oh well. Time to start researching routers. Cisco is a little out of my price range.
![]()
--
»www.projectgoodtimes.com |
|
cbcalhoun
Premium
join:2000-09-04
Heath, OH | reply to B52GUNR
Bah... Just do it right and get yourself a Cisco! |
|
B52GUNR
KM 7D love and D3 Nirvana
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-06
Vallejo, CA
clubs:
 ·Comcast
·DSL EXTREME
| reply to SliderNC
Linksys, that's half your problem right there.
I'd try going for a SMC. Linksys routers are, well. If you can't say anything nice. Their implementation of various standards and options is a joke. Their backplane is a bit pathetic as well.
Just my $.02
--
C'est la vie.
Crunching for team Starfire! 7 of 7
Proud host of Team Cache VII |
|
Xaak
You'll find me at T S W B.org
Premium
join:2002-06-19
| reply to SliderNC
I have an older smc, the 7004ABR, and am able to forward up to 20 ports. My home queue is visible from work, I also, when needed, have a development web server, ftp server, etc. set up.
I use Dameware remote to get into one of my machines remotely, from which I can control just about any other machine on my network.
I know the newer SMC supports all of this too.
While I have no experience with the router you're talking about, the Linksys products I've owned have been very good. I just like SMC a bit better (802.11a WAP and NIC, 7004ABR router, and a bunch of switches and NICs).
Either way, you should get what you need.
deadwax
|
|
SliderNC
Master Of Disaster
Premium
join:2002-12-12
Cornelius, NC
clubs:
·Windstream
| reply to Xaak
said by Xaak :
I've got the SMC router, which has a 100mbit wan port. Regularly 9000+ kbps down and 1100 kbps up.
A friend just dumped his Linksys, which he averaged around 5k before and now gets over 9k.
One point you might want to consider: Most sites can't dish out more than 5000 kbps, so mostly, he notices no difference. Once in a while, though...
deadwax
I was looking into getting the NR041 Network Anywhere by Linksys, which is highly recommended in the OOL forum, or the Linksys BEFSX41, which is also recommended. How is the port forwarding on the SMC and which model is it? I need port forwarding for both SETI(so I can use my personal cache from work) and remote access.
![]()
--
»www.projectgoodtimes.com |
|
Xaak
You'll find me at T S W B.org
Premium
join:2002-06-19
| reply to tenpin784
I've got the SMC router, which has a 100mbit wan port. Regularly 9000+ kbps down and 1100 kbps up.
A friend just dumped his Linksys, which he averaged around 5k before and now gets over 9k.
One point you might want to consider: Most sites can't dish out more than 5000 kbps, so mostly, he notices no difference. Once in a while, though...
deadwax
------------------
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Hook up with Team Starfire CacheVI at:
IP: 63.136.184.90:5517
Name: cacheVI.teamstarfire.org:5517
Stats at: »cacheVI.teamstarfire.org:5517/stats.htm
[text was edited by author 2003-06-05 12:16:30] |
|
tenpin784
I Went To The Dark Side?
join:2001-03-30
New Durham, NH | reply to B52GUNR
/me walks away with head down
lucky sob |
|
SliderNC
Master Of Disaster
Premium
join:2002-12-12
Cornelius, NC
clubs:
·Windstream
| reply to tenpin784
The problem that I have with OOL right now is that I don't top out over 5500kb/s due to my Linksys BEFSR41 router which I've had forever. The Motorola Surfboard 4x00 series and supposively, the new 5100 do not like it's 10MB WAN port. Looks like it might be time to spend a few bucks on a new one. Otherwise, I'll top out at 700-800kb on almost all my downloads of ISO's. Most of the time when I need to pull the ISO's and want that extra speed, I direct connect from the modem to one of my networked PC's close to it for an hour or so and grab what I need.
![]()
--
»www.projectgoodtimes.com |
|
tenpin784
I Went To The Dark Side?
join:2001-03-30
New Durham, NH
| reply to B52GUNR
optimum online rules!
my isp is capped, at a wonderful 512/128kbps
I cant even break 60KB/s on downloads 
--
AMD Athlon - What Pentium Wants To Be!!!
3.95Ghz of AMD Crunching Goodness. |
|
B52GUNR
KM 7D love and D3 Nirvana
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-06
Vallejo, CA
clubs:
·Comcast
·DSL EXTREME
| reply to SliderNC
Yah, right now we're tuning the PIX boxes and the switches, right now we're not getting optimal backplane bandwidth on one of the chassis. But that's not bad considering the load we're putting on it.
--
C'est la vie.
Crunching for team Starfire! 7 of 7
Proud host of Team Cache VII |
|
SliderNC
Master Of Disaster
Premium
join:2002-12-12
Cornelius, NC
clubs:
·Windstream
| reply to B52GUNR
My ISP can get me 1.2mb download speeds... not that type of upload though.
It's nice to pull down linux iso's at 950-1.0mb/s
/me wipes up tenpin's drool...
--
»www.projectgoodtimes.com
[text was edited by author 2003-06-05 11:40:55] |
|
tenpin784
I Went To The Dark Side?
join:2001-03-30
New Durham, NH | reply to B52GUNR
/me drools |
|
B52GUNR
KM 7D love and D3 Nirvana
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-06
Vallejo, CA
clubs:
·Comcast
·DSL EXTREME
|  My project over the past few months has been optimizing our company's internet connectivity. Until Monday we had approximately 30,000 users going through four proxies on old Catalyst 5000 series switches with ancient RSMs.
We since moved the campus over to GigE on 6509s with screaming fast MSFCs and the server group added a few more proxies, and this is the result:
2003-06-05 11:21:50 EST: 16622 / 12345
Your download speed : 16622056 bps, or 16622 kbps.
A 2029 KB/sec transfer rate.
Your upload speed : 12345679 bps, or 12345 kbps.
Seems like broadband .. above the 1mbit barrier!
Ahhh. Much better . If only I could get that at home.
--
C'est la vie.
Crunching for team Starfire! 7 of 7
Proud host of Team Cache VII |
|
