Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » AT&T's Identity Crisis » Another Northpoint
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Buy Covad? Why?  
cmaenginsb
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-19
Palmdale, CA

Re: Another Northpoint

AT&T never had any rights to the Northpoint subscribers, nor did they actually buy Northpoint. The bankruptcy court auctioned off the assets piecemeal. AT&T ended up with the DSLAMs and other equipment but not the right to continue to service on the lines.

Do you really think they would have turned off the subs if it wasn't out of their control, I mean come on that's like free money.

pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
·Comcast

Re: Another Northpoint

said by cmaenginsb See Profile:
The bankruptcy court auctioned off the assets piecemeal. AT&T ended up with the DSLAMs and other equipment but not the right to continue to service on the lines.
That's still very stupid of AT&T... how long would it have taken for them to check to see if they could legally run service on the lines they got from Northpoint? Surely it would have involved less cost than buying the assets and finding out they got a bunch of expensive paperweights instead.

AT&T really needs to take an "Al Dunlap" approach to saving its skin... kill all the non-profitable divisions... or else.
--
DRM == Doesn't Read MP3s

airhockey
Got Airhockey?
Premium
join:2001-03-01
San Jose, CA

Re: Another Northpoint

The problem is ATT has only non profitable divisions left. They sold the only one that has been making them money ATT Broadband.

richb01803
Rich

join:2001-02-14
02100

AT&T will be dissolved

said by airhockey See Profile:
The problem is ATT has only non profitable divisions left. They sold the only one that has been making them money ATT Broadband.
Sounds just like Digital Equipment Corporation circa 10 years ago. The hard drive group went to Quantum, the networking group went to Cisco, the chip-fab went to Intel.

The core group left was something they'd now call "professional services". Seems like every company thinks there are huge profits to be made in consulting.

But that only works if you've got the consultants attached to complicated proprietary technology that you can lock customers onto an upgrade treadmill. The folks at Compaq only figured that out after blowing a huge wad of money buying up the gutted shell of DEC, minus its crown jewels.

I guess management at most companies, when faced with a dire cash crunch, will sell off the crown jewels one at a time rather than enter bankruptcy. Of late, though, it's becoming evident that those who have tried bankruptcy on for size are keeping their firms intact, perhaps to live another day.

AT&T has nothing left. They are as relevant today as DEC was in 1995. Doesn't take a crystal ball to see what's in store for them: absorption into some other phone company.

KoolMoe
Aw Man
Premium
join:2001-02-14
Annapolis, MD
clubs:
·Verizon FIOS
·Speakeasy

Re: AT&T will be dissolved

I disagree that they're irrelevant - they have a huge phone switching system. However, they may be made irrelevant if they don't keep on top of VOIP.
If AT&T is focusing on local service, then partnering with Covad would make good sense so they can offer DSL with their POTS service.

And DEC may have sold off the 'crown jewels', but they retained a LOT of intellectual property and patents (the Alpha being a big one), which did make them a fairly valuable company for Compaq to aquire...
Though I agree they overpaid.
I also agree AT&T's future is cloudy, but don't think it's as doomed as you postulate...
KM

VinnyJ

@aol.com

AT&T Corp. will never go away. One reason the name along is the best known WORLD WIDE in telecom. Two, only AT&T has the power to reach every telephone in the world, no one else can claim that. Three, AT&T's network is not just the world's largest telecom network, but it is also one of the world's largest IP network. Four, AT&T is the only company that has the ability to replace, within 24 hours with mobile trucks and swtiches, an entire central office, as they did for the first time in their entire history on 9-11. Time and time again, AT&T has changed and moved on, granted this time i think they were really screwed over by Armstrong, I know they will still go on to lead the industry. AT&T may appear to be just a phone company, but in reality the are one of the most trust, and with good reason, communications providers.

BrianDamage
We Are The Hounds From Hell
Premium
join:2001-08-14
Rowlett, TX
clubs:

Re: AT&T will be dissolved

Let me detail some history here.
AT&T Corp. will never go away. One reason the name along is the best known WORLD WIDE in telecom.
AT&T is not the same company it was prior to divestiture. Yes, the name is well known, but that is based on what people remember before the breakup. It is like calling a cotton swab a "Q-Tip" or a finger bandage a "Band-Aid"...it is what people remember, but not entirely accurate representation of the truth. They are proper names, that are easily remembered and referenced in a conversation.
AT&T has the power to reach every telephone in the world, no one else can claim that.
So could Worldcom or many other phone companies that offer local service. One does not have to own all the facilities globally in order to get a call through to anywhere in the world.
AT&T is the only company that has the ability to replace, within 24 hours with mobile trucks and swtiches, an entire central office, as they did for the first time in their entire history on 9-11.
That was Verizon that did that, not AT&T. Additionally, the former company that was the incumbent prior to merger upon merger was Nynex. They hadn't been AT&T since divestiture, which was 1984.
Nice AT&T plug, though, but AT&T is a shadow of it's former self, and continues the name recognition based on the 125 year long legacy of the phone business. That doesn't make the popular perception these days accurate, though.
--
The rich get richer, the poorer get the picture, the bombs never hit you when yer down so low...some got pollution, others evolution, there must be some solution but I just don't know....briandamage@dslr.net

