Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Municipal Pugilism » full steam ahead at your cost
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Why not Revenue Bonds »
« California cities are trying to do the same thing!  
AuthorAll Replies


pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
·Comcast

reply to ib50MbSoon
Re: full steam ahead at your cost

said by ib50MbSoon See Profile:
Leviathan provided an excellent link to a few examples of successful municipal broadband.

In my own state municipal governments continue to raise property taxes to pay for vital services (e.g., schools, police, etc.), and now the governor is proposing a tax hike to bail them out. If my town were to waste its money on a municipal cable network, while continuing to raise taxes (and instigating the need for a general statewide tax hike), I would seriously question my government's priorities.

I suppose I could "vote them out" as is suggested, but when the government robs Peter to pay Paul, they will always have the support of Paul. Hence the government's strategy seems to be to put at least a majority of people into Paul's position. You think anyone who gets taxpayer-subsidized broadband is going to vote it away when things get tight (as they are in many places still)? I doubt it. In these times, governments at various levels must reassess their spending priorities, contrary to what people are saying here, I would say things like the military, counter-terrorism and education funding are a little more important than a toy network.

With this in mind, it still doesn't address the real problem here, the lack of service provided by incumbent cable and telcos. Its very easy for people who are sick of this to start their own privately-run co-op that could provide the service needed. The various governments involved (state and local) could pass laws such as tax breaks and grants of easements, (which is possible given how many have opposed proposals sponsored by the larger companies) that make it easier for such competition to come into the picture. There would be local accountability and the money would remain in the given town, but the government would not be bothered with expense and hassles of running the operation.
--
Pissed off at traitorous, ungrateful musicians? Don't just boycott them! Trade their MP3s and really screw them over!
Forums » Municipal PugilismWhy not Revenue Bonds »
« California cities are trying to do the same thing!  


Sunday, 22-Nov 23:15:48 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [215] Weekend Open Thread
· [117] Verizon Again Hints At Metered Billing
· [97] There's Still No Evidence That Metered Billing Is Necessary
· [94] Will AOL's Implosion Ever End?
· [85] Spain Declares Broadband A Legal Right
· [75] Deploying FTTH Without Digging Things Up
· [74] Verizon To Be Tested By Unofficial Droid Tethering
· [73] Femtocells Are A No Show
· [67] Verizon To AT&T: The Truth Hurts
· [60] Chicago Tribune Visits 'Comcast University'
Most people now reading
· [NFL] Week 11 Games Thread [Sports Chat]
· Sealing air ducts [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Best Bluray player [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Smoker's Applecare warranties may not be worth anything [All Things Macintosh]
· TekSavvy Price Increase? [TekSavvy]
· what cellphone/company to get? [TekSavvy]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Rate my website [General Questions]