Jim Gurd
Premium
join:2000-07-08
Plymouth, MI
·Comcast

said by pnh102 See Profile:

AT&T really needs to take an "Al Dunlap" approach to saving its skin... kill all the non-profitable divisions... or else.

I don't know about that. "Chainsaw Al" destroyed Sunbeam with shady accounting practices like stuffing the pipline with inventory and booking sales months in advance of actually delivering the merchandise.

rockjock

@65.103.x.x

Re: Another Northpoint

"I don't know about that. "Chainsaw Al" destroyed Sunbeam with shady accounting practices like stuffing the pipline with inventory and booking sales months in advance of actually delivering the merchandise."

Can you say "Q W E S T"??

Sounds quite similar to what most telecoms did over the last 5 years with line swapping.

BrianDamage
We Are The Hounds From Hell
Premium
join:2001-08-14
Rowlett, TX
clubs:

Wrong. ATT did buy Northpoint's assets, DSLAMs and all, but you are correct when you stated that ATT ws not entitled to NP's subscriber base.
The plan was to let the network go dark, relinquish all the network circuits, and then turn them all back up using their own facilities as much as they could and then relight the network.
The problem was, ATT did not realize prior to their actual purchase of NP that their contracts with the cable providers PROHIBITED them from providing other broadband type services, DSL specifically.
Somebody missed the fine print, and in their zeal, paid the 155 mil not fully realizing until after the fact that the entire DSL network in place would be unusable by them, because of agreements and contracts already in place.
I know this because a manager from ATT's then newly created DSL unit contacted me about a position, and we discussed this fact in detail.
At that time, they were still attempting to get past the legal ramifications of the purchase, but it turned out that they never could overcome that, and I had a feeling that such would be the way.
--
The rich get richer, the poorer get the picture, the bombs never hit you when yer down so low...some got pollution, others evolution, there must be some solution but I just don't know....briandamage@dslr.net

KoolMoe
Aw Man
Premium
join:2001-02-14
Annapolis, MD
clubs:

Re: Another Northpoint

SO now with ATT Broadband sold off, they can start relighting all the Northpoint DSLAMs and such, and contract Covad for the areas that NPT equipment doesn't cover...
Right?
KM

BrianDamage
We Are The Hounds From Hell
Premium
join:2001-08-14
Rowlett, TX
clubs:

Re: Another Northpoint

Theoretically, yes, if the sale of the assets releases them from obligation to the contracts they have signed.
But, there is a problem.
I am familiar with Northpoint's lineups.
In the COs, a lot of times, Northpoint's lineups were right next to ours (I worked for both Covad and Ryhthms at different times), and NP had primarily the Copper Mountain platform in use, which at Rhythms, we had also, in addition to Paradyne and Cisco equipment.
As such, I am familiar with all of that equipment.
The thing is, the NP DSLAMs have sat there for so long now that before they could be relit for any useful purpose, they would need to be upgraded.
That is going to be a very expensive proposition, albeit a good one for Copper Mountain. I am sure those guys could use the sales.
Not beyond the realm of possibility, mind you, but an expensive proposition.
How ready they are to do that is questionable.
--
The rich get richer, the poorer get the picture, the bombs never hit you when yer down so low...some got pollution, others evolution, there must be some solution but I just don't know....briandamage@dslr.net
Forums » AT&T's Identity Crisis« Buy Covad? Why?  


Tuesday, 24-Nov 04:01:38 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [84] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [54] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [30] AT&T Offers New Prepaid Wireless plans
· [29] Earthlink Suffers From Major E-mail Outage
· [26] Frontier Increases Modem Rental Fee
· [13] Vivendi In Way Of Comcast's NBC Desires
· [12] Charter Still Fighting With Creditors
· [7] Monday Morning Links
Most people now reading
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Big Bank Alternative to Bank of America? [General Questions]
· What to use while demonoid is down? [Filesharing Software]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [ Classes] Druid tanking: rotation and glyphs [World of Warcraft]
· Using DIR-615 C1/3.01 with Trendnet TEW-652BRP in N Mode [D-Link]
· [Config] cisco asa 5505 with multiple outside IP addresses [Cisco]